RESUMEN

Background: Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) have become a cornerstone for an increasing number of competency-based medical education programs. Today, frameworks of EPAs are being used in most, if not all, medical specialties. These frameworks can break a discipline down to its constituting tasks, and structure the training and evaluation of residents. In 2018, The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada created an EPA framework for Geriatric Specialty residency programs nationwide. The present study aims to evaluate this EPA framework through focus groups consisting of several stakeholder groups. Methods: Participants were recruited to be part of one of five focus groups-one for each stakeholder group of interest. The five focus groups consisted of: physician faculty, residents, allied health professionals, administrators/managers, and patients. Each focus group met once virtually over ZOOM® for no longer than 90 minutes. Meeting transcripts were iteratively coded based on emerging themes, and were compared for similarities and gaps between stakeholder perspectives. Results: Multi-stakeholder consultation yielded feedback on many specific EPAs, suggestions for new EPAs, and additional input which gave rise to four themes: (i) EPA scope, (ii) Operationalization, (iii) Interprofessional Collaboration, and (iv) Patient Advocacy. Lastly, we received their thoughts on how the framework defines Geriatrics relative to the work of Care of the Elderly physicians in Canada. Conclusions: Consulting a variety of stakeholder groups generates a robust and diverse supply of feedback that holistically augments EPA frameworks to be more practical, appropriate, socially accountable and patient-centred.

RESUMEN

Context: The time-variable, competency-based mid-career fellowship in Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM) is a multicenter pilot program for physicians who want to train in HPM part-time. Objectives: This study describes the experience of the early cohort of mid-career fellows. Methods: Fellows at the seven sites were surveyed about their perceptions of the program and their confidence in subspecialty skills. Results: Surveys were sent to 13 fellows and completed by 8. All reported positive experiences with curricula, direct observation, feedback, and cross-site case reviews. Most responses were positive regarding individualized learning plans and case-stimulated reviews. Respondents reported high confidence in 9 of the 13 specialty-specific skills, including communication, caring for dying patients, and pain management. They reported less confidence with psychological and non-pain symptoms, spirituality, and prognostication. Fewer than half indicated that the process for graduation was clear. Conclusion: Physicians in the competency-based HPM fellowship report a positive experience and high confidence in subspecialty skills.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Medical mis- and disinformation are on the rise and impact patient health outcomes. The complexity of modern medicine and health care delivery necessitates that care be delivered by an interprofessional team of providers well versed in addressing this increased prevalence of medical misinformation. Health professions educational curricula often lack opportunities for students to learn how to address medical misinformation, employ advanced communication techniques, and work collaboratively. Methods: Based on literature and our previous qualitative research, we created a module offering prework learning on COVID-19 and addressing misinformation through advanced communication techniques and interprofessional collaboration. After completing prework, students participated in a standardized patient encounter addressing COVID misinformation. Health professions student dyads completed a preencounter planning huddle and together interviewed a standardized patient. Students received global and checklist-based feedback from standardized patients and completed pre- and postsession self-assessments. Results: Twenty students participated (10 third-year medical, nine third-year pharmacy, one fourth-year pharmacy). Key findings included the following: Nine of 15 survey questions demonstrated statistically significant improvement, including all three questions assessing readiness to have difficult conversations and six of 10 questions assessing interprofessional collaboration and team function. Discussion: Students participating in this novel curriculum advanced their readiness to address medical misinformation, including COVID-19 vaccine disinformation, with patients and coworkers to improve health decision-making and patient care. These curricular methods can be customized for use with a range of health professions learners.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background Recently, elective posting has been introduced by the National Medical Commission (NMC) of India in the undergraduate competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum. To successfully implement it in medical colleges, facilitators (medical teachers) need to commit extra time. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of online teaching-learning methods for implementing an elective module for undergraduate medical students at Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India. Methods An online module for systematic review methods was developed using the Delphi method. This module was used to train 30 medical students divided into six groups. One resident and one faculty facilitated each group. After the elective program of 15 days, program feedback and evaluation using the Kirkpatrick model were obtained from the students. Results A total of 30 undergraduate medical students with a mean age of 22.7±0.95 years participated in the study. All of them successfully conducted a systematic review per group. The students' feedback was 86.33% positive, and the project evaluation showed an 84% positive opinion. The highest score was for understanding, facilitators' knowledge, and experience. The lowest score was for the immediate applicability of the knowledge. Conclusion An online systematic review training module can be used for elective teaching-learning for final-year medical students, particularly within limited time and resource constraints. Students appreciated the module's clear objectives, appropriate complexity, and facilitators' expertise, leading to improved communication, engagement, and critical-thinking skills. Despite some limitations, these findings suggest that online learning can complement traditional methods and address logistical challenges in medical education, warranting further research on its long-term impact and broader applicability.

RESUMEN

Competency-based medical education (CBME) is a patient-centered and learner-focused approach to education where curricula are delivered in a manner tailored to the individuals' learning needs, and assessment focuses on ensuring trainees achieve requisite and clearly specified learning outcomes. Despite calls to focus assessment on what matters for patients. In this article, the authors explore one aspect of this next era: the use of electronic health record clinical performance indicators, such as Resident-Sensitive Quality Measures (RSQMs) and TRainee Attributable and Automatable Care Evaluations in Real-time (TRACERs), for learner assessment. They elaborate on both the promise and the potential limitations of using such measures in a program of learner assessment.

RESUMEN

Background The Family Adoption Programme (FAP) has been introduced under the competency-based medical education curriculum wherein each medical student adopts families. The objective of this study was to determine the stakeholders' perspective and to suggest measures to make it relevant for Indian medical graduates. Methodology A mixed-method study was conducted among the faculty, undergraduate students, and community using prestructured, validated instruments. The quantitative data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) and analysed, while the qualitative data were coded and analysed thematically. Results All faculty members (12, 100%), the majority of students (49, 44.30%), and the community members strongly agreed that the policy decision to introduce the FAP was 'right'. The benefits mentioned were that FAP helps improve knowledge, psychomotor skills, attitudes and communication, attitude and behaviour skills, understanding of the social structures, health status of the community, and health-seeking behaviour of the families and provides an appropriate early clinical exposure. The challenges mentioned were selecting a site, gaining cooperation from family, communication, arrangement of logistics and transportation, getting support from teachers, difficulties in managing students in the community and coordinating among faculty, staff and students. Most faculty members recommended that the FAP should be started later in the curriculum and there should be restrictions on the number of families to be adopted. The students suggested that adequate logistics be provided as well as a reduction in the number of family visits. Conclusion The programme has been welcomed by most stakeholders. It requires the necessary support from the institution authorities, prior planning of visits, judicious utilization of social media, and coordination with government field-level health workers e.g. Accreditated Social Health Activists (ASHA). A comprehensive program evaluation and formulation of a standard operating module will further strengthen the programme.

RESUMEN

Background Maintaining the quality of teaching across India is a challenge. Teachers are equally responsible for patient care and administration. The importance of training medical teachers under the various faculty development programs (FDPs) is well accepted. A mechanism to evaluate the competencies acquired by medical teachers after attending FDPs becomes equally important. In the present study, we evaluate the impact of the various FDPs on medical teachers. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted for one year among 50 medical teachers attending FDPs. Ethical clearance was taken from the Institutional Ethical Committee. For quantitative data collection, the questionnaire was validated by the Scientific Approval Committee of the Institute. The study questionnaire was filled in by the participants just before and three months after attending FDPs. For qualitative data collection, in-depth Interviews (IDIs) using the Kirkpatrick model of learning evaluation were conducted. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and percentages. The thematic areas of self-efficacy and teaching competency before and after FDPs were tested using the chi-square test. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Results There was a significant increase in self-efficacy (300 vs. 426, p = <0.0001) and teaching competency (456 vs. 608, p = <0.0001) in the domains of teaching difficult students and motivating students for innovative projects. Improvement in communication skills and ability to engage the students were noteworthy in teaching competency. IDIs revealed that FDPs are essential for the efficient delivery of the competency-based medical curriculum. Conclusions FDPs play a key role in bringing about significant improvement in generating self-efficacy and teaching competencies among medical teachers. FDPs may be incorporated into the postgraduate medical curriculum itself.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: As an early adopter of competency-based medical education (CBME) our postgraduate institution was uniquely positioned to analyze implementation experience data across programs, while keeping institutional factors constant. We described participants' experiences related to CBME implementation across programs derived from early program evaluation efforts within our setting. METHODS: This evaluation focused on eight residency programs at a medium-sized academic institution in Canada. Participants (n = 175) included program leaders, faculty, and residents. The study consisted of 3 phases: (1) describing intended implementation; (2) documenting enacted implementation; and (3) comparing intended with enacted implementation to inform adaptations. Each program's findings were summarized in technical reports which were then analyzed thematically. Cross program data were organized by themes. RESULTS: Six themes were identified. All groups emphasized the need for ongoing refinement of CBME resulting from shared tensions such as increased assessment burden. However, there were some disparate CBME-related experiences between programs such as the experience with entrustable professional activities, the interpretation of retrospective entrustment anchors, and quality of feedback. CONCLUSION: We detected several cross-program successes and important challenges related to CBME. Our experience can inform other programs engaging in implementation and evaluation of CBME.

RESUMEN

In the recent past, in order to achieve our national goal of 'health for all', National Medical Commission and Government of India made competency based medical education (CBME) mandatory in all Indian medical colleges. By undergoing CBME, the Indian Medical Graduate is expected to achieve the five roles of Clinician, Communicator, Leader and Member of the health care, Professional and Lifelong learner. This article is an overview of CBME, its relevant terminologies and knowledge-gaps. The purpose is to share these changes in medical education with practicing Otolaryngologists of India. It also discusses the various challenges regarding this already- suggested implementation process for clinical academicians, which could be counterproductive to the expected national aim and goal.

RESUMEN

Background The National Medical Commission (NMC), the regulatory body for medical education in India introduced competency-based medical education (CBME) in 2019. It is an outcome-based learner-centric approach. To implement it, active and innovative learning strategies are being introduced. A flipped classroom (FC) is one such teaching method in which learners are provided learning materials before class with active discussion during teaching sessions. This promotes critical thinking, better retention, and future clinical applicability. This study aimed to compare FC and traditional teaching methods for first-phase medical learners for the anatomy curriculum. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of FC viz-a viz traditional lecture method for certain topics of clinical relevance from the anatomy curriculum and assess students' perception of the FC method.  Methodology The study was conducted on 96 phase-one medical learners after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. After obtaining informed consent, a simple random sampling method was used to group the students into two groups. For the same topic, one group was taught with the FC method, while the other group was taught using the didactic lecture (DL) method. A crossover was done for another topic. Students were assessed by pre- and post-tests. Students' perceptions' were recorded by a pre-validated questionnaire quantified on a Likert scale. Results The difference in posttest scores for the topics taught between the two groups was found to be statistically significant. Perception regarding various aspects of the FC method was affirmative. Conclusions The results of this study indicated that FC is advantageous for students. It improves learner engagement and performance, and students' perception of the method was positive. Effective execution of this method requires detailed planning, constant motivation, and consistent efforts. Therefore, this method should be used more often for the benefit of students.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since 1992, when the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) acknowledged pain medicine as a subspecialty, the field has experienced significant growth in its number of programs, diversity of sponsoring specialties, treatment algorithms, and popularity among applicants. These shifts prompted changes to the educational model, overseen by program directors (PDs) and the ACGME. The pool of pain fellowship applicants also changed during that period. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate trainees' reasons for applying to pain medicine fellowship programs as well as the applicants' specific expectations, interests, and motivations, thereby contributing to the remodeling and universal improvement of programs across the country. STUDY DESIGN: Online survey via SurveyMonkey. The online questionnaire targeted pain fellowship applicants in 2023 and current fellows in the US. METHODS: Our study was designed by board members of the Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD). The board disseminated a survey to those who applied to ACGME Pain Medicine fellowships in 2023 as well as to existing fellows. The survey was emailed to residency and fellowship PDs for dissemination to their trainees. The participants answered a 12-question survey on their reasons for pursuing pain medicine fellowships, expectations of and beyond those fellowships, and educational adjustments. RESULTS: There were 283 survey participants (80% applicants in residency training and 20% fellows). Participants ranked basic interventional procedures and a strong desire to learn advanced procedures as the most significant factors in pursuing a pain fellowship. Most trainees (70%) did not wish to pursue a 2-year fellowship, and 50% desired to go into private practice. LIMITATIONS: The relatively small number of respondents is a limitation that could introduce sampling error. Since most of the respondents were from the fields of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) and anesthesia, the use of convenience sampling reduced our ability to generalize the results to the wider community. Furthermore, approximately 80% of the trainees were residents, who might have had less experience in or knowledge of the survey's particulars than did the fellows. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrated that procedural volume and diversity were important factors in trainees' decisions to apply to the field of pain medicine; however, extending the duration of a pain fellowship was not an option survey participants favored. Therefore, PDs and educational stakeholders in pain fellowship training need to develop creative strategies to maintain competitive applicants' interest while they adapt to our evolving field.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To test the inter-reader agreement in classifying pulmonary hypertension (PH) on chest contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) between a consensus of two cardio-pulmonary-devoted radiologists (CRc) and inexperienced readers (radiology residents, RRs) when using a CECT-based quick hands-on tool built upon PH imaging literature, i.e., the "Rapid Access and Practical Information Digest on Computed Tomography for PH-RAPID-CT-PH". MATERIAL AND METHODS: The observational study retrospectively included 60 PH patients who underwent CECT between 2015 and 2022. Four RRs independently reviewed all CECTs and classified each case into one of the five PH groups per the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines. While RR3 and RR4 (RAPID-CT-PH group) used RAPID-CT-PH, RR1 and RR2 (control group) did not. RAPID-CT-PH and control groups' reports were compared with CRc using unweighted Cohen's Kappa (k) statistics. RRs' report completeness and reporting time were also compared using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The inter-reader agreement in classifying PH between the RAPID-CT-PH group and CRc was substantial (k = 0.75 for RR3 and k = 0.65 for RR4); while, it was only moderate for the control group (k = 0.57 for RR1 and k = 0.49 for RR2). Using RAPID-CT-PH resulted in significantly higher report completeness (all p < 0.0001) and significantly lower reporting time (p < 0.0001) compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: RRs using RAPID-CT-PH showed a substantial agreement with CRc on CECT-based PH classification. RAPID-CT-PH improved report completeness and reduced reporting time. A quick hands-on tool for classifying PH on chest CECT may help inexperienced radiologists effectively contribute to the PH multidisciplinary team.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the state of mastery learning interventions, identify gaps in current approaches, and highlight opportunities to improve the rigor of ML in pediatric graduate medical education (GME) training programs. Methods: In October 2022, we searched Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and ERIC. Two reviewers independently screened 165 citations and reviewed the full manuscripts of 20 studies. We developed a modified data abstraction tool based on the Recommendations for Reporting Mastery Education Research in Medicine (ReMERM) guidelines and extracted variables related to mastery learning curricular implementation and design and learner assessment. Results: Eleven studies of ML approaches within pediatric GME were included in the full review, with over half published after 2020. ML interventions were used to teach both simple and complex tasks, often in heterogeneous learner groups. While deliberate practice and feedback were consistently reported features of ML in pediatrics, opportunities for improvement include clearly defining mastery, conducting learning over multiple sessions, presenting sufficient validity evidence for assessment tools, adhering to rigorous standard setting processes, and reporting psychometric data appropriate for ML. Conclusion: In pediatric GME, ML approaches are in their infancy. By addressing common shortcomings in the existing literature, future efforts can improve the rigor of ML in pediatric training programs and its impact on learners and patients.

While mastery learning is a well-described, effective educational intervention utilized in multiple medical specialties, we perceived a relative lack of published studies on mastery learning in pediatric graduate medical education. Mills-Rudy's team searched the current literature to identify gaps in mastery learning approaches in pediatrics training and to highlight ways to improve the rigor of mastery learning in pediatric training programs. Their search yielded 11 studies of mastery learning approaches in pediatric graduate medical education. They identified major gaps in curriculum development and implementation as well as learner assessment. Opportunities to improve mastery learning in pediatrics include clearly defining mastery, conducting learning over several sessions, presenting sufficient validity evidence for assessment tools, adhering to rigorous standard setting processes, and reporting psychometric data appropriate for mastery learning. Future mastery learning interventions in pediatrics can address these gaps to improve the rigor of mastery learning in pediatric training programs.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Define and develop a set of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) to link clinical training and assessment of the hospital components of neonatal care in neonatology medical residency programs. METHODS: An exploratory study was conducted in two phases using a modified Delphi approach. In the first phase, a committee of five neonatology residency program coordinators drafted an initial set of EPAs based on the national matrix of competencies and on EPAs defined by international organizations. In the second phase, a group of neonatal care physicians and medical residents rated the indispensability and clarity of the EPAs and provided comments and suggestions. RESULTS: Seven EPAs were drafted by the coordinators´ committee (n = 5) and used in the content validation process with a group (n = 37) of neonatal care physicians and medical residents. In the first Delphi round, all EPAs reached a content validity index (CVI) above 0.8. The coordinators´ committee analyzed comments and suggestions and revised the EPAs. A second Delphi round with the revised EPAs was conducted to validate and all items maintained a CVI above 0.8 for indispensability and clarity. CONCLUSION: Seven entrustable professional activities were developed to assess residents in the hospital components of neonatal care medicine. These EPAs might contribute to implementing competency-based neonatology medical residency programs grounded in core professional activities.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Digital education tools are a cornerstone in the evolution to CBME through EPAs. Successful implementation requires understanding the variable impacts of EHR-driven delivery of EPAs, flexible digital device access to EPAs, and user-behavior trends. METHODS: Through a HIPAA compliant, flexible-device accessible, surgical education platform, general surgery training programs at 21 institutions collected EPA from July 2023 to April 2024. At 5 EHR-integrated institutions (EHR+), EPA were created for clinical activities based on the OR schedule, automatically pushed to attendings and residents with built in completion reminders. At 16 institutions without EHR integration (EHR-), EPA were initiated manually. To improve user experience, care phases were bundled (cEPA). We compared the EHR+ and EHR- groups, computing descriptive statistics on the cEPAs completed and user behavior metrics. RESULTS: We collected 4187 cEPAs in total, with 82% at EHR+ institutions and 18% at EHR- institutions. Platform triggering dramatically drove cEPA completion for both faculty and residents, 88% and 81%, respectively. Only 3% were initiated by the faculty or resident. Faculty at EHR+ institutions strongly preferred the automated OR-triggered workflow to start their EPAs (Chi-squared test, p ≈ 0). Faculty completed all 3 care phases nearly 80% of the time. Time reminders specifically drive EPA completion for residents and faculty on weekdays and build habits on weekends. 71% of cEPAs completed were by computer, and 29% by phone. More comments were provided when computers were used. Residents reviewed feedback with a median lag of 1 hour and 29 min after results were available. CONCLUSIONS: EHR-driven delivery of EPA leads to a 4.6-fold increase in EPAs completed. EPA initiation is the most critical phase in the workflow and EHR-data driven alerts drive this action. These alerts are also effective drivers of habit formation. Flexible device access is important to increase EPAs completed and improve the usefulness through comments for residents.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Clinical competency committees (CCCs) rely on narrative evaluations to assess resident competency. Despite the emphasis on these evaluations, their utility is frequently hindered by lack of sufficient detail for use by CCCs. Prior resources have sought to improve specificity of comments and use of evaluations by residents but not their utility for CCCs in assessing trainee performance. Methods: We developed a 1-hour faculty development workshop focused on a newly devised framework for Department of Medicine faculty supervising internal medicine residents. The what/why/when/where/how framework highlighted key features of useful narrative evaluations: behaviors of strength and growth, contextualized observations, improvement over time, and actionable next steps. Workshop sessions were implemented at a large multisite internal medicine residency program. We assessed the workshop by measuring attendee confidence and skill in writing narrative evaluations useful for CCCs. Skill was assessed through a rubric adapted from literature on the utility of narrative evaluations. Results: Fifty-four participants started the presurvey, and 33 completed the workshop, for a response rate of 61%. Participant confidence improved pre-, post-, and 3 months postworkshop. Total utility scores improved in mock evaluations from 12.4 to 15.5 and in real evaluations from 13.7 to 15.0, but only some subcomponent scores improved, with fewer improving in the real evaluations. Discussion: A short workshop focusing on our framework improves confidence and utility of narrative evaluations of internal medicine residents for use by CCCs. Next steps should include developing more challenging components of narrative evaluations for continued improvement in trainee performance and faculty assessment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Pediatric health inequities are pervasive and reflect the confluence of social and structural determinants of health including racism in all its forms. Current approaches in graduate medical education that prepare trainees to address health inequities and improve population health are inadequate. Competency based medical education (CBME) can advance equity-oriented efforts to improve patient outcomes, optimize the learning environment and encourage lifelong learning. We briefly describe the impact of racism and discrimination on the clinical learning environment. We then highlight how to apply the 5 core principles of CBME to equip learners across the continuum to address health inequities. We provide specific examples including 1) how CBME can inform teaching, assessment and professional development activities to promote equitable pediatric health outcomes via enturstable professional activities, 2) competency-focused instruction that address racism and inequities, 3) multimodal learning approaches to facilitate the acquisition of the desired competencies to address health inequities, 4) sequenced learning approaches across the continuum of practicing pediatricians, and 5) tools and resources for programmatic assessment of trainee and program performance in addressing pediatric health inequities.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few published articles provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence on the topic of evaluating competency-based medical education (CBME) curricula. The purpose of this review is therefore to synthesize the available evidence on the evaluation practices for competency-based curricula employed in schools and programs for undergraduate and postgraduate health professionals. METHOD: This systematized review was conducted following the systematic reviews approach with minor modifications to synthesize the findings of published studies that examined the evaluation of CBME undergraduate and postgraduate programs for health professionals. RESULTS: Thirty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria and reported evaluation practices in CBME curricula from various countries and regions worldwide, such as Canada, China, Turkey, and West Africa. 57% of the evaluated programs were at the postgraduate level, and 71% were in the field of medicine. The results revealed variation in reporting evaluation practices, with numerous studies failing to clarify evaluations' objectives, approaches, tools, and standards as well as how evaluations were reported and communicated. It was noted that questionnaires were the primary tool employed for evaluating programs, often combined with interviews or focus groups. Furthermore, the utilized evaluation standards considered the well-known competencies framework, specialized association guidelines, and accreditation criteria. CONCLUSION: This review calls attention to the importance of ensuring that reports of evaluation experiences include certain essential elements of evaluation to better inform theory and practice.

Asunto(s)