RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Doctor of Pharmacy programs are charged with developing students' empathy by the 2016 Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standard 3 and the 2022 Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA). Although empathy is essential to optimal patient care, its subjective nature makes it challenging to teach and therefore literature is lacking on best teaching practices. The authors of this paper describe a novel simulated approach to elicit and assess empathy in a pharmacy classroom. This study evaluated the impact of a decision-making game in a pharmacy skills lab course on the development of students' empathy using a validated empathy scale. METHODS: This is a cohort-based quality improvement project in which third year pharmacy students participated in a 3-h classroom empathy game experience that simulated a month in a patient's life including issues related to the cycle of poverty. Prior to the game, students completed a voluntary, anonymous baseline demographics survey. They also completed a pre- and post-survey of the validated empathy tool, the Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale (KCES-R), to assess change in the empathy score following the decision-making game. Students also provided narrative comments in the post-survey. Statistical tests used included descriptive statistics for demographic data, Shapiro-Wilk test of normality, and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for survey scores (SPSS Version 29). RESULTS: Pharmacy students (n = 37) showed an overall increase in composite KCES-R scores after participating in the empathy game class session (z = -5.071, p < 0.001). The scores of each of the 14 KCES-R items also increased after the learning experience (p < 0.05). Students' narrative comments were all positive and indicated that the activity offered new insights on self-perceived empathy development. CONCLUSION: The empathy game simulation was a successful approach to increase empathy scores in third-year pharmacy students.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Clinical Skill Training Center (CSTC) is the first environment where third year medical students learn clinical skills after passing basic science. Consumer- based evaluation is one of the ways to improve this center with the consumer. This study was conducted with the aim of preparing a consumer-oriented evaluation tool for CSTC among medical students. METHOD: The study was mixed method. The first phase was qualitative and for providing an evaluation tool. The second phase was for evaluating the tool. At the first phase, after literature review in the Divergent phase, a complete list of problems in the field of CSTC in medicine schools was prepared. In the convergent step, the prepared list was compared with the standards of clinical education and values of scriven. In the second phase it was evaluated by the scientific and authority committee. Validity has been measured by determining CVR and CVI: Index. The face and content validity of the tool was obtained through the approval of a group of specialists. RESULTS: The findings of the research were in the form of 4 questionnaires: clinical instructors, pre-clinical medical students, and interns. All items were designed as a 5-point Likert. The main areas of evaluation included the objectives and content of training courses, implementation of operations, facilities and equipment, and the environment and indoor space. In order to examine the long-term effects, a special evaluation form was designed for intern. CONCLUSION: The tool for consumer evaluation was designed with good reliability and trustworthiness and suitable for use in the CSTC, and its use can improve the effectiveness of clinical education activities.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Collaboration for nursing is a core competence and therefore educational interventions are essentials for collaborative skills. To identify such interventions, we carried out a study to understand nursing students' collaborative process. A narrative inquiry method was used to explore the collaborative process of first-year undergraduate nursing students. The analysis was conducted on field notes from 70 h of observation of 87 nursing students' collaboration during skills lab activities. It also included transcriptions of four focus group discussions with 11 students. The results are presented as a sequential process of (1) navigating in unfamiliar territory, (2) navigating together to cope, and (3) navigating together towards independency and the future nursing profession. We identified a transition from teacher-led assistance and guidance to student interdependency and reciprocal learning, ending with student-led assistance supporting independency. In line with Vygotsky's theory of zone of proximal development, different scaffolding interventions are needed depending on where the students are in the collaborative process.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Skills labs and simulation centers have become an integrated part of teaching methods in many medical schools. This study aims to describe the status of simulation in medical education in Iceland by examining student and faculty experience, facilitating and barring factors for its use in teaching and how the concept appears in the Course Catalog. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was threefold. In parts one and two, electronic surveys were sent to students and faculty members at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland. Part three was a key word search in the University´s course catalogue relating to simulation. RESULTS: Response rate for both student and faculty surveys was 65%. Simulation as a teaching method was reported for 10% of faculty according to students but approximately a third of faculty, according to faculty. Attitudes of students and faculty were positive. Faculty, previously exposed to simulation, were more likely to use simulation, as were those who had received training in educational methods. Main barriers identified were lack of facilities, equipment, funds, and training. Key words related to simulation appeared rarely in the University Course Catalogue. CONCLUSION: Student and faculty experience with simulation is limited, less than third of faculty claim to have used simulation when teaching medical students. Barring factors in Iceland are similar to what has been reported elsewhere. Lack of words describing simulation in the Course Catalog may raise questions about emphasis on teaching methods or lack thereof. Potential ways to increase the use of simulation could be to improve infrastructure and offer training in diverse educational methods, including simulation, to selected faculty.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Medical education was and still is challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic, and several strategies were implemented by the universities worldwide in order to maintain a good level of education. The aim of this work is to point out how strategies adopted in a German university hospital reached students and how comfortable they felt with the proposed solutions in order to define future possibilities in modern teaching. Methods: A questionnaire was answered by medical students at the end of the 8th and 10th semester in a German university hospital asking them about their perception of medical education during the pandemic as well as about strategies adopted by the faculty. Results: A total of 92 out of 117 students answered the questionnaire (78.6% response rate). Students felt disadvantaged in their medical education because of the pandemic on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (completely) (5.34±2.3, range 0-10 points), regardless of semester, gender, and whether they aimed at a surgical career or not. During the pandemic they missed practical exercises most (93.5%), followed by contact with other students (65.2%). Presence lessons were missed (28.3%) the least. Among the strategies offered to maintain education, recorded lessons were appreciated most, followed by skills labs. Live-stream lessons were considered less comfortable. Conclusions: Several aspects of medical education were replaced satisfactorily during the pandemic, others need to be adapted in the future in order to meet the students' needs and expectations. Theoretical online education but not live stream lessons could be an option beyond COVID-19 as they are highly appreciated by students.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bilateral cleft lip surgery is very challenging and requires a high level of skill, knowledge and experience. Existing high-fidelity simulation models that can be used by novice cleft surgeons to gain experience and expand their knowledge are rare and expensive. In this study, we developed a bilateral cleft lip model using porcine snout discs, which are available anywhere and inexpensive. METHODS: Anatomic reference points of a patient with a bilateral cleft lip were superimposed with landmarks of the porcine snout disc on a foil template. The template was used to construct an ex vivo bilateral cleft lip model. Surgery was performed on the model according to Millard and the surgical steps were photodocumented analogous to two clinical cases of bilateral cleft lip surgery. The suitability of the model was further tested by twelve participants and evaluated using self-assessment questionnaires. RESULTS: The bilateral cleft lip ex vivo model made of a porcine snout disc proved to be a suitable model with very low cost and ease of fabrication, as the template is reusable on any snout disc. The Millard procedure was successfully performed and the surgical steps of the lip plasty were simulated close to the clinical situation. Regarding the nasal reconstruction, the model lacks three-dimensionality. As a training model, it enhanced the participants comprehension of cleft surgery as well as their surgical skills. All participants rated the model as valuable for teaching and training. CONCLUSIONS: The porcine snout discs can be used as a useful ex vivo model for bilateral cleft lip surgery with limitations in the construction of the nose, which cannot be realistically performed with the model due to anatomical differences with humans. Benefits include a realistic tissue feel, the simulation of a multi-layered lip construction, a wide and rapid availability and low cost. This allows the model to be used by novice surgeons also in low-income countries. It is therefore useful as a training model for gaining experience, but also as a model for refining, testing and evaluating surgical techniques for bilateral lip plasty.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate a specialty pharmacy workshop across pharmacy management and skills lab courses. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: A specialty pharmacy workshop was developed and implemented. The lecture cohort (fall 2019) consisted of a 90-min lecture in pharmacy management. The lecture/lab cohort (fall 2020) consisted of the lecture plus a 30-min pre-lab video assignment and a two-hour laboratory activity. At the completion of lab, students presented findings virtually to specialty pharmacists. Pre-surveys and post-surveys assessed knowledge (10 items), self-confidence (9 items), and attitudes (11 items). FINDINGS: Of the 123 students enrolled in the course, 88 students (71.5%) completed pre- and post-surveys. On a 10-point scale, knowledge improved from 5.6 (SD = 1.5) to 6.5 (SD = 2.0) points in the lecture cohort and from 6.0 (SD = 1.6) to 7.3 (SD = 2.0) points in the lecture/lab cohort with a significance difference favoring the lecture/lab cohort. Perceived confidence improved for five out of nine items in the lecture cohort but improved significantly for all nine items in the lecture/lab cohort. Attitudes toward learning about specialty pharmacy were generally positive for both cohorts. SUMMARY: The specialty pharmacy workshop exposed students to workflow management and medication access processes. Students perceived the workshop to be a relevant and meaningful, allowing them to feel confident in developing knowledge and understanding of specialty pharmacy topics. The workshop can be replicated at a larger scale with schools of pharmacy utilizing the integration between didactic and laboratory courses.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) play a significant role in readying students for professional practice. Factors beyond traditional knowledge and skills taught in the didactic curriculum may play a role in APPE success. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe an activity implemented within a third-year skills lab focused on APPE preparedness, the methods used, and student feedback related to the series. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Experiential and skills lab faculty collaborated to generate advice for students regarding common misconceptions or areas of difficulty encountered on APPEs. The advice was developed into short topics that were paired with and presented at the start of most lab sessions with impromptu contributions from faculty and facilitators integrated at the time of delivery. FINDINGS: One hundred twenty-seven third-year pharmacy students (54% of the cohort) consented to complete a follow-up survey and provided feedback on the series. Most students agreed or strongly agreed with the elements evaluated, providing positive feedback for all ranked statements. Feedback from free-text response questions indicated that many students found all topics presented to be beneficial and suggested that topics of interest for the upcoming semester included advice regarding residencies/fellowships/employment, wellness, and communication with preceptors. SUMMARY: Student feedback indicated an overall perception of benefit and value from most respondents. Implementation of a similar series in other courses is a potential area for future study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: In Germany, a curriculum in special care dentistry (SCD) is not mandatory. As a result, very little is known about dental students' attitudes toward interacting with people with disability (PwD). The study´s aim was to assess this among dental students at Witten/Herdecke University (UW/H). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the academic years 2016-2017 to 2020-2021, dental students in the 7th semester (UW/H) were asked to complete a self-assessment questionnaire. Prior to its start, the study had obtained a positive vote from the ethics committee of the UW/H (#174/2016). RESULTS: Out of 199 students 166 persons on average 24.5 years old completed the questionnaire. Nearly all participants had already had previous experience with PwD in various domains of life prior to dental school (89.2%). Three-quarters indicated not having reservations about interacting with PwD. The proportion of persons without previous experience in interacting with a PwD was almost twice as high in the group with reservation (16.2%) as it was in the group without reservation (8.7%). Almost all surveyed students (92.8%) affirmed that they would like to learn more on the topic of "Professional Interaction with PwD." CONCLUSION: Most of the respondents did not have reservations about interacting with PwD. Almost all the participants indicated a high level of interest in topics related to SCD. Also, the authors like to encourage the curriculum committees of dental schools at other universities to integrate courses on SCD, based on the iADH recommendations, into their dental curricula.

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim was to explore collaboration between first year undergraduate nursing students in a three-year bachelor program during clinical skills lab practices. BACKGROUND: The ability to collaborate is important in the nursing profession to ensure patient safety. Thus, efforts supporting nursing students with learning activities emphasizing this ability is crucial in nurse education as a preparation for the requirements of the nursing profession. Collaborative learning models are described as ways that support the students' interaction during education. However, collaboration between students has shown to have challenges such as negative competition and confrontations. This stresses the need to explore the collaboration between students to find ways to support the interaction. DESIGN: The study was conducted with a focused ethnographic approach. METHOD: Data were generated by participant observations during one semester, involving 70 h observation of 87 first year nursing students for 6 months and 24 training sessions in clinical skills lab practices. Two focus group discussions were used to elaborate students' views of collaboration and to provide an opportunity for follow up questions and interpretations from the observations. Field notes and focus group discussions were interpreted as one unit of analysis conducted with thematic network analysis. A global theme were synthesized from organizational and additional basic themes presenting the overall metaphor of the students' collaboration. RESULT: The global theme, Between adaptation and non-conformity, revealed a field of tension in the nursing students' collaboration. One the one hand, the global theme involved the students' ability to adopt to new knowledge and to being a nursing student in a clinical skills lab and to others' perspective. On the other hand, non-conformity creates a collaboration with less reflection between the students and non-synchronized and time-consuming laboratory work. CONCLUSION: Collaborative activities in nurse education fosters and challenges nursing students' collaboration required for clinical practices and later in the nursing profession. By the presented scaffolding efforts, nurse educators can arrange a learning environment that can support the collaboration between students and facilitate the transition into the profession.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Using a skills-based learning environment as a launch pad for developing empathy for patients with substance use disorder or at high risk for opioid overdose allows for learning continuity and early intervention. Empathy for this patient population may reduce bias and stigma associated with negative health outcomes. Previous studies have assessed empathy in pharmacy students, but not in the context of substance use disorder and opioid overdose harm reduction among first professional year pharmacy students in skills-based education. This cohort study aimed to measure the change in empathy and opioid overdose-related attitudes before and after a two-part skills-based learning activity that focused on drug diversion and opioid overdose treatment. METHODS: First professional year pharmacy students were given a pre- and post-survey consisting of empathy and attitudes sections. The Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale (KCES) and the Opioid Overdose Attitudes Scale (OOAS) were used. The intervention was a skills-based learning activity with two segments, one that focused on naloxone counseling and the other focused on drug diversion. RESULTS: The aggregate mean change in KCES and OOAS scores of the cohort increased by 1.837 (P = .014) and 2.349 (P = .008), respectively. Of note, students with lower baseline empathy and attitudes scores showed more improvement in both KCES and OOAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Students showed improvement in empathy and attitudes regarding opioid overdose and substance use disorder. A larger magnitude of improvement was noted with lower baseline scores.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Cardiac auscultation is a core clinical skill taught in medical school. Due to contact restrictions during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, interaction with patients was very limited. Therefore, a peer-to-peer virtual case-based auscultation course via video conference was established. Methods: A randomized controlled cross-over study was conducted to evaluate whether participation in a virtual auscultation course could improve heart auscultation skills in 3rd-year medical students. A total of sixty medical students were randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group after informed consent was obtained. Due to no-shows, 55 students participated. Depending on allocation, students attended three ninety-minute courses in intervals of one week in a different order: a virtual case-based auscultation course held via video chat, literature self-study, and an on-site course using a high-fidelity auscultation simulator (SAM II). The study's primary endpoint was the performance of the two groups at the simulator after participating in the virtual auscultation course or literature self-study. To evaluate their auscultation skills, students participated in five assessments using the same six pathologies: stenosis and regurgitation of the aortic and mitral valve, ventricular septal defect, and patent ductus arteriosus. Moreover, participants rated their satisfaction with each course and provided a self-assessment of competence. Results: Compared to literature self-study, participation in the virtual auscultation course led to a significantly improved description of heart murmurs at the auscultation simulator with regard to the presence in systole and diastole, low- and high-pitched sounds, and volume dynamics. There was no significant difference between the groups in diagnostic accuracy and identification of the point of maximal intensity. After the virtual course, students showed higher satisfaction rates and a higher increase in self-assessed competence compared to participants who engaged in literature self-study. Conclusions: For the first time, this study demonstrates that a case-based virtual auscultation course can improve aspects of cardiac auscultation skills on a simulator. This may facilitate the further acquisition of an essential clinical skill, even when contact restrictions will be lifted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In the doctor of pharmacy curriculum, students are subjected to scenarios where success is contingent upon accurate retention of information learned during class. To provide incentive to students and simultaneously gauge student retention of course material, an optional honors examination was created for a skills laboratory course. The objectives of this research were to determine student pharmacist performance on the examination and to assess student pharmacist interest and motivation for taking (or not taking) the optional examination. METHODS: An optional comprehensive honors examination was implemented simultaneously within a laboratory course series. Student performance was analyzed across cohorts and students were given a web-based survey prior to the examination to gauge initial interest and engagement. A second survey was conducted after the examination to identify motivation for taking the optional examination. Surveys were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: There were 238 responses to the initial survey (47%) and 183 (96%) responses to the post-examination survey. Common topics of motivation for taking the examination included enhancing transcripts, gauging their own retention, and assessing readiness for experiential activities. One hundred sixty-one students participated in the optional examination, and 65 achieved a score of 90% and the honors designation. The majority (96%) of students who chose to take the examination thought the activity was valuable to their education. CONCLUSIONS: An optional comprehensive honors examination is one method of evaluating student retention of course material and provides an opportunity for students to set themselves apart from colleagues with an honors designation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pharmacy programs must assess student readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). This study evaluated: (1) if a relationship exists between student performance on a classroom-based patient case activity (Rx Review) and (2) performance on direct patient care and perceptions of the transferability of Rx Reviews to the APPE setting. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Rx Reviews are timed, independent, prospective reviews of a patient's medical record intended to simulate pre-rounding activities common in acute and ambulatory care settings. Students complete 12 Rx Reviews across a skills laboratory course sequence. Rx Review scores were compared to performance on acute care and ambulatory care APPEs for students in the Class of 2019 using descriptive statistics for student scores and bivariate logistic regression for the association between Rx Review scores and performance outcomes on patient care APPEs. Student perceptions of the Rx Reviews were assessed through a survey. Descriptive statistics and qualitative responses were used to analyze responses to the multiple-choice survey questions and open-ended question, respectively. FINDINGS: One hundred twenty-two students participated in the study. A relationship was found between students' Rx Review scores and performance in certain direct patient care APPEs, with students performing in the bottom 50% on Rx Reviews being more likely to perform poorly on those APPEs. Over 93% of students identified Rx Reviews as at least somewhat helpful in preparing them for APPEs. SUMMARY: This study indicated that a classroom-based patient case activity could be used as a formative measure of APPE readiness.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Studies have demonstrated suboptimal resident exposure to anorectal pathology. A workshop was developed at an academic general surgery residency. This study assesses durability of learning from the workshop. METHODS: Thirty-six residents participated in a skills laboratory addressing diagnosis and management of anorectal complaints. The skills laboratory was broken into didactic and hand-on skills stations. Residents completed pre-, post- and 6-mo after workshop assessments to evaluate knowledge and confidence. Knowledge and confidence-based scores pre-, post- and 6-mo after workshop were compared. RESULTS: Scores demonstrated retention of information. Knowledge-based question median scores improved from 63.2% pre-workshop to 73.7% post-workshop and 76.3% at 6 mo (P = 0.0005). Median confidence scores improved from 31 pre-workshop to 40 post-workshop, and were stable at 6 mo (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge and confidence gained from an anorectal skills workshop was stable or improved at 6 mo. These results suggest that an anorectal curriculum is effective at improving general surgery resident background knowledge and confidence when managing anorectal complaints.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Surgical interns who have completed medical school in the era of Covid-19 will not have the same experience gained through the traditional multi-month fourth-year surgical subinternships. During subinternships, medical students learn relevant anatomic and radiographic features of surgical pathologies, hone technical skills, and gain exposure to surgical consults and procedures. This lack of intensive exposure will have this cohort starting at a lower comfort and knowledge level compared to years prior. Residency programs, especially subspeciality programs, should review and utilize national resources to facilitate the transition to intern year, such as the American College of Surgeons Entering Resident Readiness Assessment and American College of Surgeons/ Association of Program Directors in Surgery/Association for Surgical Education Resident Prep Curriculum. We recommend the use of a specialty-tailored intern boot-camp and longitudinal curriculum that focuses on learning procedural skills and surgical conditions, anatomy, pathology, clinical examination, radiographic findings, surgical approach, and postoperative complications. These steps will help address knowledge gaps and promote intern readiness in this cohort of individuals.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: International medical students are frequently confronted with intercultural, psychosocial, and language barriers and often receive lower marks in written, oral, and clinical-practical examinations than fellow local students. Training communication competence in procedural skills, such as blood sampling, is further challenge in this particular group of medical students. This pre-post comparative intervention study aimed to investigate the effects of training communication skills during the performance of procedural skills (taking blood samples from a silicone model) in international and local students as part of their clinical practical medical training. METHODS: Study participants performed blood sampling on an arm prosthesis model (part-task trainer) before and after the communication skills training, focusing on accompanying communication with a simulation patient sitting next to the arm model. The pre- and post-evaluation video was assessed by two independent evaluators using a binary checklist, the Integrated Procedural Performance Instrument (IPPI) and global assessments of clinical professionalism in terms of procedural and communication performance. Linear models with mixed effects were used. Group differences regarding global competence levels were analysed with χ2-tests. RESULTS: International medical students did not perform as well as their local counterparts in the pre- and post-examinations. Both groups improved their performance significantly, whereby the international students improved more than their local counterparts in terms of their communication performance, assessed via binary checklist. Clinical professionalism evaluated via global assessments of procedural and communication performance highlights the intervention's impact insofar as no international student was assessed as clinically not competent after the training. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that already a low-dose intervention can lead to improved communication skills in medical students performing procedural tasks and significantly increase their confidence in patient interaction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective. To implement and evaluate a laboratory simulation for teaching difficult patient encounter skills to pharmacy students to improve their self-assessed communication abilities and skills in the affective domain.Methods. Twelve simulation scenarios that represented difficult patient encounters in a variety of practice settings were developed. All students completed a self-assessment of their ability to communicate during difficult patient encounters before and after the simulations, and wrote a guided reflection afterward. The impact of the simulation was evaluated using quantitative and qualitative methodology. Three student cohorts were analyzed to determine whether significant change occurred in students' self-perceived communication abilities. Thematic analysis of the qualitative reflection responses was performed.Results. Over three years, three student cohorts of third-year professional students participated in the simulations (n=236). Students self-rated their ability to communicate on a 0-100 scale. Mean self-rating of ability prior to the simulation was 57.7 (SD=15.9) and after was 79.2 (SD=15.2). This mean difference of 21.5 points equates to an approximate 20% increase in self-rated ability. Variability in self-ratings between the cohorts was not significant. Qualitative analysis revealed that the simulation identified for student areas needing further development which in turn promoted self-awareness. Students expressed that learning in the safe, formative environment provided by the simulation contributed to their professional growth and was relevant to their future practice of pharmacy.Conclusion. This simulation fills a gap in skills-based education, addresses the affective domain of the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards, transfers easily to schools and colleges of pharmacy. This supports a call to action for pharmacy educators to provide purposeful opportunities for students to practice communicating with patients during difficult encounters.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective To evaluate faculty and student perceptions of and performance on virtual skills-based assessments focused on communication compared to in-person assessments.Methods In spring 2020, virtual skills-based assessments were conducted. After all assessments were completed, two 12-item questionnaires, one for students and one for the faculty members who conducted the assessment, were designed to assess perceptions of virtual skills-based assessments. The surveys were distributed via an online platform to second- and third-year (P2 and P3) pharmacy students and to faculty who had participated in a virtual skills-based assessment. Scores from the spring 2020 virtual skills-based assessment were compared to scores on the in-person skills-based assessment that took place in spring 2019.Results Of the 19 faculty and 279 students invited to participate, 18 (94.7%) faculty and 241 (86.4%) students responded. The majority of faculty (88.9%) and students (63.5%) perceived the virtual skills-based assessments to be effective at simulating an interaction. However, only 33.3% of faculty and 28.6% of students preferred the virtual environment. There was not a significant difference in student performance between in-person and virtual assessments for patient consultation and SOAP note skills.Conclusion Providing sufficient formative and summative feedback to pharmacy students is a challenge, particularly in the context of skills-based assessments. Students and faculty reported that the virtual assessment provided an opportunity for an appropriate assessment of student communication skills. However, a strong preference for using virtual skills-based assessments in the future was not observed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

When students fail to meet minimum competence standards on summative pharmacy skills-based assessments, remediation can be used to ensure student readiness for progression. Skills-based remediation is challenging as a high volume of resources is required to develop an action plan that addresses the heterogeneity in student needs and to create and execute another assessment equivalent to the initial assessment. Although many Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) programs face these same challenges, there is no consensus on how to best address them. Recently, faculty from six PharmD programs convened to share ideas and approaches to overcoming these challenges. This commentary aims to define remediation as it pertains to summative skills-based assessments, share our consensus views regarding remediation best practices, and highlight areas where there is more work to be done. Our intent is to advance the ongoing conversation and empower institutions to develop their own effective and impactful skills-based remediation policies, procedures, and activities.

Asunto(s)