RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical feasibility of different treatment methods for persistent occipitotransverse position and the influence on maternal and infant complications. METHOD: During the trial of vaginal delivery from April 2020 to March 2023 in our hospital, the cervix was fully dilated and the presentation was located at +2 station. Ninety-six pregnant women with fetal presentation at +4 station, occipitotransverse fetal position, maternal complications, abnormalities in the second stage of labor, and or fetal distress were divided into two groups: 65 patients with Kielland forceps vaginal delivery and 31 patients underwent emergency cesarean section. The delivery time, vaginal laceration rate, postpartum blood loss volume, puerperal infection rate, neonatal birth injury rate, and neonatal 1 min Apgar scores were analyzed. RESULTS: The delivery outcomes and maternal and neonatal complications of 96 pregnant women were analyzed: the application of Kielland forceps delivery time was shorter, while the vaginal laceration rate, postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal infection rate were significantly lower than that of patients undergoing emergency cesarean section and the neonatal 1 min Apgar score was higher than that of emergency cesarean section group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was clinically appropriate to use Kielland forceps in vaginal delivery when the persistent occipitotransverse position was present and delivery needed to be expediated. Use of Kielland forceps can shorten the delivery time, improve the success rate of vaginal delivery and reduce the complications of mothers and infants.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence regarding the safety of Kielland's rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) in comparison with other modes of delivery for the management of persistent fetal malposition in the second stage of labour. OBJECTIVES: To derive estimates of risks of maternal and neonatal complications following KRFD, compared with rotational ventouse delivery (RVD), non-rotational forceps delivery (NRFD) or a second-stage caesarean section (CS), from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard search methodology, as recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Case series, prospective or retrospective cohort studies and population-based studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was used to derive weighted pooled estimates of maternal and neonatal complications. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. For postpartum haemorrhage there was no significant difference between Kielland's and ventouse delivery; the rate was lower in Kielland's delivery compared with non-rotational forceps (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95) and second-stage CS (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.36-0.58). There were no differences in the rates of anal sphincter injuries or admission to neonatal intensive care. Rates of shoulder dystocia were higher with Kielland's delivery compared with ventouse delivery (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.08-2.98), but rates of neonatal birth trauma were lower (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.91). There were no differences seen in the rates of 5-min APGAR score < 7 between Kielland's delivery and other instrumental births, but they were lower when compared with second-stage CS (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Kielland's rotational forceps delivery is a safe option for the management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labour.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We compared complications in pregnancies that had Kielland's rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) with non-rotational forceps delivery (NRFD). Maternal outcomes included post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS); neonatal outcomes included admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 5-minute Apgar scores <7, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), jaundice, shoulder dystocia and birth trauma. The study population included 491 (2.1%) requiring KRFD, 1,257 (5.3%) requiring NRFD and 22,111 (93.0%) that had SVD. In pregnancies with NRFD compared to KRFD, there was higher incidence of OASIS (8.5% vs. 4.7%; p = .006) and a non-significant increased trend for PPH (15.0% vs. 12.4%; p = .173). There was no significant difference in rates of admission to NICU (p = .628), 5-minute Apgar score <7 (p = .375), HIE (p = .532), jaundice (p = .809), severe shoulder dystocia (p = .507) or birth trauma (p = .514). Our study demonstrates that KRFD has lower rates of maternal complications compared to NRFD whilst the rates of neonatal complications are similar.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Kielland's rotational forceps is used for achieving vaginal delivery in pregnancies with failure to progress in second stage of labour secondary to fetal malposition. The use of Kielland's forceps has significantly declined in the last few decades due to concerns about an increased risk of maternal and neonatal complications, despite the absence of any major studies demonstrating this increased risk.What do the results of this study add? There are some studies which compare the risks in pregnancies delivering by Kiellands forceps with rotational ventouse deliveries but there is limited evidence comparing the risks of rotational with non-rotational forceps deliveries. Our study compares the major maternal and neonatal complications in a large cohort of pregnancies undergoing rotational vs. non-rotational forceps deliveries.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The results of our study demonstrate that maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies delivering by Kielland's rotational forceps undertaken by appropriately trained obstetricians are either lower or similar to those delivering by non-rotational forceps. Consideration should be given to ensure that there is appropriate training provided to obstetricians to acquire skills in using Kielland's forceps.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of Kielland's rotational forceps is considered to involve greater technical difficulty and may be associated with a higher rate of pelvic floor trauma. Our main objective was to evaluate the association between avulsion of the levator muscle and rotational and non-rotational forceps. METHODS: This was an observational study carried out at a tertiary hospital that recruited singleton cephalic vaginally primiparous women with previous Kielland's forceps delivery between March 2012 and May 2017. Patients were retrieved from a local database, contacted consecutively and blinded to all clinical data. Power calculations determined a sample of n = 160 patients. All women underwent a urogynecological interview, clinical examination and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS). The 4D TLUS volumes were stored and analyzed offline by an experienced ultrasound examiner who was blinded to all clinical data. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients were available for analysis. Rotational forceps accounted for 27.3% (45 out of 165) of the study sample. Avulsion was present in 41.8% (69 out of 165) of all forceps deliveries. On multivariate analysis, rotational forceps was associated with avulsion, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.57 (CI 95% 1.20-5.62, p = 0.016). Body mass index at the beginning of gestation was found to be a protective factor, with an adjusted OR of 0.918 (CI 95% 0.847-0.986, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Rotational forceps is associated with a higher avulsion rate than non-rotational forceps, with an adjusted OR of over 2.5. Obstetricians need to consider the potential long-term consequences of performing a rotational forceps for mothers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Operative vaginal delivery and, in particular, rotational forceps delivery require extensive training, specific skills, and dexterity. Performed correctly, it can reduce the need for difficult late second-stage cesarean delivery and its associated complications. When rotation to occiput anterior position is achieved, pelvic trauma and anal sphincter injury commonly associated with direct delivery from occiput posterior positions may be avoided. OBJECTIVE: We report the original and novel use of real-time intrapartum ultrasound simultaneously during Kielland's rotational forceps delivery to monitor correct execution and increase maternal safety. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study performed at the Charité University Hospital in Berlin between 2013 and 2018. Simultaneous, real-time, intrapartum suprapubic ultrasound during Kielland's rotational forceps deliveries were performed in a series of laboring women with normal fetuses and arrest of labor in the late second stage and with a fetal head malposition, requiring operative vaginal delivery. In addition to vaginal palpation for head station, rotation, and asynclitism, intrapartum ultrasound was also used to objectively determine head station, head direction, and midline angle. The operator was not blinded to the ultrasound findings. The delivering obstetrician examined the woman and performed the delivery. An assistant, trained in intrapartum ultrasound, placed a curved-array transducer transversely in the midline just above the pubic bone to display the forceps blades being applied and the rotation of the fetal head in occiput anterior position. RESULTS: In all 32 laboring women included in the study, the blades were applied correctly and the fetal heads successfully rotated to an occiput anterior position with direct ultrasound confirmation, and vaginal delivery was achieved. There were no cases of difficult application, repeat application, slippage of the blades, or rotation of the fetal head in the wrong direction. Maternal outcomes showed no vaginal tears, cervical tears, or postpartum hemorrhage >500 mL. There was 1 case of third-degree perineal tear (3a). Neonatal outcomes included mild hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), small cephalohematoma conservatively managed (n=1), and early-onset group B streptococcus sepsis secondary to maternal colonization (n=1). There were no neonatal deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance during Kielland's rotational forceps delivery is an original and novel approach. We describe the use of intrapartum ultrasound in assessing fetal head station and position and also to simultaneously and objectively monitor performance of rotational forceps delivery. Intrapartum ultrasound enhances operator confidence and, possibly, patient safety. It is a valuable adjunct to obstetrical training and can improve learning efficiency. Real-time ultrasound guidance of fetal head rotation to occiput anterior position with Kielland's forceps may also protect the perineum and reduce anal sphincter injury. This novel approach can lead to a renaissance in the safe use of Kielland's forceps.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to derive accurate estimates of risks of maternal and neonatal complications associated with Kielland's rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) compared to rotational ventouse delivery (RVD) or 2nd stage caesarean section (CS). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study undertaken at a large tertiary maternity and neonatal unit in the United Kingdom between January 2010 and June 2018. Pregnancies with fetal demise, major fetal defects, those lost to follow-up, those delivering by elective or emergency CS in the first stage of labour and non-rotational instrumental deliveries were excluded. The study population included singleton pregnancies delivering by Kielland's forceps, rotational ventouse, 2nd stage CS or spontaneous unassisted cephalic vaginal delivery; the latter forming the control group. The maternal outcomes examined included post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS). The neonatal outcomes included admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 5-minute Apgar scores <7, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), jaundice, shoulder dystocia and birth trauma. Absolute risks with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated in the study groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95 % CI. RESULTS: The study population of 23,786 pregnancies included: 491 (2.1 %) requiring KRFD, 344 (1.4 %) requiring RVD, 840 (3.5 %) that had a 2nd stage CS and 22,111 (93.0 %) spontaneous cephalic vaginal deliveries. With regard to maternal adverse outcomes, in pregnancies that had a KRFD compared to RVD, there was no significant difference in the incidence of OASIS (p = 0.599) or PPH (p = 0.982). In contrast, the risk of PPH was significantly higher in those delivering by a 2nd stage CS compared to KRFD (27.5 % vs. 12.4 %; p < 0.0001). With regard to neonatal adverse outcomes, in those delivering by KRFD compared to RVD and 2nd stage CS, there was no significant difference in the incidence of admission to NICU (p = 0.912; p = 0.746, respectively), 5-minute Apgar score<7 (p = 0.335; p = 0.150, respectively), jaundice (p = 0.810; p = 0.332, respectively), mild shoulder dystocia (p = 0.077), severe shoulder dystocia (p = 0.603) or birth trauma (p = 0.265; p = 0.323, respectively). The risk of maternal composite adverse outcome was highest after 2nd stage CS (OR 7.68; 95 %CI: 6.52-9.04) and lowest after KRFD (OR 3.82; 95 %CI: 2.98-4.91). The risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome was higher in those delivering by RVD (OR 2.87; 95 %CI: 2.10-3.91), compared to KRFD (OR 2.23; 95 %CI: 1.67-2.97) or 2nd stage CS (OR 2.02; 95 %CI: 1.60-2.54). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that KRFD is a safer management option when compared to RVD or 2nd stage CS for the management of persistent fetal malposition in labour.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Malposition complicates 2-13% of births at delivery, leading to increased obstetric interventions (cesarean section and instrumental delivery) and higher rates of adverse fetal and maternal outcomes. Limited data are available regarding the likely rates of obstetric intervention and subsequent neonatal and maternal outcomes of births with babies in persistent occiput posterior position vs those in persistent occiput transverse position. The UK Audit and Research trainee Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynecology (UK-ARCOG) network set out to collect data prospectively at delivery on final mode of delivery and immediate outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The UK-ARCOG network collected data on all births with malposition of the fetal head complicating the second stage of labor (n = 838) (occiput posterior/occiput transverse) requiring rotational vaginal operative birth or emergency cesarean to expedite delivery across 66 participating UK National Health Service maternity units over a 1-month period. The outcomes considered were the need for emergency cesarean section without a trial of instrumental delivery, success of the first method of delivery employed in achieving a vaginal delivery and neonatal/maternal outcomes. RESULTS: Obstetricians regarded assistance with an operative vaginal delivery method to be unsafe in 15% of babies in occiput posterior position and 6.1% of babies in occiput transverse position, and they were delivered by primary emergency cesarean section. When vaginal delivery was deemed safe (defined as attempted assisted vaginal rotational delivery), the first instrument attempted was successful in 74.4% of occiput posterior babies and 79.3% of occiput transverse babies. CONCLUSIONS: Our data facilitates decision making by obstetricians to increase safety of assisted rotational operative delivery of a malpositioned baby at initial assessment and in counseling women. Until data from a well-designed randomized controlled trial of instrumental delivery vs emergency cesarean section are available, this manuscript provides contemporaneous national data from a high resource setting within a structured training program, to assist the selection of an appropriate instrument/method for the delivery of a malpositioned baby.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Fetal malposition is a common indication for Caesarean section in the second stage of labour. Rotational (Kielland) forceps are a valuable tool in select situations for successful vaginal delivery; however, learning opportunities are scarce. Our aim was to identify the verbal and non-verbal components of performing a safe Kielland forceps delivery through filmed demonstrations by expert practitioners on models to develop a task list for training purposes. METHODS: Labour and delivery nurses at three university-affiliated hospitals identified clinicians whom they considered skilled in Kielland forceps deliveries. These physicians gave consent and were filmed performing Kielland forceps deliveries on a model, describing their assessment and technique and sharing clinical pearls based on their experience. Two clinicians reviewed the videos independently and recorded verbal and non-verbal components of the assessment; thematic analysis was performed and a core task list was developed. The algorithm was circulated to participants to ensure consensus. RESULTS: Eleven clinicians were identified; eight participated. Common themes were prevention of persistent malposition where possible, a thorough assessment to determine suitability for forceps delivery, roles of the multidisciplinary team, description of the Kielland forceps and technical aspects related to their use, the importance of communication with the parents and the team (including consent, debriefing, and documentation), and "red flags" that indicate the need to stop when safety criteria cannot be met. CONCLUSION: Development of a cognitive task list, derived from years of experience with Kielland forceps deliveries by expert clinicians, provides an inclusive algorithm that may facilitate standardized resident training to enhance education in rotational forceps deliveries.

Objectif : La malposition fœtale constitue une indication courante menant à la tenue d'une césarienne au cours du deuxième stade du travail. Les forceps de Kielland sont un outil utile dans certaines situations pour assurer la réussite de l'accouchement vaginal; toutefois, les occasions d'en apprendre l'utilisation se font rares. Nous avions pour objectif d'identifier les composantes verbales et non verbales de la tenue en toute sûreté d'un accouchement au moyen de forceps de Kielland en filmant des démonstrations menées par des praticiens spécialisés sur des modèles, et ce, dans le but de rédiger une liste de tâches à des fins pédagogiques. Méthodes : Les infirmières du service d'obstétrique de trois hôpitaux universitaires ont identifié les cliniciens qu'elles considéraient comme étant compétents en ce qui concerne les accouchements par forceps de Kielland. Ces médecins ont consenti à l'entreprise et ont été filmés pendant l'exécution d'un accouchement par forceps de Kielland sur un modèle; pendant cette simulation, ils ont pris soin de décrire leur évaluation et leur technique, en plus de partager des conseils cliniques fondés sur leur expérience. Deux cliniciens ont passé en revue les vidéos de façon indépendante et ont consigné les composantes verbales et non verbales de l'évaluation; une analyse thématique a été menée et une liste de tâches de base a été élaborée. L'algorithme a été distribué aux participants afin d'assurer un consensus. Résultats : Onze cliniciens ont été identifiés; huit d'entre eux ont consenti à participer au projet. Les thèmes communs ont été la prévention de la malposition persistante (dans la mesure du possible), une évaluation exhaustive visant à déterminer la pertinence de la tenue d'un accouchement par forceps, les rôles de l'équipe multidisciplinaire, la description des forceps de Kielland et les aspects techniques associés à leur utilisation, l'importance de la communication avec les parents et l'équipe (y compris le consentement, le débreffage et la documentation), et les « signaux d'alarme ¼ qui indiquent la nécessité de mettre fin à l'intervention lorsque les critères d'innocuité ne peuvent être assurés. Conclusion : L'élaboration d'une liste de tâches cognitives, tirée des années d'expérience de cliniciens spécialisés en ce qui a trait à la tenue d'accouchements par forceps de Kielland, offre un riche algorithme qui pourrait faciliter la standardisation de la formation des résidents, de façon à améliorer l'enseignement de tels accouchements.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Rotational instrumental deliveries are thought to carry additional risks compared with non-rotational instrumental deliveries, including trauma to maternal tissues, and require specific expertise and training. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the association between the type of forceps delivery and maternal perineal trauma, and in particular to investigate if Kielland's rotational forceps delivery increases obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of 1,515 women who attended a tertiary maternity unit over a period of 5 years and had operative vaginal deliveries primarily or completed by forceps. Data were obtained through the hospital's maternity reporting system. The severity of maternal perineal trauma, particularly third and fourth-degree tears in relation to the type of forceps delivery was explored. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate the crude and the adjusted relative risks (RR) of sustaining third-degree tears compared with other types of vaginal tears. Univariate analyses explored the crude associations between relative risks and age, ethnicity, birth weight, type of instrumental delivery and operator's experience. A multivariate multinomial logistic regression model estimated the adjusted relative risks and included all the previous variables as independent covariates. RESULTS: Of the 1,492 women included in the study, 150 women (77 %) had sustained category 1 tears, 63 women (4 %) had sustained category 2 tears and 279 women (19 %) had sustained third-degree tears. There was no statistically significant association between the severity of maternal perineal trauma and the type of forceps delivery (failed ventouse vs Kielland's forceps RR 1.52, p = 0.159 CI 0.84-2.72, Wrigleys vs Kielland's RR 0.59, p = 0.249, CI 0.24-1.43; Andersons vs Kielland's RR 1.16, p = 0.603, CI 0.65-2.05) after adjusting for age, birth weight, BMI, ethnicity and operator experience (full list of covariates not included). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of third- and fourth-degree tears following rotational Kielland's forceps delivery and other non-rotational forceps deliveries is comparable.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Kielland's rotational forceps are designed to overcome malposition of the fetal head in the second stage of labor. After a decline in their use because of reported adverse outcomes and fear of litigation, recent evidence suggests that they may be safe and effective in trained hands and significantly more successful at achieving operative vaginal delivery than either rotational ventouse or manual rotation. This is important because of the increased short and long-term morbidity related to cesarean section compared with the reduced morbidity of subsequent pregnancy after operative vaginal delivery. Kielland's forceps are therefore re-emerging as a useful instrument in the armamentarium of modern obstetrics. Limitations to wider use of Kielland's forceps are the lack of training opportunities as well as that contemporary evidence remains underpowered to detect rare adverse outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of operative cephalic births by Kielland forceps (KF), rotational ventouse (RV), or primary emergency caesarean section (pEMCS) for malposition in the second stage of labour in modern practise. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. POPULATION: Data were included from 1291 consecutive full-term, singleton cephalic births between 2 November 2006 and 30 November 2010 with malposition of the fetal head during the second stage of labour leading to an attempt to deliver by KF, RV or pEMCS. METHODS: Maternal and neonatal outcomes of all KF births were compared with other methods of operative birth for malposition in the second stage of labour (RV or pEMCS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Achieving a vaginal birth was the primary outcome and fetal (admission to special care baby unit, low cord pH, low Apgar, shoulder dystocia, Erb's palsy) and maternal (massive obstetric haemorrhage-blood loss of >1500 ml, sphincter injury, length of stay in hospital) safety outcomes were also recorded. RESULTS: Women were more likely to need caesarean section if RV (22.4%) was selected to assist the birth rather than KF (3.7%; adjusted odds ratio 8.20; 95% confidence interval 4.54-14.79). Births by KF had a rate of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes comparable to those by RV and pEMCS in the second stage for malposition. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, in experienced hands, assisted vaginal birth by KF is likely to be the most effective and safe method to prevent the ever rising rate of caesarean sections when malposition complicates the second stage of labour.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To define the skills of a mid-cavity rotational forceps delivery to facilitate transfer of skills from expert obstetricians to trainee obstetricians. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative interviews and video analysis carried out at maternity units of two university teaching hospitals (St. Michael's Hospital, Bristol, and Ninewells Hospital, Dundee). Ten obstetricians were identified as experts in conducting operative vaginal deliveries. Semi-structured interviews were carried out to identify key technical skills. The experts were also video recorded conducting mid-cavity rotational deliveries in a simulation setting. The interviews and video recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic coding. The anonymised data were individually coded by the three researchers and then compared for consistency of interpretation. The experts reviewed the data for respondent validation. The themes that emerged following the coding were used to formulate a taxonomy of skills. RESULTS: Rotational forceps were preferred by eight experts and two experts preferred manual rotation followed by direct traction forceps. The final taxonomy included detailed technical skills for Kielland rotational forceps delivery and manual rotation followed by direct traction forceps delivery. CONCLUSION: This explicitly defined skills taxonomy could aid trainees' understanding of the technique of rotational forceps delivery. This is an important potential contributor to safely reducing the rate of second-stage caesarean section.

Asunto(s)