RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the protective effect of nitroglycerin ointment 2% and Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) in dorsal flaps of the rat. METHODS: A blind, experimental study was conducted in 24 male Wistar rats, with a mean weight of 320 (286-376) grams. Group 1: Control. Petrolatum jelly (Vaseline), n = 8, Group 2: Nitroglycerin (NTG) ointment 2% (Nitro-Bid, Altana Co.) n = 8, and Group 3: DMSO gel 90% (Neogen corp. Lexington KY, 40611), n = 8. RESULTS: A total of 24 rats were operated on in the 6-month period of this study. Using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test analysis, a statistically significant p was obtained between the control group and 2% NTG ointment, both in the area of necrosis and in the healthy area (p = 0.026). In contrast, the comparison between DMSO [CH3) 2SO] and the control group (p = 0.180) and between both study groups, with a p = 0.18, was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study concluded that there is a protective effect of 2% NTG ointment for flap survival in relation to the control group (petrolatum). DMSO administered topically did not show a protective effect, compared to the control group.
OBJETIVO: Comparar el efecto protector del ungüento de nitroglicerina 2% y el dimetilsulfoxido 90% en colgajos dorsales en ratas. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio experimental ciego en 24 ratas Wistar macho, con un peso medio de 320 gramos. Grupo 1: Control. Petrolato n = 8, Grupo 2: Nitroglicerina unguento al 2 % (Nitro-Bid, Altana Co.), n = 8, Grupo 3. Dimetilsulfóxido al 90% (Neogen corp. Lexington KY.), n = 8. RESULTADOS: Un total de 24 ratas fueron operadas en el período de 6 meses de este estudio. Mediante un análisis no paramétrico de la prueba U de Mann Whitney, se obtuvo una p estadísticamente significativa entre el grupo control y la pomada de nitroglicerina al 2%, tanto en el área de necrosis como en el área sana (p = 0.026). Por el contrario, la comparación entre DMSO y el grupo control (p = 0.180) y entre ambos grupos de estudio, con una p = 0.18, no fue significativa. CONCLUSIONES: Nuestro estudio concluyó que existe un efecto protector de la pomada de nitroglicerina al 2% para la supervivencia del colgajo en relación al grupo control (vaselina). El DMSO administrado por vía tópica no mostró un efecto protector, en comparación con el grupo de control.
Assuntos
Dimetil Sulfóxido , Nitroglicerina , Ratos , Masculino , Animais , Nitroglicerina/farmacologia , Dimetil Sulfóxido/farmacologia , Pomadas , Ratos Wistar , Necrose/prevenção & controle , Vaselina/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Topical agents used in combination with phototherapy or photochemotherapy may have both blocking or enhancing effects in ultraviolet rays. OBJECTIVE: In this in vivo study, the effects of topical petrolatum, basis cream, glycerine, and olive oil on the transmission of ultraviolet A radiation were investigated. METHODS: A test was performed to determine the minimal phototoxic dose on 29 volunteers with only psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) and then the same test was repeated with white petrolatum, basis cream, glycerine, olive oil, and sunscreen (0.3cc/25cm2). The effects of each agent on the minimal phototoxic dose were determined after 72 h. RESULTS: When compared to pure PUVA, there was a statistically significant increase in the mean minimal phototoxic dose values by the application of white petrolatum (P = 0.011), but there was no significant increase or decrease in the mean minimal phototoxic dose values after the application of basis cream (P = 0.326), glycerine (P = 0.611) or olive oil (P = 0.799). STUDY LIMITATIONS: Low number of patients Conclusion: The application of white petrolatum, which has a blocking effect, and also of basis cream immediately before PUVA therapy should not be recommended. Although we specify that glycerine and maybe olive oil can be used before photochemotherapy, there is a need for further research in larger series.
Assuntos
Emolientes/farmacologia , Terapia PUVA/métodos , Vaselina/farmacologia , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/farmacologia , Dermatopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Raios Ultravioleta , Dermatite Fototóxica/prevenção & controle , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Glicerol/farmacologia , Humanos , Azeite de Oliva/farmacologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Método Simples-Cego , Testes Cutâneos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Protetores Solares/farmacologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Abstract: Background: Topical agents used in combination with phototherapy or photochemotherapy may have both blocking or enhancing effects in ultraviolet rays. Objective: In this in vivo study, the effects of topical petrolatum, basis cream, glycerine, and olive oil on the transmission of ultraviolet A radiation were investigated. Methods: A test was performed to determine the minimal phototoxic dose on 29 volunteers with only psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) and then the same test was repeated with white petrolatum, basis cream, glycerine, olive oil, and sunscreen (0.3cc/25cm2). The effects of each agent on the minimal phototoxic dose were determined after 72 h. Results: When compared to pure PUVA, there was a statistically significant increase in the mean minimal phototoxic dose values by the application of white petrolatum (P = 0.011), but there was no significant increase or decrease in the mean minimal phototoxic dose values after the application of basis cream (P = 0.326), glycerine (P = 0.611) or olive oil (P = 0.799). Study limitations: Low number of patients Conclusion: The application of white petrolatum, which has a blocking effect, and also of basis cream immediately before PUVA therapy should not be recommended. Although we specify that glycerine and maybe olive oil can be used before photochemotherapy, there is a need for further research in larger series.
Assuntos
Humanos , Vaselina/farmacologia , Fotoquimioterapia/métodos , Terapia PUVA/métodos , Dermatopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Raios Ultravioleta , Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes/farmacologia , Emolientes/farmacologia , Protetores Solares/farmacologia , Fatores de Tempo , Testes Cutâneos , Método Simples-Cego , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento , Dermatite Fototóxica/prevenção & controle , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Azeite de Oliva/farmacologia , Glicerol/farmacologiaRESUMO
Application of vitamin K (vitK) to the skin has been used for suppression of pigmentation and resolution of bruising. However, there is no report concerning the extent of its penetration in the skin. In this study, we investigated the in vitro skin penetration and transdermal delivery of vitK, and whether these parameters may be enhanced by lipid-based drug delivery systems. The lipid formulation used in this study contains monoolein (MO), which is structured as a liquid crystalline phase, named hexagonal phase. The skin penetration of vitK was assessed in vitro using porcine ear skin mounted in a Franz diffusion cell. VitK (2.5%, w/w) was incorporated in either of three formulations: liquid vaseline, MO-based hexagonal phase gel (MO-vitK-water at 77.5/2.5/20, w/w/w) and MO-based nanodispersion of hexagonal phase (MO-vitK-poloxamer-water at 15/2.5/0.9/81.6, w/w/w/w). When vaseline was used, vitK was delivered mainly to the stratum corneum (SC): 9.50+/-0.97 microg/cm(2) of vitK was delivered to the SC at 12 h post-application, whereas 4.90 +/- 1.28 microg/cm(2) of vitK was delivered to the epidermis (E)+dermis (D) at the same time point. The hexagonal phase gel and the nanodispersion delivered approximately 2 times more vitK to the SC and 2.0-3.7 times more vitK to the [E+D] than the vaseline solution. The nanodispersion (but not the gel) also increased the transdermal delivery of vitK at 9 h ( approximately 3-fold increase). These results demonstrate that the topical delivery of vitK incorporated in a lipophilic vehicle is small, but it may be enhanced by MO-based systems, which might be useful to increase the effectiveness of topical vitK therapy.
Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos/metabolismo , Portadores de Fármacos , Glicerídeos/farmacologia , Cristais Líquidos , Vaselina/farmacologia , Absorção Cutânea/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Vitamina K/metabolismo , Administração Cutânea , Animais , Química Farmacêutica , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/química , Cultura em Câmaras de Difusão , Composição de Medicamentos , Géis , Glicerídeos/química , Cinética , Vaselina/química , Pele/metabolismo , Suínos , Vitamina K/administração & dosagem , Vitamina K/químicaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of different brands of nail varnish alone or associated with petroleum jelly as surface protectors for glass ionomer cements by determining dye uptake spectrophotometrically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred thirty six specimens, 3.0 mm in diameter and 1.0 mm thick, were made with Chelon-Fil (CF) and ChemFil II (CII) and divided into 14 groups for each material. Positive control (A) and negative control (B) specimens were not protected, while experimental specimens were protected with six brands of nail varnish used with and without petroleum jelly. The specimens were immersed in 0.05% methylene blue solution 10 minutes after mixing except for negative control specimens that were immersed in deionized water. RESULTS: Dye uptake (microgram dye/restoration) for CF was: A = 11.3 +/- 3.1; B = 0.0 +/- 0.0 with varnish groups ranging from 0.6 to 2.5 and for CII: A = 12.4 +/- 2.5; B = 0.0 +/- 0.0 with varnish groups ranging from 0.4 to 2.4. The data were analyzed by ANOVA. The dye uptake among the groups was not significantly different (P < 0.01), except for the control group (unprotected cements).