Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 39(8): 848-859, 2019 07 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30137191

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture (CC) has remained an unresolved issue throughout history. Strong evidence focuses on bacterial biofilm as its main source. A literature review revealed that more than 90% of bacteria found in capsules and implants removed from patients with Baker grade III-IV CC belong to the resident skin microbiome (Staphylococcus epidermidis, predominant microorganism). The use of an adequate preoperative skin antiseptic may be a critical step to minimize implant contamination and help prevent biofilm-related CC. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to compare the effect of 2 different antiseptic skin preparations: povidone-iodine (PVP-I) vs chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) on CC proportions after primary breast augmentation through a periareolar approach. METHODS: In June of 2014, The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America proposed to use CHG for preoperative skin preparation in the absence of alcohol-containing antiseptic agents as strategy to prevent surgical site infection. The clinical safety committee of a surgical center in Colombia decided to change PVP-I to CHG for surgical site preparation thereafter. The medical records of 63 patients who underwent to primary breast augmentation through a periareolar approach during 2014 were reviewed. In the first 6 months PVP-I was used in 32 patients, and later CHG was employed in 31 patients. RESULTS: Pearson's chi-squared test to compare CC proportions between subgroups showed a statistically significant difference. The CC proportion was higher for patients who had antisepsis with PVP-I. CC was absent when CHG was employed. CONCLUSIONS: CHG as preoperative skin antiseptic for primary breast augmentation surgery was more effective than PVP-I to help prevent biofilm-related CC.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Biofilmes , Implante Mamário/efeitos adversos , Contratura Capsular em Implantes/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Administração Cutânea , Adolescente , Adulto , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Contratura Capsular em Implantes/diagnóstico , Contratura Capsular em Implantes/epidemiologia , Contratura Capsular em Implantes/microbiologia , Microbiota/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Povidona-Iodo/administração & dosagem , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Pele/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolamento & purificação , Adulto Jovem
2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 137(1): 62-69, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26710008

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Besides being a procedure with high level of patient satisfaction, one of the main causes for reoperation after breast augmentation is related to contour deformities and changes in breast volume. Few objective data are available on postoperative volumetric analysis following breast augmentation. The aim of this study was to evaluate volume changes in the breast parenchyma and pectoralis major muscle after breast augmentation with the placement of silicone implants in the subglandular and submuscular planes. METHODS: Fifty-eight women were randomly allocated either to the subglandular group (n = 24) or submuscular group (n = 24) and underwent breast augmentation in the subglandular or submuscular plane, respectively, or to a control group (n = 10) and received no intervention. Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging was performed at inclusion in all participants and either after 6 and 12 months in the control group or at 6 and 12 months after surgery in the intervention groups. RESULTS: Twelve months after breast augmentation, only the subglandular group had a significant reduction in glandular volume (mean, 22.8 percent), while patients in the submuscular group were the only ones showing significant reduction in muscle volume (mean, 49.80 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Atrophy of the breast parenchyma occurred after subglandular breast augmentation, but not following submuscular breast augmentation. In contrast, submuscular breast augmentation caused atrophy of the pectoralis major muscle. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.


Assuntos
Implantes de Mama , Contratura Capsular em Implantes/diagnóstico , Mamoplastia/métodos , Glândulas Mamárias Humanas/cirurgia , Músculos Peitorais/cirurgia , Adulto , Axila/cirurgia , Brasil , Estética , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Glândulas Mamárias Humanas/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Músculos Peitorais/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Aesthet Surg J ; 34(5): 769-75, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24963064

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture (CC) is a common complication after breast augmentation. Autologous fat grafting may be effective for restoring tissue vascularization and function. OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated the efficacy of autologous fat grafting in a porcine model as a treatment for CC after breast augmentation. METHODS: This prospective study was performed in 20 female 30-day-old pigs. Each animal was implanted with three 30-cc textured silicone implants (stage 1 of the experiment). Group A served as the untreated control group. To induce CC, 2 mL of autologous fibrin glue was applied to the pericapsular space in group B and C animals at implantation. Three months after implantation (stage 2), the CCs of all groups were assessed by Baker classification and applanation tonometry (AT). Liposuction was performed in group B to harvest fat for these animals. Three months after group B underwent fat grafting, all 3 groups were reevaluated. Reassessments included Baker classification, AT, histologic analysis, and tensiometry (stage 3). RESULTS: The deposition of mature and immature collagen was similar for the 3 groups. The amount of fat remaining around the implanted capsules did not differ significantly between the groups. At stage 3, group B exhibited significantly larger tonometry areas than did group C. The CCs in groups B and C were significantly thicker than those of group A, but the difference between groups B and C was not significant. Capsule rupture forces did not differ significantly between groups A and B but were significantly higher in group C compared with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results in this animal model indicate that pericapsular lipoinjection may be a promising treatment for CC in humans.


Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Implante Mamário/efeitos adversos , Contratura Capsular em Implantes/cirurgia , Animais , Implante Mamário/instrumentação , Implantes de Mama , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Contratura Capsular em Implantes/diagnóstico , Contratura Capsular em Implantes/etiologia , Silicones , Sus scrofa , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA