RESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the dosing patterns of regorafenib in a real-world population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a routine clinical practice setting in Spain, focusing on the starting dose of regorafenib. METHODS: An observational, retrospective, multicenter study that included patients ≥ 18 years old who had histologically documented mCRC and who had initiated treatment with regorafenib since January 2017. Post hoc categorization of dosing patterns revealed the following: initial dose < 160 mg and dose escalation, initial dose < 160 mg and maintenance, initial dose equal to 160 mg and maintenance, and initial dose equal to 160 mg and dose reduction. RESULTS: Most patients (152/241, 63.8%) initiated treatment with regorafenib at doses < 160 mg. There was large variation in the starting dose of regorafenib over time: in 2017, most patients (59%) initiated regorafenib at a dose of 160 mg, this proportion decreased to 6% in 2021. There were no significant differences in the median progression-free survival according to the regorafenib dose patterns during the first two cycles. The proportion of patients who reported at least one adverse event (AE), had a grade 3-4 AE or had an AE leading to dose reduction was greater in the group of patients who received an initial dose equal to 160 and reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that physicians in Spain have gradually adopted a dose-escalation approach during cycle 1, which is a common practice for starting treatment with a reduced dose (< 160 mg/day), a strategy that seems to improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Retrospective data suggest an association between bevacizumab efficacy and the incidence of arterial hypertension (AHT). Additionally, epigenetic mechanisms have been related to AHT. METHODS: This prospective observational study conducted by GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group included metastatic breast (MBC) or colorectal (mCRC) cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Blood pressure (BP) levels were measured (conventional and 24-h Holter monitoring) at baseline and up to cycle 3. Primary endpoint assessed BP levels increase as predictive factor for progression-free survival (PFS). Germline DNA methylation profile was explored in pre-treatment blood samples; principal component analysis was used to define an epigenetic predictive score for increased BP levels. RESULTS: From Oct-2012 to Jul-2016, 143 (78 MBC and 65 mCRC) patients were included. The incidence of AHT according to guidelines was neither predictive of PFS nor of best overall tumor response (BOR). No statistically significant association was observed with systolic BP nor diastolic BP increment for PFS or BOR. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were observed in 37 and 5% of patients, respectively. We identified 27 sites which baseline methylation status was significantly associated to BP levels increase secondary to bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the frequency of AHT nor the increase of BP levels were predictive of efficacy in MBC and mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01733628.
Assuntos
Bevacizumab , Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias Colorretais , Hipertensão , Humanos , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipertensão/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Masculino , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Metilação de DNARESUMO
Lack of expression of the tumour suppressor gene caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2) associates with poor outcomes in early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). Yet its prognostic value in the context of other prognostic biomarkers in metastatic CRC (mCRC) is unknown. Overexpressed cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) has been reported in advanced CRC. However, CDX2 and COX2 relationship in mCRC remains undetermined. We aimed to assess their expression in mCRC tumours from a clinically characterised cohort and their influence on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in first line. Among 720 consecutive mCRC patients, 346 had tumour samples appropriate for tissue microarray assembly and immunohistochemistry analyses. Clinical and survival data were retrospectively assessed. Loss of CDX2 expression was detected in 27 (7.8%) samples, enriched in poorly differentiated tumours (20%; p < 0.01) and in those with the BRAF p.V600E variant (40%; p < 0.01). Most tumours (93.4%) expressed COX2. COX2-negative samples were enriched in poorly differentiated mCRC. In unadjusted analyses, median OS (p < 0.001) and median PFS (p < 0.05) were inferior for patients with CDX2-negative versus CDX2-positive tumours. In conclusion, loss of CDX2 was significantly associated with poorly differentiated mCRC and BRAF p.V600E allele and a prognostic marker of worse OS.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) using the most recent data available. METHODS: The literature on the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 versus placebo and/or best supportive care (BSC) in mCRC was obtained through a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through January 2023. Identify the included literature and extract pertinent data, such as the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), disease control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: There were eight eligible articles that included 2903 patients (1964 TAS-102 versus 939 Placebo and/or BSC). In this meta-analysis, TAS-102 treatment resulted in longer OS, PFS, TTF, and higher DCR in patients with mCRC versus placebo and/or BSC. TAS-102 improved OS and PFS in subgroup analyses of mCRC patients with KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutant-type. In addition, TAS-102 did not increase the incidence of serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: TAS-102 can enhance the prognosis of mCRC patients whose standard therapy has failed, regardless of KRAS mutation status, and its safety is acceptable.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Pirrolidinas , Neoplasias Retais , Timina , Humanos , Trifluridina/efeitos adversos , Uracila/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras) , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Despite molecular selection, patients (pts) with RAS wildtype mCRC represent a heterogeneous population including diversity in metastatic spread. We investigated metastatic patterns for their prognostic and predictive impact on maintenance therapy with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid ± panitumumab. The study population was stratified according to (1) number of involved metastatic sites (single vs multiple organ metastasis), liver-limited disease vs (2) liver metastasis plus one additional site, and (3) vs liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regressions were used to correlate efficacy endpoints. Single organ metastasis was observed in 133 pts (53.6%) with 102 pts (41.1%) presenting with liver-limited disease, while multiple organ metastases were reported in 114 pts (46.0). Multiple compared to single organ metastases were associated with less favorable PFS (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.93; P = .004) and OS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.98-1.93; P = .068) of maintenance therapy. While metastatic spread involving one additional extrahepatic site was not associated with clearly impaired survival compared to liver-limited disease, pts with liver metastasis plus ≥two additional sites demonstrated less favorable PFS (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.30-2.83; P < .001), and OS (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.51-3.76; P < .001) of maintenance therapy. Pmab-containing maintenance therapy appeared active in both pts with multiple (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .006) as well as to a lesser numerical extent in pts with single organ metastasis (HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.57-1.21; P = .332; Interaction P = .183). These data may support clinical decisions when EGFR-based maintenance therapy is considered.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Panitumumabe , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) should be tested for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). We aimed to describe the dMMR/MSI-H testing practice in patients with mCRC in Spanish centers. METHODS: Multicenter, observational retrospective study that included patients newly diagnosed with mCRC or who progressed to a metastatic stage from early/localized stages. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were included in the study from May 2020 through May 2021, with a median age of 68 years, and two hundred twenty-five (75%) had stage IV disease at initial diagnosis; two hundred eighty-four patients received first-line treatment, and dMMR/MSI-H testing was performed in two hundred fifty-one (84%) patients. The results of the dMMR/MSI-H tests were available in 61 (24%) of 251 patients before the diagnosis of metastatic disease and in 191 (81%) of 236 evaluable patients for this outcome before the initiation of first-line treatment. Among the 244 patients who were tested for dMMR/MSI-H with IHC or PCR, 14 (6%) were MMR deficient. The most frequent type of first-line treatment was the combination of chemotherapy and biological agent, that was received by 71% and 50% of patients with MMR proficient and deficient tumors, respectively, followed by chemotherapy alone, received in over 20% of patients in each subgroup. Only 29% of dMMR/MSI-H tumors received first-line immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that a high proportion of patients with mCRC are currently tested for dMMR/MSI-H in tertiary hospitals across Spain. However, there is still room for improvement until universal testing is achieved. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Síndromes Neoplásicas Hereditárias , Neoplasias Retais , Idoso , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Estudos Retrospectivos , EspanhaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a complex disease with high mortality rates. Over time, the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has gradually improved due to the development of modern chemotherapy and targeted therapy regimens. However, due to the inherent heterogeneity of this condition, identifying reliable predictive biomarkers for targeted therapies remains challenging. A recent promising classification system-the consensus molecular subtype (CMS) system-offers the potential to categorize mCRC patients based on their unique biological and molecular characteristics. Four distinct CMS categories have been defined: immune (CMS1), canonical (CMS2), metabolic (CMS3), and mesenchymal (CMS4). Nevertheless, there is currently no standardized protocol for accurately classifying patients into CMS categories. To address this challenge, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and next-generation genomic sequencing (NGS) techniques may hold promise for precisely classifying mCRC patients into their CMSs. AIM: To investigate if mCRC patients can be classified into CMS categories using a standardized molecular biology workflow. METHODS: This observational study was conducted at the University of Chile Clinical Hospital and included patients with unresectable mCRC who were undergoing systemic treatment with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. Molecular biology techniques were employed to analyse primary tumour samples from these patients. RT-qPCR was utilized to assess the expression of genes associated with fibrosis (TGF-ß and ß-catenin) and cell growth pathways (c-MYC). NGS using a 25-gene panel (TumorSec) was performed to identify specific genomic mutations. The patients were then classified into one of the four CMS categories according to the clinical consensus of a Tumour Board. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients prior to their participation in this study. All techniques were conducted at University of Chile. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were studied with the techniques and then evaluated by the Tumour Board to determine the specific CMS. Among them, 23% (n = 6), 19% (n = 5), 31% (n = 8), and 19% (n = 5) were classified as CMS1, CMS2, CMS3, and CMS4, respectively. Additionally, 8% of patients (n = 2) could not be classified into any of the four CMS categories. The median overall survival of the total sample was 28 mo, and for CMS1, CMS2, CMS3 and CMS4 it was 11, 20, 30 and 45 mo respectively, with no statistically significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: A molecular biology workflow and clinical consensus analysis can be used to accurately classify mCRC patients. This classification process, which divides patients into the four CMS categories, holds significant potential for improving research strategies and targeted therapies tailored to the specific characteristics of mCRC.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The PanaMa trial demonstrated significant benefit in progression-free survival with the addition of panitumumab (Pmab) to fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) as maintenance therapy following first-line induction therapy with FOLFOX/Pmab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Here, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) analyses from the PanaMa trial. METHODS: HRQOL outcomes were evaluated using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at every cycle of therapy until disease progression/death. HRQOL outcomes were mean and individual changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 from baselines (before induction therapy and before maintenance therapy) to each cycle of treatment. Comparative analyses were performed by randomisation status and treatment arm for induction- and maintenance-therapy, respectively. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01991873). RESULTS: At least one HRQOL questionnaire was completed by a total of 349/377 (93%) patients who received induction therapy, and by 237/248 (96%) patients who were randomised and received maintenance therapy. During induction therapy, most HRQOL dimensions remained stable or showed improvement, while appetite loss and diarrhoea significantly deteriorated. During maintenance therapy, HRQOL dimensions remained stable, while those that deteriorated during induction therapy showed significant improvement, without significant differences between the treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Maintenance therapy improves HRQOL dimensions that initially deteriorated during induction therapy while stabilising HRQOL in other dimensions. The addition of Pmab to FU/FA as maintenance therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs progression-free survival without negative impact on HRQOL.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Panitumumabe , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Recent advances in biomarker-driven therapies have changed the landscape of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and brought not only access issues but also difficulties for the treating physician (especially generalist oncologists) in choosing the most suitable treatment for each individual patient. This manuscript proposes an algorithm developed by The Brazilian Group of Gastrointestinal Tumours with the aim of bringing easy-to-follow steps in the management of unresectable mCRC. The algorithm is based on evidence for fit patients to facilitate therapeutic decisions in the clinical practice and assumes that there are no access and resource limitations.
RESUMO
Colorectal cancer is a disease of older patients, but few guidelines directly address age in their recommendations. Older patients may present comorbidities that affect the choice of chemotherapy, and care must be taken when choosing the best approach. This narrative review aimed to describe the literature regarding approved oral agents for third-line treatment in older patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, regorafenib, and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI).
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Demência Frontotemporal , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Idoso , Trifluridina/uso terapêutico , Uracila/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Demência Frontotemporal/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The second-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with FOLFIRI-aflibercept demonstrated an increase in survival compared with FOLFIRI in patients previously treated with oxaliplatin-based regimens. Few data are available in patients treated previously with bevacizumab. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI-aflibercept in second-line treatment in patients who have previously received bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a observational, retrospective study of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFIRI-aflibercept in 2nd line in eight hospitals in the Valencian Community. Survival, response, and toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: 122 patients with a median age of 61 years were included. 89% of patients had PS 0-1. The median of PFS (progression free survival) and OS (overall survival) was 5.45 (95% CI 4.74-6.15 months) and 10.15 (95% CI 7.47-12.82 months), respectively. Disease control rate 59.8%. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (13,1%) and asthenia (9%). The presence of hypertension during treatment with FOLFIRI-aflibercept was associated with a survival benefit. Median of OS was 14.45 (95% CI 11.58-17.32) in patients with hypertension vs 7.78 (95% CI 5.02-10.54) in patients without hypertension (p = .001). Our results suggest that the presence of PS 0, primary tumor surgery, metachronous metastases, and the presence of only 1 metastatic location, are favorable prognostic factors associated with better OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the value of maintaining angiogenesis inhibition with FOLFIRI-aflibercept in mCRC after progression to a first-line treatment with bevacizumab. The development of hypertension during treatment is a possible predictive marker of response.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Hipertensão , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Camptotecina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/induzido quimicamente , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Metástase Neoplásica/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is effective for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, cetuximab resistance often occur and the mechanism has not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of asparaginyl endopeptidase (AEP) in cetuximab resistance. METHODS: Differentially expressed genes between cetuximab responders and non-responders were identified by analyzing the gene expression profile GSE5851, retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The potential genes were further validated in cetuximab-resistant CRC cell lines. The expression of AEP in the peripheral blood and tumor tissues of mCRC patients in our hospital were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunohistochemistry, respectively. The survival analysis was carried out by Kaplan-Meier method. The function and associated pathways of AEP were further investigated by lentivirus transfection, CCK8 assay, colony formation assay, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and western blot. RESULTS: Through bioinformatics analysis, we found that the expression of AEP gene was related to progress free survival (PFS) of mCRC patients treated with cetuximab alone (P = 0.00133). The expression of AEP was significantly higher in the cetuximab-resistant CRC cell lines, as well as in mCRC patients with shorter PFS treated with cetuximab-containing therapy. Furthermore, AEP could decrease the sensitivity of CRC cells to cetuximab in vitro. And the phosphorylation level of MEK and ERK1/2 was increased in AEP overexpression cells. The downregulation of AEP using specific inhibitors could partially restore the sensitivity of CRC cells to cetuximab. CONCLUSION: The higher expression of AEP could contribute to the shorter PFS of cetuximab treatment in mCRC. The reason might be that AEP could promote the phosphorylation of MEK/ERK protein in the downstream signal pathway of EGFR.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Cisteína Endopeptidases , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Cetuximab/farmacologia , Cetuximab/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Quinases de Proteína Quinase Ativadas por Mitógeno/metabolismo , Mutação , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retais/genética , Transdução de Sinais , Cisteína Endopeptidases/genética , Cisteína Endopeptidases/metabolismo , Sistema de Sinalização das MAP QuinasesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, depth of response (DpR) has gained importance as a novel end-point in clinical trials. We investigated the overall DpR, as well as the prognostic and predictive impact of DpR to induction therapy (six cycles of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin [FU/FA], oxaliplatin [FOLFOX] and panitumumab [Pmab]) on consecutive maintenance therapy (FU/FA plus Pmab or FU/FA alone) in patients treated within the PanaMa trial. METHODS: Central radiological assessment was performed according to RECIST 1.1. DpR was defined as percentage change in tumour diameter within defined time intervals (induction therapy, maintenance therapy, total course of therapy). For prognostic and predictive analyses, median DpR (
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia de Indução , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Panitumumabe , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the R0 resection rate in KRAS wild-type (WT), liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients initially identified as having unresectable disease who were treated with FOLFOX7 plus cetuximab. Exploratory molecular analyses were undertaken before and after treatment. METHODS: Twenty patients were enrolled. None had prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Cetuximab was added to a FOLFOX7 backbone and administered at 500 mg/m2 every 14 days with dose reductions to 400 and 300 mg/m2 in the event of toxicity. In the absence of toxicity, dose-escalations to 600, 700, and 800 mg/m2 were allowed. The mean dose of cetuximab (mg/m2 /week) throughout the study was 289 mg/m2 . Paired samples were collected for correlative studies, where feasible. RESULTS: We assessed the conversion rates from unresectable to resectable in hepatic-only, KRAS exon 2 WT mCRC. Seventeen of 20 patients undergoing chemotherapy were considered resectable by imaging criteria; R0 resection was achieved in 15/20 patients. Molecular profiling revealed heterogeneity between patients at the gene-expression, pathway signaling, and immune-profile levels. CONCLUSIONS: Although 15/20 (75%) converted to R0 resection, by 2 years, 10/15 R0 resections had recurred. Therefore, chemotherapy plus cetuximab is of limited long-term benefit in this setting. ctDNA analysis may guide additional therapy including immunotherapy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Cetuximab/uso terapêutico , Camptotecina , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Fluoruracila , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , LeucovorinaRESUMO
Objective: To analyze the frequency of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF hotspot mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Observational, descriptive and retrospective study in mCRC patients with available ctDNA-based genotype of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. Results: The frequencies of plasma mutations for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF were 34% (± 7), 4% (± 3) and 4% (± 3), respectively. Median overall survival of plasma-tested RAS/BRAF-mutated patients was 26.6 months (95% CI: 14.4-not estimable [NE]), while RAS/BRAF wild-type patients did not reach the median survival during follow-up. Median progression-free survival for RAS/BRAF wild-type and RAS/BRAF-mutated patients was 12 (95% CI: 7-NE) and 4 months (95% CI: 4-NE), respectively. Conclusion: Our work supports the utility of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis in liquid biopsy from mCRC patients.
Assuntos
DNA Tumoral Circulante , Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Retais , DNA Tumoral Circulante/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , GTP Fosfo-Hidrolases/genética , Humanos , Biópsia Líquida , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Mutação , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Some patients with histologically confirmed primary mCRC and mutated RAS reported undetectable RAS mutant clones in plasma after receiving anti-VEGF treatment. The aim was to prospectively assess it with its potential therapeutic implications. METHODS: RAS mutant genes in solid biopsy (before first-line treatment: FOLFOX/CAPOX + bevacizumab) were compared in liquid biopsy (before second-line treatment: panitumumab + FOLFIRI), using Idylla™ system. Discordant results between solid/liquid biopsies were assessed by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) test (solid/liquid biopsies). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were assessed (seven had RAS mutant discrepancies between solid/liquid biopsies). The NGS test confirmed that 3/23 (13%) patients had undetectable RAS mutant clones in liquid biopsy and 3/23 (13%) presented discrepancies in solid biopsy (Idylla™ system vs. NGS test). CONCLUSION: Thirteen percentage of patients had undetectable RAS mutant clones in liquid biopsy after first-line treatment. However, some discrepancies between solid and liquid biopsies have been observed. These results suggest a need to improve accuracy of RAS analyses, especially in solid biopsies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Células Clonais/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Mutação , Panitumumabe/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The discovery of predictive biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is essential to improve clinical outcomes. Recent data suggest a potential role of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as prognostic indicators. We conducted a follow-on analysis from a prospective study of consecutive patients with mCRC. CTC analysis was conducted at two timepoints: baseline (CTC1; before starting chemotherapy), and two months after starting treatment (CTC2). CTC isolation/quantification were completed by ISET® (Rarecells, France). CTC expressions of drug resistance-associated proteins were evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Seventy-five patients were enrolled from May 2012 to May 2014. A CTC1 cut-off of >1.5 CTCs/mL was associated with an inferior median OS compared to lower values. A difference of CTC2-CTC1 > 5.5 CTCs/mL was associated with a reduced median PFS. By multivariate analysis, CTC1 > 1.5 CTCs/mL was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS. Multi-drug resistance protein-1 (MRP-1) expression was associated with poor median OS. CTC baseline counts, kinetics, and MRP-1 expression were predictive of clinical outcomes. Larger studies are warranted to explore the potential clinical benefit of treating mCRC patients with targeted therapeutic regimens guided by CTC findings.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance for the management of RAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in daily practice. METHODS: Nominal group and Delphi techniques were used. A steering committee of seven experts analyzed the current management of RAS wt mCRC, through which they identified controversies, critically analyzed the available evidence, and formulated several guiding statements for clinicians. Subsequently, a group of 30 experts (the expert panel) was selected to test agreement with the statements, through two Delphi rounds. The following response categories were established in both rounds: 1 = totally agree, 2 = basically agree, 3 = basically disagree, 4 = totally disagree. Agreement was defined if ≥ 75% of answers were in categories 1 and 2 (consensus with the agreement) or 3 and 4 (consensus with the disagreement). RESULTS: Overall, 71 statements were proposed, which incorporated the following areas: (1) overarching principles; (2) tumor location; (3) triplets; (4) maintenance; (5) second-line and beyond treatments; (6) Rechallenge and liquid biopsy. After the two Delphi rounds, only six statements maintained a lack of clear consensus. CONCLUSIONS: This document aims to describe the expert's attitude when dealing with several common clinical questions regarding patients with RAS wt mCRC.
Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Genes ras/genética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapêutico , Colo Ascendente/patologia , Colo Transverso/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/genética , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Genótipo , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Biópsia Líquida , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/métodos , Compostos Organoplatínicos/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , RetratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent neoplasms worldwide, and the majority of patients are diagnosed in advanced stages. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harbors several mutations with different prognostic and predictive values; KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations are the best known. Indeed, RAS and BRAF molecular status are associated with a different response to monoclonal antibodies (Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor agents), which are usually added to chemotherapy in first-line, and thus allow to select the optimal therapy for patients with mCRC. Furthermore, sidedness is an important predictive and prognostic factor in mCRC, which is explained by the different molecular profile of left and right-sided tumors. Recently, microsatellite instability-high has emerged as a predictive factor of response and survival from immune checkpoint inhibitors in mCRC. Finally, several other alterations have been described in lower frequencies, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 overexpression/amplification, PIK3CA pathway alterations, phosphatase and tension homolog loss, and hepatocyte growth factor/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor pathway dysregulation, with several targeted therapies already demonstrating activity or being tested in currently ongoing clinical trials. AIM: To review the importance of studying the predictive and prognostic roles of the molecular profile of mCRC, the changes occurred in recent years and how they would potentially change in the near future, to guide physicians in treatment decisions. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: Today, several different therapeutic options can be offered to patients in the first-line setting of mCRC. Therapies at present approved or under investigation in clinical trials will be thoroughly reviewed, with special emphasis on the molecular rationale behind them. Understanding the molecular status, resistance mechanisms and potential new druggable targets may allow physicians to choose the best therapeutic option in the first-line mCRC.