RESUMO

A significant limitation of numerous current genetic engineering therapy approaches is their limited control over the strength, timing, or cellular context of their therapeutic effect. Synthetic gene/genetic circuits are synthetic biology approaches that can control the generation, transformation, or depletion of a specific DNA, RNA, or protein and provide precise control over gene expression and cellular behavior. They can be designed to perform logical operations by carefully selecting promoters, repressors, and other genetic components. Patent search was performed in Espacenet, resulting in 38 selected patents with 15 most frequent international classifications. Patent embodiments were categorized into applications for the delivery of therapeutic molecules, treatment of infectious diseases, treatment of cancer, treatment of bleeding, and treatment of metabolic disorders. The logic gates of selected genetic circuits are described to comprehensively demonstrate their therapeutic applications. Synthetic gene circuits can be customized for precise control of therapeutic interventions, leading to personalized therapies that respond specifically to individual patient needs, enhancing treatment efficacy and minimizing side effects. They can be highly sensitive biosensors that provide real-time therapy by accurate monitoring various biomarkers or pathogens and appropriately synthesizing a therapeutic molecule. Synthetic gene circuits may also lead to the development of advanced regenerative therapies and to implantable biodevices that produce on-demand bioactive molecules. However, this technology faces challenges for commercial profitability. The genetic circuit designs need adjustments for specific applications, and may have disadvantages like toxicity from multiple regulators, homologous recombination, context dependency, resource overuse, and environmental variability.

RESUMO

La pandemia de COVID-19 demostró que las políticas públicas relacionadas con la propiedad intelectual y el derecho de la competencia no fueron adecuadas o suficientemente articuladas para permitir el acceso oportuno de la población a las vacunas de manera equitativa, debido a distorsiones en su fabricación, distribución y venta cuando éstas estuvieron disponibles durante la pandemia. Esta investigación tiene como objetivo analizar, desde una perspectiva jurídica, si los problemas observados se originan en una inadecuada aplicación de la legislación que regula la propiedad intelectual y su relación con otras políticas públicas vinculadas a la competencia, o, eventualmente, en el ejercicio abusivo de tales derechos, y que, como consecuencia, distorsionaría el proceso de competencia en los mercados nacionales y regionales.

The COVID 19 pandemic demonstrated that public policies related to intellectual property and competition law were not adequate or sufficiently articulated to allow timely access to vaccines in an equitable manner, due to distortions in the manufacture, distribution, and sale of COVID-19 vaccines when they were available during the pandemic. This research aims to analyze, from a legal perspective, whether the observed problems originate in an inadequate application of intellectual property legislation and its relationship with other public policies related to competition, or, eventually, in the abusive exercise of such rights, which, as a consequence, would distort the process of competition in national and regional markets.

A pandemia de COVID 19 demostrou que as políticas públicas relacionadas com a propriedade intelectual e o direito de competência não foram adequados ou suficientemente articulados para permitir o acesso oportuno da população às vacinas de maneira equitativa, devido a distorções na fabricação, distribuição e venda de vacinas COVID-19, quando estavam disponíveis durante a pandemia. Esta investigação tem como objetivo analizar, desde uma perspectiva jurídica, se os problemas observados se originam em uma inadequada aplicação da legislação que regula a propriedade intelectual e sua relação com outras políticas públicas vinculadas à competência ou, eventualmente, no exercício abusivo de tais direitos, e que, como consequência, distorceria o processo de competência nos mercados nacionais e regionais.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The ora-pro-nóbis (Pereskia aculeata Mill.) is a plant from Brazilian biodiversity used for food and medicinal purposes. It has ample technological potential, however, it is still underutilized, being classified as a Non-Conventional Food Plant (PANC). Prospective studies in intellectual property banks make it possible to expand perspectives for scientific research, enhancing the generation of new products. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the patents of products containing Pereskia aculeata Mill. for the areas of food and health in intellectual property databases. METHODS: The study was conducted through structured prospective investigation (collection, processing and analysis) in 4 patent databases: National Institute of Intellectual Property (INPI) - Brazil, United States Patent and Trademark Office, World Trade Organization Intellectual Property (WIPO) and Espacenet. RESULTS: The evaluation showed a reduced number of registered patents. In general, 8 patent applications were examined, of which 7 are directly associated with the species (and its derivatives) and 1 is related to a device specially designed for harvesting leaves/fruits and removing thorns. The focus of the patents was the use of the species in the food, pharmaceutical and biotechnological areas, with emphasis on the use of the leaves in the extraction of mucilage and proteins. CONCLUSION: This study showed that Pereskia aculeata Mill. is a technologically promising plant, because of its nutritional and medicinal composition, and it is important to encourage innovation and the development of new products with the species.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo A covid-19 jogou luz sobre o impacto negativo da propriedade intelectual na saúde e deu nova relevância à Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 5529/DF, que, acatada pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal em 2021, culminou na extinção da extensão automática de patentes no Brasil. Este estudo busca analisar o efeito do julgamento histórico da ADI 5529/DF sobre pedidos de patente e as patentes de interesse das Parcerias para Desenvolvimento Produtivo (PDP). Trata-se de um estudo com base em uma pesquisa documental de análise do andamento, até 31 de dezembro de 2020, de 90 pedidos de patente relacionados a 15 medicamentos objetos de PDP. Nos sites do Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial, do Ministério da Saúde, da Anvisa e da Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos, foram pesquisadas variáveis para comparar o cenário patentário dos medicamentos com o das PDP. De 88 pedidos válidos, 28 patentes foram concedidas, das quais dezessete foram estendidas para mais de vinte anos (média de 24 anos e nove meses). A decisão do STF resultou em mais de 68 anos de monopólio perdidos, potencialmente desanuviando alternativas para a produção de genéricos no país. Neste momento de retomada das PDP, estratégias para a superação de barreiras patentárias deveriam ser incorporadas à política.

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has shed light on the negative impact of intellectual property on health and has given new relevance to the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 5529/DF, which was ruled by the Supreme Court in 2021, resulting in the extinction of automatic patent extensions in Brazil. This documentary case study analyzes the effects of the judicial decision on patent applications and patents of interest for Productive Development Partnerships (PDP), investigating the progress of 90 patent applications related to 15 PDPs drugs of interest until Decembre 31, 2020. Variables for comparing the drug patent scenario with that of the PDPs were researched on the websites of the National Institute of Industrial Property, the Ministry of Health, ANVISA, and the Brazilian Medicines Market Regulation Chamber. Of 88 valid applications, 28 patents were granted, 17 of which had been extended to more than 20 years (24 years and 09 months average). The court decision resulted in a loss of over 68 years of monopoly, potentially opening alternatives for generic production. This resumption of the PDP policy should incorporate strategies to overcome patent barriers.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo Os queijos roquefort e canastra são produtos de origem animal com reconhecimento de identificação geográfica, fabricados com leite cru por meio de modos de produção centenários. Para proteção da identidade e qualidade únicas de produtos como esses, tratados e acordos foram celebrados na comunidade internacional. Ao mesmo tempo, há um debate quanto à segurança sanitária deles devido à utilização de leite sem processamento térmico, o que gera barreiras à sua comercialização, existindo normas sanitárias internacionais internalizadas na legislação dos países signatários que devem ser aplicadas à produção tradicional, mesmo que às vezes com adaptações. Este trabalho teve por objetivo promover uma revisão não sistemática ao analisar o conteúdo de tratados, acordos e normas internacionais, comerciais e sanitárias, além das legislações brasileira, francesa e da União Europeia, a fim de verificar a robustez dos processos de regulação previstos. Concluiu-se que os documentos levantados têm potencial abrangente para a proteção qualitativa e sanitária dos produtos elencados, ficando a concretização dessas garantias a cargo da aplicabilidade da teoria nos processos de fabricação, registro, fiscalização e inspeção dos países, não menosprezando a necessidade de alerta para grupos vulneráveis da população sobre o consumo desses produtos.

Abstract Roquefort and Canastra cheese are products of animal origin with Geographical Identification recognition. They are made with raw milk in a centuries-old traditional production. To protect the unique identity and quality of products such as these, treaties and agreements have been passed in the international community. At the same time, a debate revolves around food safety due to the use of milk without heat treatment, which creates barriers to commercialization. Thus, international health standards, internalized in the legislation of the signatory countries, must be applied to traditional production, sometimes with adaptations. This study aimed to promote a non-systematic review, analyzing the content of commercial and health international treaties, agreements, and norms, and the Brazilian and French/European Union legislation, to evaluate the robustness of the foreseen regulation processes. It concluded that the surveyed documents have a comprehensive potential for the qualitative and sanitary protection of the products by implementing guarantees that are conditioned to the applicability of theory to practice in manufacturing, registering, and inspecting production in the evaluated countries and considering the need of consumption alerts for vulnerable population groups.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo Este artigo procurou contribuir para a literatura e para o debate nacional e global sobre a superação de uma polarização relacionada ao aspecto jurídico e administrativo do processo de inovação, procurando se concentrar nas patentes como um fator condicionante das trajetórias tecnológicas que viabilizam o aprendizado em âmbito produtivo. Baseou-se em um arcabouço teórico e político relacionado à inovação e ao acesso a medicamentos, especialmente quanto aos direitos de Propriedade Intelectual, e na análise crítico-reflexiva de instrumentos de Propriedade Intelectual utilizados em Parcerias para o Desenvolvimento Produtivo (PDP), desenvolvidas por um instituto de tecnologia em fármacos sintéticos, público e nacional. Os resultados demonstram a relevância da compatibilização dos direitos de patentes com a construção de uma capacidade tecnológica e de inovação no país, vinculada ao acesso universal, especialmente quando envolverem produtos que se destinam ao tratamento de doenças graves, de alta complexidade tecnológica e de alto custo. Conclui-se que, para superação da dependência tecnológica e ampliação do acesso a medicamentos no Brasil, o Estado deve buscar o equilíbrio entre os interesses públicos e privados na área da saúde, a articulação entre os instrumentos jurídicos legais existentes e o alinhamento entre suas políticas de saúde, industriais, de CT&I e Propriedade intelectual.

Abstract This article aims to contribute to the literature and to the national and global debate on overcoming the polarization related to the legal and administrative aspect of the innovation process, seeking to focus on patents as a conditioning factor of the technological trajectories that enable learning in the productive scope. It was based on a theoretical and political framework related to innovation and access to medicines, especially regarding Intellectual Property rights, and on a critical-reflexive analysis of Intellectual Property instruments used in Productive Development Partnerships (PDP), developed by a public national institute for synthetic drug technology. The results demonstrate the importance of making patent rights compatible with the construction of technological and innovation capacities in the country, which are linked to universal access, especially when they involve products that are intended to treat serious, technologically complex and high-cost diseases. In conclusion, to overcome technological dependence and expand access to medicines in Brazil, the State must seek a balance between public and private interests in the healthcare area, articulate the existing legal instruments and align its health, industry, ST&I and intellectual property policies.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Due to the great interest in ovarian cryopreservation and, consequently conservation and restoration of female fertility in the last decades, different vitrification procedures (vitrification devices or solutions) have been developed, patented, and used both for academic research purposes and for clinical use. Therefore, the present study aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of data obtained from the application of different patented and non-patented vitrification devices and solutions in different countries. For this purpose, relevant observational studies published between the years 2000 to 2021 were selected to verify the efficiency of ovarian vitrification processes on parameters such as morphology, viability, and apoptosis in preantral ovarian follicles after transplantation or in vitro culture. Our research revealed that, although several countries were considered in the study, the United States and Japan were the countries that registered the most processes, and 22 and 16 vitrification devices and solutions out of a total of 51, respectively were patented. Sixty-two non-patented processes were also considered in the study in all countries. We also observed that transplantation and in vitro ovarian culture were the techniques predominantly used to evaluate the efficiency of the devices and vitrification solutions, respectively. In conclusion, this review showed that patented or non-patented protocols available in the literature are able to successfully preserve preantral follicles present in ovarian tissue. Despite the satisfactory results reported so far, adjustments in ovarian vitrification protocols in order to minimize cryoinjuries to the follicles remain one of the goals of cryopreservation and preservation of the female reproductive function. We found that vitrification alters the morphology and viability, and offers risks leading in some cases to follicular apoptosis. However, adjustments to current protocols to develop an optimal procedure can minimize damage by not compromising follicular development after vitrification/warming.

RESUMO

mRNA vaccine technology is the most interesting final product of decades of research. This new platform for public health is simple to transfer to low-income countries and can be used against diverse agents, including cancer. It is environmentally clean, relatively low-cost, and does not use animals for its production. Most importantly, mRNA vaccines have been highly efficacious in avoiding serious disease and death from COVID-19. Yet, at the highest point of the pandemic, many voices, including some from prominent positions, opposed their use. Similarly, the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, which are highly effective, very safe, and probably confer long life protection against its HPV types, faced strong parents' hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy has been the subject of extensive research, focusing primarily on factors associated with the public, the political environment, and messaging strategies. However, the issue of unfair worldwide access to the COVID-19 vaccines has recently sparked significant debate about the vaccine industry's role. Recent data demonstrated that the system's perceived unfairness with the masses is behind the growing populist anti-vaccine movements worldwide. The association between populism and antivaccine attitudes has been reported at country and individual levels. The anti-science attitudes behind vaccine hesitancy emerge when the scientist is not found credible due to the suspicion that they had monetary investments in pharmaceutical companies. Here, I argue that the obscurity of the vaccine market, but also its unfairness, are important factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy. The purpose of this commentary is to stimulate a review of current market regulations and to improve its transparency and fairness, particularly in the context of public health emergencies. By doing so, a new pandemic would find us better prepared. The general population and much of the healthcare community often ignore the years of dedicated work and substantial public funding that enabled the discovery and design of vaccines. Conversely, pharmaceutical companies often over-emphasize their investments in research and development. A decade ago, Marcia Angell provided a detailed breakdown of pharmaceutical expenses, revealing that marketing and administration costs were 2.5 times higher than research and development expenses; recently, Olivier Wouters confirmed the high expenditures of the pharmaceutical industry in lobbying and political campaign contributions. In this commentary, I will present the cases of HPV and COVID-19 vaccines as examples of when vaccines, instead of being public health goods, became market goods, creating large inequities and health costs. This failure is a structural cause behind more ideological vaccine hesitancy, less studied so far.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Foods that promote health benefits are being increasingly used. Innovative techniques, such as nanotechnology, have been used to improve functional properties, sensory characteristics, or the conservation of foods. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the technological domain of patents for tomato products with or without nanotechnology and elucidate the technological advances associated with the recent use of tomatoes as a natural food dye in the food industry by exploring patent documents. METHODS AND RESULTS: The search was conducted using the Espacenet and INPI databases. There was an increase in patent document applications employing nanotechnology in 2013, with a peak between 2017 and 2018. China is the lead country in the number of patent applications. In Brazil, the patent applications are variable, and the food industry is most involved in studies on tomatoes as a natural food dye. Most patent deposits using nanotechnology were from companies, and the main sources of the patent application were the food and pharmaceutical industries. CONCLUSION: There is an increasing trend for the use of tomatoes as natural food dyes, produced with or without nanotechnology, and number of patents filed yearly. New technologies are being developed in several application areas.

Assuntos

RESUMO

O presente artigo apresenta resultados de uma pesquisa bibliográfica que teve como objetivo realizar uma reflexão crítica sobre a relação entre a questão ambiental e a discussão internacional sobre sustentabilidade, evidenciando, a partir de acordos multilaterais da globalização econômica, a geopolítica internacional de interesses contraditórios defendidos no âmbito da Convenção sobre a Diversidade Biológica (CDB) e o Acordo sobre Aspectos Comerciais Relativos aos Direitos de Propriedade Intelectual (Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights ­ TRIPS), estabelecido pela Organização Mundial do Comércio (OMC). Entre os principais resultados, aponta-se que os princípios de proteção da natureza e dos conhecimentos das populações tradicionais estabelecidos na CDB estão em confronto com os interesses do sistema internacional de propriedade intelectual na arena de disputa pelo acesso aos recursos da natureza e ao conhecimento das populações tradicionais pela indústria mundial de biotecnologia

This article presents the results of a bibliographical research, which aimed tocarry out a critical reflection on the relationship between the environ-mental issue and the international discussion on sustainability, highlighting, from multilateral agreements on economic globalization, the international geopolitics of contradictory interests defended within the scope of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the intellectual property agreement (TRIPS) established by the World Trade Organization (WTO). Among the main results, it is pointed out that the principles of protecting nature and the knowledge of traditional populations established in the CBD are in conflict with the interests of the international intellectual property system, through the dispute for access to natural resources and knowledge of traditional populations by the global biotechnology industry

Assuntos

RESUMO

Buscando compreender como as epidemias de zika e chikungunya incitaram o desenvolvimento tecnológico, este estudo realizou levantamento de dados epidemiológicos e prospecção tecnológica, utilizando dados do Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI) e do Orbit Intelligence. Ainda, analisou produtos desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento a nível mundial e aqueles registrados no Brasil por meio da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa). No ano de 2016, observou-se o maior número de casos totais para ambas as doenças. A prospecção tecnológica nacional revelou que há interesse global em desenvolver tecnologias para essas doenças e depositar suas patentes no Brasil, tendo as empresas como principais depositantes. Por sua vez, a prospecção tecnológica global mostrou que o ano de 2016 configura-se como importante marco na evolução do número de patentes para zika e chikungunya, sugerindo que as epidemias brasileiras estimularam o mundo no desenvolvimento de novos insumos para a saúde. Os Estados Unidos e a China são as principais jurisdições, tendo as universidades como maiores depositantes. A análise de produtos a nível global revelou que apenas dois chegaram ao mercado para zika e um para chikungunya, e as vacinas estão na categoria principal. A busca na Anvisa revelou que há mais produtos registrados para zika do que em comparação à chikungunya. Os principais fabricantes legais são empresas brasileiras, com pedidos de registro realizados principalmente pelas empresas DiaSorin S.p.A., ECO Diagnóstica Ltda. e Chembio Diagnostics Brazil Ltda. Apesar do visível estímulo à pesquisa, desenvolvimento e patenteamento gerado pelas epidemias de zika e chikungunya no Brasil, isso não garantiu a chegada de novos produtos ao mercado nem acesso da população a eles.

This study aims to understand how the zika and chikungunya epidemics incited technological development. We surveyed epidemiological data and technological prospecting, using data from Brazilian National Institute of Industry Property (INPI) and Orbit Intelligence, and analyzed products developed/under development worldwide and products registered in Brazil by Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa). In 2016, the highest number of total cases was observed for both diseases. Brazil's technological prospection revealed the existence of a global interest in developing technologies for these diseases and filing their patents in Brazil, with companies as the main depositors. Global technological prospecting showed that 2016 is an important milestone in the evolution of the number of patents for zika and chikungunya, suggesting that Brazilian epidemics stimulated the world in the development of new health inputs. The United States and China are the main jurisdictions, with universities as the largest depositors. Global product analysis revealed that only two products reached the market for zika and one for chikungunya, and vaccines are in the top category. A research in Anvisa revealed more products registered for zika compared to chikungunya. The main legal manufacturers are Brazilian companies, with DiaSorin S.p.A., Eco Diagnóstica Ltda., and Chembio Diagnostics Brazil Ltda. leading the registration requests. Despite the visible stimulus to research, development, and patenting generated by the zika and chikungunya epidemics in Brazil, such stimulus did not guarantee the arrival of new products on the market and population access to these products.

Con el fin de comprender cómo las epidemias de zika y chikunguña estimularon el desarrollo tecnológico, este estudio realizó la recopilación de datos epidemiológicos y la prospección tecnológica, utilizando datos del Instituto Nacional de la Propiedad Industrial (INPI) y Orbit Intelligence, y analizó los productos desarrollados y en desarrollo en todo el mundo y productos registrados en Brasil por la Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (Anvisa). En 2016 se observó el mayor número de casos para ambas enfermedades. La prospección tecnológica nacional reveló que existe un interés mundial por desarrollar tecnologías para estas enfermedades y depositar sus patentes en Brasil, con las empresas como los principales depositantes. La prospección tecnológica mundial mostró que 2016 fue un hito importante en la evolución del número de patentes de zika y chikunguña, lo que sugiere que las epidemias brasileñas estimularon el desarrollo mundial de nuevos insumos para la salud. EE.UU. y China son las principales jurisdicciones, con las universidades como las mayores depositantes. El análisis global de productos reveló que solo 2 han llegado al mercado para zika y 1 para chikunguña, y las vacunas están en la categoría superior. La búsqueda en Anvisa reveló la existencia de más productos registrados para zika que para chikunguña. Los principales fabricantes legales son empresas brasileñas, con las solicitudes de registro realizadas principalmente por DiaSorin S.p.A., Eco Diagnóstica Ltda. y Chembio Diagnostics Brazil Ltda. Aunque hubo una notable promoción a la investigación, desarrollo y patentamiento generado por las epidemias de zika y chikunguña en Brasil, esto no implicó la llegada de nuevos productos al mercado y el acceso a ellos por parte de la población.

RESUMO

With the objective of stimulating the production and licensing of new technologies, the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), the agency responsible for granting patents in Brazil, created a priority or fast track procedure for patent processes related to innovations that can be used against COVID-19. The first effects of this institutional measure are assessed in the present work, based on the identification and analysis of the time elapsed between fast track requests by the Ministry of Health or through petition by the depositors themselves. The results demonstrate that the INPI was able to successfully respond to the public health emergency by granting patents on average 5.3 months after the fast track request, a time considerably shorter than the average required in usual processes.

Con objeto de estimular la producción y el otorgamiento de licencias de nuevas tecnologías, el Instituto Nacional de la Propiedad Industrial (INPI), entidad autónoma responsable de la concesión de patentes en Brasil, creó una modalidad de trámite prioritario para los procesos de concesión de patentes relativas a innovaciones que puedan emplearse en la lucha contra la COVID-19. En este trabajo se evaluaron los primeros efectos de esa medida institucional, al determinar y analizar la duración de los procesos prioritarios de concesión de patentes solicitados por medio de comunicación oficial del Ministerio de Salud o de una petición presentada por los propios solicitantes. Los resultados demuestran que el INPI pudo atender con éxito la emergencia de salud pública, al conceder patentes en un período promedio de 5,3 meses contados a partir de la fecha de presentación de la solicitud de priorización, un tiempo considerablemente inferior al promedio exigido en los procesos habituales.

RESUMO

Propósito/Contexto. En este artículo se analizan los distintos factores que han afectado el acceso a las vacunas para la prevención de la infección por SARS-CoV-2, con particular atención a los intereses que atraviesan las negociaciones. Se detalla un análisis de los procesos de investigación, producción, contratación, distribución y comercialización de vacunas, así como las normas éticas internacionales que orientan estas prácticas. Metodología/Enfoque. De igual modo, se identifican un marco de excepciones científicas, metodológicas, éticas y legales para la investigación, la producción y la comercialización de vacunas, al tiempo que se ha mantenido y profundizado, sin excepciones, las normas impuestas por el sistema global de mercado en lo referente a protección de propiedad intelectual (Adpic), negociaciones y contratos, defensa de intereses privados y de las empresas. También se pone en evidencia el rol que han tenido los países más ricos, acumulando más dosis de las necesarias, lo cual impactó seriamente en el acceso de los países de bajos ingresos. Resultados/Hallazgos. Se analizan las normas éticas internacionales y los acuerdos realizados por los gobiernos que deberían limitar conductas como estas, evitar sus consecuencias y que no han sido cumplidas. Discusión/Conclusiones/Contribuciones. Se concluye con una propuesta concreta que podría aliviar la situación actual y se incluye una reflexión sobre el impacto en la vida y la salud de los países y los grupos más vulnerables, si el orden internacional sigue regido por el sistema global de mercado en lugar de un nuevo pacto global más justo.

Purpose/Context. This article discusses the various factors that have affected access to vaccines for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with particular attention to the interests involved in the negotiations. An analysis of the processes of vaccine research, production, procurement, distribution, and marketing is detailed, as well as the international ethical standards that guide these practices. Methodology/Approach. Similarly, a framework of scientific, methodological, ethi-cal and legal exceptions for research, production and commercialization of vaccines is identified, while the rules imposed by the global market system regarding intellec-tual property protection (TRIPS), negotiations and contracts, defense of private and corporate interests have been maintained and deepened without exceptions. It also highlights the role played by the richest countries, accumulating more doses than necessary, which seriously impacted the access of low-income countries. Results/Findings. The international ethical norms and agreements made by gover-nments that should limit conducts such as these, avoid their consequences and that have not been complied with, are analyzed. Discussion/Conclusions/Contributions. It concludes with a concrete proposal that could alleviate the current situation and includes a reflection on the impact on the life and health of the most vulnerable countries and groups, if the international order continues to be governed by the global market system instead of a new and fairer global agreement.

Finalidade/Contexto. Este artigo discute os vários factores que afectaram o acesso às vacinas para a prevenção da infecção pelo SRA-CoV-2, com especial atenção para os interesses envolvidos nas negociações. Detalha uma análise dos processos de investigação, produção, aquisição, distribuição e comercialização de vacinas, bem como as normas éticas internacionais que orientam estas práticas. Metodologia/Aproximação. Do mesmo modo, é identificado um quadro de excepções científicas, metodológicas, éticas e legais para a investigação, produção e comercialização de vacinas, enquanto as regras impostas pelo sistema de mercado global em termos de protecção da propriedade intelectual (Adpic), negociações e contratos, defesa de interesses privados e empresariais foram mantidas e aprofundadas sem exceções. Salienta também o papel desempenhado pelos países mais ricos, acumulando mais doses do que as necessárias, o que teve um sério impacto no acesso dos países de baixos rendimentos. Resultados/Findings. Normas e acordos éticos internacionais feitos pelos governos que deveriam limitar comportamentos como este e evitar as suas consequências são analisados e não têm sido cumpridos. Discussão/Conclusões/Contribuições. Conclui com uma proposta concreta que poderia aliviar a situação actual e inclui uma reflexão sobre o impacto na vida e saúde dos países e grupos mais vulneráveis, se a ordem internacional continuar a ser regida pelo sistema de mercado global em vez de um novo pacto global, mais justo.

RESUMO

Introduction: The transparency of data on the value chain of medicines is crucial for the study and monitoring of the pharmaceutical system. These data may impact medicine pricing negotiations, contribute to patient access to pharmaceutical products, and strengthen health systems. Objective: This study analyzed the national strategies to ensure the transparency of data from medicine cost development to marketing in Argentina, Brazil, and Colombia. Method: A descriptive study was carried out by searching databases, reports, documents, and scientific articles published between January and August 2022 related to rules on transparency and databases, including 1) marketing authorization; 2) pricing; 3) intellectual property; 4) clinical trials; 5) research and development (R&D); and 6) health technology assessment (HTA) of selected biopharmaceuticals. Results: Transparency data, rules, and information are not uniform. The infostructures (organizational capacity for collecting and distributing information) regarding the pharmaceutical value chain in these three countries face limitations in appropriate measures to publicly share data and evidence, including pre-clinical data, clinical data, and costs. None of the countries require transparency about data on research and development costs. All three countries present similar publicization of data on marketing authorization and intellectual property, with some differences. The significant limitations in Argentina include the absence of formal price regulation and data on the volume of medicine purchased and respective amounts paid. Among the three countries, Brazil showed a higher degree of information transparency, perhaps due to the legal regulation that guarantees citizens access to information of public interest. Brazil also stands out in terms of the public availability of HTA reports and pricing, in addition to the highest volume of information. In contrast, Colombia has in place a decree that allows 5 years of trial data exclusivity for new medicines, an act contrary to data transparency. Despite the different stages of transparency, no country has evidenced a robust use of these data in public policy decision-making. Conclusion: The results reinforce the presence of information asymmetry between stakeholders, data fragmentation, data gaps and overlap, and difficulty in comparing available data across the three countries and the use of these data nationally to produce evidence.

RESUMO

Stem cell technology is a powerful tool ready to respond to the needs of modern medicine that is experiencing rapid technological development. Given its potential in therapeutic applications, intellectual property rights (IPR) as a protection resource of knowledge are a relevant topic. Patent eligibility of stem cells has been controversial as restrictions to access the fundamental technologies open a gap between research and clinic. Therefore, we depicted the current patent landscape in the field to discuss if this approach moves forward in closing this breach by examining patent activity over the last decade from a transdisciplinary perspective. Stem cell therapeutic applications is an area of continuous growth where patent filing through the PCT is the preferred strategy. Patenting activity is concentrated in the USA, European Union, and Australia; this accumulation in a few key players leads to governance, regulation, and inequality concerns. To boost wealthiness and welfare in society - stem cell therapies' ultimate goal - while at post-pandemic recovery, critical elements in the field of IPR rise to overcome current limitations: to promote bridge builders able to connect the research and business worlds, regulatory updates, novel financing models, new vehicles (startups, spinouts, and spin-offs), and alternative figures of intellectual property.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMO Com o objetivo de estimular a produção e o licenciamento de novas tecnologias, o Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (INPI), autarquia responsável pela concessão de patentes no Brasil, criou uma modalidade de trâmite prioritário para processos de patentes relativos a inovações que possam ser usadas no combate à COVID-19. Os primeiros efeitos dessa medida institucional foram avaliados no presente trabalho, a partir da identificação e análise do tempo dos processos prioritários de patente solicitados por ofício pelo Ministério da Saúde ou por meio de petição pelos próprios depositantes. Os resultados demonstram que o INPI foi capaz de atender de forma exitosa à emergência de saúde pública, concedendo patentes em um período médio de 5,3 meses a contar do pedido de priorização, um tempo consideravelmente inferior à média exigida nos processos usuais.

ABSTRACT With the objective of stimulating the production and licensing of new technologies, the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), the agency responsible for granting patents in Brazil, created a priority or fast track procedure for patent processes related to innovations that can be used against COVID-19. The first effects of this institutional measure are assessed in the present work, based on the identification and analysis of the time elapsed between fast track requests by the Ministry of Health or through petition by the depositors themselves. The results demonstrate that the INPI was able to successfully respond to the public health emergency by granting patents on average 5.3 months after the fast track request, a time considerably shorter than the average required in usual processes.

RESUMEN Con objeto de estimular la producción y el otorgamiento de licencias de nuevas tecnologías, el Instituto Nacional de la Propiedad Industrial (INPI), entidad autónoma responsable de la concesión de patentes en Brasil, creó una modalidad de trámite prioritario para los procesos de concesión de patentes relativas a innovaciones que puedan emplearse en la lucha contra la COVID-19. En este trabajo se evaluaron los primeros efectos de esa medida institucional, al determinar y analizar la duración de los procesos prioritarios de concesión de patentes solicitados por medio de comunicación oficial del Ministerio de Salud o de una petición presentada por los propios solicitantes. Los resultados demuestran que el INPI pudo atender con éxito la emergencia de salud pública, al conceder patentes en un período promedio de 5,3 meses contados a partir de la fecha de presentación de la solicitud de priorización, un tiempo considerablemente inferior al promedio exigido en los procesos habituales.

RESUMO

Resumen: Artículo de carácter reflexivo y argumentativo que busca confrontar referentes conceptuales desde la Bioética y el derecho para dar solución a estos interrogantes: ¿son los derechos de propiedad intelectual la antítesis de otros derechos? ¿Existe un conflicto de principios bioéticos en dicha tensión? ¿Cómo abordar desde la Bioética este choque de miradas? ¿Es necesario un cambio de paradigma para transformar el individualismo imperante de la contemporaneidad y evitar los daños de una guerra de rapiñas que se enmascara detrás de un eufemismo de la competencia de mercados y la propiedad intelectual? Entre argumentos, cuestionamientos y disensos se busca un abordaje a estos dilemas con un enfoque bioético. Se deja sobre la mesa la cooperación con una base de empatía y compasión para desviarse del camino del individualismo pernicioso y la voracidad subsecuente del dinero y el poder. Por ello, la Bioética como puente hacia al futuro es la disciplina llamada manifestar dicha cooperación, no solo en los ámbitos disciplinarios, sino entre los diferentes actores sociales, entre los protagonistas de esta obra, para que su final no sea trágico, sino esperanzador y saludable.

Summary: This is a reflexive and argumentative article which intention is to confront conceptual references from bioethics and the right to solve the following questions: are intellectual property rights the antithesis of other rights? Is there a conflict of bioethical principles in this discussion? How to address from Bioethics this difference in point of views? Is a paradigm shift necessary to transform the prevailing individualism of contemporaneity and avoid the damages of a war of plunder masked behind a euphemism of market competition and intellectual property? Between arguments, questions and dissents, an approach to these dilemmas is sought with a bioethical approach. Cooperation is on the table based on empathy and compassion to divert it from the path of pernicious individualism and the subsequent voracity of money and power. Therefore bioethics, as a bridge to the future is the discipline called to manifest this cooperation, not only in disciplinary areas, but between the different social stakeholders, among those main players of this work, so that its end is not tragic, but hopeful and healthy.

Resumo: Artigo reflexivo e argumentativo que busca confrontar referências conceituais da Bioética e do direito para resolver as seguintes questões: os direitos de propriedade intelectual são a antítese de outros direitos? Existe um conflito de princípios bioéticos nessa tensão? Como abordar este choque de perspectivas a partir da Bioética? É necessária uma mudança de paradigma para transformar o individualismo predominante da contemporaneidade e evitar os danos de uma briga que se mantém mascarada por trás de um eufemismo de concorrência de mercado e propriedade intelectual? Entre argumentos, perguntas e dissensos, busca-se uma abordagem desses dilemas com uma abordagem Bioética. A cooperação é deixada sobre a mesa com uma base de empatia e compaixão para se desviar do caminho do individualismo pernicioso e da subsequente voracidade do dinheiro e do poder. Portanto, a Bioética, como ponte para o futuro, é a disciplina convocada a manifestar tal cooperação, não apenas nos campos disciplinares, mas entre os diferentes atores sociais, entre os protagonistas deste trabalho, para que seu fim não seja trágico, mas esperançoso e saudável.

RESUMO

Resumo O texto contém uma proposta atualizada de política de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação em Saúde no Brasil e a pertinência da atualização decorre do desastre nas atividades nesse terreno verificadas no país desde o início do atual governo federal em 2019, bem como dos desafios colocados pela emergência da pandemia COVID-19 desde 2020. Ele está organizado em cinco seções, a saber: Pesquisa em Saúde; Inovação Produtiva; Avaliação e Incorporação de Tecnologias em Saúde; Propriedade Intelectual em Saúde; Novos desafios colocados pela Pandemia. Os autores fazem parte do Comitê de Assessoramento em Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação da Abrasco.

Abstract The text presents an updated proposal for a Health Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Brazil, following the huge political turmoil in the country since 2019 and the COVID-19 pandemic since 2020. The proposal is presented in five sections: Scientific Research; Productive Innovation; Health Technology Assessment and Incorporation; Intellectual Property in Health; New challenges posed by the Pandemic. The authors take part in the Advisory Committee in Science, Technology and Innovation of the Brazilian Association of Collective Health.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Microalgae have been used widely as a biological source for several industries, such as biofuel, pharmaceutical and food. Recently, the agricultural industry has also began using microalgae as an alternative source for sustainable products to replace agrochemicals. Due to the lack of scientific articles in this research area, the objective of this study was to search for applications of microalgae and to characterize its use in agriculture using the patent documents available in three patent databases, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), European Patent Office (EPO) and Brazilian Institute of Industrial Property (INPI). The search was carried out using the keyword "microalgae" and applying the filter for International Patent Classification (IPC) code "A01N" which corresponds to patents related to agriculture and cultivation of microalgae. Our patent database search returned 669 documents and 132 patents were selected for the study based on their abstracts. The first patent was registered in 1982 and described the use of microalgae Chlorella extract as a plant growth promoter. After that, no patent was registered for 15 years. From 2005 to 2014, only seven patents were found. However, the scenario changed from 2015 when the number of patents increased mainly in the United States, China and Europe. The patent analysis showed several applications for microalgae in the agricultural sector, such as plant growth promotion, biofertilization, plant disease control, weed management, and post-harvest quality. This review confirmed the increasing interest in microalgae-derived products in agriculture and the value of using patent documents to assess innovative areas.

RESUMO

O direito de propriedade intelectual tem as suas exceções e os seus limites internos, previstos na lei. Nos últimos tempos, vem crescendo a discussão da sua compressão à luz de princípios gerais, como o interesse público, a liberdade de expressão ou a saúde pública. Dir-se-ia, pois, que estes direitos têm, também, uma função social, para além da proteção das prerrogativas dos seus titulares, o que é verdadeiro, sobretudo, para as patentes farmacêuticas. Grande parte desta discussão sempre passou, na verdade, pelas patentes farmacêuticas, sua concessão e exploração, em especial no que tange às patentes biotecnológicas. Esta discussão mais e mais se exacerbou quanto às patentes das vacinas destinadas ao tratamento contra a COVID-19. Não falta quem queira lançar mão dos meios previstos nas leis nacionais e internacionais para compelir às licenças obrigatórias das patentes e, até, à sua expropriação. Em causa, podem estar, no entanto, outros aspetos, como contratos mal negociados pela Comissão da União Europeia com algumas empresas farmacêuticas e os problemas logísticos na produção de vacinas. Por outro lado, centrar a discussão nas patentes poderá ser redutor, uma vez que há outros aspetos da propriedade intelectual a considerar. Contudo, a resposta estará, muito provavelmente, no equilíbrio entre os direitos dos titulares de patentes e o interesse público.

Intellectual property law has its exceptions and internal limits, as provided by law. In recent times, there has been a growing discussion of its compression in the light of general principles, such as public interest, freedom of expression or public health. It would be said, therefore, that these rights also have a social function, in addition to protecting the rights of their holders, which is especially true for pharmaceutical patents. Much of this discussion has always, in fact, passed through pharmaceutical patents, their granting and exploitation, especially regardingbiotechnological patents. This discussion has become increasinglyexacerbated regardingthe patents on vaccines intended for treatment against COVID-19. There is no shortage of people who want to use the means provided by national and international laws to compel mandatory patent licenses and even their expropriation. At issue, however, may be other aspects, such as contracts poorly negotiated by the European Union Commission with pharmaceutical companies and logistical problems in the production of vaccines. On the other hand, focusing the discussion on patents, can be reduced, there are other aspects of intellectual property to consider. However, the answer will most likely lie in the balance between the rights ofpatent holders and the public interest.

La ley de propiedad intelectual tiene sus excepciones y límites internos, según lo establece la ley. En los últimos tiempos, ha habido un creciente debate sobre su compresión a la luz de principios generales, como el interés público, la libertad de expresión o la salud pública. Se diría,por tanto, que estos derechos también tienen una función social, además de proteger los derechos de sus titulares, lo que es especialmente cierto para las patentes farmacéuticas. Gran parte de esta discusión siempre ha pasado, de hecho, por las patentes farmacéuticas, su concesión y explotación, especialmente en lo que respecta a las patentes biotecnológicas. Esta discusión se ha exacerbado cada vez más con respecto a las patentes de vacunas destinadas al tratamiento contra COVID-19. No hay escasez de personas que quieran utilizar los medios que brindan las leyes nacionales e internacionales para imponer licencias de patentes obligatorias e incluso su expropiación. Sin embargo, pueden estar en juego otros aspectos, como los contratos mal negociados por la Comisión de la Unión Europea con algunas empresas farmacéuticas y los problemas logísticos en la producción de vacunas. Por otro lado, centrar la discusión en las patentes, se puede reducir, hay otros aspectos de la propiedad intelectual a considerar. Sin embargo, lo más probable es que la respuesta esté en el equilibrio entre los derechos de los titulares de patentes y el interés público.