RESUMO

Background. COVID-19 patients may present sequelae, such as neuromuscular electrophysiological disorders (NED), that can be assessed using the stimulus electrodiagnostic test (SET). However, little is known about the reliability and agreement of the SET in post-COVID-19 patients.Objective. We aimed to verify the intra-inter-rater reliability and agreement of SET measurements in the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) in post-COVID-19 participants.Methods. We designed an observational prospective study to evaluate 20 (10 males and 10 females) post-COVID-19 patients, age: 44.95 ± 11.07 years, weight: 87.99 ± 19.08 kg, height: 1.69 ± 0.09 m. Two independent raters took two evaluations using the SET on selected muscles. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% limits of the agreement defined the quality and magnitude of the measures.Results. For intra-rater reliability, all measurements presented correlations classified as high or very high (ICC: 0.71-1.0). For inter-rater reliability, the rheobase, chronaxie, accommodation, and accommodation index presented high or very high correlations, except for the accommodation index of the GL (ICC = 0.65), which was moderate.Conclusion. The reliability of the SET obtained by independent raters was very high, except for the GL accommodation, which presented moderate ICC. Therefore, the SET is a reliable tool for evaluating NED in post-COVID-19 patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to determine the association between neuromuscular function, motor function impairment, and muscle and tendon structures in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) compared to a control (non-disabled) population. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study with a control group. SETTING: Center of Adapted Sports Training and Special Physical Education. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen individuals with SCI and motor function impairments participated in the study. A paired non-disabled group was recruited for comparison. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: Muscle (biceps brachii, rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and tibialis anterior) and tendon (quadriceps and patellar tendons) structures were assessed by ultrasound imaging (thickness, pennation angle, fascicle length, and echogenicity). Neuromuscular electrophysiological disorders were also assessed using electrodiagnosis techniques (stimulus non-responsivity and chronaxie) in the same muscles. RESULTS: Except for the biceps brachii muscle, muscle thickness, pennation angle, and fascicle length were lower (p < 0.01) while echogenicity and chronaxie were greater (p < 0.01) in SCI participants. The SCI participants had a higher prevalence of neuromuscular electrophysiological disorders for all muscles, except the biceps brachii. CONCLUSION: Neuromuscular disorders occur in association with muscle and tendon maladaptation in individuals with chronic SCI. A higher prevalence of electrophysiological disorders suggests an acquired polyneuromyopathy for muscles with motor function impairment even though the muscle was innerved, in addition to widespread muscle atrophy.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objective: The aim of the present study was to verify the intra- and inter-rater reliability and agreement of the stimulus electrodiagnostic test (SET) measurements obtained by pen and square electrodes in the vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles. Design: An intra- and inter-rater reliability and agreement study was performed for the SET by two independent raters. Two different sizes of cathode electrodes (1 cm2 and 25 cm2) and two muscles were assessed (tibialis anterior and vastus lateralis). Results: Chronaxie did not change according to the different electrodes. A high intra-rater reliability (0.72 ≤ r ≤ 0.88) was detected independently of the electrode and muscle assessed. Moreover, moderate and almost perfect agreements (0.51 ≤ Kappa ≤ 1.00) were detected on intra-rater assessment. Similar correlations (0.74 ≤ r ≤ 0.79) were found for intra-rater reliability. However, dissimilar inter-rater agreement was detected: Kappa ≤ 0.40 for tibialis anterior and Kappa = 1.00 for vastus lateralis. Conclusion: The SET presented high reliability and moderate agreement in intra-rater evaluations. A fair agreement was found in the inter-rater assessment of the tibialis anterior. Evaluations performed with different electrode sizes did not influence the results. Therefore, the SET should be performed by a unique rater in test retest situations.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Distal ulnar nerve injury leads to impairment of hand function due to motor and sensorial changes. Stimulus electrodiagnosis (SE) is a method of assessing and monitoring the development of this type of injury. OBJECTIVE: To identify the most sensitive electrodiagnostic parameters to evaluate ulnar nerve recovery and to correlate these parameters (Rheobase, Chronaxie, and Accommodation) with motor function evaluations. METHOD: A prospective cohort study of ten patients submitted to ulnar neurorrhaphy and evaluated using electrodiagnosis and motor assessment at two moments of neural recovery. A functional evaluation using the DASH questionnaire (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) was conducted at the end to establish the functional status of the upper limb. RESULTS: There was significant reduction only in the Chronaxie values in relation to time of injury and side (with and without lesion), as well as significant correlation of Chronaxie with the motor domain score. CONCLUSION: Chronaxie was the most sensitive SE parameter for detecting differences in neuromuscular responses during the ulnar nerve recovery process and it was the only parameter correlated with the motor assessment.

Assuntos