RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine, through clinical studies, whether there is a correlation between the Periotest value (PTV) and the implant stability quotient (ISQ). CONTENT: Methods to evaluate the stability of dental implants. SUMMARY: A search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for articles on the proposed subject up to January 29, 2023, using search terms that combined "resonance frequency analysis" and "Periotest" with "correlation" or "relationship"; and combinations of "implant stability quotient" and "Periotest" with "correlation" or "relationship." The inclusion criteria were clinical studies in English involving human subjects who received dental implants and evaluating the correlation between PTV and ISQ. A total of 46 articles were screened, of which 10 were selected for full-text analysis, and eight articles were included in this review. Based on three articles, 75 % of the results of this systematic review showed a negative correlation between PTV and ISQ, regardless of the type of stability assessed. Based on the remaining five articles, 100 % (regardless of the patient's gender) and 66.66 % of the results showed a negative correlation for primary and secondary stability, respectively. There is a negative correlation between PTV and ISQ for both primary and secondary dental implant stability. OUTLOOK: This review can serve as a reference for the development of methodologies for future clinical studies on this topic.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Aim: Stability measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is an important factor to be considered in the success of dental implant treatments, which can be evaluated from the implant stability quotient (ISQ). The aim of the present case series was to map the RFA during healing of implants with nanostructured hydroxyapatite surface to describe the behavior of ISQ values related to individual factors. Materials and Methods: Twenty-three implants were placed in eight patients by conventional surgical protocol, and ISQ values were monitored from the day of implant placement until week 20. To obtain the ISQ values, an Osstell device was used and the placed implants were grouped in proportional amounts to describe the ISQ behavior considering the length (≤10 or >10 mm), the diameter (3.5 or 4.3 mm), the insertion torque (<40 N-cm or ≥40 N-cm), and the placement area (maxilla or mandible). Results: All the implants assessed decreased their values in the first 3 weeks after placement. Subsequently, the ISQ values increased by amounts similar to those obtained at the time of the placement and even more. Implants with length >10 mm, diameter 4.3 mm, and insertion torque ≥40 N-cm showed the highest ISQ values. Conclusions: A decrease in the ISQ values of dental implants with nanostructured hydroxyapatite surface was evidenced between weeks 2 and 3 considering length, diameter, insertion torque, and maxillary or mandibular placement site.

RESUMO

Objectives: The present study compared two implants with different macrogeometries placed in healed alveolar sites, evaluating the insertion torque (ITV) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values at three different periods. Methods: Seventy patients with a total of 100 dental implants were allocated into two groups (n = 50 per group): DuoCone implants (DC group) that included 28 implants in the maxilla and 22 in the mandible, and Maestro implants (MAE group) that included 26 in the maxilla and 24 in the mandible. The ITV was measured during the implant placement, and the ISQ values were measured immediately at implant placement (baseline) and after 30 and 45 days. Results: The mean and standard deviations of the ITV were statistically significant (p < 0.0001), 56.4 ± 6.41 Ncm for the DC group and 29.3 ± 9.65 Ncm for the MAE group. In the DC group, the ISQs ranged between 61.1 ± 3.78 and 69.8 ± 3.86, while the MAE group presented similar values compared with the other group, ranging between 61.9 ± 3.92 and 72.1 ± 2.37. Conclusions: The value of implant insertion torque did not influence the ISQ values measured immediately after implant placement. However, the ITV influenced the ISQ values measured in the two initial periods of osseointegration, with implants installed with lower torques presenting higher ISQ values.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Introdução: A estabilidade primária é um importante indicador de sucesso da osseointegração. Porém, fatores locais com osso de baixa intensidade podem interferir negativamente na obtenção da estabilidade primária. Objetivo: O presente estudo avaliou o efeito de diferentes direções, velocidades de rotação e sistemas de fresagem na expansão de perfurações e estabilidade de implantes instalados em blocos mimetizando osso do tipo IV. Material e método: Foram instalados 50 implantes em blocos de poliuretano sólido rígido. Esses implantes foram igualmente divididos em cinco grupos (n = 10): 1) Fresa Maximus (utilizadas no sentido horário a 1200rpm); 2) Fresa Maximus (utilizadas no sentido horário a 600rpm); 3) Fresa Neodent (utilizadas no sentido horário a 800rpm); 4) Fresa Neodent (utilizadas no sentido anti-horário a 800rpm); 5) Fresa Neodent (utilizadas no sentido anti-horário a 600rpm). Foram executadas análises de estabilidade dos implantes através de testes de torque de inserção e remoção, além das análises de frequência de ressonância. Adicionalmente, a expansão associada às perfurações promovida pelas brocas foi avaliada por meio de análises tomográficas. Resultado: Verificou-se que os implantes instalados após o preparo da perfuração com as brocas Maximus a 600rpm apresentaram valores de torque de inserção maiores, quando comparados ao grupo de implantes instalados em perfurações confeccionadas com brocas Neodent. Ademais, as brocas Maximus apresentaram valores de expansão maiores que as brocas Neodent. Conclusão: As brocas Maximus são mais eficientes em promover a osseodensificação, e sua utilização está associada ao aumento da estabilidade dos implantes instalados em blocos mimetizando osso do tipo IV.

Introduction: Primary stability is an important indicator to obtain a successful osseointegration. However, local factors like bone with low density can negatively interfere in obtaining primary stability. Objective: This study assessed the effect of different drilling systems, speeds, and movement directions on the expansion of perforations and the stability of implants placed in blocks that mimicked type IV bone. Material and method: Fifty implants were installed in rigid solid polyurethane blocks and equally divided into the following five groups (n = 10): 1) Maximus Driller (on a clockwise direction at 1200rpm); 2) Maximus Driller (on a clockwise direction at 600rpm); 3) Neodent Driller (on a clockwise direction at 800rpm); 4) Neodent Driller (on a counter clockwise direction at 800rpm); 5) Neodent Driller (on a counter clockwise direction at 600rpm). The stability analyses of the implants were performed through insertion and removal torque testing, in addition to resonance frequency analysis. Additionally, the expansion promoted by the drills associated with the perforations was assessed through tomographic analysis. Result: We found that implants placed after drilling preparation with Maximus drills at 600 rpm had higher values of insertion torque than the group of implants installed in drillings made with Neodent drills. In addition, the maximus drills showed higher expansion values than the Neodent drills. Conclusion Maximus drills are more efficient in promoting osseodensification and their use was associated with increased stability of implants installed in blocks that mimicked type IV bone.

Assuntos

RESUMO

La estabilidad primaria es un requisito importante para la supervivencia y éxito de los implantes durante la osteointegración. En los últimos años, los implantes inmediatos postextracción han demostrado ser una opción de tratamiento exitosa y predecible para la reposición de dientes con mal pronóstico, pero surge la duda de si dichos implantes alcanzan valores de estabilidad primaria comparables a aquellos colocados en hueso maduro. Comparar la estabilidad primaria de implantes inmediatos colocados en alveolos postextracción con la de implantes colocados en hueso maduro. Se llevó a cabo un estudio clínico retrospectivo, con los datos recogidos sobre 175 implantes, colocados en 175 pacientes. Todos los implantes colocados pertenecían al modelo Essential Cone (Klockner Implant System) y se dividieron en dos grupos: implantes inmediatos (Grupo A, n=31) e implantes colocados en hueso maduro (Grupo B, n=144). La estabilidad primaria de todos los implantes se midió mediante torque de inserción y análisis de frecuencia de resonancia con Osstell ISQ. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas respecto a la estabilidad medida a través del torque de inserción (26,29+10,07 Vs 25,76+9,72 N/cm) pero sí que se encontraron diferencias significativas en la medida de la estabilidad primaria mediante AFR, siendo inferiores los valores correspondientes a los implantes colocados en los alveolos post exodoncia (60,74 ± 6,17 en sentido VL y 62,19 ± 7.64 en sentido MD frente a 68,34 ± 6.26 en sentido VL y 69,29 ± 7.98 en sentido MD obtenidos en los implantes colocados en hueso maduro). El torque de inserción de los implantes inmediatos es similar al de los implantes colocados en hueso maduro, pero sus valores ISQ son significativamente inferiores, lo que demuestra un mayor grado de micromovimiento, y por consiguiente, un mayor riesgo de fracaso durante el período de osteointegración.

Primary stability is an important requirement for the survival and success of implants during osseointegration. In recent years, immediate post-extraction implants have proven to be a successful and predictable treatment option for the replacement of teeth with a poor prognosis, but the question arises as to whether these implants reach primary stability values comparable to those placed in mature bone. The objective of the study was to compare the primary stability of immediate implants placed in post-extraction alveoli with that of implants placed in mature bone. A retrospective clinical study was carried out, with data collected on 175 implants, placed in 175 patients. All implants placed belonged to the Essential Cone model (Klockner Implant System) and were divided into two groups: immediate implants (Group A, n = 31) and implants placed in mature bone (Group B, n = 144). The primary stability of all implants was measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis with Osstell ISQ. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the stability measured through the insertion torque (26.29 + 10.07 Vs 25.76 + 9.72 N / cm) but significant differences were found in the measurement of primary stability by means of AFR, the values corresponding to implants placed in the post-exodontic alveoli being lower (60.74 ± 6.17 in the VL direction and 62.19 ± 7.64 in the MD direction versus 68.34 ± 6.26 in the VL direction and 69.29 ± 7.98 in the MD direction obtained in implants placed in mature bone). The insertion torque of immediate implants is similar to that of implants placed in mature bone, but their ISQ values are significantly lower, which demonstrates a higher degree of micromotion, and therefore, a greater risk of failure during the period of osseointegration.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: Implant stability in vivo is contingent on multiple factors, such as bone structure, instrument positioning and implant surface modifications, implant diameter, and implant length. Resonance-frequency analysis is considered a non-invasive, reliable, predictable, and objective method by which to evaluate implant stability, due to its correlation with bone-to-implant contact. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant length on the primary and secondary stability of single-implant crown rehabilitations, as measured by resonance-frequency analysis at different times. Materials and Methods: Implants of 10 and 11.5 mm were placed, and the resonance frequency was measured at the time of surgery (T0), as well as at 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months post-surgery. Results: A total of 559 implants were placed in 195 patients. Significant differences were observed when comparing the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values at T1, with values for 10-mm implants being greater than those for 11.5-mm implants (p = 0.035). These differences were also observed when comparing ISQ values for buccal and lingual areas. At T0, T2, and T3, no significant differences in ISQ values were observed. The use of 10-mm implants in the anterior maxilla yielded significantly greater values at T0 (p = 0.018) and T1 (p = 0.031) when compared with 11.5-mm implants. Significant differences in measurements were observed only for buccal areas (p = 0.005; p = 0.018). When comparing the sample lengths and sex, women with 11.5-mm implants showed significantly lower results than those with 10-mm implants (p < 0.001). Conclusions: There is a direct relationship between implants of a smaller length and greater ISQ values, with this relationship being most evident in the maxilla and in women.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMEN: Los protocolos odontológicos de controles son guías que tienen por objetivo optimizar la calidad de atención y estandarizar ciertos procedimientos para poder establecer mejores pronósticos. Varias complicaciones se pueden presentar posterior a la instalación de una prótesis fija total con carga inmediata (PFTC), desde el daño de la estructura protésica provisoria hasta la pérdida de la oseointegración de los implantes dentales. La escasa evidencia sobre el comportamiento clínico que se debe tener posterior a este tipo de tratamiento indica la necesidad de confección de un protocolo para poder mejorar las tasas de éxito. Para confeccionar el protocolo clínico se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura en la base de datos PubMed. Los filtros de búsqueda fueron ajustados de la siguiente manera. Se utilizaron los términos de búsqueda "immediate loading" AND "full arch" AND "Resonance frequency analysis". Los que fueron sometidos a los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, dando como resultado un total de 15 estudios. Todos los estudios seleccionados son ensayos clínicos controlados donde se encontraron complicaciones como fracturas, desalojos y desgaste de la estructura protésica, entre otros. En los resultados encontrados no existe evidencia sobre el número y rango de sesiones necesarias para el control clínico de una PFTCI. El momento más indicado para la extracción de la prótesis provisoria e instalación de la prótesis definitiva es durante el 3° y 4° mes posterior a la carga inmediata. Existe escasa evidencia sobre el número, momento y tipo de examen imageneológico a solicitar. Por lo que este protocolo clínico será una guía para los controles que se realicen posterior a una instalación de una PFTCI.

ABSTRACT: Dental protocols are guidelines used to optimize service quality and to standardize procedures to establish a better prognosis. There are many complications that can occur after installation of a an immediately loaded implant-supported prosthesis for rehabilitation. These may generate damage to the provisional structure and even loss of osseointegration from the dental implants. Limited evidence on the clinical approach required to monitor these procedures, makes it necessary to establish clinical protocols for treatment control, and increases the success rate. In order to develop such protocols a systematic research was carried out in the Pubmed database. The filters used were "immediate loading", "full arch" and "Resonance frequency analysis". The results were subject to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 15 studies were selected. All of the studies were randomized clinical trials. An important number of complications were recorded, such as fractures, dislodgment and wear of the prosthesis structure. There is no evidence about the number and range of sessions needed to assess the clinical control of an immediate loading fixed rehabilitation. The best time to remove the provisional prosthesis and install the restorative rehabilitation is during the third and fourth month following immediate loading. Limited evidence was found regarding the number, time and type of radiological images requested for clinical support. Therefore, the clinical protocol developed by the authors will be a guide for future controls related to an immediately loaded implant-supported prosthesis.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This retrospective chart review study assessed patient records to determine implant insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values during implant placement to evaluate the correlation with cortical bone anchorage (mono- or bicortical). METHODS: Primary stability data (IT during implant placement surgery and ISQ values immediately after implant placement) and cone beam computed tomography of 33 patients (165 implants) were assessed. Patients were divided into the following groups: G1, implants with apical cortical bone contact; G2, implants with bicortical bone contact (apical and cervical regions); and G3, implants with cervical cortical bone contact. RESULTS: Sixty-eight implants were excluded due to cortical bone contact on regions other than implant apical or cervical. Ninety-seven implants were therefore assessed for this study. No implant failure was found after a mean 70.42-month follow-up time. Implants with bicortical anchorage (G2) showed higher IT (64.1 Ncm) during implant placement and higher ISQ values (76) (p < 0.05). Monocortical implants (G1, apical, and G3, cervical) showed similar IT (G1 52.3 and G3 54.3) and ISQ values (G1 71.9 and G3 73) (p > 0.05). No correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient) was found between the two stability measurement devices for the different cortical bone anchorages that were analyzed (G1 0.190, G2 0.039, and G3 - 0.027) (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Insertion torque values and implant stability quotients were influenced by cortical bone contact. No significant correlation was found between IT and ISQ values-higher insertion torque values do not necessarily lead to higher implant stability quotients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMEN: Son varias las complicaciones que se pueden presentar posterior a la instalación de una prótesis fija total con carga inmediata (PFTCI), estas pudiesen generar desde el daño de la estructura protésica provisoria hasta la pérdida de la oseointegración de los implantes dentales. La escasa evidencia sobre el comportamiento clínico que se debe tener posterior a este tipo de tratamiento indica la necesidad de controlar mejor estas complicaciones. En esta revisión narrativa, el 3 de marzo de 2016 se realizó una búsqueda electrónica en la base de datos PubMed. Para poder efectuar una investigación acabada los filtros de búsqueda fueron ajustados de la siguiente manera. Se utilizaron los términos de búsqueda "immediate loading" AND "full arch" AND "Resonance frequency analysis". Los que fueron sometidos a los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, dando como resultado un total de 15 estudios. Todos los estudios eran ensayos clínicos controlados, donde se encontraron complicaciones como fracturas, desalojos y desgaste de la estructura protésica, entre otros. Se pudo observar que desde el día de la carga hasta un mes después el valor ISQ (cociente de estabilidad del implante) disminuye, para luego aumentar paulatina y progresivamente. En conclusión, no existe evidencia sobre el número y rango de sesiones necesarias para el control clínico de una PFTCI. El momento más indicado para la extracción de la prótesis provisoria e instalación de la prótesis definitiva es durante el 3° y 4° mes posterior a la carga inmediata. Existe escasa evidencia sobre el número, momento y tipo de examen imageneológico a solicitar. La presencia de complicaciones protésicas posterior a una PFTCI hace necesaria la confección de un protocolo de control clínico para este tipo de tratamiento.

ABSTRACT: There are many complications that can occur following placement with an immediately loaded implant-supported prosthesis in rehabilitation, these may generate damage to the provisional structure and even loss of the osseointegration from the dental implants. Limited evidence about clinical behavior post-installation, creates the need to better assess possible future complications that may arise. In this review, a systematic research was made in the PubMed database. The filters used were "immediate loading", "full arch" and "Resonance frequency analysis". The results were subject to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 15 studies were selected. All of the studies were randomized clinical trials, many complications were recorded, such as fractures, dislodgement and wear of the prosthesis structure. It was observed that from the first day of immediate loading until the first month, Implant Stability Quotient value decreases, subsequently, progressively increasing. There is no evidence about the number and range of sessions needed to assess the clinical control of a immediate loading fixed rehabilitation. The ideal time for removal of the provisional prosthesis and installation of the restorative rehabilitation, is during the third and fourth month after the immediate loading. Limited evidence was found regarding the number, the time and type of radiological images for clinical support. The possibility of several complications after an installation of a immediately loaded implant-supported prosthesis are very real, therefore is necessary to establish a clinical protocol for controls regarding this treatment.

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Changes in the macrogeometry of dental implants are known to influence primary stability and the osseointegration process. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of geometric changes in the apex region of dental implants. METHODS: Thirty-five cylindrical dental implants (Titamax Ti; Neodent) were machined at the apical third to reproduce the experimental groups: without apical cut (Wc), apical bi-split cut, apical tri-split cut, apical quadri-split cut (Qs). One (control group) (Titamax Ti Ex) (n = 7) without any modifications was added. The implants had the same final dimensions (4.1 x 11 mm2 ). All implants were inserted into artificial bone blocks and were evaluated by insertion torque and resonance frequency by ISQ values (Osstell). Two-tailed analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) and Tukey's post-test (P < .05). RESULTS: Control and Qs implants showed a significant increase of the insertion torque (P < .001). For the resonance frequency, Wc and (control) implants had the greatest ISQ values. However, there's no significant difference between (control) and Qs for the ISQ values (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the present study, the proposed geometries at the apical third of dental implants greatly influenced its insertion torque and primary stability in vitro.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Abstract To evaluate peri-implant bone loss (PIBL) and stability around submerged and non-submerged dental implants in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Thirty-five T2DM and non-diabetic (NT2DM) patients were included in this study. Demographic data were recorded using a questionnaire and PIBL was measured on digital radiographs. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was carried out for each implant at the time of fixture placement and at 3 months in both groups. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. One hundred and eighteen dental implants with a mean height of 10 to 12 mm and 3.3 to 4.1 mm in diameter were placed. The comparison of the mean RFA values at baseline and at 3 months was statistically significant (p = 0.008) in T2DM patients. The inter-group mean RFA values at baseline and at 3 months were not significant (p > 0.05). PIBL was significantly high in T2DM as compared to NT2DM patients at each follow-up (p < 0.05). At 2, 3, and 7 years, non-submerged dental implants showed significantly high PIBL in T2DM patients as compared to NT2DM individuals (p<0.05). The results of the present clinical study demonstrate increased PIBL around non-submerged single-tooth implant-supported restorations in T2DM patients, which may be due to the immune inflammatory status.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to measure the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values at three different time points after surgical procedures and crestal bone behavior in multiple implants (two or more) installed simultaneously with the bone splitting technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this study, 45 patients with different edentulous areas in the maxilla were selected, and a total of 114 dental implants were installed. Implant stability was measured by resonance frequency analysis immediately following implant placement to assess immediate stability (time 1) and stability at 90 days (time 2), and 150 days (time 3). Crestal bone height was measured in peri-apical radiographs at 90 and 150 days after implantation in relation to each implant shoulder, given that the implants were installed at the level of the crestal bone. RESULTS: Six implants were not osseointegrated. Overall, the means and standard deviations of the ISQ values were 60.3 ± 4.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-69) at baseline, 66.6 ± 5.28 (95% CI, 49-75) at 90 days, and 72.1 ± 4.28 (95% CI, 59-79) at 150 days (p < 0.0001). The mean marginal bone loss of the implants was 1.11 ± 0.61 mm on the mesial side and 1.17 ± 0.61 mm on the distal side at time 2, and 1.73 ± 0.68 mm on the mesial side and 1.79 ± 0.70 mm on the distal side at time 3. A strong positive correlation between implant stability and bone loss was detected (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, the bone splitting technique with simultaneous implant installation exhibited a good success rate with respect to the osseointegration index but requires attention with respect to crestal bone behavior.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to perform a histomorphometric and biomechanical comparison of three implants with different designs of the apical area to promote a better bone initial stability and its correlation with the osseointegration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-four tapered implants with same length, diameter and surface properties but with three different apical configurations (Group I: MK4: Group II: C1 and Group III: MK7) were inserted in the tibia of rabbits. Implant stability and bone formation were evaluated by resonance frequency analysis measured at 0, 6, 8 and 12 weeks and by histomorphometric analysis performed at 6, 8 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Statistical test to compare the stability through the implant stability quotient in the four times showed few differences between the groups and time periods proposed, with significance set at P < 0.05. In the bone-implant contact, by comparing the groups in the three times proposed, it was possible concluded that there is a similar behavior among the three implant design (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: With the limitations of this animal study, it can be concluded that the design of the apical area influences the implant stability and the bone-to-implant contact.

Assuntos

RESUMO

El propósito de este estudio fue medir y comparar la estabilidad de implantes dentales en maxilar y mandíbula en tres tiempos distintos, mediante análisis de resonancia de frecuencia (RFA). Mediante un diseño no experimental prospectivo, fueron evaluados 103 Implantes 3i Osseotite en 57 pacientes (50 en el maxilar y 53 en mandíbula). Mediante un dispositivo electrónico (Osstell-Mentor®) se registró el coeficiente de estabilidad para cada implante (ISQ) al momento de la cirugía de implantes, a las 6 semanas y a las 8 semanas siguientes. Respecto al maxilar, las medianas aumentan progresivamente después de la cirugía de implantes. En la mandíbula, parecen ser similares entre la primera y la tercera medición, pero decrecen en la segunda. Independiente tanto para el maxilar como para la mandíbula, los valores de las medianas fueron altamente significativas, lo cual indica que estas difieren en los tres tiempos estudiados (p<0,001). Se encontró diferencia significativa entre las medianas del maxilar y la mandíbula solamente al momento de la colocación de implantes. En los demás tiempos evaluados, no se observaron diferencias significativas (p>0,05). En el maxilar, la estabilidad de los implantes aumenta con el tiempo. En la mandíbula, disminuye en la sexta semana y aumenta en las 8 siguientes, alcanzando valores similares a los iniciales. La estabilidad de los implantes es mayor en la mandíbula que en el maxilar, solo al momento de la cirugía. A las 8 semanas, la estabilidad alcanzada por los implantes en el maxilar y la mandíbula son similares.

The aim of this study was to test and compare dental implant stability placed in the maxilla and the mandible during three time periods, by resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Using a non experimental prospective study we evaluated 103 3i Biomet Osseotite Implants in 90 patients (50 in maxilla and 53 in mandible). An electronic RFA device (Osstell Mentor®) was used to record the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ values) at implant surgery, at six weeks and at eight weeks. Concerning the maxilla, median values increase continuously after implant placement. In the mandible, median values seem to be similar in mandibular at the first and the third evaluation time, but decrease in the second one. Separately for both maxilla and mandible, the median values were highly significant, indicating that these differ in the three time periods studied (p<0.001). Significant difference between the median of the maxilla and mandible was found only at the time of implant placement. At 6 and 8 weeks, no significant differences were observed (p>0.05). In the maxilla, the initial stability of implants is increased in time. In the mandible, initial stability decreases at 6 weeks but increases again at 8 weeks, reaching values similar to the initial. The implant stability was higher in mandible than maxilla only at implant placement. At 8 weeks the stability achieved by the implants in the maxilla and mandible was similar.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: evaluar el torque de remoción de tres implantes con superficies diferentes, a los 60 días de inserción. Materiales y métodos: se midió la frecuencia de resonancia inicial y final y torque de remoción a los 60 días en 18 implantes: Biomet 3i (Palm Beach Gardens, FL, Estados Unidos); n=6; B&W (Buenos Aires, Argentina), n=6; Tree-Oss (Buenos Aires, Argentina), n=6; todos de 8,5 mm de longitud y 4 mm de diámetro. Los datos fueron sometidos al test no paramétrico de Mann-Whitney, al de Kruskal-Wallis y al de Wilcoxon. Resultados: la media de torque de remoción fue de 82,58 Ncm para implantes Biomet 3i; de 78,08 Ncm para B6W; y de 69 Ncm para Tree-Oss, sin diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p=0,220). La media de ISQ inicial y final fue de 57, 17 y 70,33 para Biomet 3i; de 56,33 y 62,07 para B6W y de 58,17 y 54,5 para Tree-Oss. Conclusión: los tres grupos de implantes presentan valores de torque de remoción similares, sin diferencias estadísticamente significativas pero con diferencias significativas en relación a ISQ final.

Aim: to evaluate the removal torque of three implants with different surfaces placed in rabbit femur, 60 days afterinsertion and to compare the implant stability quotient rightafter insertion and 60 days later.Materials and methods: Initial and final resonance frequency analysis and removal torque were measured at day60, in 18 parallel wall implants: Biomet 3i (Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA), n=6; B&W (Buenos Aires, Argentina), n=6; Tree-Oss (Buenos Aires, Argentina), n=6; of 8.5 mm in lengthand 4 mm in diameter, placed in the femur of 6 rabbits. Datacollected were analyzed by nonparametric Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests. Results: The mean removal torques were 82,58 Ncm forBiomet 3i, 78,08 Ncm for B&W and 69 Ncm for Tree-Oss. Differences were not statistically significant (p=0.220). Inassessing initial and final ISQ, the averages obtained for Biomet3i were 57.17 and 70.33, respectively; for B&W 56.33 and62.67, and 58.17 and 54.5 for Tree-Oss. Conclusion: It is concluded that the three groups presented similar removal torque values with no statistically significant differences between them, but there were significant differences in relation to final ISQ.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to investigate how a low-intensity laser affects the stability and reverse torque resistance of dental implants installed in the tibia of rabbits. Thirty rabbits received 60 dental implants with the same design and surface treatment, one in each proximal metaphysis of the tibia. Three groups were prepared (n = 10 animals each): conventional osseointegration without treatment (control group), surgical sites irradiated with a laser beam emitted in the visible range of 680 nm (Lg1 group), surgical sites irradiated with a laser beam with a wavelength in the infrared range of 830 nm (Lg2 group). Ten irradiation sessions were performed 48 hours apart; the first session was during the immediate postoperative period. Irradiation energy density was 4 J/cm(2) per point in 2 points on each side of the tibias. The resonance frequency and removal torque values were measured at 2 time points after the implantations (3 and 6 weeks). Both laser groups (Lg1 and Lg2) presented a significant difference between resonance frequency analysis values at the baseline and the values obtained after 3 and 6 weeks (P > .05). Although the removal torque values of all groups increased after 6 weeks (P < .05), both laser groups presented greater mean values than those of the control group (P < .01). Photobiomodulation using laser irradiation with wavelengths of 680 and 830 nm had a better degree of bone integration than the control group after 6 weeks of observation time.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The present study measured implant stability quotient (ISQ) values at three different time points after surgical procedures to compare whether the stability values differed between implants placed in fresh extraction sockets versus healed alveolar sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To measure implant stability, resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed in 77 patients (53 women, 24 men) with a total of 120 dental implants. These implants were divided into two groups: Group 1 included 60 implants in healed alveolar sites (22 in the maxilla, 38 in the mandible), and Group 2 included 60 implants in fresh sockets (41 in the maxilla, 19 in the mandible). Implant stability was measured immediately at implant placement (baseline), 90, and 150 days later. Statistical analysis was made using a multivariate regression linear model at implant level (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Overall, the means and standard deviations of the ISQ values were 62.7 ± 7.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 39-88) at baseline, 70.0 ± 6.22 (95% CI, 46-88) at 90 days, and 73.4 ± 5.84 (95% CI, 58-88) at 150 days. In Group 1, the ISQs ranged between 64.3 ± 6.20 and 75.0 ± 5.69, while in Group 2, presented lower values that ranged between 61.2 ± 8.09 and 71.9 ± 5.99 (P = 0.002). Anatomic location and times periods were the only identified variables with an influence on ISQ values at implant level (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The stabilities of the implants placed in the fresh sockets and in healed sites exhibited similar evolutions in ISQ values and thus osseointegration; however, the implants in the healed alveolar sites exhibited superior values at all time points.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The Resonance Frequency Analysis by Osstell® is used in the assessment of primary and secondary implant stability. The aim of this study was to determine its accuracy as a method of testing, checking its repeatability and reproducibility. A pilot study was performed whereby implants were placed in a cow rib to compare several ISQ measurements with the same SmartPeg transducer (repeatability), or with different SmartPegs (reproducibility). Statistical analysis of the data showed a high correlation of the ISQ values obtained in both assays, which suggests that Osstell®analysis can provide high repeatability and reproducibility.

El análisis de frecuencia de resonancia (AFR) por Osstell® se utiliza en la evaluación de la estabilidad primaria y secundaria del implante. El objetivo del presente estudio fue establecer la precisión del AFR mediante Osstell©, como método de prueba empleado en la determinación de la estabilidad implantaria. Se realizó un estudio experimental in vitro, en el que se colocaron implantes en una costilla de vaca y compararon diferentes mediciones del coeficiente de estabilidad del implante (ISQ) obtenidas sobre estos implantes con un mismo transductor SmartPeg (repetibilidad) o con diferentes SmartPegs (reproductibilidad). El análisis estadístico de los datos mostró una elevada correlación de los ISQ obtenidos en ambos ensayos, lo cual sugiere una reproductibilidad y repetibilidad elevada del análisis mediante Osstell.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to compare the influence of graft material (non-ceramic hydroxyapatite versus autologous bone) on bone behaviour and perform a resonance frequency analysis of implants placed in augmented sites to evaluate stability. For this study, 11 patients with bilateral edentulous areas in the mandibular posterior region were selected. Alveolar augmentation osteotomies were bilaterally (split mouth design) performed. In one hemiarch, the space generated by the osteotomy was grafted with an interpositional intra-oral autologous bone graft (control group). In the other hemiarch, the space generated by the osteotomy was grafted with an interpositional non-ceramic hydroxyapatite (ncHA) (test group). The groups were randomized. After 6 months of healing, a bone sample was retrieved from each side for histological evaluation using a trephine drill that was 2-mm in internal diameter. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured by the resonance frequency immediately following implant placement at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up. Good incorporation of the graft was observed in both groups; however, in the test group, a residual-grafted material was observed. Bone density and marrow spaces were similar between groups. Correlations between the ISQ values and the histometric variables were not observed (p>0.05). The results of this trial suggest that both intra-oral autologous bone and ncHA may be elected as interpositional grafting materials to vertically augment posterior atrophic mandibles.

Assuntos