RESUMO
The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) has been consistently described in patients with acute/subacute cerebellar injuries. However, studies with chronic patients have had controversial findings that have not been explored with new cerebellar-target tests, such as the CCAS scale (CCAS-S). The objective of this research is to prove and contrast the usefulness of the CCAS-S and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test to evaluate cognitive/affective impairments in patients with chronic acquired cerebellar lesions, and to map the cerebellar areas whose lesions correlated with dysfunctions in these tests. CCAS-S and MoCA were administrated to 22 patients with isolated chronic cerebellar strokes and a matched comparison group. The neural bases underpinning both tests were explored with multivariate lesion-symptom mapping (LSM) methods. MoCA and CCAS-S had an adequate test performance with efficient discrimination between patients and healthy volunteers. However, only impairments determined by the CCAS-S resulted in significant regional localization within the cerebellum. Specifically, patients with chronic cerebellar lesions in right-lateralized posterolateral regions manifested cognitive impairments inherent to CCAS. These findings concurred with the anterior-sensorimotor/posterior-cognitive dichotomy in the human cerebellum and revealed clinically intra- and cross-lobular significant regions (portions of right lobule VI, VII, Crus I-II) for verbal tasks that overlap with the "language" functional boundaries in the cerebellum. Our findings prove the usefulness of MoCA and CCAS-S to reveal cognitive impairments in patients with chronic acquired cerebellar lesions. This study extends the understanding of long-term CCAS and introduces multivariate LSM methods to identify clinically intra- and cross-lobular significant regions underpinning chronic CCAS.
Assuntos
Doenças Cerebelares , Transtornos Cognitivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Cerebelo , Cognição , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cognitivos/etiologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/patologia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicaçõesRESUMO
The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale (CCAS-S) was designed to detect specific cognitive dysfunctions in cerebellar patients but is scarcely validated in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA). The objective of this study is to determine the usefulness of the CCAS-S in a Cuban cohort of SCA2 patients and the relationship of its scores with disease severity. The original scale underwent a forward and backward translation into Spanish language, followed by a pilot study to evaluate its comprehensibility. Reliability, discriminant, and convergent validity assessments were conducted in 64 SCA2 patients and 64 healthy controls matched for sex, age, and education. Fifty patients completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. The CCAS-S showed an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74) while its total raw score and the number of failed tests showed excellent (ICC = 0.94) and good (ICC = 0.89) test-retest reliability, respectively. Based on original cut-offs, the sensitivity of CCAS-S to detect possible/probable/definite CCAS was notably high (100%/100%/91%), but specificities were low (6%/30/64%) because the decreased specificity observed in four items. CCAS-S performance was significantly influenced by ataxia severity in patients and by education in both groups. CCAS-S scores correlated with MoCA scores, but showed higher sensitivity than MoCA to detect cognitive impairments in patients. The CCAS-S is particularly useful to detect cognitive impairments in SCA2 but some transcultural and/or age and education-dependent adaptations could be necessary to improve its diagnostic properties. Furthermore, this scale confirmed the parallelism between cognitive and motor deficits in SCA2, giving better insights into the disease pathophysiology and identifying novel outcomes for clinical trials.