RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the association between potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and the risk of death among community-dwelling older Brazilian adults. METHODS: Participants from the Health, Well-Being, and Aging Cohort Study (SABE) in São Paulo, Brazil, between 2000 and 2016 were included. The dependent variable was all-cause mortality, measured as the time elapsed until death. The exposure of interest was the use of PIM according to the Beers Criteria 2019 version. All covariates, except for sex and education, were considered time-varying. RESULTS: PIM use was not associated with mortality after adjusting for covariates (HR = 0.99; 95 % CI: 0.88-1.12). There was a significant interaction between PIM use and age (HR = 0.98; 95 % CI: 0.96-0.99). CONCLUSION: The association between PIM use and the risk of death was moderated by age. Future studies should consider the impact of necessary medication omissions when assessing the mortality risk associated with PIM use.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in critical care units remains limited, especially in terms of the factors associated with their use. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and factors associated with PIMs use in intensive care units. DESIGN AND SETTING: Historical cohort study was conducted in a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 314 patients aged ≥ 60 years who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. The dates were extracted from a "Patient Safety Project" database. A Chi-square test, Student's t-test, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess which factors were associated with PIMs. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: According to Beers' criteria, 12.8% of the identified drugs were considered inappropriate for the elderly population. The incidence rate of PIMs use was 45.8%. The most frequently used PIMs were metoclopramide, insulin, antipsychotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and benzodiazepines. Factors associated with PIMs use were the number of medications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17), length of hospital stay (OR = 1.07), and excessive potential drug interactions (OR = 2.43). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the older adults in ICUs received PIM. Patients taking PIMs had a longer length of stay in the ICU, higher numbers of medications, and higher numbers of potential drug interactions. In ICUs, the use of explicit methods combined with clinical judgment can contribute to the safety and quality of medication prescriptions.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions are a common cause of potentially avoidable harm, particularly in older adults. AIMS: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a pilot multifactorial intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older adults. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2, feasibility, open-label study in the ambulatory setting of an integrated healthcare network in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We recruited primary care physicians (PCPs) and measured PIM use in a sample of their patients (65 years or older). Educational workshops for PCPs were organized with the involvement of clinician champions. Practical deprescribing algorithms were designed based on Beers criteria. Automatic email alerts based on specific PIMs recorded in each patient's electronic health record were used as a reminder tool. PCPs were responsible for deprescribing decisions. We randomly sampled 879 patients taking PIMs from eight of the most commonly used drug classes at our institution and compared basal (6 months prior to the intervention) and final (12 months after) prevalence of PIM use using a test of proportions. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in all drug classes evaluated. Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (basal prevalence 5.92%; final 1.59%); benzodiazepines (10.13%; 6.94%); histamine antagonists (7.74%; 3.07%); opioids (2.16%; 1.25%); tricyclic antidepressants (8.08%; 4.10%); muscle relaxants (7.74%; 3.41%), anti-hypertensives (3.53%; 1.82%) and oxybutynin (2.96%; 1.82%). The absolute reduction in the overall prevalence was 8.5 percentage points (relative reduction of 51.4%). CONCLUSION: This multifactorial intervention is feasible and effective in reducing the use of potentially inappropriate medication in all drug classes evaluated.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background Potentially inappropriate medications for older adults are those that offer more risks than benefits for this population. Such medications found in older adults' prescriptions across the world are associated with higher rates of comorbidities and hospitalizations, along with high expenditure on healthcare resources. Objectives To estimate the frequency of older adults using potentially inappropriate medications according to four different criteria, to identify factors associated with the use of such medicines and differences between the tools. Setting A primary healthcare unit linked to a university hospital in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Method This was a cross-sectional study conducted via data collection from the electronic medical records of 390 older adults. The information collected comprised sex, age, chronic diseases diagnosed and medications used. The dependent variable of the study was the use of at least one potentially inappropriate medication, according to the following criteria: Beers, Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP), Brazilian consensus and Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS). Main outcome measurement Prevalence of inappropriate medication, differences between the tools and associated factors. Results: The use of at least one potentially inappropriate medication was found in 55.1% of the sample according to the Beers criterion, 51.3% according to the Brazilian consensus, 42.6% according to STOPP and 23.6% according to ARS. It was also seen that 14.9% of the studied population was exposed to a very strong anticholinergic risk. Depending on which tools were used, the agreement observed between the criteria was considered high, moderate, or low. Regarding the four criteria, the use of potentially inappropriate medication is associated with polypharmacy, the diagnosis of three or more chronic diseases and the presence of neuropsychiatric and musculoskeletal diseases. Conclusion Among the older adult population studied, the prevalence of potentially anappropriate medication is high, according to the four different classification criteria used. As a more specific tool, the agreement between Anticholinergic Risk Scale and other criteria was lower, but it can be an important complement to other lists.

Assuntos

RESUMO

O envelhecimento está relacionado, via de regra, ao uso de medicamentos. Esta é uma revisão sistemática sobre as prevalências de uso de medicamento potencialmente perigosos em idosos, em estudos brasileiros, utilizando-se o Critério de Beers. A prevalência variou entre 17 e 98,2% em amostras domiciliares, ambulatoriais, hospitalares e em instituições de longa permanência. Dados que demonstram a necessidade de políticas de enfrentamento aos riscos inerentes ao uso de medicamento pelo paciente idoso no Brasil.

The aging is related with use of drugs. This research is a systematic review about use of potentially inappropriate drugs for elderly evaluated by Beers Criteria. The prevalence's range was 17 to 98,2% on home, ambulatory, hospital or nursing home samples. These data demonstrate that governmental politics are necessary to face the risks of drugs using by elderly in Brazil.

El envejecimiento generalmente está relacionado con el uso de medicamentos. Esta es una revisión sistemática de la prevalencia del uso de drogas potencialmente peligrosas en los ancianos, en estudios brasileños, utilizando el Criterio de Beers. La prevalencia varió entre 17 y 98.2% en muestras de atención domiciliaria, ambulatoria, hospitalaria y de atención a largo plazo. Datos que demuestran la necesidad de políticas para enfrentar los riesgos inherentes al uso de medicamentos por parte de pacientes de edad avanzada en Brasil.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background Medications in which the risk of adverse events exceeds the expectations of clinical benefits are called potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). To identify the use of PIMs in elderly patients, the most commonly used tool are the Beers criteria, developed for the population of the United States. Recently, a consensus panel of Argentine experts developed the first Latin American tool, called the IFAsPIAM List. Objective The present study aimed to identify PIM prescriptions in elderly outpatients, to estimate the prevalence of PIMs, and to evaluate their possible relation with polypharmacy and gender and age of the patients. Also, we aimed to compare the results obtained by using the Beers criteria and the IFAsPIAM List. Setting Ten community pharmacies of Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted between February and September 2015. Data were acquired from 56,952 prescriptions prescribed to 2231 patients aged 65 years old or older. To detect the use of PIMs, we used two tools: the Beers criteria and the IFAsPIAM List. Main outcome measure The prevalence of PIM use according to the Beers criteria and the IFAsPIAM List. Results The monthly average of medications dispensed per patient was 4.35 ± 2.18 and 42.27% of the patients presented major polypharmacy. The prevalence of PIMs was 72.75% according to the Beers criteria and 71.13% according to the IFAsPIAM List (Kappa coefficient k = 0.72), and was significantly higher in patients with major polypharmacy, older than 75 years old, and females. The most frequent PIMs prescribed were anxiolytics, analgesics and antipsychotics. Conclusions The IFAsPIAM List is an effective tool to evaluate the prescription of PIMs in the elderly. The results showed a high prevalence of PIMs with a multicausal origin and directly associated with polypharmacy. As clarified by the authors of the IFAsPIAM List, the criteria specified in the list do not substitute the clinical evaluation of each patient.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background Older kidney transplant recipients take a larger number of medications than younger patients, but there is currently no evidence that this affects health outcomes or that is it associated with potentia medicine-related problems. Objective To evaluate the prevalence and number of potentially inappropriate medications in older kidney transplant recipients and also the possible associated factors (sex, age, comorbidities, number of medications, etc.). Setting A renal post-transplant ambulatory outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil. Method PIMs were defined according to the Beers criteria, version 2015. Medications were classified following the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. Chi squared tests and analysis of variance were used for the analyses. Main outcome measure Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications and medication groups with higher prevalence rates of PIMs, including associated factors. Results Among 143 kidney transplant recipients, 77.6% had at least one potentially inappropriate medication as part of their prescription regime. Medication groups that were most implicated in PIM are medicines that act on the alimentary tract and metabolism (55.9%), cardiovascular system (32.2%) and nervous system (21.7%). We detected a high prevalence (63.6%) of self-medication (use of OTC medicines without indication of a healthcare professional) among the population studied. There was a statistically significant association between the number of prescribed medications and the presence of potentially inappropriate medication in the prescription regime (P < 0.01). Conclusion Our data draw attention to the need of medicine therapy management by clinical pharmacists and clinicians in this group of patients and also assessing the real clinical impacts of these medications in the prescription regimes of elderly renal transplant patients.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate whether the potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is a predictor for mortality in a community-based population of older adults. METHODS: A cohort study was performed between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2011, based on data from a representative sample of the population aged 60 years or older living in Bambuí, Brazil. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the association between the variable of interest (use of PIM or pharmacological groups of PIM) and mortality were based on the extended Cox model for proportional hazards. The extended model was adopted to include the measurement of the exposure of interest throughout the follow-up period and not only at baseline. Adjustment variables included sociodemographic characteristics, health status, and use of health care services and medications. A level of significance of 5% was adopted for all analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence of PIM use was 56.0% (95%CI 53.4-58.6). After multiple adjustments, the risk of death among users of at least one PIM was 44% higher (HR = 1.44; 95%CI 1.21 to 1.71) than among those who did not use any PIM. Among the PIM groups analyzed, antipsychotics were the most strongly associated with mortality (HR = 2.33; 95%CI 1.72 to 3.17). CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed a high prevalence of PIM use among the community-based aged population. It also identified PIM use as a predictor for mortality in this group of individuals. This indicates the need for selection of safer drug therapy alternatives in this patient group.

Assuntos

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Management of pharmacotherapy in elderly with metabolic diseases is challenging and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are risk factors for drug interactions and adverse events. The exposure to PIMs in elderly outpatients with metabolic diseases and its relationship with polypharmacy and other variables was investigated. PIMs prescribed to 207 elderly patients (aged 60 to 96 years) with metabolic diseases who attended a University Hospital of Sao Paulo city, Brazil, from April/2010 to January/2011, were evaluated. PIMs were detected using both 2003 Beers and 2008 STOPP criteria. The association between PIMs and age, gender and polypharmacy was also examined. 2008 STOPP criteria detected more PIMs (44.4 %) than 2003 Beers criteria (16.0%, p<0.001). Beers detected mainly PIMs antihypertensive (clonidine, 20.0%; doxazosin, 10.0%) and antidepressant (fluoxetine, 15.0%; amitriptyline, 10.0%) PIMs. Medicines used for cardiovascular (aspirin, 53.7%) and endocrine system (glibenclamide, 21.3%) were PIMs more frequently detected by 2008 STOPP. Unlike age and gender, polypharmacy increased the risk of PIMs by both 2003 Beers (OR: 4.0, CI95%: 1.2-13.8, p<0.031) and 2008 STOPP (OR: 6.8, CI95%: 3.0-15.3, p<0.001). Beers and STOPP criteria are important tools to evaluate the exposure to PIMs, which is strongly associated with polypharmacy in elderly outpatients with metabolic diseases.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumo O objetivo foi avaliar a frequência de utilização em domicílio de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados por idosos e analisar a significância clínica. Trata-se de estudo transversal retrospectivo, recorte de um estudo de utilização de medicamentos desenvolvido em um hospital público. Os medicamentos inapropriados foram classificados empregando os três grupos de critérios explícitos incluídos na Lista de Beers de 2012. Houve inclusão de 190 idosos na pesquisa e a prevalência encontrada para utilização de medicamentos inapropriados foi 44,2%. As classes terapêuticas de medicamentos inapropriados mais utilizados foram antiinflamatórios não esteroidais, agentes cardiovasculares, benzodiazepínicos e antidepressivos. Identificou-se associação positiva entre utilização de medicamentos inapropriados e polifarmácia, polipatologia e hipertensão. Na Rename 2013 identificou-se 35(34,3%) fármacos inapropriados. O estudo demonstrou alta prevalência de utilização de medicamentos inapropriados pelos idosos. As consequências clínicas da utilização de medicamentos inapropriados são importantes para a saúde pública devido ao risco de eventos adversos e impacto negativo na funcionalidade do idoso. Na atenção ao idoso é importante desenvolver ações para promover o uso racional de medicamentos.

Abstract The goal of this study was to assess how often potentially inappropriate medicines are used by the elderly at home, and analyze its clinical significance. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study, a segment of a study on the use of medication conducted at a public hospital. Inappropriate medication was classified according to the three criteria in the 2012 Beers List. 190 elderly were included in this study; the prevalence of the use of inappropriate medicines was 44.2%. The therapeutic classes of most often used inappropriate medicines were non-steroid anti-inflammatories, cardiovascular agents, benzodiazepines and antidepressants. We found a positive association between the use of inappropriate medicines and polypharmacy, polypathology and hypertension. The 2013 Rename identified 35 inappropriate drugs (34.3%). The study showed a high prevalence of using inappropriate medicines by the elderly. The clinical consequences of using inappropriate medicines are important for public health due to the risk of adverse events and a negative impact on elderly functionality. When it comes to caring for the elderly, it is important to develop measures to foster the rational use of medication.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence and determinants of the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older U.S. adults using the 2012 Beers criteria. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study in a random national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. SETTING: Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries from 2007 to 2012. PARTICIPANTS: U.S. population aged 65 and older with Parts A, B, and D enrollment in at least 1 month during a calendar year (N = 38,250 individuals; 1,308,116 observations). MEASUREMENTS: The 2012 Beers criteria were used to estimate the prevalence of the use of PIMs in each calendar month and over a 12-month period using data on diagnoses or conditions present in the previous 12 months. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for the dependence of multiple monthly observations of a single person when estimating 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and logistic regression was used to identify independent determinants of PIM use. RESULTS: The point prevalence of the use of PIMs decreased from 37.6% (95% CI = 37.0-38.1) in 2007 to 34.2% (95% CI = 33.6-34.7) in 2012, with a statistically significant 2% (95% CI = 1-3%) decline per year assuming a linear trend. The 1-year period prevalence declined from 64.9% in 2007 to 56.6% in 2012. The strongest predictor of PIM use was the number of drugs dispensed. Individuals aged 70 and older and those seen by a geriatrician were less likely to receive a PIM. CONCLUSION: From 2007 to 2012, the prevalence of PIM use in older U.S. adults decreased according to the 2012 Beers criteria, although it remains high, still affecting one-third each month and more than half over 12 months. The number of dispensed prescriptions could be used to target future interventions.

Assuntos

RESUMO

A descriptive, cross-sectional study of data from 15 elderly users of the Medication Therapy Management (MTM) service, delivered as a university extension project at a primary health unit in the city of Minas Gerais, Brazil was carried out. The objective of the study was to assess the use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) according to the Beers criteria (2015 version) and its relationship with drug-related problems (DRPs) identifed both theoretically and by the students during the process of service provision. The MTM service adopted the methodology recommended in the theoretical framework of Pharmaceutical Care Practice. In addition, the knowledge on PIMs held by the Pharmacy students involved in the service was assessed by applying a semi-structured questionnaire. The majority of the patient population was in use of at least one PIM (60%), with a total of 10 PIMs prescribed to 9 patients. Each PIM corresponded to a single DRP (n=10). However, the Pharmacy students providing the service identifed only three DRPs. All of the students interviewed reported knowing the PIM concept. However, the majority of students were unable to identify the PIMs in the pharmacotherapy of their patients. These results highlight the importance of the Beers criteria for identifying DRPs and the need for greater focus on these criteria during Pharmacy training.(AU)

Este estudo transversal descritivo foi realizado com dados de 15 idosos acompanhados em um Serviço de Gerenciamento da Terapia Medicamentosa ofertado como projeto de extensão universitária em uma unidade de atenção primária à saúde em um município de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Teve como objetivo avaliar a utilização de medicamentos potencialmente inadequados (MPI) de acordo com os critérios de Beers (versão 2015) e sua relação com problemas relacionados ao uso de medicamentos (PRM) identifcados teoricamente bem como aqueles identifcados pelos estudantes durante o processo de provisão do serviço. O serviço seguiu a metodologia preconizada no arcabouço teórico de Pharmaceutical Care Practice. Além disso, por meio de um questionário semiestruturados, foi avaliado o conhecimento dos estudantes de Farmácia envolvidos no serviço acerca de MPI. A maioria da população utilizava pelo menos um MPI (60%), sendo que foram identifcados 10 MPI que estavam prescritos para 9 idosos. Cada MPI correspondeu a um PRM teórico (n=10). No entanto, os estudantes de Farmácia oferecendo o serviço identifcaram apenas três PRM. Todos os estudantes entrevistados relataram conhecer o conceito de MPI. Porém, a maioria não os identifcou na farmacoterapia de seus pacientes. Estes resultados demonstram a importância dos critérios de Beers para identifcação de PRM e a necessidade de melhorias na sua abordagem durante a graduação em Farmácia.(AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Explicit criteria for evaluating the appropriateness of medication use among the elderly have been extensively employed in several countries. The aim of the current study was to assess and characterize the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) according to the Screening Tool of Older People's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria and compare these data with the 2012 Beers criteria. METHODS: A prospective survey of the medications used by elderly patients was performed. A total of 142 participants were randomly selected via systematic sampling. The Beers and STOPP criteria were applied to evaluate the use of PIMs among the sample. All of the medications included in these criteria were assessed for their availability in Brazil. The prevalence of PIMs was chosen as an occurrence measure and compared among the exposure group using the prevalence ratio (PR) as a measure of association. RESULTS: The prevalence of PIM use in the sample was 33.8% according to the STOPP criteria and 51.8% using the 2012 Beers criteria. The most prevalent PIMs according to the Beers criteria were short-acting nifedipine (17.4%) and glyburide (11.9%); according to the STOPP criteria, they were acetylsalicylic acid (32.9%), clonazepam (10.1%) and diclofenac (6.3%). The use of four or more drugs (polypharmacy) was associated with a higher prevalence of PIM use (PR = 3.11, 95% CIs = 1.65-5.85). CONCLUSIONS: The 2012 Beers criteria identified more PIMs than the STOPP criteria. This difference highlights the need to develop national criteria.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) use and associated factors, as well as the prevalence of Prescribing Omissions (PO). A cross-sectional study was conducted in a philanthropic Brazilian nursing home involving 46 individuals aged 60 years or older. The following information was collected from medical records and drug prescriptions: gender, age, health conditions and drugs used in the past thirty days. PIM and PO were identified according to the Beers' Criteria and the STOPP/START screening tools. Over one third (37%) of the population used at least one PIM according to the Beers' Criteria (n=17) and 60.9% according to the STOPP tool. A significant association was found between polypharmacy (use of five or more drugs) and use of PIM according to the Beers' Criteria, but not according to the STOPP. Eight residents (17.4%) were exposed to eight PO. This study allowed the diagnosis of a concerning drug utilization profile with use of a high number of PIMs. Thus, there is an evident need to implement strategies for improving geriatric prescription.

O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a prevalência de uso de medicamentos potencialmente inadequados (MPI) e fatores associados, bem como a prevalência de omissões farmacoterapêuticas (OF). Trata-se de um estudo transversal realizado em uma instituição filantrópica brasileira de longa permanência com 46 indivíduos com 60 anos ou mais. As seguintes informações foram coletadas a partir de prontuários e prescrições: sexo, idade, condições de saúde e medicamentos utilizados nos últimos trinta dias. MPI e OF foram identificados pelo Critério de Beers e as ferramentas de triagem STOPP/START. Mais de um terço (37%) da população utilizou pelo menos, um MPI de acordo com os critérios de Beers (n=17) e 60.9% de acordo com a ferramenta STOPP. Associação estatisticamente significante foi detectada entre a polifarmácia (consumo de cinco ou mais medicamentos) e uso de MPI de acordo com os critérios de Beers, mas não de acordo com o STOPP. Oito residentes (17,4%) foram expostos a oito OF. Este estudo permitiu o diagnóstico de um perfil de utilização de medicamentos preocupante com número elevado de utilização de MPI. Isso indica a necessidade de implementar estratégias para melhorar a qualidade da prescrição geriátrica.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The need for specific care, coupled with new family arrangements, has contributed to the increasing institutionalization of elderly members. The purpose of this study was to evaluate drug use by institutionalized older adults according to Beers Criteria. This prospective, longitudinal study was conducted in the three non-profit long-stay geriatric care institutions of Campo Grande, in the Central-West region of Brazil. All subjects aged 60 years and above on November 2011 were included and followed until November 2012. Eighteen subjects were excluded and the final sample consisted of 133 individuals aged 60 to 113 years. Overall, 212 medications were used at geriatric care institution A, 532 at B, and 1329 at C. Thirty-four drugs were inappropriately prescribed 89 times at geriatric care institution A (41.98%), 49 prescribed 177 times at B (33.27%), and 91 prescribed 461 times at C (34.68%). Statistical differences in the inappropriate drug use were found between genders (p=0.007). The most commonly used potentially inappropriate medication were first-generation antihistamines (15.34%). There was a high frequency in the use of potentially inappropriate medications which can initiate marked side effects and may compromise the fragile health of institutionalized elderly. Thus, adopting the Beers Criteria in prescribing medication contributes to minimize adverse reactions and drug interactions.

A exigência de cuidados específicos, aliada aos novos arranjos familiares, tem contribuído para a crescente institucionalização dos idosos. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi avaliar o uso de medicamentos por idosos institucionalizados utilizando os Critérios de Beers. Este estudo longitudinal prospectivo foi realizado nas três instituições de longa permanência para idosos de Campo Grande, Centro-Oeste do Brasil. Todos os sujeitos com 60 anos ou mais foram incluídos em Novembro de 2011 e acompanhados até Novembro de 2012. Dezoito idosos foram excluídos, sendo a amostra final composta por 133 sujeitos com idade entre 60 e 113 anos. O total de medicamentos utilizados foi 212 na instituição A, 532 na B e 1329 na C. Foram identificados 34 medicamentos inapropriados, prescritos 89 vezes na instituição A (41.98%), 49 prescritos 177 vezes na B (67.29%) e 90 prescritos 460 vezes na C (34.61%). Este estudo demonstrou diferença estatística na utilização de medicamentos inapropriados entre os gêneros (p=0.007). Os anti-histamínicos de 1ª geração foram os medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados para idosos mais utilizados (15.34%). Houve elevada frequência no uso de MPI, os quais podem desencadear efeitos colaterais acentuados e comprometer mais a saúde fragilizada do idoso institucionalizado. Ainda, a adoção dos Critérios de Beers na prescrição contribui para minimizar as reações adversas e interações medicamentosas.

Assuntos

RESUMO

In recent decades, the elderly population in Brazil has grown rapidly, as has concern for the health of this population. Institutionalization in nursing homes has appeared as an alternative form of health care for frail elderly that live alone. The present study evaluated the pharmacotherapy and inappropriate drug prescriptions for institutionalized elderly patients living in long-term institutions in southeastern Brazil. This research was conducted at five institutions with a total sample of 151 individuals aged at least 60 years. Databases were used to identify drug interactions, defined daily dose and inappropriate prescriptions. The prevalence of drug intake among the elderly was 95.36%, and there were an average of 3.31 ± 1.80 drug prescriptions per individual. Based on Beers criteria, the prevalence of inappropriate prescriptions was 25.83%. In addition, 70.2% of prescriptions were prescribed at a higher dosage than the defined daily dose (ATC/WHO). Potential drug interactions were identified for 54.11% of prescriptions; 81.42% of these were of moderate severity. The main inappropriate drugs were prescribed for cardiovascular and nervous system problems. Institutionalized elderly individuals presented a high consumption and misuse of medications, requiring professional intervention to monitor prescriptions and improve the quality of service for this population.

Nas últimas décadas, o número de idosos no Brasil cresceu rapidamente, bem como, a preocupação com a saúde desta parcela da população. Neste cenário, a institucionalização em casas de repouso aparece como uma alternativa para os cuidados com a saúde dos idosos debilitados ou que vivem sozinhos. O presente estudo avaliou a farmacoterapia e a prescrição inadequada para idosos que residem em instituições de longa permanência no sudeste do Brasil. Esta pesquisa foi realizada em cinco instituições, totalizando uma amostra de 151 indivíduos com idade a partir de 60 anos. O banco de dados foi analisado para identificação de interações medicamentosas, dose diária definida e critérios de Beers. Dentre os indivíduos avaliados, 95,36% consomem algum tipo de medicamento, sendo 3,31 ± 1,80 medicamentos prescritos por indivíduo. Com base nos critérios de Beers, a prevalência de prescrições inapropriadas foi de 25,83%, sendo também encontradas 70,2% das prescrições com doses superiores à dose diária definida (ATC/WHO). Interações medicamentosas potenciais estavam presentes em 54,11% das prescrições, sendo 81,42% com grau moderado de gravidade. Os principais medicamentos inapropriados foram prescritos para problemas cardiovasculares e do sistema nervoso. Os idosos institucionalizados apresentam alto consumo e uso inadequado de medicamentos, sendo necessária a intervenção profissional para monitorar as prescrições médicas e melhorar a qualidade do serviço de distribuição de medicamentos a esta parte da população.

Assuntos