RESUMO
Presentamos el caso de un paciente con una tenosinovitis piógena del 5° dedo de la mano, tratado inicialmente con desbridamiento quirúrgico y antibioterapia empírica. La evolución fue desfavorable, pues el dedo presentaba un defecto de cobertura con signos infecciosos en la herida y las curas resultaban muy dolorosas. Al paciente se le ofertaron varias opciones quirúrgicas y, mientras se decidía por alguna, aceptó por escrito iniciar curas con sevoflurano líquido tópico (según protocolo vigente para uso de fármacos fuera de indicación). El efecto analgésico del sevoflurano apareció rápidamente, y la evolución posterior de la herida fue muy favorable, pues los signos infecciosos desaparecieron y el defecto de cobertura se había cerrado tras tres semanas de empleo de sevoflurano tópico, sin necesidad de nuevas cirugías. Este caso ejemplifica que el uso fuera de indicación de sevoflurano tópico para tratar heridas complejas puede evitar actuaciones quirúrgicas, mucho más agresivas para los pacientes.
The clinical case is presented on a patient suffering from pyogenic tenosynovitis affecting the 5th finger of the hand, which was initially treated with surgical debridement and empirical antibiotic treatment. The clinical outcome was unfavourable, since the finger presented with a coverage defect, and the wound seemed to be infected. Wound cleaning and dressings were very painful. The patient was asked to choose between several surgical therapeutic alternatives, but he gave written informed consent to be treated with topical sevoflurane, following an approved protocol for the off-label use of this drug. Pain was accurately controlled after sevoflurane application, and the wound exhibited a very good outcome with disappearance of the clinical signs of infection and complete closure of the defect coverage after three weeks of sevoflurane, with no new surgical procedures. The present clinical case illustrates how the off-label use of topical sevoflurane for the treatment of complicated wounds could be useful to avoid surgical procedures that are more aggressive for patients.
Assuntos
Humanos , Sevoflurano , Tenossinovite , Infecção dos Ferimentos , Analgésicos de Curta Duração , Manejo da Dor , Anti-Infecciosos LocaisRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) consists of providing antimicrobial therapy by parenteral infusion without hospitalization. A systematic review was performed to compare OPAT and hospitalization as health care modalities from an economic perspective. Areas covered: We identified 1455 articles using 13 electronic databases and manual searches. Two independent reviewers identified 35 studies conducted between 1978 and 2016. We observed high heterogeneity in the following: countries, infection site, OPAT strategies and outcomes analyzed. Of these, 88% had a retrospective observational design and one was a randomized trial. With respect to economic analyses, 71% of the studies considered the cost-consequences, 11% cost minimization, 6% cost-benefit, 6% cost-utility analyses and 6% cost effectiveness. Considering all 35 studies, the general OPAT cost saving was 57.19% (from -13.03% to 95.47%). Taking into consideration only high-quality studies (6 comparative studies), the cost saving declined by 16.54% (from -13.03% to 46.86%). Expert commentary: Although most studies demonstrate that OPAT is cost-effective, the magnitude of this effect is compromised by poor methodological quality and heterogeneity. Economic assessments of the issue are needed using more rigorous methodologies that include a broad range of perspectives to identify the real magnitude of economic savings in different settings and OPAT modalities.