RESUMO

Testicular germ cell tumors are the most common tumors in adolescent and young men. They are curable malignancies that should be treated with curative intent, minimizing acute and long-term side effects. Inguinal orchiectomy is the main diagnostic procedure, and is also curative for most localized tumors, while patients with unfavorable risk factors for recurrence, or those who are unable or unwilling to undergo close follow-up, may require adjuvant treatment. Patients with persistent markers after orchiectomy or advanced disease at diagnosis should be staged and classified according to the IGCCCG prognostic classification. BEP is the most recommended chemotherapy, but other schedules such as EP or VIP may be used to avoid bleomycin in some patients. Efforts should be made to avoid unnecessary delays and dose reductions wherever possible. Insufficient marker decline after each cycle is associated with poor prognosis. Management of residual masses after chemotherapy differs between patients with seminoma and non-seminoma tumors. Patients at high risk of relapse, those with refractory tumors, or those who relapse after chemotherapy should be managed by multidisciplinary teams in experienced centers. Salvage treatment for these patients includes conventional-dose chemotherapy (TIP) and/or high-dose chemotherapy, although the best regimen and strategy for each subgroup of patients is not yet well established. In late recurrences, early complete surgical resection should be performed when feasible. Given the high cure rate of TGCT, oncologists should work with patients to prevent and identify potential long-term side effects of the treatment. The above recommendations also apply to extragonadal retroperitoneal and mediastinal tumors.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Leprosy, or Hansen's Disease, is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae that affects millions of people worldwide. Despite persistent efforts to combat it leprosy remains a significant public health concern particularly in developing countries. The underlying pathophysiology of the disease is not yet fully understood hindering the development of effective treatment strategies. However, recent studies have shed light on the potential role of microRNAs (miRNAs), small non-coding RNA molecules that can regulate gene expression, as promising biomarkers in various disease, including leprosy. This study aimed to validate a set of nine circulating miRNAs to propose new biomarkers for early diagnosis of the disease. Hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-106b-5p, hsa-miR-1291, hsa-miR-144-5p, and hsa-miR-20a-5p showed significant differential expression between non-leprosy group (non-LP) and leprosy group (LP), accurately discriminating between them (AUC > 0.75). In addition, our study revealed gender-based differences in miRNA expression in LP. Notably, hsa-miR-1291 showed higher expression in male LP, suggesting its potential as a male-specific biomarker. Similarly, hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-20a-5p displayed elevated expression in female LP, indicating their potential as female-specific biomarkers. Additionally, several studied miRNAs are involved in the dysregulation of apoptosis, autophagy, mitophagy, cell cycle, and immune system in leprosy. In conclusion, the validation of miRNA expression highlights several miRNAs as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis and provides new insights into the pathogenesis of the disease.

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the mitochondria/immune system interaction has been proposed, so that variants of mitochondrial genome and levels of heteroplasmy might deregulate important metabolic processes in fighting infections, such as leprosy. METHODS: We sequenced the whole mitochondrial genome to investigate variants and heteroplasmy levels, considering patients with different clinical forms of leprosy and household contacts. After sequencing, a specific pipeline was used for preparation and bioinformatics analysis to select heteroplasmic variants. RESULTS: We found 116 variants in at least two of the subtypes of the case group (Borderline Tuberculoid, Borderline Lepromatous, Lepromatous), suggesting a possible clinical significance to these variants. Notably, 15 variants were exclusively found in these three clinical forms, of which five variants stand out for being missense (m.3791T > C in MT-ND1, m.5317C > A in MT-ND2, m.8545G > A in MT-ATP8, m.9044T > C in MT-ATP6 and m.15837T > C in MT-CYB). In addition, we found 26 variants shared only by leprosy poles, of which two are characterized as missense (m.4248T > C in MT-ND1 and m.8027G > A in MT-CO2). CONCLUSION: We found a significant number of variants and heteroplasmy levels in the leprosy patients from our cohort, as well as six genes that may influence leprosy susceptibility, suggesting for the first time that the mitogenome might be involved with the leprosy process, distinction of clinical forms and severity. Thus, future studies are needed to help understand the genetic consequences of these variants.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Leprosy is an infectious disease primarily caused by the obligate intracellular parasite Mycobacterium leprae. Although it has been considered eradicated in many countries, leprosy continues to be a health issue in developing nations. Besides the social stigma associated with it, individuals affected by leprosy may experience nerve damage leading to physical disabilities if the disease is not properly treated or early diagnosed. Leprosy is recognized as a complex disease wherein socioenvironmental factors, immune response, and host genetics interact to contribute to its development. Recently, a new field of study called epigenetics has emerged, revealing that the immune response and other mechanisms related to infectious diseases can be influenced by noncoding RNAs. This review aims to summarize the significant advancements concerning non-coding RNAs in leprosy, discussing the key perspectives on this novel approach to comprehending the pathophysiology of the disease and identifying molecular markers. In our view, investigations on non-coding RNAs in leprosy hold promise and warrant increased attention from researches in this field.

RESUMO

Introduction: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (MIS-C), a novel hyperinflammatory condition secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, is associated with severe outcomes such as coronary artery aneurysm and death. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study including eight centers in Mexico, aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with MIS-C. Patient data were evaluated using latent class analysis (LCA) to categorize patients into three phenotypes: toxic shock syndrome-like (TSSL)-MIS-C, Kawasaki disease-like (KDL)-MIS-C, and nonspecific MIS-C (NS-MIS-C). Risk factors for adverse outcomes were estimated using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. Results: The study included 239 patients with MIS-C, including 61 (26%), 70 (29%), and 108 (45%) patients in the TSSL-MIS-C, KDL-MIS-C, and NS-MIS-C groups, respectively. Fifty-four percent of the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 42%, 78%, and 41% received intravenous immunoglobulin, systemic glucocorticoids, and anticoagulants, respectively. Coronary artery dilatation and aneurysms were found in 5.7% and 13.2% of the patients in whom coronary artery diameter was measured, respectively. Any cause in-hospital mortality was 5.4%. Hospitalization after ten days of symptoms was associated with coronary artery abnormalities (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.0). Age ≥10 years (OR: 5.6, 95% CI: 1.4-2.04), severe underlying condition (OR: 9.3, 95% CI: 2.8-31.0), platelet count <150,000 /mm3 (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.7), international normalized ratio >1.2 (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.05-13.9), and serum ferritin concentration >1,500 mg/dl at admission (OR: 52, 95% CI: 5.9-463) were risk factors for death. Discussion: Mortality in patients with MIS-C was higher than reported in other series, probably because of a high rate of cases with serious underlying diseases.

RESUMO

Background: Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, identifying the COVID-19 pathophysiology not only has been addressed to applying diagnostic tests or preventing through vaccines, but also to the timely detection, especially of patients in risk groups such as those in transplants areas (renal, hematology, etcetera). In the case of these patients, using RT-PCR tests avoids putting them at risk by subjecting them to states of immunosuppression that could aggravate their situation if they were faced with an onset of a COVID-19 infection. Objective: To present the results of patients of a transplant unit tested for SARS-CoV-2. Material and methods: Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, and retrolective study. Data of results of RT-PCR tests of patients who underwent transplantation from June 2021 to April 2022 in a third level hospital were collected. Results: 755 tests were done to patients who underwent transplantation. 384 (50.8%) were women. Out of all patients, only 73 (9.7%) were positive to SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions: Implementing RT-PCR tests as a transplant protocol to detect SARS-CoV-2 prevents fatal complications due to COVID infection to donors and receptors.

Introducción: desde que comenzó la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2, identificar la fisiopatología de la COVID-19 no solo se ha encaminado a aplicar pruebas diagnósticas o prevenir por medio de vacunas, sino también a la oportuna detección, sobre todo de pacientes de grupos de riesgo como los del área de trasplantes (renal, hematológico, etcétera). En el caso de estos pacientes, usar pruebas como la RT-PCR evita someterlos a estados de inmunosupresión que podrían agravar la situación en caso de que se encuentren ante un inicio de la infección por COVID-19. Objetivo: exponer los resultados de las pruebas de SARS-CoV-2 aplicadas a pacientes de una unidad de trasplantes. Material y métodos: estudio descriptivo, observacional, transversal y retrolectivo. Se recolectaron los datos de los resultados de las pruebas de RT-PCR para SARS-CoV-2 de pacientes sometidos a trasplante de junio de 2021 a abril de 2022 en un hospital de tercer nivel. Resultados: se hicieron 755 pruebas a los pacientes sometidos a trasplante; 384 (50.8%) fueron mujeres. De todos los pacientes, solo 73 (9.7%) fueron positivos a SARS-CoV-2. Conclusiones: implementar pruebas RT-PCR para detectar el SARS-CoV-2 como protocolo de trasplante previene complicaciones fatales derivadas de la infección por COVID a los donadores y a los receptores.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objective: To describe the epidemiological behavior of leprosy in several Latin American countries during 2011-2020, based on World Health Organization (WHO) indicators. Methods: Cross-sectional, descriptive and quantitative study with official data on incidence and prevalence in the general population, children, clinical form and cases with grade 2 disability from WHO records between 2011 and 2020. The eight countries in Latin America that reported most cases were selected and analyses were carried out using simple descriptive and comparative statistics between different variables. Results: During the study period, 301 312 cases of leprosy were reported in the selected countries: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Paraguay, and Venezuela. Brazil is the only country in the region with a prevalence greater than 1 per 10 000, representing 93.77% of all cases. Brazil and the Dominican Republic showed an increase in prevalence during 2011-2019, while in other countries the trend was decreasing. The disease is more frequent in men, and multibacillary cases significantly exceed paucibacillary ones. Brazil showed the highest incidences of cases of childhood leprosy and grade 2 disability during the evaluated period. Conclusion: In Latin America, leprosy is only considered a public health problem in Brazil; however, most countries in the region continue to report cases annually, revealing a lack of adequate medical care. This study confirmed the importance of active surveillance, early diagnosis and planning of actions against the disease in all the countries evaluated with the aim of reducing its transmission.

Objetivo: Descrever o comportamento epidemiológico da hanseníase em vários países de América Latina durante 2011-2020, tomando como base os indicadores da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Método: Estudo transversal, descritivo e quantitativo com dados oficiais de incidência e prevalência na população geral, em crianças, forma clínica e casos com incapacidade de grau 2 nos registros da OMS entre 2011 e 2020. Se selecionaram os oito países da América Latina que relataram a maioria dos casos e as análises foram avaliadas por meio de estatísticas descritivas e comparativas simples entre as variáveis. Resultados: No período, foram notificados 301 312 casos de hanseníase nos países selecionados: Argentina, Brasil, Colômbia, Cuba, México, Paraguai, República Dominicana e Venezuela. O Brasil é o único país da região com prevalência maior que 1 por 10 000 habitantes, representando 93,77% do total de casos. O Brasil e a República Dominicana mostraram um aumento na variação da prevalência durante 2011-2019, enquanto nos demais a tendência foi decrescente. A doença é mais frequente em homens e os casos multibacilares superam significativamente os paucibacilares. O Brasil apresentou as maiores incidências de hanseníase infantil e incapacidade de grau 2 durante o período avaliado. Conclusão: Na América Latina, a hanseníase só é considerada um problema de saúde pública no Brasil; no entanto, a maioria dos países da região continua notificando casos anualmente, revelando falta de assistência médica adequada. O presente estudo confirmou a importância da vigilância ativa, do diagnóstico precoce e do planejamento de ações contra a doença em todos os países avaliados, com o objetivo de reduzir e interromper a sua transmissão.

RESUMO

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Describir el comportamiento epidemiológico de la lepra en varios países latinoamericanos durante 2011-2020, tomando como base los indicadores de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Método. Estudio transversal, descriptivo y cuantitativo con datos oficiales sobre incidencia y prevalencia en la población en general, niños, forma clínica y casos de discapacidad de grado 2 registrados por la OMS entre 2011 y 2020. Se seleccionaron los ocho países latinoamericanos con más casos y se realizaron análisis de estadística descriptiva simple y comparativa entre las variables. Resultados. Entre 2011-2020 se reportaron 301 312 casos de lepra en los países seleccionados: Argentina, Brasil, Colombia, Cuba, México, Paraguay, República Dominicana y Venezuela. Brasil fue el único con una prevalencia mayor a 1 por 10 000 habitantes y representó 93,77% de casos. En Brasil y República Dominicana se observó un aumento de la prevalencia durante 2011-2019, mientras que en los demás países esta tendió a disminuir. La enfermedad fue más frecuente en hombres, y los casos multibacilares superaron significativamente a los paucibacilares. En Brasil se encontraron las mayores incidencias de casos de lepra infantil y discapacidad de grado 2 durante el período evaluado. Conclusión. A pesar de que en América Latina la lepra solo es considerada un problema de salud pública en Brasil, la mayoría de los países de la región continúa reportando casos cada año, lo que revela una falta de atención médica adecuada. El estudio confirmó la importancia de la vigilancia activa, el diagnóstico temprano y la planificación de acciones contra la enfermedad en todos los países evaluados, con el propósito de disminuir o detener su transmisión.

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To describe the epidemiological behavior of leprosy in several Latin American countries during 2011-2020, based on World Health Organization (WHO) indicators. Methods. Cross-sectional, descriptive and quantitative study with official data on incidence and prevalence in the general population, children, clinical form and cases with grade 2 disability from WHO records between 2011 and 2020. The eight countries in Latin America that reported most cases were selected and analyses were carried out using simple descriptive and comparative statistics between different variables. Results. During the study period, 301 312 cases of leprosy were reported in the selected countries: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Paraguay, and Venezuela. Brazil is the only country in the region with a prevalence greater than 1 per 10 000, representing 93.77% of all cases. Brazil and the Dominican Republic showed an increase in prevalence during 2011-2019, while in other countries the trend was decreasing. The disease is more frequent in men, and multibacillary cases significantly exceed paucibacillary ones. Brazil showed the highest incidences of cases of childhood leprosy and grade 2 disability during the evaluated period. Conclusion. In Latin America, leprosy is only considered a public health problem in Brazil; however, most countries in the region continue to report cases annually, revealing a lack of adequate medical care. This study confirmed the importance of active surveillance, early diagnosis and planning of actions against the disease in all the countries evaluated with the aim of reducing its transmission.

[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Descrever o comportamento epidemiológico da hanseníase em vários países de América Latina durante 2011-2020, tomando como base os indicadores da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Método. Estudo transversal, descritivo e quantitativo com dados oficiais de incidência e prevalência na população geral, em crianças, forma clínica e casos com incapacidade de grau 2 nos registros da OMS entre 2011 e 2020. Se selecionaram os oito países da América Latina que relataram a maioria dos casos e as análises foram avaliadas por meio de estatísticas descritivas e comparativas simples entre as variáveis. Resultados. No período, foram notificados 301 312 casos de hanseníase nos países selecionados: Argentina, Brasil, Colômbia, Cuba, México, Paraguai, República Dominicana e Venezuela. O Brasil é o único país da região com prevalência maior que 1 por 10 000 habitantes, representando 93,77% do total de casos. O Brasil e a República Dominicana mostraram um aumento na variação da prevalência durante 2011-2019, enquanto nos demais a tendência foi decrescente. A doença é mais frequente em homens e os casos multibacilares superam significativamente os paucibacilares. O Brasil apresentou as maiores incidências de hanseníase infantil e incapacidade de grau 2 durante o período avaliado. Conclusão. Na América Latina, a hanseníase só é considerada um problema de saúde pública no Brasil; no entanto, a maioria dos países da região continua notificando casos anualmente, revelando falta de assistência médica adequada. O presente estudo confirmou a importância da vigilância ativa, do diagnóstico precoce e do planejamento de ações contra a doença em todos os países avaliados, com o objetivo de reduzir e interromper a sua transmissão.

Assuntos

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To review current measures for renal cancer care and develop a comprehensive and updated list of measures for their practical use in Spain. METHODS: The study was developed by Fundación ECO, a Spanish foundation aiming to improve oncology quality of care. A systematic literature review was carried out to identify measures and knowledge gaps. A scientific committee composed of nine experts reviewed the literature findings and added measures. A preliminary list of 42 measures was evaluated with the Delphi method to gather feedback from 47 medical oncology experts in Spain. Experts scored the appropriateness of the measures and ranked their priority in two consecutive online surveys. The scientific committee reviewed the Delphi results and developed the measures. A technical group from Universidad Francisco de Vitoria conducted and oversaw the Delphi method. RESULTS: The Delphi method led to consensus on all 42 measures. The scientific committee used a prioritisation matrix to select 25 of these measures for evaluating quality of care in renal cancer. These measures regarded structure, process, and outcome and covered general management, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and evaluation of health outcomes. Easy-to-use index cards were developed for all 25 measures, including their definition, formula, acceptable level of attainment, and rationale. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript aims to provide healthcare professionals with expert- and evidence-based measures that are useful for evaluating quality of care in renal cancer in Spain and cover all aspects and stages.

Assuntos

RESUMO

RESUMEN Objetivo. Describir el comportamiento epidemiológico de la lepra en varios países latinoamericanos durante 2011-2020, tomando como base los indicadores de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Método. Estudio transversal, descriptivo y cuantitativo con datos oficiales sobre incidencia y prevalencia en la población en general, niños, forma clínica y casos de discapacidad de grado 2 registrados por la OMS entre 2011 y 2020. Se seleccionaron los ocho países latinoamericanos con más casos y se realizaron análisis de estadística descriptiva simple y comparativa entre las variables. Resultados. Entre 2011-2020 se reportaron 301 312 casos de lepra en los países seleccionados: Argentina, Brasil, Colombia, Cuba, México, Paraguay, República Dominicana y Venezuela. Brasil fue el único con una prevalencia mayor a 1 por 10 000 habitantes y representó 93,77% de casos. En Brasil y República Dominicana se observó un aumento de la prevalencia durante 2011-2019, mientras que en los demás países esta tendió a disminuir. La enfermedad fue más frecuente en hombres, y los casos multibacilares superaron significativamente a los paucibacilares. En Brasil se encontraron las mayores incidencias de casos de lepra infantil y discapacidad de grado 2 durante el período evaluado. Conclusión. A pesar de que en América Latina la lepra solo es considerada un problema de salud pública en Brasil, la mayoría de los países de la región continúa reportando casos cada año, lo que revela una falta de atención médica adecuada. El estudio confirmó la importancia de la vigilancia activa, el diagnóstico temprano y la planificación de acciones contra la enfermedad en todos los países evaluados, con el propósito de disminuir o detener su transmisión.

ABSTRACT Objective. To describe the epidemiological behavior of leprosy in several Latin American countries during 2011-2020, based on World Health Organization (WHO) indicators. Methods. Cross-sectional, descriptive and quantitative study with official data on incidence and prevalence in the general population, children, clinical form and cases with grade 2 disability from WHO records between 2011 and 2020. The eight countries in Latin America that reported most cases were selected and analyses were carried out using simple descriptive and comparative statistics between different variables. Results. During the study period, 301 312 cases of leprosy were reported in the selected countries: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Paraguay, and Venezuela. Brazil is the only country in the region with a prevalence greater than 1 per 10 000, representing 93.77% of all cases. Brazil and the Dominican Republic showed an increase in prevalence during 2011-2019, while in other countries the trend was decreasing. The disease is more frequent in men, and multibacillary cases significantly exceed paucibacillary ones. Brazil showed the highest incidences of cases of childhood leprosy and grade 2 disability during the evaluated period. Conclusion. In Latin America, leprosy is only considered a public health problem in Brazil; however, most countries in the region continue to report cases annually, revealing a lack of adequate medical care. This study confirmed the importance of active surveillance, early diagnosis and planning of actions against the disease in all the countries evaluated with the aim of reducing its transmission.

RESUMO Objetivo. Descrever o comportamento epidemiológico da hanseníase em vários países de América Latina durante 2011-2020, tomando como base os indicadores da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Método. Estudo transversal, descritivo e quantitativo com dados oficiais de incidência e prevalência na população geral, em crianças, forma clínica e casos com incapacidade de grau 2 nos registros da OMS entre 2011 e 2020. Se selecionaram os oito países da América Latina que relataram a maioria dos casos e as análises foram avaliadas por meio de estatísticas descritivas e comparativas simples entre as variáveis. Resultados. No período, foram notificados 301 312 casos de hanseníase nos países selecionados: Argentina, Brasil, Colômbia, Cuba, México, Paraguai, República Dominicana e Venezuela. O Brasil é o único país da região com prevalência maior que 1 por 10 000 habitantes, representando 93,77% do total de casos. O Brasil e a República Dominicana mostraram um aumento na variação da prevalência durante 2011-2019, enquanto nos demais a tendência foi decrescente. A doença é mais frequente em homens e os casos multibacilares superam significativamente os paucibacilares. O Brasil apresentou as maiores incidências de hanseníase infantil e incapacidade de grau 2 durante o período avaliado. Conclusão. Na América Latina, a hanseníase só é considerada um problema de saúde pública no Brasil; no entanto, a maioria dos países da região continua notificando casos anualmente, revelando falta de assistência médica adequada. O presente estudo confirmou a importância da vigilância ativa, do diagnóstico precoce e do planejamento de ações contra a doença em todos os países avaliados, com o objetivo de reduzir e interromper a sua transmissão.

RESUMO

Introducción: La infiltración de la rodilla es una labor cotidiana en la consulta ortopédica. Para alcanzar el mayor potencial terapéutico en la infiltración articular, es necesario inyectar directamente en el espacio articular y no en estructuras adyacentes. Objetivo: Determinar la exactitud y eficacia de los diferentes puntos de infiltración de la rodilla en pacientes con gonartrosis grado II ­ III, considerando los portales de abordaje anterolateral (AL), anteromedial (AM), suprapatelar lateral (SPL), medio patelar lateral (MPL), medio patelar medial (MPM) y trans tendón (TT). Métodos: Estudio descriptivo y transversal. Se infiltraron 123 rodillas bajo control fluroscópico en las diferentes vías de acceso, teniendo como variables el sexo, artrografía positiva al primer intento, grado de dolor que presentan los pacientes durante la prueba así como complicaciones y efectos secundarios. Resultados: Se usó MPL en 20 rodillas teniendo una artrografía positiva en el 40%, 17 SPL con 70,5%, 20 MPM con 90%, 21 AL rodillas con 61,3%, 26 AM con 69,9%, 19 TT con 78,9%. Conclusión: El portal de abordaje MPM proporciona una mayor eficacia en comparación de los otros portales utilizados en este estudio. Siendo mayor el porcentaje de artrografías positivas en el primer intento de punción.

Introduction: Knee joint injection is a daily procedure in orthopedic outpatient visit. In order to obtain the maximum therapeutic benefit, it is necessary to perform the injection directly into the articular space and not into the adjacent structures. Objective: To establish the accuracy of the injection site into the knee joint in patients with grade II-III gonarthrosis. The portal approaches taken into consideration in this study were: Anterolateral (AL), Anteromedial (AM), Lateral Suprapatellar (LSP), Lateral mid-patellar (LMP), Medial mid-patellar (MMP) and Transtendinous (TT). Methods: A cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted. A total of 123 knee joints were injected under fluoroscopy through the different approach portals. Variables: gender, positive arthrography at the first attempt, level of pain in patients during the procedure, as well as complications and side effects. Results: Lateral mid-patellar (LMP) approach was used on 20 knee joints with a 40% positive arthrography, 17 through LSP with 70.5%, 20 MMP with 90%, 21 AL with 61.3%, 26 M with 69.9%, 19 TT with 78.9% Conclusion: The medial mid-patellar approach portal provides the greatest effectiveness in comparison to the other portals used on this study. Additionally, a greater percentage of positive arthrography was achieved at the first attempt.

RESUMO

ANTECEDENTES: Las fracturas de radio distal Fernández III (FRDF III) son una urgencia muy frecuente. Las indicaciones quirúrgicas y no quirúrgicas persisten controversiales, así como el impacto funcional. OBJETIVO: Comparar la evolución clínica de los trabajadores con FRDF III, con manejo quirúrgico frente a no quirúrgico, no complicados, en un hospital especializado. MÉTODO: Estudio comparativo, observacional y longitudinal en trabajadores con FRDF III unilateral cerrada, de ambos sexos, con evolución menor de 5 días. Se excluyeron pacientes con comorbilidad afectante de consolidación ósea y polifracturados. Se eliminaron aquellos con información incompleta, con complicaciones, con aparato de yeso modificado 5 días después de su colocación, con mala reducción-estabilización acorde a la AO. Se aplicó la Escala Funcional de Mayo para Muñeca (EFMM) a los 3 y 6 meses del tratamiento. Se utilizó la prueba t de Student. RESULTADOS: 159 pacientes, 34% mujeres, 66% hombres. Edad promedio 40.18 años. Manejo quirúrgico 42,5% (placa 8.7%, fijador 29%, fijador + clavillo 8.7%); no quirúrgico 33%. Diferencias significativas (p ≤ 0.05): EFMM 3 y 6 meses; a 3 meses: dolor, prensión; a 6 meses: movilidad; y días totales de incapacidad. CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento quirúrgico muestra mejores resultados funcionales, destacando el dolor y la prensión a 3 meses, y la movilidad a 6 meses, con reincorporación laboral en menos tiempo. BACKGROUND: This fracture is a very frequent emergency. Surgical and non-surgical management are still controversial, such as functional impact. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical evolution of Fernandez III distal radius fractures, managed with surgically vs no surgical treatment, in a specialized hospital. METHOD: Comparative, observational, longitudinal study, released on workers with unilateral Fernandez III closed distal radius fractures, both sex, with evolution less than 5 days. Those patients with pathologies getting difficult in bone consolidation, and with several fractures were excluded. Those with incomplete information, complicated, and whom paste were modified after 5 days, and with bad reduction or stabilization fracture according AO were eliminated. Mayo Functional Wrist Scale (EFMM) was applied at 3 and 6 months. Student-t test was applied. RESULTS: 159 patients recruited, 34% females, 66% males. Medium age 40 years old. Surgical treatment 42.5% (plaque 8.7%, external fixation 29%, external fixation and nails 8.7%). Non-surgical treatment 33%. Significative differences (p≤0.05): EFMM at 3 and 6 months; pain, grasp at 3 months; mobility at 6 months; total laboral inhability days. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment shows better functional results, specially pain and grasp at 3 months, mobility at 6 months, and faster returning to work.

Assuntos

RESUMO

The deconvolution process is a key step for quantitative evaluation of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) samples. By this process, the fluorescence impulse responses (FluoIRs) of the sample are decoupled from the instrument response (InstR). In blind deconvolution estimation (BDE), the FluoIRs and InstR are jointly extracted from a dataset with minimal a priori information. In this work, two BDE algorithms are introduced based on linear combinations of multi-exponential functions to model each FluoIR in the sample. For both schemes, the InstR is assumed with a free-form and a sparse structure. The local perspective of the BDE methodology assumes that the characteristic parameters of the exponential functions (time constants and scaling coefficients) are estimated based on a single spatial point of the dataset. On the other hand, the same exponential functions are used in the whole dataset in the global perspective, and just the scaling coefficients are updated for each spatial point. A least squares formulation is considered for both BDE algorithms. To overcome the nonlinear interaction in the decision variables, an alternating least squares (ALS) methodology iteratively solves both estimation problems based on non-negative and constrained optimizations. The validation stage considered first synthetic datasets at different noise types and levels, and a comparison with the standard deconvolution techniques with a multi-exponential model for FLIM measurements, as well as, with two BDE methodologies in the state of the art: Laguerre basis, and exponentials library. For the experimental evaluation, fluorescent dyes and oral tissue samples were considered. Our results show that local and global perspectives are consistent with the standard deconvolution techniques, and they reached the fastest convergence responses among the BDE algorithms with the best compromise in FluoIRs and InstR estimation errors.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Cervical cancer (CC) continues to be one of the leading causes of death for women across the world. Although it has been determined that papillomavirus infection is one of the main causes of the etiology of the disease, genetic and epigenetic factors are also required for its progression. Among the epigenetic factors are included the long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), transcripts of more than 200 nucleotides (nt) that generally do not code for proteins and have been associated with diverse functions such as the regulation of transcription, translation, RNA metabolism, as well as stem cell maintenance and differentiation, cell autophagy and apoptosis. Recently, studies have begun to characterize the aberrant regulation of lncRNAs in CC cells and tissues, including Homeobox transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR), H19, Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1), Cervical Carcinoma High-Expressed 1 (CCHE1), Antisense noncoding RNA in the inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (ANRIL), Growth arrest special 5 (GAS5) and Plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1). They have been associated with several disease-related processes such as cell growth, cell proliferation, cell survival, metastasis and invasion as well as therapeutic resistance, and are novel potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis in CC. In this review, we summarize the current literature regarding the knowledge we have about the roles and mechanisms of the lncRNAs in cervical neoplasia.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Revisar sistemáticamente la evidencia de la terapia endovascular comparado con el manejo estándar. Criterios de inclusión: Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados que incluyan a: pacientes adultos mayores de 18 años, haber sufrido accidente cerebrovascular isquémico manejados con terapia endovascular en comparación con manejo médico. Métodos: Se realizó la búsqueda en las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE; Cochrane Injuries group y lista de referencia de los artículos. Resultados: La trombectomía se asoció con disminución de la mortalidad (OR 0,78, IC del 95%: 0,63-0,95 p= 0,01), aumento de la tasa de revascularización (OR 6,16, IC del 95%: 4,39-8,64 p= <0,0001), mejoría de desenlace funcional (OR 1,78, IC del 95%: 1,52 ­ 2,08 p= <0,0001). No hubo diferencia en cuanto a la recurrencia de isquemia cerebral ni de la aparición de hemorragia intracerebral (OR 0,86, IC del 95%: 0,51 ­ 1,47 p= 0,59; OR 1,13, IC del 95%: 0,79 ­ 1,62 p= 0,5, respectivamente). Conclusiones: La terapia endovascular comparada con la fibrinólisis endovenosa mejora el pronóstico funcional, aunque se necesitan más estudios.

Objective: Systematically review the evidence of endovascular therapy compared with standard management. Inclusion criteria: Randomized clinical trials that include adult patients older than 18 years, have suffered an ischemic stroke managed with endovascular therapy compared to medical management. Methods: The search is performed in the following databases: MEDLINE, the Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE; Cochrane Injury Group and reference list of articles. Results: Thrombectomy was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.95 p = 0.01), increased revascularization rate (OR 6.16, CI 95%: 4.39-8.64 p = <0.0001), improvement in functional outcome (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.52 - 2.08 p = <0.0001). There was no difference in the recurrence of cerebral ischemia or the appearance of intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.51 - 1.47 p = 0.59, OR 1.13, 95% CI %: 0.79 - 1.62 p = 0.5, respectively). Conclusions: Endovascular therapy compared with the treatment of fibrinolysis improves functional prognosis

Assuntos

RESUMO

Resumen: Objetivo: revisar sistemáticamente la evidencia sobre la administración de progesterona tras un trauma craneoencefálico grave en adultos y su relación con mortalidad y pronóstico neurológico. Criterios de inclusión: ensayos clínicos aleatorizados que incluyan a pacientes adultos mayores de 18 años, haber sufrido un traumatismo craneal grave (Glasgow <8), donde se compare la administración de progesterona vs grupo control (placebo o no administración). Método: se realizó la búsqueda en las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE; Cochrane Injuries group y lista de referencia de los artículos. Resultados: no hubo reducción de la mortalidad comparado con el grupo control (RR 0,93, IC95% 0,79-1,10 p= 0,41), no hubo diferencias entre progesterona y el grupo control en desenlaces neurológicos positivos ni negativos (RR 1,07, IC95% 0,97-1,17 p= 0,20; RR 0,94, IC 95% 0,81-1,08 p= 0,27), respectivamente. Conclusiones: no se encontró evidencia respecto a que la administración de progesterona posterior a un traumatismo craneoencefálico reduzca la mortalidad o mejore desenlaces neurológicos, aunque se necesitan más estudios de buena calidad para extraer conclusiones definitivas.

Summary: Objective: to systematically review evidence on the administration of progesterone after a traumatic brain injury in adults and its relationship with mortality and neurological head prognosis. Inclusion criteria: randomized clinical trials that include: patients older than 12 years old, having had an injury (Glasgow <8), comparing the administration of Progesterone versus the control group (placebo or no administration). Methods: we searched the following databases: MEDLINE, the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE; Cochrane Injury Group and reference list of articles. Results: there was no reduction in mortality in patients in the control group (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-1.10 p = 0.41), there were no differences between progesterone and the control group in favorable or adverse neurological outcomes (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97-1.17 p = 0.20, RR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.81 -1,08 p= 0.27), respectively. Conclusions: there is no evidence that the administration of progesterone after a traumatic brain injury reduces or improves neurological results, although further good quality studies are required to obtain conclusive results.

Resumo: Objetivo: realizar uma revisão sistemática da evidência sobre a administração de progesterona depois de traumatismo crânio-encefálico grave em adultos e sua relação com a mortalidade e o prognóstico neurológico. Critérios de inclusão: ensaios clínicos aleatorizados que incluam: pacientes adultos maiores de 18 anos, haver sofrido um traumatismo craniano grave (Glasgow <8) donde se compare a administração de progesterona versus grupo controle (placebo ou não administração). Métodos: foi feita uma pesquisa bibliográfica nas seguintes bases de dados: MEDLINE, Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE, Cochrane Injuries Group e nas referências bibliográficas dos artigos. Resultados: não foi observada uma redução da mortalidade comparada com o grupo controle (RR 0,93, IC del 95%: 0,79-1,10 p= 0,41), não foram observadas diferenças entre o grupo que recebeu progesterona e o grupo controle nos resultados neurológicos positivos ou negativos (RR 1,07, IC del 95%: 0,97-1,17 p= 0,20; RR 0,94, IC del 95%: 0,81-1,08 p= 0,27), respectivamente. Conclusões: não se encontrou evidência de que a administração de progesterona depois de um traumatismo crânio-encefálico reduza a mortalidade ou melhore os resultados neurológicos embora novos estudos de boa qualidade sejam necessários para chegar a conclusões definitivas.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: Revisar sistemáticamente la evidencia que tiene la inducción de hipotermia en la hipertensión endocraneana traumática refractaria. Criterios de inclusión: Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados que incluyan a: pacientes mayores de 12 años, haber sufrido un traumatismo craneal grave (Glasgow < 8) con hipertensión intracraneana y que se les haya inducido hipotermia terapéutica. Métodos: Se realizó la búsqueda en las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE; Cochrane Injuries group y lista de referencia de los artículos. Resultados: La mortalidad disminuyó en los pacientes en que se usó la inducción de hipotermia comparados con el grupo control (RR 0,82, IC del 95%: 0,7-0,95 p= 0,008), el grupo inducción de hipotermia muestra una disminución de los desenlaces neurológicos no favorables (estado vegetativo y coma, GOS-E 1-3) frente al control (RR 0,81, IC del 95%: 0,75 a 0,88 p= <0,00001). Conclusiones: Los pacientes con trauma craneoencefálico e hipertensión endocraneana refractaria se beneficiarían con el uso de hipotermia terapéutica, aunque se necesitan más estudios de buena calidad para extraer conclusiones definitivas.

Objectives: To systematically review published evidence on the induction of mild hypothermia for refractory traumatic intracranial hypertension. Methods: A thorough search was conducted of MEDLINE, the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE; Cochrane Injuries group and the reference lists of articles, looking for randomized clinical trials that assessed mortality and morbidity in patients, 12 years old and older, who had suffered a severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma scale < 8), had intracranial hypertension, and had mild hypothermia intentionally induced. Results: Mortality was reduced in patients treated with mild hypothermia relative to controls (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70- 0.95; p = 0.008). Similarly, hypothermia induction was associated with a decreased rate of unfavorable neurological outcomes (vegetative state, coma, GOS-E 1-3) (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.88; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that traumatic brain injury patients with refractory intracranial hypertension may benefit from therapeutic hypothermia. However, more methodologically-robust studies are needed.

Assuntos

Assuntos

RESUMO

Clasificacion de Dimeglio

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivos: Revisar sistemáticamente la evidencia relacionada con el monitoreo de la presion intracraneana en unidades de cuidado neurocrítico en el contexto de trauma craneoencefálico severo. Criterios de elección: Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados que comparen el uso del monitoreo de la presión intracraneana (PIC) que muestren un estimado de mortalidad/discapacidad a 6 meses, en pacientes mayores de 12 años de edad con trauma craneoencefálico severo (escala de Glasgow menor a 8). Método de búsqueda: En Medline, el Registro Central de Ensayos Controlados (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI, EMBASE; Grupo Cochrane de Lesiones y las listas de referencias de artículos. De acuerdo con el Manual Cochrane para meta-análisis y revisión sistemática. Resultados: No hubo diferencias entre el grupo de PIC y el control en el pronóstico de discapacidad (RR [Riesgo Relativo]1.01, 95 por ciento CI 0.87 to 1.18). Sin embargo, el monitoreo de la PIC reduce la estancia en UCI en comparación con otros métodos. La estancia en UCI con tratamiento cerebral específico también se redujo en comparación con grupo control. Conclusiones: En pacientes con trauma craneoencefálico, no hubo diferencia entre el monitoreo de la PIC y el examen clínico sin embargo, para mantener una PIC baja, hubo una sustancial reducción de requerimiento de solución salina hipertónica y un descenso en la hiperventilación trayendo consigo beneficios para pacientes en UCI.

Objectives: To systematically review the evidence of intracranial pressure monitoring in neuro critical care unit in the context of a severe head injury. Study eligibility criteria: Patients were older than 12 years ,had a severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma scale < 8), that compared the use of ICP monitoring with control, that presented an estimate of mortality/ disability prognosis 6 months after injury.only randomized clinical trials. Methods: Searched MEDLINE, the Central Registerof Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed, HINARI,EMBASE; Cochrane Injuries group and the reference lists of articles. In accordance with the Cochrane handbook for meta-analysis and systematic review. Results: In the ICP and control groups there was no difference in the prognosis of disability (RR [Relative Risk]1.01, 95 percent CI 0.87 to 1.18). However, ICP monitoring reduced the duration of stay in ICU compared to other surveillance methods. The stay in the ICU with specific medical support for brain injury was also reduced compared to the control group. Conclusions: In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, the ICP monitoring was not difference to imaging and clinical examination. However, by keeping the ICP low there was a substantial reduction in the requirement for hypertonic saline and a decrease in hyperventilation providing benefits to thepatient in the ICU.

Assuntos