RESUMEN

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with 5-year treatment-free remissions in approximately 80% of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) who failed or were dependent on intravenous immunoglobulin and or plasmapheresis. Autologous HSCT was associated with significant improvement in strength, independent ambulation, quality of life, nerve conduction velocity, and compound muscle action potential amplitude. The results of HSCT are dependent on proper patient selection, i.e., the right diagnosis and the right stage of the disease. An important caveat is that a significant number of patients with a CIDP diagnostic label are found upon further workup have a peripheral neuropathy of another etiology. Patients undergoing HSCT for CIDP should be reevaluated before HSCT to confirm the diagnosis and those who fail HSCT should be reevaluated for a diagnosis other than CIDP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an inflammatory disease affecting the peripheral nerves and the most frequent autoimmune polyneuropathy. Given the lack of established biomarkers or risk factors for the development of CIDP and patients' treatment response, this research effort seeks to identify potential clinical factors that may influence disease progression and overall treatment efficacy. METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective analysis, we have screened 197 CIDP patients who presented to the University Hospitals in Düsseldorf, Berlin, Cologne, Essen, Magdeburg and Munich between 2018 and 2022. We utilized the respective hospital information system and examined baseline data with clinical examination, medical letters, laboratory results, antibody status, nerve conduction studies, imaging and biopsy findings. Aside from clinical baseline data, we analyzed treatment outcomes using the Standard of Care (SOC) definition, as well as a comparison of an early (within the first 12 months after manifestation) versus late (more than 12 months after manifestation) onset of therapy. RESULTS: In terms of treatment, most patients received intravenous immunoglobulin (56%) or prednisolone (39%) as their first therapy. Patients who started their initial treatment later experienced a worsening disease course, as reflected by a significant deterioration in their Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) leg disability score. SOC-refractory patients had worse clinical outcomes than SOC-responders. Associated factors for SOC-refractory status included the presence of fatigue as a symptom and alcohol dependence. CONCLUSION: Timely diagnosis, prompt initiation of treatment and careful monitoring of treatment response are essential for the prevention of long-term disability in CIDP and suggest a "hit hard and early" treatment paradigm.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Contactin-1 (CNTN1) antibody-positive nodopathy is rare and exhibits distinct clinical symptoms such as tremors and ataxia. However, the mechanisms of these symptoms and the characteristics of the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) remain unknown. Case presentation: Here, we report a case of recurrent CNTN1 antibody-positive nodopathy. Initially, a 45-year-old woman experiencing numbness in the upper limbs and weakness in the lower limbs was diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Eleven years later, her symptoms worsened, and she began to experience tremors and ataxia. Tests for serum CNTN1, GT1a, and GQ1b antibodies returned positive. Subsequently, she was diagnosed with CNTN1 antibody-positive nodopathy and underwent plasmapheresis therapy, although the treatment's efficacy was limited. To gain a deeper understanding of the disease, we conducted a comprehensive literature review, identifying 52 cases of CNTN1 antibody-positive nodopathy to date, with a tremor prevalence of 26.9%. Additionally, we found that the average CSF protein level in CNTN1 antibody-positive nodopathy was 2.57 g/L, with 87% of patients exhibiting a CSF protein level above 1.5 g/L. Conclusion: We present a rare case of recurrent CNTN1 antibody-positive nodopathy. Our findings indicate a high prevalence of tremor (26.9%) and elevated CSF protein levels among patients with CNTN1 antibody-positive nodopathy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common chronic autoimmune disease of the peripheral nervous system. It is often difficult to diagnose, but severaly therapeutic options are nowadays available to reduce neurological deficits and to improve the disease course. This article exemplifies the management of CIDP by a typical case study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is no diagnostic biomarker that can reliably detect Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Diagnosis relies upon integrating key clinical characteristics and relevant supportive data. Consequently, misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are common. Diagnostic criteria have proven valuable resources to improve diagnosis, but are underutilized during routine clinical care. RECENT FINDINGS: In 2021, the EAN/PNS CIDP criteria was published, and were followed by the EAN/PNS GBS criteria in 2023. Both guidelines utilized GRADE methodology to formulate evidence-based recommendations that are intended to be used by adult and paediatric clinicians across diverse care settings to optimize diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes during routine clinical care. SUMMARY: The EAN/PNS GBS and CIDP criteria detail specific clinical, electrophysiological, and laboratory features that raise diagnostic confidence, and call attention to diagnostic mimics. The sensitivity of EAN/PNS and other modern criteria to detect GBS and CIDP is high, but utilization during clinical practice is low. Complexity is one factor limiting widespread application. Strategies are needed to optimize criteria adoption during routine clinical care such that GBS and CIDP diagnosis can be achieved with greater speed and accuracy.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common chronic immune-mediated demyelinating neuropathy and includes several clinical subtypes. The major phenotype is "typical CIDP," which is characterized by symmetric polyneuropathy and "proximal and distal" muscle weakness. In typical CIDP, the nerve roots and distal nerve terminals, where the blood-nerve barrier is anatomically deficient, are preferentially affected, and therefore antibody-mediated immune pathogenesis is likely to have a major role. Currently, CIDP is considered a syndrome including typical CIDP and CIDP variants. In 2021, the European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline was published, whereas the Japanese CIDP/ Multifocal Motor Neuropathy Clinical Practice Guideline will be available in May 2024. This review article summarizes the immunopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment for typical CIDP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common chronic autoimmune neuropathy. Its management has considerably evolved over the last decade. In 2021, the diagnostic guidelines for CIDP were updated and the diagnostic criteria simplified. They enable better characterization of the electro-clinical phenotype of the disease, and emphasize supportive criteria, in particular neuro-muscular imaging. In terms of pathophysiology, the discovery of antibodies directed against antigens in the nodal and paranodal regions has given rise to the concept of autoimmune nodopathy. Finally, the preliminary results of the ADHERE study on efgartigimod have rekindled hopes of a new, effective therapy for CIDP.

La polyradiculoneuropathie inflammatoire démyélinisante chronique (PIDC) est la neuropathie auto-immune chronique la plus fréquente. Sa prise en charge a largement évolué durant la dernière décennie. En 2021, les recommandations diagnostiques de la PIDC ont été mises à jour et les critères diagnostiques simplifiés. Ils permettent une meilleure caractérisation du phénotype électroclinique de la maladie et mettent en avant les critères de support diagnostiques, en particulier l'imagerie neuromusculaire. Sur le plan physiopathologique, la découverte d'anticorps dirigés contre des antigènes des régions nodale et paranodale a fait naître le concept de nodopathie auto-immune. Enfin, les résultats préliminaires de l'étude ADHERE sur l'efgartigimod font émerger l'espoir d'une nouvelle thérapie efficace dans la PIDC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a most common chronic immune-mediated demyelinating neuropathy, and includes a number of clinical subtypes. The major phenotype is "typical CIDP", which is characterized by symmetric polyneuropathy and "proximal and distal" muscle weakness. During the historical changes in the concept of CIDP, multifocal motor neuropathy, anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) neuropathy, and autoimmune nodopathy have been excluded. Currently CIDP is considered as a syndrome including typical CIDP and CIDP variant such as distal CIDP and multifocal CIDP. In 2021, the international guideline of diagnosis and treatment for CIDP, European Academy of Neurology (EAN)/Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) Guideline, was published. This review article introduces the putline of the guideline with medical-social situation in Japan. The diagnosis of CIDP is based on (1) phenotype of typical CIDP or variant, (2) electrophysiologic evidence of peripheral nerve demyelination, and (3) exclusion criteria. The first-line treatments are corticosteroids or immunoglobulin therapy, and plasma exchange should be considered if the 2 treatments were not effective sufficiently. This guideline recommends intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin as a maintenance therapy, and suggests other immune-suppressive agents. In the near future, new treatment with biologics, such as monoclonal antibodies against neonatal Fc receptors, complements, and CD19/20 will be approved.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate potential knowledge gaps between neurologists and non-specialists and identify challenges in the current management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), with a focus on 'early diagnosis' and 'appropriate treatment' for CIDP. DESIGN: A non-interventional, cross-sectional, web-based quantitative survey of physicians working in healthcare clinics or hospitals in Japan. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the Nikkei Business Publications panel from 18 August to 14 September 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Responses from 360 physicians (120 each of internists, orthopaedists and neurologists) were collected. OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses relating to a CIDP hypothetical case and current understanding were assessed to determine awareness, collaboration preferences and diagnosis and treatment decisions. RESULTS: Understanding of CIDP was 90.8% among neurologists, 10.8% among orthopaedists and 13.3% among internists; >80% of orthopaedists and internists answered that neurologists are preferable for treatment. Diagnostic assessment using a hypothetical case showed 95.0% of neurologists, 74.2% of orthopaedists and 72.5% of internists suspected CIDP. Among orthopaedists and internists suspecting CIDP, >70% considered referring to neurology, while ~10% considered continuing treatment without a referral. Among neurologists, 69.4% chose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) as first-line treatment and determined effectiveness to be ≤3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedists and internists had lower CIDP awareness compared with neurologists, which may lead to inadequate referrals to neurology. Evaluation of IVIg effectiveness for maintenance therapy occurred earlier than the guideline recommendations (6-12 months), risking premature discontinuation. Improving CIDP knowledge among orthopaedists and internists is critical for better diagnosis and collaboration with neurologists. Neurologists should consider slow and careful evaluation of IVIg maintenance therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000048516.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the current epidemiology, clinical profile, and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) using a nationwide survey in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey using an epidemiologic method established in 2021. Questionnaire sheets were sent to the hospital departments of neurology and pediatric neurology throughout Japan. A primary questionnaire was used to determine the number of patients and their prevalence, and a second questionnaire was used to collect detailed clinical information. RESULTS: The primary survey showed that the estimated number of patients with CIDP was 4,180, with a prevalence of 3.3 per 100,000 persons. In the secondary survey, detailed clinical data were available for 1,257 patients. The male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1, and the median age at onset was 52 years. Typical CIDP was the most frequent subtype (52%), followed by distal (17%) and multifocal/focal CIDP (17%). Initial treatments included immunoglobulin therapy (72%), corticosteroids (15%), and others (13%). Among patients with CIDP, 78% had a progressive/relapsing course, 14% did not respond to first-line treatments, and 18% could not walk independently at the last visit. Among the subtypes, typical CIDP had the most severe disability before treatment (44% of patients could not walk independently). However, they showed a more favorable response to treatment than those with distal or multifocal CIDP. In the subgroup analyses, logistic regression analyses showed that younger age at onset, no muscle atrophy, and abnormal median-normal sural sensory nerve responses were associated with a higher probability of independent walking. DISCUSSION: Our study represents the largest cohort study on CIDP to demonstrate the current epidemiologic and clinical status of CIDP in Japan. Clinical subtypes seem to be associated with different treatment responses and outcomes; therefore, an appropriate treatment strategy according to the pathophysiology of each subtype is required to improve the prognosis of CIDP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with anti-MAG neuropathy present with distal demyelinating polyneuropathy, IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and elevated titers of anti-MAG antibodies. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews what is known about the clinical presentation, course, pathophysiology, and treatment of anti-MAG neuropathy, with considerations for the design of therapeutic trials. METHODS: A literature review of the medical and scientific literature related to anti-MAG neuropathy, and the design of therapeutic clinical trials in peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: Anti-MAG neuropathy can remain indolent for many years but then enter a progressive phase. Highly elevated antibody titers are diagnostic, but intermediate titers can also occur in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The peripheral nerves can become inexcitable, thereby masking the demyelinating abnormalities. There is good evidence that the anti-MAG antibodies cause neuropathy. Reduction of the autoantibody concentration by agents that target B-cells was reported to result in clinical improvement in case series and uncontrolled trials, but not in controlled clinical trials, probably due to inadequate trial design. CONCLUSION: We propose that therapeutic trials for anti-MAG neuropathy include patients with the typical presentation, some degree of weakness, highly elevated anti-MAG antibody titers, and at least one nerve exhibiting demyelinating range abnormalities. Treatment with one or a combination of anti-B-cell agents would aim at reducing the autoantibody concentration by at least 60%. A trial duration of 2 years may be required to show efficacy. The neuropathy impairment score of the lower extremities (NIS-LL) plus the Lower Limb Function (LLF) score would be a suitable primary outcome measure.

ANTECEDENTES: Pacientes com neuropatia anti-MAG apresentam polineuropatia desmielinizante distal, gamopatia monoclonal IgM e títulos elevados de anticorpos anti-MAG. OBJETIVO: Este artigo revisa o que se sabe sobre a apresentação clínica, curso, fisiopatologia e tratamento da neuropatia anti-MAG, com considerações para o desenho de ensaios terapêuticos. MéTODOS: Revisão bibliográfica da literatura médica e científica relacionada à neuropatia anti-MAG e desenho de ensaios clínicos terapêuticos em neuropatia periférica. RESULTADOS: A neuropatia anti-MAG pode permanecer indolente durante muitos anos, mas depois entra numa fase progressiva. Títulos de anticorpos altamente elevados são diagnósticos, mas títulos intermediários também podem ocorrer na polineuropatia desmielinizante inflamatória crônica (CIDP). Os nervos periféricos podem tornar-se inexcitáveis, mascarando, assim, as anomalias desmielinizantes. Há boas evidências de que os anticorpos anti-MAG causam a neuropatia. Foi relatado que a redução da concentração de autoanticorpos por agentes direcionados às células B resultou em melhora clínica em séries de casos e ensaios não controlados, mas não em ensaios clínicos controlados, provavelmente devido ao desenho inadequado dos ensaios. CONCLUSãO: Propomos que os ensaios terapêuticos para neuropatia anti-MAG incluam pacientes com apresentação típica, algum grau de fraqueza, títulos de anticorpos anti-MAG altamente elevados e pelo menos um nervo exibindo anormalidades na faixa desmielinizante. O tratamento com um ou uma combinação de agentes anticélulas B teria como objetivo reduzir a concentração de autoanticorpos em pelo menos 60%. Pode ser necessária uma duração de ensaio de 2 anos para demonstrar eficácia. A pontuação de comprometimento da neuropatia das extremidades inferiores (NIS-LL) mais a pontuação da função dos membros inferiores (LLF) seria uma medida de resultado primário adequada.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Identifying patients with inflammatory motor neuropathies (IMNs) is warranted since effective treatments are available and the prognosis of these patients differs from that of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. METHODS: Between January 2019 and May 2022, 102 consecutive treatment-naïve lower motor neuron syndrome (LMNS) patients were recruited; these patients were suspected of having multifocal motor neuropathy, pure motor chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with initial lower motor neuron presentation. Neuromuscular ultrasound (US) and nerve conduction studies (NCSs) were conducted at baseline. Relevant diagnostic investigations were performed if clinically warranted. The proposed US evidence of IMN was as follows: (i) nerve enlargement at ≥1 of the predetermined sites or (ii) absence of high intensity fasciculations in predefined muscle groups. Final diagnoses were made by experienced physicians after a prolonged follow-up period (≥12 months). IMN patients were defined as LMNS patients who experienced convincing improvements in response to immunotherapies. IMN patients without electrodiagnostic demyelinating features were diagnosed with treatment-responsive LMNS (TR-LMNS). RESULTS: In total, 16 patients were classified as IMN, including nine chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy/multifocal motor neuropathy patients and seven TR-LMNS patients. Six TR-LMNS patients were identified by neuromuscular US. The sensitivity and specificity of NCSs, nerve US and muscle US were 56.3% and 100%, 43.8% and 90.7% and 68.8% and 97.7%, respectively. When these three modalities were combined, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.8% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neuromuscular US studies are supplementary modalities to NCSs, and the combined use of these techniques might improve the identification of IMNs in LMNS patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: It is unclear whether the revised European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society diagnostic criteria (EAN/PNS 2021 criteria) improved the diagnostic yield for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) compared with the previous version. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the EAN/PNS 2021 criteria and the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society 2010 diagnostic criteria (EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria), with a specific focus on the electrodiagnostic criteria. METHODS: Data of patients with clinically suspected CIDP who exhibited objective treatment response, and of those with chronic axonal neuropathies, obtained between 2009 and 2021, were extracted retrospectively from our database. Patients who underwent nerve conduction studies in at least unilateral upper and lower extremities were enrolled. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the EAN/PNS 2021 and EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria. RESULTS: In total, 55 patients with clinically suspected CIDP and 36 patients with chronic axonal neuropathies were enrolled. When considering the "possible CIDP" category, the EAN/PNS 2021 criteria showed lower sensitivity than the EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria (78% vs. 93%, p < .05), whereas its specificity was higher (78% vs. 61%, p < .05). The lower sensitivity was caused mainly by the failure to fulfill the sensory nerve conduction criteria. The revised definition of abnormal temporal dispersion of the tibial nerve contributed markedly to the improved specificity. DISCUSSION: To improve the sensitivity of the EAN/PNS 2021 criteria, increasing the number of tested sensory nerves may be necessary.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: Autoimmune nodopathies have specific clinicopathologic features, antibodies directed against nodal proteins (neurofascin 186) or paranodal proteins (neurofascin 155, contactin 1, contactin-associated protein 1 (Caspr1)), and usually have a poor response to first-line therapies for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Anti-Caspr1 nodopathy treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has not been previously reported. METHODS: We report the first case of an anti-Caspr1 antibody-positive nodopathy refractory to high-intensity immunosuppressive treatment, including rituximab, that responded dramatically to AHSCT. RESULTS: A 53-year-old woman presented with a rapidly progressive generalized ataxic, painful motor, and inflammatory neuropathy supported by neurophysiologic and MRI studies. Initial tests for antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins were negative. She was treated with multiple courses of intravenous immunoglobulin and methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide without significant clinical benefit. Repeated testing for antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins yielded a positive result for anti-Caspr1/IgG4 isotype antibodies. Given the poor response to multiple high intensity treatments and the relatively young age of the patient, we decided to perform AHSCT at 30 months post-onset. Immediately after AHSCT, she stopped all immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy. The Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score improved from 8/12 to 4/12 at 6 months post-AHSCT. At 3 months post-AHSCT, IgG4 against Caspr1 was negative and no reactivity against paranodes could be detected. CONCLUSION: We report a particularly severe anti-Caspr1 antibody autoimmune nodopathy that responded dramatically to AHSCT. Although the rarity of the disease limits the possibility of larger studies, AHSCT may be a valuable therapy in treatment-refractory cases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This article is an overview of chronic demyelinating neuropathies and highlights the phenotypic categorization, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies. The clinical and diagnostic characteristics of other chronic demyelinating neuropathies that are common mimics of immune-mediated neuropathies are also discussed. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: The underlying pathophysiology of chronic demyelinating neuropathies is heterogeneous, and components of both humoral and cellular immune responses are thought to play a role in the immune-mediated types of chronic demyelinating neuropathy. The role of the humoral response is highlighted with a specific focus on the relatively recent discovery of antibody-mediated antinodal and paranodal demyelinating neuropathies. Additionally, new diagnostic criteria for some of the chronic demyelinating neuropathies, as well as ways to differentiate chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy from other chronic demyelinating polyneuropathies, are discussed. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Chronic demyelinating neuropathies can present with overlapping clinical characteristics with seemingly subtle variations. It is clinically important to differentiate these types of neuropathies because the treatment and management can vary and affect prognosis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD) is a rare autoimmune neurologic disease, characterized by immune-mediated damage of myelin sheath at central and peripheral levels of the nervous system. The current knowledge about this disorder is only limited, mainly due to the low incidence of the disease. According to previous studies, CCPD has a very heterogeneous course, insufficient therapeutic response, and an unfavorable prognosis. We report on the 37-year-old patient with a coincidence of demyelinating lesions in the brain fulfilling current McDonald's diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis, as well as the presence of an atypical variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) - multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory-motor neuropathy (MADSAM), as a subtype of combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Standardized pharmacological response tests are important and established diagnostic tools in the field of neurology. However, regarding therapeutic responses to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) in CIDP, neither a definition of therapeutic response has been established, nor a response test has been suggested so far. Here we suggest a practical clinical approach which is supported by current literature in the field. An established standardized IVIg response test could avoid prolonged therapy without benefit for the patient and ensure a timely therapy switch or treatment escalation if required. This approach would also be advantageous due to the global scarcity of plasma derivatives as a human resource and could be the foundation to be adjusted and improved by subsequent studies.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The spectrum of immune-mediated neuropathies is broad and the different subtypes are still being researched. With the numerous subtypes of immune-mediated neuropathies, establishing the appropriate diagnosis in normal clinical practice is challenging. The treatment of these disorders is also troublesome. The authors have undertaken a literature review of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). The molecular, electrophysiological and ultrasound features of these autoimmune polyneuropathies are analyzed, highlighting the differences in diagnosis and ultimately treatment. The immune dysfunction can lead to damage to the peripheral nervous system. In practice, it is suspected that these disorders are caused by autoimmunity to proteins located in the node of Ranvier or myelin components of peripheral nerves, although disease-associated autoantibodies have not been identified for all disorders. The electrophysiological presence of conduction blocks is another important factor characterizing separate subgroups of treatment-naive motor neuropathies, including multifocal CIDP (synonyms: multifocal demyelinating neuropathy with persistent conduction block), which differs from multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN) in both responses to treatment modalities and electrophysiological features. Ultrasound is a reliable method for diagnosing immune-mediated neuropathies, particularly when alternative diagnostic examinations yield inconclusive results. In overall terms, the management of these disorders includes immunotherapy such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange. Improvements in clinical criteria and the development of more disease-specific immunotherapies should expand the therapeutic possibilities for these debilitating diseases.

Asunto(s)