RESUMEN
Treatment options for patients with relapsed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining anlotinib and sintilimab plus chemotherapy as a second line or later therapy for ES-SCLC patients. This is a phase II clinical trial (ChiCTR2100049390) conducting at Shandong Cancer Hospital. Patients with ES-SCLC and received at least one prior systemic treatment were enrolled. The trial design involved a combination therapy (sintilimab, anlotinib, and nab-paclitaxel) administered over six 21-day cycles, followed by maintenance sintilimab therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Circulating tumor DNA sequencing was employed for exploratory analysis. From July 2021 to April 2023, 25 eligible patients were enrolled. The confirmed ORR was 60% (95% CI: 38.7-78.9%) and the DCR was 76% (95% CI: 54.9-90.6%). The mPFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.7), and the 6-month PFS rate was 49.2%. The mOS was 13.4 months (95% CI: 11.8-NR), with a 12-month survival rate of 62.2%. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 80% of patients, with the most common being fatigue (40%) and nausea (32%). TRAEs of Grade 3 or higher were reported in 12% of patients. ctDNA analysis indicated that low on-treatment blood tumor mutation burden was associated with longer PFS and OS and a potential role of KMT2D mutation in treatment resistance. This combination therapy shows promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile as a second-line or later treatment for ES-SCLC, with genomic insights providing potential biomarkers for treatment response.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Indoles , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Quinolinas , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Anciano , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Indoles/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , AlbúminasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade improves survival in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the efficacy of taxanes after exposure to PD-1 blockade remains unclear in patients with advanced ESCC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of advanced ESCC patients treated with taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with/without prior exposure to PD-1 blockade (Exposed /Naïve group) at National Cancer Center Hospital from June 2016 to December 2020. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (Exposed group, n = 32; Naïve group, n = 67) were included. The objective response rate (ORR) of the Exposed group was significantly higher than that of the Naïve group (37.5% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.009). The median progression-free survival was similar between the Exposed and Naïve groups (3.8 vs. 2.8 months, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65-1.86, p = 0.66). PD-1 blockade exposure independently predicated higher ORR to taxanes in multivariate analysis. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable between the Exposed and Naïve groups (45.8% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Taxanes following PD-1 blockade in advanced ESCC showed a higher ORR but similar PFS compared to taxanes without prior PD-1 exposure.
Asunto(s)
Docetaxel , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Objective: Development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) poses significant challenges in cancer treatment, often leading to dose reductions or treatment discontinuation. Goshajinkigan (GJG), a traditional Japanese medicine, has shown promise for alleviating CIPN symptoms. This multicenter, randomized controlled trial aimed to prospectively examine the efficacy of GJG in preventing paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Methods: This study enrolled 55 patients with ovarian cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy using paclitaxel and carboplatin. The participants were randomized into Groups A (GJG initiation after onset of grade 2 neuropathy) and B (prophylactic administration of GJG from 1 week before chemotherapy). The primary endpoints were the proportion with a maximum sensory neuropathy grade and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. The secondary endpoints were the rate of chemotherapy completion and paclitaxel dose reduction due to neurotoxicity. Results: Prophylactic GJG administration (Group B) resulted in significant benefits. While both groups had a similar incidence of grade 2 sensory neuropathy, all patients in Group B with grade 2 neuropathy completed treatment without requiring additional analgesics. Group B exhibited lower VAS scores by the end of the study, reduced reliance on adjuvant analgesics (27.3% vs 66.7% in Group A), and significantly less frequent persistent CIPN 6 months post-chemotherapy (18.2% vs 55.6% in Group A). No differences were observed in the chemotherapy completion rates or CIPN-related changes between the groups. Conclusion: GJG, when administered prophylactically, showed potential for mitigating CIPN symptoms during paclitaxel chemotherapy. While promising, further research with placebo controls and objective measures is essential to comprehensively validate these findings.
Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos , Paclitaxel , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Humanos , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/prevención & control , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Medicina Tradicional de Asia Oriental/métodos , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
A 73-year-old man with lung squamous cell carcinoma was administered carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + pembrolizumab for four cycles. Subsequently, he presented with multiple purpuras on his extremities, joint swelling on his fingers, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, accompanied by acute kidney injury (AKI), increased proteinuria, hematuria, and elevated C-reactive protein levels. Skin biopsy showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis as well as IgA and C3 deposition in the vessel walls. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with IgA vasculitis as an immune-related adverse event (irAE) induced by carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + pembrolizumab. After discontinuation of pembrolizumab and glucocorticoids, the symptoms immediately resolved. Regular monitoring of skin, blood tests, and urinalysis are necessary, and the possibility of irAE IgA vasculitis should be considered in cases of purpura and AKI during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carboplatino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Vasculitis por IgA/inducido químicamente , Vasculitis por IgA/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina A , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options. AIM: To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs. METHODS: This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar , Capecitabina , Paclitaxel , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: At the time of AtTEnd trial design, standard treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer included carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. This trial assessed whether combining atezolizumab with chemotherapy might improve outcomes in this population. METHODS: AtTEnd was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 89 hospitals in 11 countries across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Asia. Enrolled patients were aged 18 years or older, and had advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma or carcinosarcoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and received no previous systemic chemotherapy for recurrence. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive web response system (block size of six) to either atezolizumab 1200 mg or placebo given intravenously with chemotherapy (carboplatin at area under the curve of 5 or 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days) for 6-8 cycles, then continued until progression. Stratification factors were country, histological subtype, advanced or recurrent status, and mismatch repair (MMR) status. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The hierarchically tested co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (in patients with MMR-deficient [dMMR] tumours, and in the overall population) and overall survival (in the overall population). Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned patients who gave their full consent to participation in the study and data processing. Safety was assessed in all patients included in the intention-to-treat population who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, we report the primary progression-free survival and the interim overall survival results. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03603184. FINDINGS: Between Oct 3, 2018, and Jan 7, 2022, 551 patients were randomly assigned to atezolizumab (n=362) or placebo (n=189). Two patients in the atezolizumab group were excluded from all analyses due to lack of consent. Median follow-up was 28·3 months (IQR 21·2-37·6). 81 (23%) patients in the atezolizumab group and 44 (23%) patients in the placebo group had dMMR disease by central assessment. In the dMMR population, median progression-free survival was not estimable (95% CI 12·4 months-not estimable [NE]) in the atezolizumab group and 6·9 months (6·3-10·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·36, 95% CI 0·23-0·57; p=0·0005). In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 10·1 months (95% CI 9·5-12·3) in the atezolizumab group and 8·9 months (8·1-9·6) in the placebo group (HR 0·74, 95% CI 0·61-0·91; p=0·022). Median overall survival was 38·7 months (95% CI 30·6-NE) in the atezolizumab group and 30·2 months (25·0-37·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·63-1·07; log-rank p=0·048). The p value for the interim analysis of overall survival did not cross the stopping boundary; therefore, the trial will continue until the required number of events are recorded. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (97 [27%] of 356 patients in the atezolizumab group vs 51 [28%] of 185 in the placebo group) and anaemia (49 [14%] vs 24 [13%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 46 (13%) patients in the atezolizumab group and six (3%) patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in two patients (pneumonia in one patient in each group). INTERPRETATION: Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy increased progression-free survival in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, particularly in those with dMMR carcinomas, suggesting the addition of atezolizumab to standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment in this specific subgroup. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carboplatino , Neoplasias Endometriales , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Método Doble Ciego , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Anciano , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A standardised dose-reduction strategy has not been established for the widely used gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of alternating treatment cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination therapy and gemcitabine alone versus continuous treatment with the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination. METHODS: ALPACA was a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted at 29 study centres across Germany. Patients aged 18 years or older with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had not been previously treated for advanced disease were enrolled. After an induction phase with three cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination therapy (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by stratified permuted block randomisation either to continue treatment with standard nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine or to receive alternating cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine and gemcitabine alone. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. Randomisation was done centrally by the study statistician using a computer-generated randomisation list, and was stratified by Karnofsky Performance Status and presence of liver metastases. The primary endpoint was the derivation of an unbiased point estimate and an associated confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 80% for the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival after randomisation, without testing a specific hypothesis, analysed by intention to treat in all patients who started randomised treatment. Safety was analysed according to treatment received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02564146, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 27, 2016, and May 27, 2021, 325 patients were enrolled. Following three cycles of induction treatment, 174 patients were randomly assigned: 85 to continue receiving standard nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine, of whom 79 started treatment, and 89 to the alternating treatment schedule, of whom 88 started treatment. Of the 167 patients who started randomised treatment, 88 (53%) were female and 79 (47%) were male. Median overall survival after randomisation was 10·4 months (80% CI 9·2-12·0) in the group that received standard treatment and 10·5 months (10·2-11·1) in the group that received alternating treatment (HR 0·90, 80% CI 0·72-1·13; p=0·56). The most common adverse events of any grade were peripheral neuropathy (59 [74%] of 80 patients in the continuous treatment group vs 53 [62%] of 85 patients in the alternating treatment group) and fatigue (43 [54%] vs 44 [52%]). Treatment-emergent serious adverse events after randomisation occurred in 40 (50%) patients in the continuous treatment group and in 28 (33%) in the alternating treatment group. Fewer treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in patients treated with alternating cycles compared with those receiving standard therapy, especially for peripheral neuropathy (17 [21%] patients in the continuous treatment group vs 12 [14%] in the alternating treatment group) and infections (16 [20%] vs nine [11%]). There were two treatment-related deaths after randomisation, both in the continuous treatment group (one multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, not treated after randomisation, and one interstitial lung disease). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that a dose-reduced regimen with alternating cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine and gemcitabine alone after three induction cycles is associated with similar overall survival to that for standard treatment with nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine, but with improved tolerability. We therefore propose that a switch to the alternating schedule could be considered in a clinical setting for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have at least stable disease after three cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine treatment. FUNDING: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Desoxicitidina , Gemcitabina , Paclitaxel , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Esquema de MedicaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a troublesome side effect in patients exposed to taxanes in the treatment of cancer and may affect quality of life dramatically. Here we assessed whether serum levels of neurofilament light (NfL) and tau (two neuroaxonal injury biomarkers) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, a biomarker for astrocytic activation) correlate with the development of CIPN in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using ultrasensitive single molecule array technology, serum levels of NfL, GFAP, and tau were measured before and every 3 weeks in 10 women receiving adjuvant EC (epirubicin 90 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m²) every 3 weeks × 3, followed by weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m² × 9-12 weeks after surgery due to early breast cancer. CIPN was graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0) and the questionnaire EORTC QLQ CIPN-20. RESULTS: Serum levels of GFAP increased successively during cycles of EC. NfL increased instead in response to the treatment of paclitaxel. NfL and GFAP continued to rise throughout exposure of cumulatively higher doses of paclitaxel and were reduced 3 months after the end of chemotherapy. Serums levels of tau were marginally affected by exposure to chemotherapy. Women with worse symptoms of CIPN had higher concentrations of NfL than women with mild symptoms of CIPN. INTERPRETATION: NfL and GFAP are promising biomarkers to identify women at risk of developing CIPN. Larger prospective studies are now needed.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Neoplasias de la Mama , Epirrubicina , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos , Paclitaxel , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Proteínas tau , Humanos , Femenino , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/sangre , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/sangre , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteína Ácida Fibrilar de la Glía/sangre , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Proteínas tau/sangre , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Epirrubicina/efectos adversos , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Astrocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Astrocitos/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos , Neoplasias Endometriales , Paclitaxel , Penfigoide Ampolloso , Humanos , Femenino , Penfigoide Ampolloso/inducido químicamente , Penfigoide Ampolloso/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Macular edema is a known side effect of taxane-based anticancer drugs. We retrospectively investigated data from 11 centers between January 2016 and December 2021. Among 14,260 patients, 30 (0.21%) developed macular edema; from these, the number of cases associated with nab-paclitaxel was 16 (0.43%), significantly higher than the number of cases associated with paclitaxel or docetaxel (P < 0.01). Visual acuity (VA) and retinal choroidal change were examined in 27 patients, with a follow-up of at least 3 months. The patients' mean age was 67.2 years; 14 (51.3%) were male and four (14.8%) had unilateral onset. The mean interval between anticancer drug initiation and the first ophthalmology visit was 290.1 days. Among the 20 patients who discontinued anticancer drugs, VA and edema significantly improved 2 months after discontinuation (LogMAR VA: 0.50 vs. 0.28, central retinal thickness: 472.7 µm vs. 282.5 µm, both P < 0.01). No significant changes were observed in the central choroidal thickness. A correlation was found between duration of taxane treatment and VA immediately before discontinuation of anticancer drugs (ß = 0.00050; 95% confidence interval: 0.00036-0.00097; P < 0.05). Although taxane-induced macular edema is reversible, slower anticancer drug discontinuation worsened VA, highlighting the need for regular ophthalmologic evaluation during treatments.
Asunto(s)
Edema Macular , Taxoides , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Femenino , Edema Macular/inducido químicamente , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Japón/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Pronóstico , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Retina/efectos de los fármacos , Retina/patología , Retina/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (PTX) is an essential cytotoxic anticancer agent and a standard treatment regimen component for various malignant tumors, including advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer, thymic cancer, and primary unknown cancers. However, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) caused by PTX is a significant adverse event that may lead to chemotherapy discontinuation and deterioration of the quality of life (QOL). Although treatment modalities such as goshajinkigan (GJG), pregabalin, and duloxetine are empirically utilized for CIPN, there is no established evidence for an agent as a preventive measure. We designed a randomized phase II trial (OLCSG2101) to investigate whether prophylactic GJG administration can prevent the onset of CIPN induced by PTX. METHODS: This study was designed as a two-arm, prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II trial. The patients will be randomly assigned to either the GJG prophylaxis arm (Arm A) or the GJG non-prophylaxis arm (Arm B), using cancer type (lung cancer or not) and age (<70 years or not) as adjustment factors. A total of 66 patients (33 in each arm) will be enrolled. DISCUSSION: The results of this study may contribute to better management of CIPN, which can enable the continuation of chemotherapy and maintenance of the patient's QOL. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the certified review board of Okayama University (approval no. CRB21-005) on September 28, 2021. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number jRCTs061210047).
Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos , Paclitaxel , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/administración & dosificación , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer is a highly lethal gynecologic disease with limited treatment options. Chiauranib is a novel small-molecule selective inhibitor, which could effectively target multiple pathways including Aurora B and CSF-1R to inhibit cell cycle process and improve anti-tumor immune function, as long as VEGF pathway for tumor extinction. METHODS: A phase II study was sequentially conducted after a phase Ib monotherapy study to evaluate the efficacy of chiauranib combined with chemotherapy. Chinese patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were enrolled. Eligible patients received chiauranib combined with a maximum of six cycles of chemotherapy: etoposide (CE group) or weekly-paclitaxel (CP group). Patients, who exhibited a complete or partial response, or stable disease following combo treatment, progressed to maintenance phase to receive chiauranib monotherapy. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: From November 2017 to March 2019, 25 patients were enrolled in a phase 1b study and a median PFS of 3.7 months (95% CI 1.8-NE) was achieved by chiauranib monotherapy. From July 2019 to December 2020, a total of 47 patients were enrolled in the phase II study. One CP patient did not receive the study drugs, and three patients withdrew before the first tumor assessment. Thus, 43 patients (CE group: 22 patients; CP group: 21 patients) were included in the evaluation. The median PFS was 5·4 months (95% CI 2·8-5·6) and 5·6 months (95% CI 3·4-7·0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to evaluate chiauranib, a novel multi-targeted kinase inhibitor in patients with ovarian cancer. The administration of chiauranib along with etoposide or weekly-paclitaxel significantly enhanced the efficacy with manageable adverse events. This warrants further clinical studies on this novel treatment. A phase III study is promising and ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicaTrials.gov identifier: NCT03901118 (phase II) and NCT03166891 (phase Ib).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy has gradually shown substantial promise to increase T cell infiltration and antitumor efficacy. However, paclitaxel in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1/PD-L1 was only used to treat a small proportion of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and the clinical outcomes was very limited. In addition, this regimen cannot prevent paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Therefore, there was an urgent need for a novel target to enhance the antitumor activity of paclitaxel and alleviate chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer. Here, we found that Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) expression was upregulated in multiply subtypes of human breast cancer specimens after paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Mechanistic studies revealed that paclitaxel promoted DKK1 expression by inducing EGFR signaling in breast cancer cells, and the upregulation of DKK1 could hinder the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel by suppressing the infiltration and activity of CD8+ T cells in tumor microenvironment. Moreover, paclitaxel treatment in tumor-bearing mice also increased DKK1 expression through the activation of EGFR signaling in the primary sensory dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, leading to the development of peripheral neuropathy, which is charactered by myelin damage in the sciatic nerve, neuropathic pain, and loss of cutaneous innervation in hindpaw skin. The addition of an anti-DKK1 antibody not only improved therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel in two murine subtype models of breast cancer but also alleviated paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Taken together, our findings providing a potential chemoimmunotherapy strategy with low neurotoxicity that can benefit multiple subtypes of breast cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular , Paclitaxel , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/farmacología , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular/metabolismo , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intercelular/genética , Humanos , Animales , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Ratones , Línea Celular Tumoral , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Microambiente Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/metabolismoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) is an established salvage regimen for germ cell tumors (GCT) on the basis of a phase II trial, but efficacy on a large patient cohort including patients with unfavorable risk features and long-term outcomes has not been reported. Herein, we report updated treatment efficacy and long-term follow-up with TIP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with GCT who received TIP after cisplatin-based chemotherapy were eligible. Favorable response (complete response or partial response with negative tumor markers), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates, relapse, and toxicity were determined. Disease was reclassified according to the International Prognostic Factor Study Group (IPFSG) score. RESULTS: Of the 104 patients, 87 had favorable risk factors and 17 had at least one unfavorable factor by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria. Ten patients were treated for a second gonadal primary GCT. With a median follow-up of 8.9 years, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 66% (95% CI, 55 to 74) and 69% (95% CI, 59 to 77), respectively. Among 87 patients with favorable-risk disease, 69 (79%) achieved a favorable response with 5-year PFS and OS rates of 67% (95% CI, 56 to 76) and 72% (95% CI, 61 to 80), respectively. Among 17 patients with MSKCC unfavorable-risk disease, 13 (76%) achieved a favorable response with 5-year PFS and OS rates of 59% (95% CI, 33 to 78) and 56% (95% CI, 28 to 76), respectively. After IPFSG reclassification, 5-year PFS and OS rates for patients with ≤intermediate-risk disease were 75% (95% CI, 50 to 89) and 73% (95% CI, 55 to 85), respectively. CONCLUSION: TIP is an effective second-line regimen for patients with GCT. Similar outcomes were observed in patients with favorable- and unfavorable-risk disease. The randomized TIGER trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02375204) comparing TIP with high-dose chemotherapy will determine the optimal second-line treatment approach.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Cisplatino , Ifosfamida , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias , Paclitaxel , Terapia Recuperativa , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ifosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ifosfamida/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos como AsuntoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the major side effects and main reasons for affecting quality of life and dose reduction or even discontinuation of treatment in breast cancer patients. One of the most widely prescribed chemotherapies is the "taxanes." Considering that duloxetine has been used in treating neuropathies in recent years, this study aimed to investigate its effectiveness in preventing taxane-related neuropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial on 47 patients: 24 received a placebo and 23 received duloxetine at 30 mg daily in the first week following the injection of paclitaxel and 60 mg during the second week in each chemotherapy cycle. Patients objective (nerve conduction velocity (NCV) values) and subjective symptoms (visual analog scale including; neuropathy, paresthesia, pain, cold sensitivity, and numbness), the grades of the patients' neuropathy (calculated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.5), and the presence of complications, before and after each chemotherapy cycle, were recorded. RESULTS: The placebo group experienced significantly higher occurrences of new neuropathy (8/23 in duloxetine vs 16/24 in placebo, P = 0.029) in NCV by tibial nerve latency (- 0.28% vs 19.87%, P = 0.006), tibial amplitude (4.40% vs - 10.88%, P = 0.049), and median nerve latency (8.72% vs 31.16%, P = 0.039); administration of duloxetine significantly reduced the scores of neuropathies (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.027), during chemotherapy, and 6 weeks later; however, no significant effect was observed on paresthesia, numbness, cold sensitivity, and other NCV measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel can cause neuropathy, lasting for a long time. Our study showed duloxetine is potentially an effective medication that can prevent subjective and objective neuropathy.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina , Paclitaxel , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Duloxetina/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Método Doble Ciego , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/prevención & control , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Calidad de Vida , AncianoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) combination therapy is a standard of care for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ-NSCLC); however, the lack of safety data limits its clinical application in Japan. METHODS: This study compared the safety of ABCP with that of bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BCP) combination for the treatment of advanced NSQ-NSCLC in Japanese patients by evaluating the clinical background and incidence of adverse events (AEs) based on data extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) for up to 1 year were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method. RESULTS: A search conducted using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes identified 350,987 patients, of whom 202 were included in the ABCP cohort and 232 in the BCP cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and febrile neutropenia (FN) was significantly higher in the ABCP cohort versus the BCP cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-4.91] for skin disorder and 1.70 (95% CI 1.01-2.85) for FN. The adjusted RMST differences were - 64.2 days (95% CI - 93.0 to - 35.4 days) and - 46.0 days (95% CI - 73.5 to - 18.5 days) for skin disorder and FN, respectively. These results were comparable to those of other pivotal clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this DPC database study highlight the safety of ABCP in Japanese clinical practice, and this methodology may facilitate more efficient research in real-world settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID UMIN000041507.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bevacizumab , Carboplatino , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano , Japón , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Standard-of-care first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) is pembrolizumab plus platinum and fluorouracil (FU). However, FU is associated with potential challenges (continuous 4-day infusion, high administration costs, and cardiovascular and gastrointestinal toxicities), creating a clinical need for alternative chemotherapy combinations. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel for R/M HNSCC in the open-label, single-arm, phase IV KEYNOTE-B10 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04489888). METHODS: Eligible adults had previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed R/M HNSCC regardless of PD-L1 status, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles and carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL/min intravenously once every 3 weeks for ≤6 cycles and investigator's choice of paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 or 175 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. RESULTS: Between October 27, 2020, and April 29, 2022, 149 patients were screened and 101 received treatment. As of February 20, 2023, the median follow-up was 18.9 months (range, 9.1-27.0). At this final analysis, 49 (49%) of 101 patients had an objective response (95% CI, 38.4 to 58.7), including seven patients (7%) with a confirmed complete response. Of the 101 treated patients, grade 3-5 and serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 76 (75%) and 27 (27%), respectively. There were no new safety signals. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in first-line R/M HNSCC, suggesting this combination may be an alternative option for this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carboplatino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Paclitaxel , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Humanos , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Anciano , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , AdultoRESUMEN
With the postponement of female reproductive age and the higher incidence of cancer in young people, fertility preservation has become increasingly important in childbearing age. Chemotherapy during pregnancy is crucial for maternal cancer treatments and fetal outcomes. It is a need to further study ovarian damage caused by chemotherapy drug combinations and long-term effects on offspring development, and a detailed understanding of side effects of chemotherapy drugs. In this study, chemotherapy drug combinations significantly impacted on ovarian function, especially epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) combination led to an unbalance in the development of the left and right ovary. Exposure to EC and cisplatin/paclitaxel (TP) increased the number of progenitor follicles while decreased the count of antral follicles and corpora luteum. As to the estrus cycle, EC exposure resulted in a longer estrus period and diestrus period, while TP exposure only extended the diestrus period. EC and TP affected steroid biosynthesis by reducing the expression of SF1 and P450arom.γ-H2AX was detected in both EC and TP exposure groups. As to the impact on the offspring from 4T1 tumor-bearing pregnant mice injected with EC, no significant difference was observed in the physical and neurological development compared to the control, but the ovarian weights, estrus cycles of the offspring were significantly different. Chemotherapy drug combinations exhibit ovarian toxicity, not only causing direct damage on the follicle cells but also disrupting steroid biosynthesis. The reproductive system of offspring from maternal tumor-bearing mice exposed to chemotherapy drugs was observed disorder, but the concrete mechanism still needs further exploration.
Asunto(s)
Cisplatino , Ciclofosfamida , Epirrubicina , Ovario , Femenino , Animales , Ciclofosfamida/toxicidad , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/toxicidad , Epirrubicina/efectos adversos , Epirrubicina/toxicidad , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/toxicidad , Ratones , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/toxicidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (AG regimen) combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: Data of 52 patients with advanced PC who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (Xuzhou, China) between August 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment regimen, patients were divided into two groups, including 27 patients in the chemotherapy group (AG regimen) and 25 patients in the combined treatment group (AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The survival curves of the two groups were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in PFS and OS between the two groups were compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors influencing prognosis. RESULTS: The median OS and PFS in the combined treatment group were significantly longer than those in the chemotherapy group (OS, 12.8 vs. 7.9 months, P = 0.005; PFS, 5.6 vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (32.0 % vs. 25.9 %, P = 0.629), and DCR in the combined treatment group was significantly better than that in the chemotherapy group (84.0 % vs. 59.3 %, P = 0.049). Grade 1-2 adverse reactions were predominant in both groups, and no adverse reaction-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Compared with chemotherapy alone, AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors exhibited to have a higher efficacy for the first-line treatment of advanced PC, and the adverse reactions were also controllable.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Desoxicitidina , Gemcitabina , Indoles , Paclitaxel , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Quinolinas , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) is a family of phase II metabolizing enzymes contribute to detoxification and elimination of variety of endogenous as well as exogenous xenobiotics including chemotherapeutic agents. The comprehensive knowledge on the impact of genetic polymorphisms in GST) enzyme coding gene will help to understand the clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with either Adriamycin or paclitaxel or combination of both. In this study we attempted to assess the genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 and their association with Adriamycin and Paclitaxel induced toxicity reactions in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Two hundred BC patients receiving Adriamycin and Paclitaxel chemotherapy were enrolled in this study and chemotherapy induced hematological and non-hematological toxicity reactions were noted. The polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 gene were studied by PCR and RFLP analysis. RESULTS: After the univariate analysis of the genetic polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 showed that GSTT1 null genotype showed significant association with neutropenia (OR=2.84, 95% CI: 1.06-7.56; p=0.036) in breast cancer patients treated with Adriamycin and GSTT1 null genotype in patients with >1 CINV toxicity confirmed significant correlation (OR=3.75, 95% CI: 1.46-9.59; p=0.005). The genetic polymorphisms of GSTP1 (exon 5) A/G heterozygous genotype was significant in grade >1 toxicity reactions of mucositis (OR=3.22, 95% CI: 1.06-9.71; p=0.037) in breast cancer patients administered with Paclitaxel chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The findings obtained from this study proposed significant involvement of GSTT1-null genotype in hematological neutropenia toxicity in response to Adriamycin and GSTM1-null genotype showed negative association with non-hematological toxicity (bodyache) in response to Paclitaxel.