RESUMEN
Drug treatment of glioblastoma, the most aggressive and widespread form of brain cancer, is complicated due to the difficulty of penetration of chemotherapeutic drugs through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Moreover, with surgical removal of tumors, in 90 % of cases they reappear near the original focus. To solve this problem, we propose to use hydrogel based on cellulose nanocrystals grafted with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (CNC-g-PNIPAM) as a promising material for filling postoperative cavities in the brain with the release of antitumor drugs. The CNC-g-PNIPAM is formed by "grafting to" method for precise control of molecular weight and grafting density. This colloidal system is liquid under injection conditions (at r. t.) and turns into a gel at human body temperature (when filling the postoperative area). It was shown for the first time that due to the rod-shaped of CNC, the gel has a fibrillar structure and, thus, mechanical properties similar to those of brain tissue, including nonlinear mechanics (strain-stiffening and compression softening). The biocompatibility of the hydrogel with primary brain cells is demonstrated. In addition, the release of the antitumor drug paclitaxel from the hydrogel and its antitumor activity is shown. The resulting nanocolloid system provides an innovative alternative approach to filling postoperative cavities and can be used for postoperative treatment due to the programmable release of drugs, as well as for in vitro modeling of tumor interaction with the BBB affecting drug transport in the brain.
Asunto(s)
Resinas Acrílicas , Materiales Biocompatibles , Celulosa , Hidrogeles , Nanopartículas , Celulosa/química , Nanopartículas/química , Resinas Acrílicas/química , Humanos , Animales , Materiales Biocompatibles/química , Hidrogeles/química , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Paclitaxel/química , Paclitaxel/farmacología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Temperatura , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/patología , Liberación de Fármacos , Barrera Hematoencefálica/metabolismoRESUMEN
Breast cancer is a malignant tumor that poses a significant threat to women's health and single therapy fails to play a good oncological therapeutic effect. Synergistic treatment with multiple strategies may make up for the deficiencies and has gained widespread attention. In this study, sulfhydryl-modified hyaluronic acid (HA-SH) was covalently crosslinked with polydopamine (PDA) via a Michael addition reaction to develop an injectable hydrogel, in which PDA can be used not only as a matrix but also as a photothermal agent. After HSA and paclitaxel were spontaneously organized into nanoparticles via hydrophobic interaction, hyaluronic acid with low molecular weight was covalently linked to HSA, thus conferring effectively delivery. This photothermal injectable hydrogel incorporates PTX@HSA-HA nanoparticles, thereby initiating a thermochemotherapeutic response to target malignancy. Our results demonstrated that this injectable hydrogel possesses consistent drug delivery capability in a murine breast cancer model, collaborating with photothermal therapy to effectively suppress tumor growth, represented by low expression of Ki-67 and increasing apoptosis. Photothermal therapy (PTT) can effectively stimulate immune response by increasing IL-6 and TNF-α. Notably, the treatment did not elicit any indications of toxicity. This injectable hydrogel holds significant promise as a multifaceted therapeutic agent that integrates photothermal and chemotherapeutic modalities.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Ácido Hialurónico , Hidrogeles , Paclitaxel , Terapia Fototérmica , Animales , Ácido Hialurónico/química , Hidrogeles/química , Hidrogeles/farmacología , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ratones , Terapia Fototérmica/métodos , Paclitaxel/farmacología , Paclitaxel/química , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Indoles/química , Indoles/farmacología , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Polímeros/química , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Nanopartículas/química , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/química , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Fototerapia/métodosRESUMEN
Treatment options for patients with relapsed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining anlotinib and sintilimab plus chemotherapy as a second line or later therapy for ES-SCLC patients. This is a phase II clinical trial (ChiCTR2100049390) conducting at Shandong Cancer Hospital. Patients with ES-SCLC and received at least one prior systemic treatment were enrolled. The trial design involved a combination therapy (sintilimab, anlotinib, and nab-paclitaxel) administered over six 21-day cycles, followed by maintenance sintilimab therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Circulating tumor DNA sequencing was employed for exploratory analysis. From July 2021 to April 2023, 25 eligible patients were enrolled. The confirmed ORR was 60% (95% CI: 38.7-78.9%) and the DCR was 76% (95% CI: 54.9-90.6%). The mPFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.7), and the 6-month PFS rate was 49.2%. The mOS was 13.4 months (95% CI: 11.8-NR), with a 12-month survival rate of 62.2%. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 80% of patients, with the most common being fatigue (40%) and nausea (32%). TRAEs of Grade 3 or higher were reported in 12% of patients. ctDNA analysis indicated that low on-treatment blood tumor mutation burden was associated with longer PFS and OS and a potential role of KMT2D mutation in treatment resistance. This combination therapy shows promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile as a second-line or later treatment for ES-SCLC, with genomic insights providing potential biomarkers for treatment response.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Indoles , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Quinolinas , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Anciano , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Indoles/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , AlbúminasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Aim: To analyze the results of treatment of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: 276 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma were treated in 2008-2021. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of three to six cycles: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin 350 mg/m2 (or cisplatin 100 mg/m2) on the first day. The interval between cycles was 21 days. After the cycles, all patients were prescribed a course of radiation therapy in a total focal dose (TFD) of 65 Gy. The outcome of treatment was assessed by the degree of tumor regression according to RECIST criteria one month after the end of combination treatment. Statistical processing was performed using STATISTICA 6.1 software (StatSoftInc). RESULTS: Results: The three- and five-year survival rates of the examined patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma after treatment were 40.8% respectively (95% CI 33.7 - 47.9) and 27.0%, (95% CI 20.6 - 33, 4) with a median survival of 36 months with 95% CI (35.5 - 40.2). Processing was performed using STATISTICA 6.1 software (StatSoftInc). CONCLUSION: Сonclusions: Analysis of treatment of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma with predominance of squamous cell carcinoma (90.6%), localized primarily in the palatine tonsil (73.2%), with the most common stages T3N1M0 (30.1%) and T3N1M0 %), with regional metastases to the lymph nodes of the neck (89.9%), showed that the effectiveness of treatment of patients is quite high, because in most of the examined in the short term after combined treatment there was complete or partial regression of the tumor (91.7%), no progression of the oncological process was detected in any of them.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Terapia NeoadyuvanteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade improves survival in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the efficacy of taxanes after exposure to PD-1 blockade remains unclear in patients with advanced ESCC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of advanced ESCC patients treated with taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with/without prior exposure to PD-1 blockade (Exposed /Naïve group) at National Cancer Center Hospital from June 2016 to December 2020. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (Exposed group, n = 32; Naïve group, n = 67) were included. The objective response rate (ORR) of the Exposed group was significantly higher than that of the Naïve group (37.5% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.009). The median progression-free survival was similar between the Exposed and Naïve groups (3.8 vs. 2.8 months, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65-1.86, p = 0.66). PD-1 blockade exposure independently predicated higher ORR to taxanes in multivariate analysis. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable between the Exposed and Naïve groups (45.8% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Taxanes following PD-1 blockade in advanced ESCC showed a higher ORR but similar PFS compared to taxanes without prior PD-1 exposure.
Asunto(s)
Docetaxel , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized therapeutic potential of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), their role in neoadjuvant therapy and reliable efficacy biomarkers remain elusive. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent surgery following a 2-cycle platinum and paclitaxel-based treatment, with or without PD-1 inhibitors (January 2020-March 2023). We assessed peripheral blood indexes and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) density to evaluate their impact on pathological response and prognosis, leading to a clinical prediction model for treatment efficacy and survival. RESULTS: Of the 157 patients recruited, 106 received immunochemotherapy (ICT) and 51 received chemotherapy (CT) alone. The ICT group demonstrated a superior pathological response rate (PRR) (47.2% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.034) with comparable adverse events and postoperative complications. The ICT group also showed a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 39.8 months, unattained by the CT group. The 1-year DFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 73% and 91% for the ICT group, and 68% and 81% for the CT group, respectively. We found higher baseline activated T cells, lower baseline Treg cells, and a decreased posttreatment total lymphocyte and CD4+/CD8+ ratio predicted an enhanced PRR. Reduced posttreatment CD4+/CD8+ ratio and increased NK cells were associated with prolonged survival, while higher TLS density indicated poorer prognosis. Among ICT group, a lower posttreatment CD4+/CD8+ ratio indicated longer DFS and reduced posttreatment B cells indicated longer OS. A nomogram integrating these predictors was developed to forecast treatment efficacy and survival. CONCLUSION: The combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy appears promising for locally advanced ESCC. Evaluating the differentiation status and dynamic changes of peripheral blood immune cells may provide valuable predictive insights into treatment efficacy and prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Subgrupos Linfocitarios/inmunología , Pronóstico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Adulto , EsofagectomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an effective treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (BC). However, there are no effective biomarkers for evaluating its efficacy. CDR1-AS, well known for its important role in tumorigenesis, is a famous circular RNA involved in the chemosensitivity of cancers other than BC. However, the predictive role of CDR1-AS in the efficacy and prognosis of NAC for BC has not been fully elucidated. We herein aimed to clarify this role. METHODS: The present study included patients treated with paclitaxel-cisplatin-based NAC. The expression of CDR1-AS was detected by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing. The predictive value of CDR1-AS expression was examined in pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC using logistic regression analysis. The relationship between CDR1-AS expression and survival was demonstrated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and tested by log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: The present study enrolled 106 patients with BC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that CDR1-AS expression was an independent predictive factor for pCR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.244; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.081-0.732; p = 0.012). Furthermore, pCR benefits with low CDR1-AS expression were observed across all subgroups. The Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test suggested that the CDR1-AS high-expression group showed significantly better disease-free survival (DFS; log-rank p = 0.022) and relapse-free survival (RFS; log-rank p = 0.012) than the CDR1-AS low-expression group. Multivariate analysis revealed that CDR1-AS expression was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted HR = 0.177; 95% CI 0.034-0.928, p = 0.041), RFS (adjusted HR = 0.061; 95% CI 0.006-0.643, p = 0.020), and distant disease-free survival (adjusted HR = 0.061; 95% CI 0.006-0.972, p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: CDR1-AS may be a potential novel predictive biomarker of pCR and survival benefit in patients with locally advanced BC receiving NAC. This may help identify specific chemosensitive individuals and build personalized treatment strategies.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias de la Mama , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Femenino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , ARN Circular/genética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anciano , China/epidemiología , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
The WHO (World Health Organization) conducted an elimination of cervical cancer program using triple pillar intervention strategy to target 90%-70%-90% of women before the year 2030, including (1) a full vaccination of HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccine to 90% of girls <15 years of age; (2) a high-performance screening procedure to 70% of women during the reproductive age (at the age of 35 and 45 years of age); and (3) an appropriate and adequate treatment to 90% of women with confirmed diagnosis of cervical lesions. Among the aforementioned three pillars, a full HPV vaccination has been introduced in our previous review, of which we have discussed the policy and strategy of HPV vaccination in the world and also reviewed the efficacy of HPV vaccination, with a successful reduction of over 90% of HPV-associated neoplasms. The aims of the current review will target another pillar-an appropriate and adequate treatment to 90% of women with confirmed diagnosis of cervical lesions. Since the early-stage cervical cancer has a favorable outcome and the treatment recommendation has been established, therefore, the current review focuses on women with persistent, recurrent and metastatic cervical cancers (advanced cervical cancers), which are still a biggest challenge based on its extremely worse outcomes before the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Integration of ICIs into conventional chemotherapy (paclitaxel-cisplatin) has become the new standard therapy for those patients with advanced cervical cancers. The recent clinical trials, such as KENOTE 826 and KENOTE A18 showing a dramatical improvement of both progression free survival and overall survival have approved the therapeutic efficacy of this combination as ICI plus paclitaxel-platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) with/without bevacizumab to women with persistent, recurrent and metastatic cervical cancers.
Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The current review described a 55-year woman using 28 months to finish her surgery-based radiation-free multimodality treatment journey to fight International Federation of Gynaecology & Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 clinical stage IIA2 (cT2aN0M0) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix. She received six cycles of perioperative adjuvant therapy, including three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and three cycles of postoperative adjuvant therapy by using combination of dose-dense chemotherapy (CT, weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2+triweekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2), immunotherapy (IO, triweekly pembrolizumab 200 mg) and half-dose anti-angiogenic agent (triweekly bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg) plus interval radical surgery (radical hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy + bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection + para-aortic lymph node sampling) and following maintenance therapy with monthly 22 cycles of half-dose of IO (pembrolizumab 100 mg) and concomitant 4 cycles of single-agent CT (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2) and 18 cycles of half-dose anti-angiogenic agent (bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg). During the cervical SCC fighting journey, two unwanted adverse events (AEs) occurred. One was pseudo-progressive disease during the NAT treatment and pathology-confirmed upgrading FIGO stage IIIC1p (ypT2a1N1M0) after radical surgery and the other was the occurrence of hypothyroidism during the post operative adjuvant therapy. Based on this case we presented, we review the recent trend in the management of women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) using the radiation-free but surgery-based multimodality strategy and highlight the strengths and limitations about perioperative adjuvant therapy with dose-dense CT + IO + half-dose anti-angiogenic agent and maintenance treatment of half-dose IO combining with short-term single agent CT and following long-term half-dose anti-angiogenic agent. All underscore the possibility that women with LACC have an opportunity to receive surgery-based RT-free multi-modality strategy to manage their diseases with satisfactory results. Additionally, the evolving role of IO plus CT with/without anti-angiogenic agent functioning as either primary treatment or adjuvant therapy for the treatment of advanced CC has been in process continuously. Moreover, the patient's positive response to IO, pembrolizumab as an example, both during the primary and maintenance therapy, highlights the importance of integrating IO into CT regimens for CC, especially in cases where conventional therapies, RT as an example, are insufficient or who do not want to receive RT-based treatment. The sustained disease-free status of the patient over several years reinforces the potential of IO to significantly increase long-term survival outcomes in CC patients, particularly for those with LACC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Histerectomía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Histerectomía/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Terapia Combinada , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Escisión del Ganglio LinfáticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The long-term impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of DCB angioplasty with rescue stenting to intended drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment for patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery lesions. METHODS: REC-CAGEFREE I was an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial conducted at 43 sites in China. After successful lesion pre-dilatation, patients aged 18 years or older with de novo, non-complex coronary artery disease (irrespective of target vessel diameter) and an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned (1:1), via a web-based centralised system with block randomisation (block size of two, four, or six) and stratified by site, to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with the option of rescue stenting due to an unsatisfactory result (DCB group) or intended deployment of second-generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting stents (DES group). The primary outcome was the device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE; including cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically and physiologically indicated target lesion revascularisation) assessed at 24 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment). Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI for the absolute risk difference was smaller than 2·68%. Safety was assessed in the ITT population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04561739. It is closed to accrual and extended follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 5, 2021, and May 1, 2022, 2272 patients were randomly assigned to the DCB group (1133 [50%]) or the DES group (1139 [50%]). Median age at the time of randomisation was 62 years (IQR 54-69), 1574 (69·3%) of 2272 were male, 698 (30·7%) were female, and all patients were of Chinese ethnicity. 106 (9·4%) of 1133 patients in the DCB group received rescue DES after unsatisfactory DCB angioplasty. As of data cutoff (May 1, 2024), median follow-up was 734 days (IQR 731-739). At 24 months, the DoCE occurred in 72 (6·4%) of 1133 patients in the DCB group and 38 (3·4%) of 1139 in the DES group, with a risk difference of 3·04% in the cumulative event rate (upper boundary of the one-sided 95% CI 4·52; pnon-inferiority=0·65; two-sided 95% CI 1·27-4·81; p=0·0008); the criterion for non-inferiority was not met. During intervention, no acute vessel closures occurred in the DCB group and one (0·1%) of 1139 patients in the DES group had acute vessel closure. Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in ten (0·9%) of 1133 patients in the DCB group and nine (0·8%) in the DES group. INTERPRETATION: In patients with de novo, non-complex coronary artery disease, irrespective of vessel diameter, a strategy of DCB angioplasty with rescue stenting did not achieve non-inferiority compared with the intended DES implantation in terms of the DoCE at 2 years, which indicates that DES should remain the preferred treatment for this patient population. FUNDING: Xijing Hospital and Shenqi Medical. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Anciano , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , China/epidemiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodosRESUMEN
Objective: To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) inhibitors combined with paclitaxel (albumin-conjugated) and cisplatin (TP regimen) for locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and laryngeal organ function preservation. Methods: Data of 53 patients, including 51 males and 2 females, aged 38-70 years old, who were diagnosed with locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous carcinoma confirmed by histology and enhanced CT at the Cancer Prevention and Control Center of Sun Yat-sen University during the initial treatment from January 1, 2019 to January 15, 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received neoadjuvant therapy with PD-1 inhibitors combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel (260 mg/m2) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) for 3 to 4 cycles. The main outcome measures were larynx dysfunction-free survival (LDFS), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox multifactorial analysis was further performed if Cox univariate analysis was statistically significant. Results: The overall efficiency was 90.6% (48/53). The 1-year and 2-year LDFS rates were 83.8% (95%CI: 74.0% to 94.8%) and 50.3% (95%CI: 22.1% to 91.6%), the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 95.2% (95%CI: 88.9% to 100.0%) and 58.2% (95%CI: 25.6% to 81.8%), and the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 83.9% (95%CI: 74.2% to 94.9%) and 53.5% (95%CI: 32.1% to 89.1%). Adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant therapy were mainly myelosuppression (45.3%), gastrointestinal reactions (37.7%) and hypothyroidism (20.8%). Conclusion: The neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using PD-1 inhibitors combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin can provide with a higher survival rate with a improved laryngeal organ function preservation rate.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Cisplatino , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/terapia , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
A 73-year-old man with lung squamous cell carcinoma was administered carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + pembrolizumab for four cycles. Subsequently, he presented with multiple purpuras on his extremities, joint swelling on his fingers, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, accompanied by acute kidney injury (AKI), increased proteinuria, hematuria, and elevated C-reactive protein levels. Skin biopsy showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis as well as IgA and C3 deposition in the vessel walls. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with IgA vasculitis as an immune-related adverse event (irAE) induced by carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel + pembrolizumab. After discontinuation of pembrolizumab and glucocorticoids, the symptoms immediately resolved. Regular monitoring of skin, blood tests, and urinalysis are necessary, and the possibility of irAE IgA vasculitis should be considered in cases of purpura and AKI during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carboplatino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Vasculitis por IgA/inducido químicamente , Vasculitis por IgA/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina A , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options. AIM: To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs. METHODS: This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar , Capecitabina , Paclitaxel , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Weekly paclitaxel (WP) is a chemotherapeutic cornerstone in the management of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma. Multiple WP dosing regimens have been used clinically and studied individually. However, no formal comparison of these regimens is available to provide objective guidance in clinical decision making. The primary objective of this study was to compare the cumulative dose of paclitaxel delivered using 80 mg/m2/week, administered using either a 3 weeks out of 4 (WP3) or a 4 weeks out of 4 (WP4) regimen. The secondary objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with both regimens, including efficacy and toxicity parameters. Our retrospective cohort comprised 149 patients harboring platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated at the CHU de Québec from January 2012 to January 2023. WP3 and WP4 reached a similar cumulative dose (1353.7 vs. 1404.2 mg/m2; p = 0.29). No significant differences in the clinical outcomes were observed. The frequency of dose reduction was significantly higher for WP4 than WP3 (44.7% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.01), mainly due to treatment intolerance from toxicity (34.0% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.01). Our data suggest that a WP3 regimen delivers a similar cumulative dose to WP4, hence offering a better efficacy profile without compromising efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Femenino , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquema de Medicación , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a rare pancreatic neoplasm. Recently, molecular analysis revealed that PACC shows a high frequency of the BRCA1/2 mutation and is likely to be considered a cancer associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Hereditary cancers, including HBOC, are characterized by multifocal and/or metachronous tumors. However, no case reports exist of germline BRCA1-mutated synchronous and metachronous PACC. CASE: A 58-year-old man was diagnosed with synchronous and metachronous PACC at the age of 56 and underwent two surgeries. Ten months after the second surgery, the patient developed multiple liver metastases. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy was administered as first-line chemotherapy. After seven cycles, computed tomography examination revealed progressive disease (PD). Therefore, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) was administered as second- line chemotherapy. After 19 cycles of mFFX, comprehensive cancer genomic profiling (CGP) identified a BRCA1 pathogenic variant that was confirmed to be germline origin. Accordingly, we treated the patient with olaparib; however, he was diagnosed with PD after 4 months. He subsequently died 5 years and 9 months after the initial surgery, and 3 years and 10 months after chemotherapy. Based on the genetic data of the patients, his family members received genetic counseling followed by cascade testing. Consequently, the same gBRCA1 pathogenic variant was detected in the son and his surveillance for HBOC-related cancers was initiated. CONCLUSION: We diagnosed a 58-year-old man with a synchronous and metachronous PACC with germline BRCA1 pathogenic variant. Considering that PACC is likely to have BRCA1/2 mutations responsible for HBOC, we need to be aware of the possible presence of multifocal and/or metachronous tumors in patients with PACC. Additionally, patients with PACC should undergo genetic examinations, which would be beneficial in determining treatment strategies and health care for blood relatives.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Proteína BRCA1 , Carcinoma de Células Acinares , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Carcinoma de Células Acinares/genética , Carcinoma de Células Acinares/patología , Carcinoma de Células Acinares/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Acinares/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/genética , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/genética , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/terapia , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Purpose: To study the effects of prior pelvic radiotherapy on bone marrow suppression in recurrent cervical cancer patients during chemotherapy. Methods and materials: The cases of 129 patients with recurrent cervical cancer were reviewed, of which 77 patients had pelvic radiotherapy history and another 52 patients with no pelvic radiotherapy history were used as control group. All patients received a chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (TC) per 21 days for 5-6 times. Hematologic toxicity, including count of red blood cell, white blood cell and neutrophil cell and platelet, was defined by using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). The relationship between age, body mass index, disease free survival, pathological types, FIGO stages, radiotherapy methods and the degree of bone marrow suppression during chemotherapy was statistically analyzed, respectively, for all recurrent cervical cancer patients. Results: Among 77 patients with previous radiotherapy history, 73 recurrent patients (94.8%) had bone marrow suppression followed by chemotherapy. Recurrent cervical cancer patients without prior radiotherapy (n=52) showed a lower risk of bone marrow suppression followed by chemotherapy (n=39, 75.0%, P < 0.05). The probability of severe bone marrow suppression (grade III-IV) after chemotherapy in recurrent cervical patients with or without history of radiotherapy was 41.6% and 13.5%, respectively (P < 0.05). In univariate analysis, radiotherapy methods were associated with the incidence of grade III-IV bone marrow suppression in recurrent cervical cancer patients (P=0.005). In multivariate analysis, radiotherapy methods and extended-field radiotherapy were the risk factor of grade III-IV bone marrow suppression (χ2=16.975, P=0.001). No significant differences in the counts of white blood cell, hemoglobin and platelet were observed before chemotherapy at relapse between patients with and without prior radiotherapy. Reduction of white blood cell counts, absolute value of neutrophil cell and platelet counts composited majority type of grade III and IV bone marrow suppression. Conclusions: The prior pelvic radiotherapy significantly increased the incidence of bone marrow suppression during chemotherapy in recurrent cervical cancer patients. When treating recurrent cervical cancer patients with chemotherapy who had prior radiotherapy, especially for those experienced external beam radiation therapy, essential attention and timely intervention are recommended to ensure completion of chemotherapy and clinical efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Médula Ósea/efectos de la radiación , Médula Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Médula Ósea/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Pelvis/efectos de la radiación , Pelvis/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia sin EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: At the time of AtTEnd trial design, standard treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer included carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. This trial assessed whether combining atezolizumab with chemotherapy might improve outcomes in this population. METHODS: AtTEnd was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 89 hospitals in 11 countries across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Asia. Enrolled patients were aged 18 years or older, and had advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma or carcinosarcoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and received no previous systemic chemotherapy for recurrence. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive web response system (block size of six) to either atezolizumab 1200 mg or placebo given intravenously with chemotherapy (carboplatin at area under the curve of 5 or 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days) for 6-8 cycles, then continued until progression. Stratification factors were country, histological subtype, advanced or recurrent status, and mismatch repair (MMR) status. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The hierarchically tested co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (in patients with MMR-deficient [dMMR] tumours, and in the overall population) and overall survival (in the overall population). Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned patients who gave their full consent to participation in the study and data processing. Safety was assessed in all patients included in the intention-to-treat population who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, we report the primary progression-free survival and the interim overall survival results. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03603184. FINDINGS: Between Oct 3, 2018, and Jan 7, 2022, 551 patients were randomly assigned to atezolizumab (n=362) or placebo (n=189). Two patients in the atezolizumab group were excluded from all analyses due to lack of consent. Median follow-up was 28·3 months (IQR 21·2-37·6). 81 (23%) patients in the atezolizumab group and 44 (23%) patients in the placebo group had dMMR disease by central assessment. In the dMMR population, median progression-free survival was not estimable (95% CI 12·4 months-not estimable [NE]) in the atezolizumab group and 6·9 months (6·3-10·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·36, 95% CI 0·23-0·57; p=0·0005). In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 10·1 months (95% CI 9·5-12·3) in the atezolizumab group and 8·9 months (8·1-9·6) in the placebo group (HR 0·74, 95% CI 0·61-0·91; p=0·022). Median overall survival was 38·7 months (95% CI 30·6-NE) in the atezolizumab group and 30·2 months (25·0-37·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·63-1·07; log-rank p=0·048). The p value for the interim analysis of overall survival did not cross the stopping boundary; therefore, the trial will continue until the required number of events are recorded. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (97 [27%] of 356 patients in the atezolizumab group vs 51 [28%] of 185 in the placebo group) and anaemia (49 [14%] vs 24 [13%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 46 (13%) patients in the atezolizumab group and six (3%) patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in two patients (pneumonia in one patient in each group). INTERPRETATION: Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy increased progression-free survival in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, particularly in those with dMMR carcinomas, suggesting the addition of atezolizumab to standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment in this specific subgroup. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carboplatino , Neoplasias Endometriales , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Paclitaxel , Humanos , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Método Doble Ciego , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Anciano , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thoracic radiation intensification is debated in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the activity and safety of a boost radiotherapy dose up to 74 Gy in a functional sub-volume given according to on-treatment [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG)-PET results. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, controlled non-comparative phase 2 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with inoperable stage III NSCLC without EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and who were affiliated with or a beneficiary of a social benefit system, with evaluable tumour or node lesions, preserved lung function, and who were amenable to curative-intent radiochemotherapy. Patients were randomly allocated using a central interactive web-response system in a non-masked method (1:1; minimisation method used [random factor of 0·8]; stratified by radiotherapy technique [intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy] and by centre at which patients were treated) either to the experimental adaptive radiotherapy group A, in which only patients with positive residual metabolism on [18F]FDG-PET at 42 Gy received a boost radiotherapy (up to 74 Gy in 33 fractions), with all other patients receiving standard radiotherapy dosing (66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6·5 weeks), or to the standard radiotherapy group B (66 Gy in 33 fractions) over 6·5 weeks. All patients received two cycles of induction platinum-based chemotherapy cycles (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks and carboplatin area under the curve [AUC]=6 once every 3 weeks, or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 60 mg/m2 orally [or 30 mg/m2 intravenously] on day 8 once every 3 weeks). Then they concomitantly received radiochemotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (three cycles for 8 weeks, with once per week paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 intravenously and carboplatin AUC=2 or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and 40 mg/m2 orally (or 20 mg/m2 intravenously) on day 8 in 21-day cycles). The primary endpoint was the 15-month local control rate in the eligible patients who received at least one dose of concomitant radiochemotherapy. This RTEP7-IFCT-1402 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02473133), and is ongoing. FINDINGS: From Nov 12, 2015, to July 7, 2021, we randomly assigned 158 patients (47 [30%] women and 111 [70%] men) to either the boosted radiotherapy group A (81 [51%]) or to the standard radiotherapy group B (77 [49%)]. In group A, 80 (99%) patients received induction chemotherapy and 68 (84%) received radiochemotherapy, of whom 48 (71%) with residual uptake on [18F]FDG-PET after 42 Gy received a radiotherapy boost. In group B, all 77 patients received induction chemotherapy and 73 (95%) received radiochemotherapy. At the final analysis, the median follow-up for eligible patients who received radiochemotherapy (n=140) was 45·1 months (95% CI 39·3-48·3). The 15-month local control rate was 77·6% (95% CI 67·6-87·6%) in group A and 71·2% (95% CI 60·8-81·6%) in group B. Acute (within 90 days from radiochemotherapy initiation) grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 20 (29%) of 68 patients in group A and 33 (45%) of 73 patients in group B, including serious adverse events in five (7%) patients in group A and ten (14%) patients in group B. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (seven [10%] of 68 in group A vs 16 [22%] of 73 in group B), and anaemia (five [7%] vs nine [12%]). In the acute phase, two deaths (3%) occurred in group B (one due to a septic shock related to chemotherapy, and the other due to haemotypsia not related to study treatment), and no deaths occurred in group A. After 90 days, one additional treatment-unrelated death occurred in group A and two deaths events occurred in group B (one radiation pneumonitis and one pneumonia unrelated to treatment). INTERPRETATION: A thoracic radiotherapy boost, based on interim [18F]FDG-PET, led to a meaningful local control rate with no difference in adverse events between the two groups in organs at risk, in contrast with previous attempts at thoracic radiation intensification, warranting a randomised phase 3 evaluation of such [18F]FDG-PET-guided radiotherapy dose adaptation in patients with stage III NSCLC. FUNDING: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique National 2014.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Quimioradioterapia , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) presents significant clinical and therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature and generally poor prognosis. We initiated a Phase II clinical trial (ChiCTR1900027160) to assess the efficacy of a pioneering neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy regimen comprising programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade (Toripalimab), nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel), and the oral fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1, in patients with locally advanced ESCC. This study uniquely integrates clinical outcomes with advanced spatial proteomic profiling using Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC) to elucidate the dynamics within the tumor microenvironment (TME), focusing on the mechanistic interplay of resistance and response. Sixty patients participated, receiving the combination therapy prior to surgical resection. Our findings demonstrated a major pathological response (MPR) in 62% of patients and a pathological complete response (pCR) in 29%. The IMC analysis provided a detailed regional assessment, revealing that the spatial arrangement of immune cells, particularly CD8+ T cells and B cells within tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS), and S100A9+ inflammatory macrophages in fibrotic regions are predictive of therapeutic outcomes. Employing machine learning approaches, such as support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) analysis, we identified critical spatial features linked to drug resistance and developed predictive models for drug response, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 97%. These insights underscore the vital role of integrating spatial proteomics into clinical trials to dissect TME dynamics thoroughly, paving the way for personalized and precise cancer treatment strategies in ESCC. This holistic approach not only enhances our understanding of the mechanistic basis behind drug resistance but also sets a robust foundation for optimizing therapeutic interventions in ESCC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Proteómica , Microambiente Tumoral , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Proteómica/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Albúminas , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Combinación de Medicamentos , TegafurRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A standardised dose-reduction strategy has not been established for the widely used gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of alternating treatment cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination therapy and gemcitabine alone versus continuous treatment with the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination. METHODS: ALPACA was a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted at 29 study centres across Germany. Patients aged 18 years or older with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had not been previously treated for advanced disease were enrolled. After an induction phase with three cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine combination therapy (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by stratified permuted block randomisation either to continue treatment with standard nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine or to receive alternating cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine and gemcitabine alone. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. Randomisation was done centrally by the study statistician using a computer-generated randomisation list, and was stratified by Karnofsky Performance Status and presence of liver metastases. The primary endpoint was the derivation of an unbiased point estimate and an associated confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 80% for the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival after randomisation, without testing a specific hypothesis, analysed by intention to treat in all patients who started randomised treatment. Safety was analysed according to treatment received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02564146, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 27, 2016, and May 27, 2021, 325 patients were enrolled. Following three cycles of induction treatment, 174 patients were randomly assigned: 85 to continue receiving standard nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine, of whom 79 started treatment, and 89 to the alternating treatment schedule, of whom 88 started treatment. Of the 167 patients who started randomised treatment, 88 (53%) were female and 79 (47%) were male. Median overall survival after randomisation was 10·4 months (80% CI 9·2-12·0) in the group that received standard treatment and 10·5 months (10·2-11·1) in the group that received alternating treatment (HR 0·90, 80% CI 0·72-1·13; p=0·56). The most common adverse events of any grade were peripheral neuropathy (59 [74%] of 80 patients in the continuous treatment group vs 53 [62%] of 85 patients in the alternating treatment group) and fatigue (43 [54%] vs 44 [52%]). Treatment-emergent serious adverse events after randomisation occurred in 40 (50%) patients in the continuous treatment group and in 28 (33%) in the alternating treatment group. Fewer treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in patients treated with alternating cycles compared with those receiving standard therapy, especially for peripheral neuropathy (17 [21%] patients in the continuous treatment group vs 12 [14%] in the alternating treatment group) and infections (16 [20%] vs nine [11%]). There were two treatment-related deaths after randomisation, both in the continuous treatment group (one multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, not treated after randomisation, and one interstitial lung disease). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that a dose-reduced regimen with alternating cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine and gemcitabine alone after three induction cycles is associated with similar overall survival to that for standard treatment with nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine, but with improved tolerability. We therefore propose that a switch to the alternating schedule could be considered in a clinical setting for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have at least stable disease after three cycles of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine treatment. FUNDING: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb.