RESUMEN
Margin status in head and neck cancer has important prognostic implications. Currently, resection is based on manual palpation and gross visualization followed by intraoperative specimen or tumor bed-based margin analysis using frozen sections. While generally effective, this protocol has several limitations including margin sampling and close and positive margin re-localization. There is a lack of evidence on the association of use of frozen section analysis with improved survival in head and neck cancer. This article reviews novel technologies in head and neck margin analysis such as 3-dimensional scanning, augmented reality, molecular margins, optical imaging, spectroscopy, and artificial intelligence.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Márgenes de Escisión , Humanos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugíaRESUMEN
Introduction: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) are rare, aggressive cancers that develop in second order or smaller bile ducts. The aim of this review is to systematically review the most important prognostic factors affecting the long-term outcomes of these patients. Material and Methods: articles conducted on this issue, written in English, published between from January 2000 to December 2023 in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, MedLine, Web of Science, Elsevier, Google Scholar were systematically researched and reviewed. Results: ICCA are usually late diagnosed cancers because of the asymptomatic character, and curative procedures are often not feasible, only 20 to 30% of patients being fit for surgery. With the prognostic of this aggressive malignancy being baleful, the most important risk factors but also prognosis factors seem to be represented by socioeconomic factors, morphological presentation, dimensions, number and extension of the tumor as well as resection margins. Conclusions: once these factors are widely recognized and identified in each case, the clinician will be able to find the best treatment for these patients in order to improve the long-term outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Humanos , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Márgenes de Escisión , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Factores Socioeconómicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/patología , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Synovial sarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas in children. Guidelines regarding the adequate extent of resection margins and the role of re-resection are lacking. We sought to evaluate the adequate resection margin and the role of re-resection in predicting outcomes in children with synovial sarcomas. METHODS: A cohort of 36 patients less than 18 years of age at diagnosis who were treated for localized synovial sarcoma at three tertiary pediatric hospitals between January 2004 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient and tumor demographics, treatment information, and margin status after surgical resection were collected from the medical record. Clinical, treatment, and surgical characteristics, as well as outcomes including hazard ratios (HRs), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared by resection margins group and re-resection status. RESULTS: Patients in the R1 resection group were significantly more likely to relapse or die compared to patients in the R0 resection group. However, there was no significant difference in EFS (HR 0.52, p = 0.54) or OS (HR 1.56, p = 0.719) in R0 patients with less than 5 mm margins compared to R0 patients with more than 5 mm margins. Patients with R1 on initial or re-resection had significantly worse OS than patients who had R0 resection on initial or re-resection (HR = 10.12, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This study re-affirms that R0 resection is an independent prognostic predictor of better OS/EFS in pediatric synovial sarcoma. Second, our study extends this finding to report negative margins on initial resection or re-resection is associated with better OS/EFS than positive margins on initial resection or re-resection. Lastly, we found that there is no difference in outcomes associated with re-resection or <5 mm margins for R0 patients, indicating that re-resection and <5 mm margins are acceptable if microscopic disease is removed.
Asunto(s)
Márgenes de Escisión , Sarcoma Sinovial , Humanos , Sarcoma Sinovial/cirugía , Sarcoma Sinovial/patología , Sarcoma Sinovial/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Niño , Adolescente , Preescolar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Reoperación , PronósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Frozen section examination (FSE) of the tumor resection margins is important during penile-preserving surgery (PPS) in penile cancer. The margin status will impact on how much penile or urethral tissue is excised. We aim to evaluate the outcomes of intraoperative FSE of resection margins in PPS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who underwent a FSE of resection margins between 2010 and 2022 was conducted. FSEs were compared with the final histopathological analysis and the Diagnostic Testing Accuracy (DTA): sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 137 FSE were performed. The median (IQR) age was 65 (53-75) years. 118 (86.1%) patients had negative FSE margins, 16 (11.7%) had positive FSE margins and 3 (2.2%) had equivocal (atypical cells) results. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of penile FSE were 66.7%, 100%, 100%, 93.2% and 94% respectively. 18 patients underwent further resection in the same episode due to a positive or equivocal FSE and 12 (66.7%) achieved negative margins. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and lack of control arm to compare with. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative FSE performed at our center for the assessment of penile SCC margins is 66.7% sensitive and 100% specific. FSE should be considered in PPS, as it's an essential and a reliable diagnostic tool in minimizing over-treatment.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Secciones por Congelación , Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias del Pene , Humanos , Neoplasias del Pene/cirugía , Neoplasias del Pene/patología , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Pene/cirugía , Pene/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The routine assessment of intraoperative margins has long been the standard of care for oral cavity cancers. However, there is a controversy surrounding the best method for sampling surgical margins. The aim of our study is to determine the precision of a new technique for sampling tumor bed margins (TBMs), to evaluate the impact on survival and the rate of free flap reconstructions. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved 156 patients with primary cancer of the tongue or floor of the mouth who underwent surgery as initial curative treatment. Patients were separated into 2 groups: one using an oriented TBM derived from Mohs' technique, where the margins are taken from the tumor bed and identified with Vicryl sutures on both the specimen and the tumor bed, and the other using a specimen margins (SMs) driven technique, where the margins are taken from the specimen after the initial resection. Clinicopathologic features, including margin status, were compared for both groups and correlated with locoregional control. Precision of per-operative TBM sampling method was obtained. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included in the study, of which 80 were in TBM group and 76 were in SM group. Precision analysis showed that the oriented TBM technique pertained a 50% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, and an 87.5% negative predictive value. Survival analysis revealed nonstatistically significant differences in both local control (86.88% vs 83.50%; P = .81) as well as local-regional control (82.57% vs 72.32%; P = .21). There was a significant difference in the rate of free flap-surgeries between the 2 groups (30% vs 64.5%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our described oriented TBM technique has demonstrated reduced risk of free flap reconstructive surgery, increased precision, and similar prognostic in terms of local control, locoregional control, and disease-free survival when compared to the SM method.
Asunto(s)
Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias de la Boca , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Boca/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Neoplasias de la Boca/mortalidad , Anciano , Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Cirugía de MohsRESUMEN
AIMS: Primary malignant bone tumor of the pelvis is an uncommon lesion, the resection of which via freehand osteotomy is subject to inaccuracy due to its three-dimensional anatomy. Patient-Specific Guides (PSG), also called Patient-Specific Instruments (PSI) are essential to ensure surgical planning and resection adequacy. Our aim was to assess their use and effectiveness. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective study was conducted on 42 adult patients who underwent PSG-based resection of a primary malignant bone tumor of the pelvis. The primary outcome was the proportion of R0 bone margins. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of overall R0 margins, considering soft-tissue resection, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence, and the time of production for the guides. A comparison to a previous series at our institution was performed regarding histological margins. RESULTS: Using PSGs, 100% R0 safe bone margin was achieved, and 88% overall R0 margin due to soft-tissue resection being contaminated, while the comparison to the previous series showed only 80% of R0 safe bone margin. The cumulative incidences of local recurrence were 10% (95% CI: 4-20%) at one year, 15% (95% CI: 6-27%) at two years, and 19% (95% CI: 8-33%) at five years. The median overall duration of the fabrication process of the guide was 35 days (Q1-Q3: 26-47) from the first contact to the surgery date. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-Specific Guides can provide a reproducible safe bony margin.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Márgenes de Escisión , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Adulto , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Huesos Pélvicos/cirugía , Huesos Pélvicos/patología , Adulto Joven , Osteotomía/métodos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pélvicas/patología , AdolescenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic head cancer patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) often experience disease recurrence, frequently associated with a positive margin status (R1). Total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) has emerged as a potential approach to increase surgical radicality and minimize locoregional recurrence. However, its effectiveness and safety remain under evaluation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize current evidence on TMpE outcomes. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to March 2024 to identify studies comparing TMpE with standard pancreatoduodenectomy (sPD). The risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) was pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: From 452 studies identified, 9 studies with a total of 738 patients were included, with 361 (49%) undergoing TMpE. TMpE significantly improved the R0 resection rate (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.11-1.38; P < 0.05), reduced blood loss (MD -143.70 ml; 95% CI -247.92, -39.49; P < 0.05), and increased lymph node harvest (MD 7.27 nodes; 95% CI 4.81, 9.73; P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in hospital stay, postoperative complications, or mortality between TMpE and sPD. TMpE also significantly reduced overall recurrence (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.81; P < 0.05) and local recurrence (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.24-0.63; P < 0.05). Additionally, the risk of pancreatic fistula was lower in the TMpE group (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.85; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Total mesopancreas excision significantly increases the R0 resection rate and reduces locoregional recurrence while maintaining an acceptable safety profile when compared with standard pancreatoduodenectomy. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted to determine the optimal surgical approach for total mesopancreatic resection.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Márgenes de EscisiónRESUMEN
Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of routine histological examination of stapled colorectal anastomotic doughnuts in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery (RCS). Justification of biopsy examination could form part of the strategies of NHS net zero practice with effort to reduce wastage and carbon footprint. Method: A data analysis of all patients undergoing RCS during 2019-2021 at our institute was performed. We also analysed the cost of preparing and reviewing histology slides. Results: 52 patients underwent anterior resection during the aforementioned period. Doughnuts were sent in 37 (71%) patients. 23 (62%) patients were male, and 14 (38%) were female. The median age at diagnosis was 68 (range 54-84) years. All resected specimens were adenocarcinomas. Of the 37 patients, 18 (49%) underwent low anterior resection and 19 (51%) underwent high anterior resection. Proximal doughnuts were sent in 26 (70%) patients, whereas distal doughnuts were sent in all cases. Mean distal microscopic resection margin from tumour was 22 mm (range 6-45 mm). Each doughnut required 3 slides, each costing £50 and requiring 82 minutes to fix and read. This incurred a cost of £13,650 and required 19,656 hours of preparation time. All of the doughnuts as well as resection margins were negative for malignancy. Conclusion: Routine histopathological examination of doughnuts is time and cost-intensive however provides little or no clinical value (particularly analysis of the proximal doughnut). Distal doughnuts should only be sent for histological examination in exceptional circumstances.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/economía , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/economía , Márgenes de Escisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/economíaRESUMEN
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the tongue is the most prevalent form of oral cavity cancer, with surgical intervention as the preferred method of treatment. Achieving negative or free resection margins of at least 5 mm is associated with improved local control and prolonged survival. Nonetheless, margins that are close (1-5 mm) or positive (less than 1 mm) are often observed in practice, especially for the deep margins. Ultrasound is a promising tool for assessing the depth of invasion, providing non-invasive, real-time imaging for accurate evaluation. We conducted a clinical trial using a novel portable 3D ultrasound imaging technique to assess ex vivo surgical margin assessment in the operating room. During the operation, resected surgical specimens underwent 3D ultrasound scanning. Four head and neck surgeons measured the surgical margins (deep, medial, and lateral) and tumor area on the 3D ultrasound volume. These results were then compared with the histopathology findings evaluated by two head and neck pathologists. Six patients diagnosed with tongue SCC (three T1 stage and three T2 stage) were enrolled for a consecutive cohort. The margin status was correctly categorized as free by 3D ultrasound in five cases, and one case with a "free" margin status was incorrectly categorized by 3D ultrasound as a "close" margin. The Pearson correlation between ultrasound and histopathology was 0.7 (p < 0.001), 0.6 (p < 0.001), and 0.3 (p < 0.05) for deep, medial, and lateral margin measurements, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis compared the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for deep margin measurement by 3D ultrasound and histopathology, with a mean difference of 0.7 mm (SD 1.15 mm). This clinical trial found that 3D ultrasound is accurate in deep margin measurements. The implementation of intraoperative 3D ultrasound imaging of surgical specimens may improve the number of free margins after tongue cancer treatment.
Asunto(s)
Imagenología Tridimensional , Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias de la Lengua , Ultrasonografía , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Lengua/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Lengua/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Lengua/patología , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop preoperative nomograms using risk factors based on clinicopathological and MRI for predicting the risk of positive surgical margin (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent prostate MRI before RP at our center between January 2015 and November 2022. Preoperative clinicopathological factors and MRI-based features were recorded for analysis. The presence of PSM (overall PSM [oPSM]) at pathology and the multifocality of PSM (mPSM) were evaluated. LASSO regression was employed for variable selection. For the final model construction, logistic regression was applied combined with the bootstrap method for internal verification. The risk probability of individual patients was visualized using a nomogram. RESULTS: In all, 259 patients were included in this study, and 76 (29.3%) patients had PSM, including 40 patients with mPSM. Final multivariate logistic regression revealed that the independent risk factors for oPSM were tumor diameter, frank extraprostatic extension, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the nomogram for oPSM reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.717 in development and 0.716 in internal verification. The independent risk factors for mPSM included the percentage of positive cores, tumor diameter, apex depth, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the AUC of the nomogram for mPSM was 0.790 in both development and internal verification. The calibration curve analysis showed that these nomograms were well-calibrated for both oPSM and mPSM. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed nomograms showed good performance and were feasible in predicting oPSM and mPSM, which might facilitate more individualized management of prostate cancer patients who are candidates for surgery.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Márgenes de Escisión , Nomogramas , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical excision with clear histopathological margins is the preferred treatment to prevent progression of lentigo maligna (LM) to invasive melanoma. However, the assessment of resection margins on sun-damaged skin is challenging. We developed a deep learning model for detection of melanocytes in resection margins of LM. METHODS: In total, 353 whole slide images (WSIs) were included. 295 WSIs were used for training and 58 for validation and testing. The algorithm was trained with 3,973 manual pixel-wise annotations. The AI analyses were compared to those of three blinded dermatopathologists and two pathology residents, who performed their evaluations without AI and AI-assisted. Immunohistochemistry (SOX10) served as the reference standard. We used a dichotomized cutoff for low and high risk of recurrence (≤ 25 melanocytes in an area of 0.5 mm for low risk and > 25 for high risk). RESULTS: The AI model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 in discriminating margins with low and high recurrence risk. In comparison, the AUC for dermatopathologists ranged from 0.72 to 0.90 and for the residents in pathology, 0.68 to 0.80. Additionally, with aid of the AI model the performance of two pathologists significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: The deep learning showed notable accuracy in detecting resection margins of LM with a high versus low risk of recurrence. Furthermore, the use of AI improved the performance of 2/5 pathologists. This automated tool could aid pathologists in the assessment or pre-screening of LM margins.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Peca Melanótica de Hutchinson , Márgenes de Escisión , Melanocitos , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Peca Melanótica de Hutchinson/patología , Peca Melanótica de Hutchinson/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Melanocitos/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several ablation confirmation software methods for minimum ablative margin assessment have recently been developed to improve local outcomes for patients undergoing thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Previous assessments were limited to single institutions mostly at the place of development. The aim of this study was to validate the previously identified 5 mm minimum ablative margin (A0) using autosegmentation and biomechanical deformable image registration in a multi-institutional setting. METHODS: This was a multicentre, retrospective study including patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing CT- or ultrasound-guided microwave or radiofrequency ablation during 2009-2022, reporting 3-year local disease progression (residual unablated tumour or local tumour progression) rates by minimum ablative margin across all institutions and identifying an intraprocedural contrast-enhanced CT-based minimum ablative margin associated with a 3-year local disease progression rate of less than 1%. RESULTS: A total of 400 ablated colorectal liver metastases (median diameter of 1.5 cm) in 243 patients (145 men; median age of 62 [interquartile range 54-70] years) were evaluated, with a median follow-up of 26 (interquartile range 17-40) months. A total of 119 (48.9%) patients with 186 (46.5%) colorectal liver metastases were from international institutions B, C, and D that were not involved in the software development. Three-year local disease progression rates for 0 mm, >0 and <5 mm, and 5 mm or larger minimum ablative margins were 79%, 15%, and 0% respectively for institution A (where the software was developed) and 34%, 19%, and 2% respectively for institutions B, C, and D combined. Local disease progression risk decreased to less than 1% with an intraprocedurally confirmed minimum ablative margin greater than 4.6 mm. CONCLUSION: A minimum ablative margin of 5 mm or larger demonstrates optimal local oncological outcomes. It is proposed that an intraprocedural minimum ablative margin of 5 mm or larger, confirmed using biomechanical deformable image registration, serves as the A0 for colorectal liver metastasis thermal ablation.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Márgenes de Escisión , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Phyllodes tumours of the breast are rare, and their treatment is still subject to discussion. They are classified as benign, borderline, or malignant based on histopathological characteristics of the stroma. This study demonstrates 10 years' experience in diagnosis and management of malignant phyllodes. METHODS: All patients referred for discussion at our sarcoma multidisciplinary team meeting from 2003 to 2013 with a diagnosis of malignant phyllodes were identified. Patient demographics, biopsy details, excision extent, final pathology, reconstruction, adjuvant treatment, recurrence and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty patients were identified over the 10 year period. Eight (26.7 %) had their diagnosis upgraded to malignant phyllodes on completion excision, compared to initial biopsy. Nine (30 %) had breast surgery elsewhere as definitive treatment before referral to our service. Four of these (44.4 %) required more extensive excision and three developed metastases (33.3 %) and died. Twenty-one patients had primary surgery through our service and three (14.3 %) died from disease. Overall, 13 patients had radical mastectomy, 92.3 % with adequate margins (>1 cm histologically) and no local recurrence, 9 simple mastectomy 22.2 % with adequate margins and 1 local recurrence and 8 wide local excision with 37.5 % adequate margins and 1 local recurrence. CONCLUSION: For malignant phyllodes patients, the best chance to reduce recurrence and improve survival is adequate excision and radical mastectomy should be considered. For borderline lesions, consideration should be given for referral to a specialist centre and we recommend delayed reconstruction, because of the chance of histological upgrade to malignancy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mastectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Tumor Filoide , Humanos , Tumor Filoide/patología , Tumor Filoide/cirugía , Tumor Filoide/terapia , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mamoplastia , Márgenes de Escisión , Sarcoma/terapia , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven , BiopsiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Surgical pathology reports play an integral role in postoperative management of head and neck cancer patients. Pathology reports of complex head and neck resections must convey critical information to all involved clinicians. Previously, we demonstrated the utility of 3D specimen and defect scanning for communicating margin status and documenting the location of supplemental margins. We introduce a newly designed permanent pathology report which improves documentation of intraoperative margin mapping and extent of corresponding supplemental margins harvested. METHODS: We test the hypothesis that gaps in understanding exist for head and neck resection pathology reports across providers. A cross-sectional exploratory study using human-centered design was implemented to evaluate the existing permanent pathology report with respect to understanding margin status. Pathologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists from United States-based medical institutions were surveyed. The results supported a redesign of our surgical pathology template, incorporating 3D specimen / defect scans and annotated radiographic images indicating the location of inadequate margins requiring supplemental margins, or indicating frankly positive margins discovered on permanent section. RESULTS: Forty-seven physicians completed our survey. Analyzing surgical pathology reports, 28/47 (60%) respondents reported confusion whether re-excised supplemental margins reflected clear margins, 20/47 (43%) reported uncertainty regarding final margin status, and 20/47 (43%) reported the need for clarity regarding the extent of supplemental margins harvested intraoperatively. From this feedback, we designed a new pathology report template; 61 permanent pathology reports were compiled with this new template over a 12-month period. CONCLUSION: Feedback from survey respondents led to a redesigned permanent pathology report that offers detailed visual anatomic information regarding intraoperative margin findings and exact location/size of harvested supplemental margins. This newly designed report reconciles frozen and permanent section results and includes annotated radiographic images such that clinicians can discern precise actions taken by surgeons to address inadequate margins, as well as to understand the location of areas of concern that may influence adjuvant radiation planning.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Márgenes de Escisión , Patología Quirúrgica , Humanos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Estudios Transversales , Patología Quirúrgica/métodos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Imagenología TridimensionalRESUMEN
PURPOSE : A vertical margin (VM) distance of < 500 µm is a risk factor for recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) resected by endoscopy. We aimed to determine the effects of the VM distance on the recurrence and prognosis of T1 CRC. METHODS: We enrolled 168 patients with T1 CRC who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at multiple centers between 2008 and 2016. None of the patients were followed up for < 5 years. The enrolled 168 patients were classified into patients with VM distance of < 500 µm including positive VM (n = 72 [43%], VM distance < 500 µm group) and patients with VM distance of ≥ 500 µm (n = 96 [57%], VM distance ≥ 500 µm group). The clinicopathological features, recurrence rates, and prognoses were compared between the groups using propensity-score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Tumors recurred in eight of the 168 patients (5%) with VM distance < 500 µm. After PSM, the rate of overall recurrence and local recurrence in the VM distance < 500 µm group were significantly higher than those in the VM distance ≥ 500 µm group. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the VM distance ≥ 500 µm group than that in VM distance < 500 µm group after PSM (100% vs. 89%, p < 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Complete en bloc resection of T1 CRC via ESD must include a sufficient amount of SM to reduce the risk of metastasis and recurrence after additional surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Márgenes de Escisión , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Pronóstico , Anciano , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal margin (SCCAM) is an uncommon lesion that comprises one-third to a quarter of all anal squamous cell carcinoma. Treatment involves surgery or exclusive radiotherapy for small tumours, whereas the preferred treatment for larger tumours is chemoradiotherapy. In our department, selected patients with SCCAM are treated with electron beam radiotherapy using one perineal field. The present study evaluates this strategy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive patients with SCCAM and treated with electron beam radiotherapy from 2012 to 2022 were included. Data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records and analysed descriptively. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS: Forty patients were evaluated. Primary radiotherapy was delivered in 35 (87.5%) patients. Five (12.5%) patients had postoperative radiotherapy. Median prescription dose was 60.0 (range 45.0-60.2) Gy in 28 (range 10-30) fractions delivered with 8 (range 4-18) MeV using a standard circular aperture and bolus. At a median follow-up of 73 (range 9-135) months, 7 (17.5%) patients were diagnosed with local recurrences. The 5-year LC rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 71.4%-97.2%). Analysis of LC according to T-stage revealed a 5-year LC of 100% (95% CI: 100%-100%) in T1 tumours compared to 57.0% (95% CI: 27.4%-86.6%) in T2 tumours (p < 0.001). 5-year OS was 91.6% (95% CI: 83.0%-100%). Late grade 3 toxicity included ulceration in the skin and subcutis in 2 (5.0%) patients. INTEPRETATION: Electron beam radiotherapy enables the delivery of 'eye-guided' radiotherapy directly to the tumour. LC is good in patients with T1 tumours. Patients with T2 tumours have less satisfactory LC and should be treated with chemoradiotherapy. Electron beam radiotherapy enables the delivery of "eye-guided" RT directly to the tumour. LC is excellent in patients with T1 tumours. Patients with T2 tumours have less satisfactory LC and should be treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Humanos , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Neoplasias del Ano/radioterapia , Neoplasias del Ano/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Electrones/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Márgenes de Escisión , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To identify independent predictors of urinary continence and report early complications after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a large, contemporary German cohort. METHODS: Urinary incontinence data of patients undergoing 3-week inpatient rehabilitation (IR) after RP were prospectively assessed by 24-hr pad test and uroflowmetry at the beginning and the end of IR, respectively. Lymphoceles were assessed prospectively by ultrasound. Tumor and patient characteristics, and information on urinary leakage on initial cystography were retrospectively extracted from discharge letters and surgical reports. Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of urinary continence at the beginning of IR. RESULTS: Overall, 2,141 patients were included in the final analyses. Anastomotic leakage on the initial cystography and lymphoceles were found in 11.4% and 30.8% of patients, respectively. Intervention for a symptomatic lymphocele was required in 4.2% of patients. At the end of IR, 54.2% of patients were continent, while the median urine loss decreased to 73 g (interquartile range 15-321). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age and diabetes mellitus as independent negative predictors, but nerve-sparing surgery as an independent positive predictor of urinary continence (each p < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that 24-hr urine loss increased by 7 g with each year of life (p < 0.001), was 79 g higher in patients with diabetes mellitus (p = 0.007), and 175 g lower in patients with NS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Age, diabetes mellitus, and NS are significantly associated with continence outcomes in the early period after RP. Our analyses may help clinicians to pre-operatively counsel patients on potential surgical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Márgenes de Escisión , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Incontinencia Urinaria , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Centros de RehabilitaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Inadequate resection margins of less than 5 mm impair local tumor control. This weak point in oncological safety is exacerbated in bone-infiltrating tumors because rapid bone analysis procedures do not exist. This study aims to assess the bony resection margin status of bone-invasive oral cancer using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: LIBS experiments were performed on natively lasered, tumor-infiltrated mandibular cross-sections from 10 patients. In total, 5,336 spectra were recorded at defined distances from the tumor border. Resection margins < 1 mm were defined as very close, from 1-5 mm as close, and > 5 mm as clear. The spectra were histologically validated. Based on the LIBS spectra, the discriminatory power of potassium (K) and soluble calcium (Ca) between bone-infiltrating tumor tissue and very close, close, and clear resection margins was determined. RESULTS: LIBS-derived electrolyte emission values of K and soluble Ca as well as histological parameters for bone neogenesis/fibrosis and lymphocyte/macrophage infiltrates differ significantly between bone-infiltrating tumor tissue spectra and healthy bone spectra from very close, close, and clear resection margins (p < 0.0001). Using LIBS, the transition from very close resection margins to bone-infiltrating tumor tissue can be determined with a sensitivity of 95.0%, and the transition from clear to close resection margins can be determined with a sensitivity of 85.3%. CONCLUSIONS: LIBS can reliably determine the boundary of bone-infiltrating tumors and might provide an orientation for determining a clear resection margin. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LIBS could facilitate intraoperative decision-making and avoid inadequate resection margins in bone-invasive oral cancer.
Asunto(s)
Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias de la Boca , Análisis Espectral , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Boca/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Análisis Espectral/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Invasividad Neoplásica , Calcio/análisis , Potasio/análisis , Mandíbula/cirugía , Mandíbula/patología , Rayos LáserRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of early stage breast cancer has risen as a result of increased detection of non-palpable tumors through the implementation of screening programs and greater public awareness. Performing breast-conserving surgery can be challenging due to the need for accurate localization of non-palpable breast lesions, particularly given the logistical difficulties associated with wire localization. After implementing a new technique for localizing non-palpable breast lesions (LOCalizerTM Radiofrequency identification TAG-Hologic®), a radiofrequency identification tag localization device manufactured by Hologic, Inc. in Marlborough, MA, was launched in 2017, our objective was to investigate its impact on surgical outcomes, whether there was an increase in re-excision rates for positive margins and whether the attainment of clear margins was dependent on the exact positioning of the RFID device. METHOD: A single-center single-arm interventional study, data were gathered both in a forward-looking manner for 1 year (prospectively) and by looking back at past records for 1 year (retrospectively) for a total period of two years. Individuals who were diagnosed with non-palpable breast lesions, as confirmed by histological analysis, or invasive breast cancer and who were scheduled to undergo breast-conserving surgery were eligible for inclusion in the study. The RFID (Radiofrequency Identification) method was used to localize the lesions prior to surgery. Either with a mammogram or ultrasound scan position of the Tag was recorded, including the distance of the lesion from the center of the lesion and the lesion depth from the skin in millimeters. The rate of re-excision was documented and examined in relation to the parameters mentioned above. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty RFID Tags were inserted in two hundred and seventeen (three patient had bilateral tags insertion), patients aged between 30 and 85 had a localizer Tag inserted between Oct 2020 and Oct 2022. Three patients had non-palpable breast lesions in both breasts. Fourteen were inserted under stereotactic guidance and two hundred and six under ultrasound guidance. Ten patients subsequently had wire insertion also due to Tag position. Of 210 procedures, RFIF Tags within the lesion was seen in hundred and sixty patients (76.19 %). An additional 50 procedures were performed using the RFID Tag system, which were not directly related to the lesion but were deemed appropriate to proceed with. Out of a total of 220 procedures, positive margins were observed in 38 cases (17.27 %). Among these cases, eleven (28.94 %) involved the use of the RFID Tag system, not within the lesion but adjacent to it (within 15 mm surrounding the lesion). CONCLUSION: RFID is a good alternative to wire localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Re-excision rates are higher in patients with Tag outside the lesion compared to those with Tag within the lesion.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Anciano , Dispositivo de Identificación por Radiofrecuencia , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Márgenes de Escisión , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. The surgical treatment of breast cancer has transitioned progressively from radical mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery. In this meta-analysis, we are aiming to compare oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OS) with conventional breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in terms of efficacy and safety. METHODS: We searched Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane databases, Clinicaltrial.gov, and CNKI until April 30, 2024. Data from cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Outcomes included primary outcomes (re-excision, local recurrence, positive surgical margin, mastectomy), secondary outcomes and safety outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate the quality of outcomes. RESULTS: Our study included 52 studies containing 46,835 patients. Primary outcomes comprise re-excision, local recurrence, positive surgical margin, and mastectomy, there were significant differences favoring OS over BCS (RR 0.68 [0.56, 0.82], RR 0.62 [0.47, 0.82], RR 0.76 [0.59, 0.98], RR 0.66 [0.44, 0.98] respectively), indicating superior efficacy of OS. Additionally, OS demonstrated significant aesthetic benefits (RR 1.17 [1.03, 1.33] and RR 1.34 [1.18, 1.52]). While total complications were significantly fewer in the OS group (RR 0.70 [0.53, 0.94]), the differences in specific complications were not significant. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted based on nationality, sample size, quality, and type. CONCLUSION: OS demonstrates either superior or at least comparable outcomes across various aspects when compared to BCS.