Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 102
Filtrar
1.
J Orthop Traumatol ; 25(1): 41, 2024 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39225851

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Distal femoral fractures account for less than 1% of all fractures. The therapy of choice is usually surgical stabilization. Despite advances in implant development over the past few years, complication rate remains comparatively high. The aim of this study is to analyze our results with plate fixation of distal femoral fractures with a focus on complication and fracture healing rates. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients (> 18 years) with distal femoral fractures treated at an urban level I trauma center between 2015 and 2022 were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 206 patients (167 female, 39 male) with an average age of 75 (SD 16) years were diagnosed with a fracture of the distal femur. One hundred fourteen of these patients were treated surgically by means of plate osteosynthesis. In 13 cases (11.41%), a revision procedure had to be performed. The indication for surgical revision was mechanical failure in eight cases (7.02%) and septic complication in five cases (4.39%). Periprosthetic fractures were more likely to cause complications overall (19.6% versus 4.76%) and further included all documented septic complications. The analysis of modifiable surgical factors in the context of plate osteosynthesis showed higher complication rates for cerclage in the fracture area compared with plate-only stabilizations (44.44% versus 22.22%). CONCLUSIONS: The data show an increased amount of revisions and a significantly higher number of septic complications in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur compared with non-periprosthetic fractures. The detected combination of plates together with cerclage was associated with higher complication rates. Level of evidence Level III retrospective comparative study.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Fracturas Periprotésicas/etiología , Anciano , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Reoperación , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Femorales Distales
2.
Injury ; 55 Suppl 2: 111357, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39098785

RESUMEN

Recent studies report the overall incidence of distal femur fractures as 8.7/100,000/year. This incidence is expected to rise with high energy motor vehicle collisions and elderly osteoporotic fractures in native and prosthetic knees keep increasing. These fractures are more common in males in the younger age spectrum while females predominate for elderly osteoporotic fractures. Surgical treatment is recommended for these fractures to maintain articular congruity, enable early joint motion and assisted ambulation. Over the last two decades, development of minimally invasive and quadriceps sparing surgical approaches, availability of angle stable implants have helped achieve predictable healing and early return to function in these patients. Currently, laterally positioned locked plate is the implant of choice across all fracture patterns. Retrograde with capital implantation of intramedullary nails with provision for multiplanar distal locking is preferred for extra-articular and partial articular fractures. Even with these advancements, nonunion after distal femur fracture fixation can be as high as 19%. Further recent research has helped us understand the biomechanical limitations and healing problems with lateral locked plate fixation and intramedullary nails. This has lead to development of more robust constructs such as nail-plate and double plate constructs aiming for improved construct strength and to minimise failures. Early results with these combination constructs have shown promise in high risk situations such as fractures with extensive metaphyseal fragmentation, osteoporosis and periprosthetic fractures. These constructs however, run the risk of being over stiff and can inhibit healing if not kept balanced. The ideal stiffness that is needed for fracture healing is not clearly known and current research in this domain has lead to the development of smart implants which are expected to evolve and may help improve clinical results in future.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Curación de Fractura , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Clavos Ortopédicos , Fracturas Femorales Distales/fisiopatología , Fracturas Femorales Distales/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 38(8): 435-440, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39007660

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the biomechanical differences between linked and unlinked constructs in young and osteoporotic cadavers in addition to osteoporotic sawbones. METHODS: Intraarticular distal femur fractures with comminuted metaphyseal regions were created in three young matched pair cadavers, three osteoporotic matched pair cadavers, and six osteoporotic sawbones. Precontoured distal femur locking plates were placed in addition to a standardized retrograde nail, with unitized constructs having one 4.5 mm locking screw placed distally through the nail. Nonunitized constructs had seven 4.5 mm locking screws placed through the plate around the nail, with one 5 mm distal interlock placed through the nail alone. Cadaveric specimens were subjected to axial fatigue loads between 150 and 1500 N (R Ratio = 10) with 1 Hx frequency for 10,000 cycles. Sawbones were axially loaded at 50% of the ultimate load for fatigue testing to achieve runout, with testing performed with 30 and 300 N (R Ratio = 10) loads with 1 Hz frequency for 10,000 cycles. RESULTS: In young cadavers, there was no difference in the mean cyclic displacement of the unitized constructs (1.51 ± 0.62mm) compared to the non-unitized constructs (1.34 ± 0.47mm) (Figure 4A), (p = 0.722). In osteoporotic cadavers, there was no difference in the mean cyclic displacement of the unitized constructs (2.46 ± 0.47mm) compared to the non-unitized constructs (2.91 ± 1.49mm) (p =0.639). There was statistically no significant difference in cyclic displacement between the unitized and non-unitized groups in osteoporotic sawbones(p = 0.181). CONCLUSIONS: Linked constructs did not demonstrate increased axial stiffness or decreased cyclical displacement in comparison to unlinked constructs in young cadaveric specimens, osteoporotic cadaveric specimens, or osteoporotic sawbones.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Placas Óseas , Cadáver , Fracturas del Fémur , Humanos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/fisiopatología , Anciano , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Masculino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Mecánico , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Fracturas Femorales Distales
4.
Injury ; 55(8): 111597, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878381

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this trial was to determine whether coronal plane angulation affects functional and clinical outcomes after the fixation of distal femur fractures. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial SETTING: 20 academic trauma centers PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 156 patients with distal femur fractures were enrolled. 123 patients were followed 12 months. There was clinical outcome data available for 105 patients at 3 months, 95 patients at 6 months and 81 patients at one year. INTERVENTION: Lateral locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiographic alignment, functional scoring including SMFA, Bother Index, and EQ-5D. Clinical scoring of walking ability, need for ambulatory support and ability to manage stairs. RESULTS: At 3 months, there was no difference between groups (varus, neutral or valgus) with respect to any of the clinical functional outcome scores measured. At 6 months, compared to those with neutral alignment, patients with varus angulation had a worse Stair Climbing score (4.33 vs. 2.91, p = 0.05). At 12 months, the average patient with neutral or valgus alignment needed less ambulatory support than the average patient in varus. Walking distance ability was no different between the groups at any time point. With respect to the validated patient-based outcome scores, we found no statistical difference in in the SMFA, Bother, or EQ-5D between patients with valgus or varus mal-alignment and those with neutral alignment at any time point (p > 0.05). Regardless of coronal angulation, the SMFA trended towards lower (improved) scores over time, while EQ-5D scores for patients with varus angulation did not improve over time. CONCLUSIONS: Valgus angulation and neutral angulation may be better tolerated in terms of clinical outcomes like stair climbing and need for ambulatory support than varus angulation, though patient reported outcome measures like the SMFA, Bother Index and EQ-5D show no statistical significance. Most patients with distal femur fractures tend to improve during the first year after injury but many remain significantly affected at 12 months post injury.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placas Óseas , Fracturas Femorales Distales/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Femorales Distales/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Curación de Fractura , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Recuperación de la Función , Resultado del Tratamiento , Caminata/fisiología
5.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 117: 106296, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936291

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study experimentally validated a computationally optimized screw number and screw distribution far cortical locking distal femur fracture plate and compared the results to traditional implants. METHODS: 24 artificial femurs were osteotomized with a 10 mm fracture gap 60 mm proximal to the intercondylar notch. Three fixation constructs were used. (i) Standard locking plates secured with three far cortical locking screws inserted according to a previously optimized distribution in the femur shaft (n = 8). (ii) Standard locking plates secured with four standard locking screws inserted in alternating plate holes in the femur shaft (n = 8). (iii) Retrograde intramedullary nail secured proximally with one anterior-posterior screw and distally with two oblique screws (n = 8). Axial hip forces (700 and 2800 N) were applied while measuring axial interfragmentary motion, shear interfragmentary motion, and overall stiffness. FINDINGS: Experimental far cortical locking plate results compared well to published computational findings. Far cortical locking femurs contained the highest axial motion within the potential ideal range of 0.2-1 mm and a sheer-to-axial motion ratio < 1.6 at toe-touch weight-bearing (700 N). At full weight-bearing (2800 N), Standard locking-plated femurs had the only axial motion within 0.2-1 mm but had an excess shear-to-axial motion ratio. Nail-implanted femurs underperformed at both forces. INTERPRETATION: For toe-touch weight-bearing, the far cortical locking construct provided optimal biomechanics to allow moderate motion, which has been suggested to encourage early callus formation. Conversely, at full weight-bearing, the standard locking construct offered the biomechanical advantage on fracture motion.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Tornillos Óseos , Fracturas del Fémur , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/fisiopatología , Humanos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fémur/cirugía , Fémur/fisiopatología , Simulación por Computador , Soporte de Peso , Estrés Mecánico , Diseño de Prótesis , Fracturas Femorales Distales
6.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(6): 2909-2913, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806688

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The retrograde femoral nailing advanced (RFNA) system (DePuy synthes) is a commonly used implant for the fixation of low distal femur and periprosthetic fractures. There is concern that the rate of distal interlock screw back-out may be higher for the RFNA compared to other nails (ON). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of interlock screw back-out and associated screw removal for RFNA versus ON, along with associated risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of patients who underwent retrograde nailing for a distal femur fracture at an academic level one trauma center was performed. The incidence of distal interlock screw back-out and need for screw removal were compared for RFNA versus a propensity score matched cohort who received other nails. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients underwent retrograde nailing with the RFNA for a distal femur fracture from 2015 to 2022 (average age: 66, BMI: 32, 52.7% smokers, 54.5% female, 61.8%). There was a significantly higher rate of interlock back-out in the RFNA group compared to the ON (27 patients, 24.5% vs 12 patients, 10.9%, p = 0.01), which occurred 6.3 weeks postoperatively. Screw removal rates for back-out were not significantly different for the RFNA group versus ON (8 patients, 7.3% vs 3 patients, 2.7%, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective comparative study of distal femur fractures treated with retrograde nailing, the RFNA implant was associated with an increased risk of distal interlock screw back-out compared to other nails.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Tornillos Óseos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Humanos , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Puntaje de Propensión , Fracturas Femorales Distales
8.
Osteoporos Int ; 35(8): 1469-1475, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801524

RESUMEN

Osteoporosis increases the risk of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after TKA, especially in patients with a history of osteoporotic fractures. Therefore, careful assessment and proper treatment of osteoporosis need and the importance of taking osteoporotic medication needs to be recognized by the patients following primary TKA. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is a risk factor for fractures, including those of the hip, vertebrae, and distal radius; however, the association between osteoporosis and periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been much investigated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association of the presence of systemic osteoporosis with periprosthetic fractures after TKA. METHODS: This study included 34 patients with periprosthetic fractures following primary TKA and 106 controls matched for age and sex. Bone mineral density was evaluated at the femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Medical records were reviewed for age; sex; body mass index; smoking; rheumatoid arthritis, endocrine diseases, and cardiovascular diseases; history of glucocorticoid use; medication for osteoporosis; and history of previous osteoporotic fracture. In addition, anterior femoral notching after TKA was evaluated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to determine factors associated with periprosthetic fracture. RESULTS: The prevalence of osteoporosis in the fracture group was higher than that in the control group (61.8% vs. 40.6%, p=0.045). The rate of medication for osteoporosis was significantly low in the fracture group (47.6 % vs 76.7%, p=0.026). History of previous osteoporotic fracture (odds ratio [OR], 9.1; p=0.015) and osteoporosis (OR, 3.6; p=0.013) were significant risk factors for periprosthetic fractures after TKA. Medication for osteoporosis could decrease the risk of periprosthetic fracture (OR 0.3; p=0.020). CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after TKA. Therefore, careful assessment and proper treatment of osteoporosis need and the importance of taking osteoporotic medication needs to be recognized to the patients following primary TKA, especially in patients with a history of osteoporotic fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III.


Asunto(s)
Absorciometría de Fotón , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Densidad Ósea , Fracturas del Fémur , Osteoporosis , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Humanos , Femenino , Fracturas Periprotésicas/etiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Masculino , Anciano , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Osteoporosis/etiología , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Absorciometría de Fotón/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Femorales Distales
9.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 303, 2024 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769547

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFF) is increasing as the number of total knee replacements becomes more common. This study compared the demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of periprosthetic versus native distal femur fractures (NDFF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥ 18 who underwent surgical fixation of NDFF or PDFF from 2012 to 2020 at a level-1 trauma center. The main variables collected included demographics, AO/OTA fracture classification, fixation construct, concomitant fractures, polytrauma rates, bone density, and reduction quality. Primary outcomes were unexpected return to the operating room (UROR), hospital length of stay, and quality of reduction. T-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 209 patients were identified, including 70 PDFF and 139 NDFF. PDFF patients were elderly females (81%) with isolated (80%) and comminuted (85%) 33 A.3 (71%) fractures. NDFF patients included 53% females, were commonly middle-aged, and displayed comminuted (92%) 33 C.2 fractures. 48% of NDFF patients had concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the primary fixation for both groups, followed by nail-plate combination (37%) for PDFF and lateral locking plates (21%) for NDFF. NDFF patients experienced significantly longer hospital stays, higher UROR rates, and worse quality of reduction (p < 0.05). PDFF patients had a significantly greater prevalence of low bone density (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PDFF occur as isolated injuries with significant metaphyseal comminution in elderly females with low bone quality. NDFF commonly occurs in younger patients with less metaphyseal comminution and concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the most common treatment for both groups, although preference for nail-plate combination fixation is increasing. NDFF type 33 C fractures are at greater risk of UROR.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Fracturas Femorales Distales/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Periprotésicas/etiología , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Fracturas Periprotésicas/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
JBJS Case Connect ; 14(2)2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579021

RESUMEN

CASE: A 51-year-old man and 64-year-old woman with bilateral cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties (CR-TKAs) who sustained unilateral periprosthetic distal femur fractures above their CR-TKA and experienced knee instability secondary to an iatrogenic posterior-cruciate-ligament (posterior cruciate ligament [PCL]) injury from retrograde intramedullary nailing. Both patients recovered knee stability after undergoing revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Many CR-TKA designs have sufficient medial-lateral intercondylar distance to place a retrograde nail, femoral components with a relatively posterior transition from the trochlear groove to the intercondylar box will necessitate a nail starting point closer to the PCL origin. This may contribute to iatrogenic postoperative knee instability for patients with CR-TKA designs.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Ligamento Cruzado Posterior/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad
11.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(4): 2147-2153, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564013

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Distal femur fractures account for 3-6% of all femur fractures. Internal fixation of most distal femur fractures with an anatomic lateral locking plate should permit some motion at the metaphyseal portion of the fracture when secondary bone healing is planned by the operating surgeon. While several studies have been performed evaluating union rates for distal femur fractures with stainless steel and titanium plates, the timing of callus formation between stainless steel and titanium implants used as bridge plates for distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33-A and -C) has been investigated to a lesser extent. We hypothesize that callus will be visualized earlier with post-operative radiographs with titanium versus stainless steel bridge plates. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive cohort of patients over 18 years of age with acute AO/OTA 33-A and 33-C fracture patterns treated with an isolated stainless steel or titanium lateral bridge plate within 4 weeks of injury by a single fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeon from 2011 to 2020 at one academic Level 1 trauma center. An independent, fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma attending surgeon reviewed anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs from every available post-operative clinic visit and graded them using the Modified Radiographic Score for Tibia (mRUST). RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects were included in the study with 10 with stainless steel and 15 with titanium plates. There were no significant differences in demographics between both groups, including age, sex, BMI, injury classification, open versus closed, mechanism, and laterality. Statistically significant increased mRUST scores, indicating increased callus formation, were seen on 12-week radiographs (8.4 vs. 11.9, p = 0.02) when titanium bridge plates were used. There were no statistically significant differences in mRUST scores at 6 or 24-weeks, but scores in the titanium group were higher in at every timepoint. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, we observed greater callus formation at 12 weeks after internal fixation of 33-A and 33-C distal femur fractures treated with titanium locked lateral distal femoral bridge plates compared to stainless steel plates. Our data suggest that titanium metallurgy may have quicker callus formation compared to stainless steel if an isolated, lateral locked bridge plate is chosen for distal femur fracture fixation.


Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Callo Óseo , Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Acero Inoxidable , Titanio , Humanos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Masculino , Callo Óseo/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Radiografía , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Anciano , Fracturas Femorales Distales
12.
J Orthop Trauma ; 38(7): 373-377, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38506513

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of fascia iliaca (FI) blocks performed in the emergency department on femoral shaft and distal femur fracture patients on opioid consumption, length of stay (LOS), and readmission rate. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Community-based Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with isolated low-energy femoral shaft or distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 32 and 33) presenting from January 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022, were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Opioid consumption, LOS, discharge disposition, and 30-day readmission rate were compared between patients undergoing FI compartment block and not receiving the block. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients were included. Twenty-four received FI block. Both cohorts were primarily female gender (66.7% and 66.9%, respectively, for the FI block and the no FI block cohort). Most of the FI block cohort had femoral shaft fractures (62.5%), whereas the no FI block cohort had mostly distal femur fractures (56.2%). The mean body mass index, fracture type, and surgical procedure were similar between patients undergoing FI block and not receiving FI block. The FI block group had significantly lower opioid consumption preoperatively [36.1 vs. 55.3 morphine milliequivalents (MMEs), P = 0.030], postoperatively (71.7 vs. 130.6 MMEs, P = 0.041), and over total hospital stay (107.9 vs. 185.9 MMEs) including the mean opioid consumption per day of hospital stay (25.9 vs. 48.4 MMEs, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in LOS (4.9 vs. 5.0 days, P = 0.900), discharge disposition destination ( P = 0.200), or 30-day readmissions (12.5% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.148) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing FI block in the emergency department was associated with decreased opioid consumption in patients with femoral shaft or distal femur fractures. There was no associated difference in LOS, discharge disposition, or 30-day readmissions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Fracturas del Fémur , Tiempo de Internación , Bloqueo Nervioso , Humanos , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Fascia , Anciano , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Fracturas Femorales Distales
13.
JBJS Rev ; 12(3)2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446912

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Distal femur fractures are known to have challenging nonunion rates. Despite various available treatment methods aimed to improve union, optimal interventions are yet to be determined. Importantly, there remains no standard agreement on what defines radiographic union. Although various proposed criteria of defining radiographic union exist in the literature, there is no clear consensus on which criteria provide the most precise measurement. The use of inconsistent measures of fracture healing between studies can be problematic and limits their generalizability. Therefore, this systematic review aims to identify how fracture union is defined based on radiographic parameters for surgically treated distal femur fractures in current literature. METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Studies that addressed surgically treated distal femur fractures with reported radiographic union assessment were included. Outcomes extracted included radiographic definition of union; any testing of validity, reliability, or responsiveness; reported union rate; reported time to fracture union; and any functional outcomes correlated with radiographic union. RESULTS: Sixty articles with 3,050 operatively treated distal femur fractures were included. Operative interventions included lateral locked plate (42 studies), intramedullary nail (15 studies), dynamic condylar screw or blade plate (7 studies), dual plate or plate and nail construct (5 studies), distal anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior screws (1 study), and external fixation with a circular frame (1 study). The range of mean follow-up time reported was 4.3 to 44 months. The most common definitions of fracture union included "bridging or callus formation across 3 of 4 cortices" in 26 (43%) studies, "bony bridging of cortices" in 21 (35%) studies, and "complete bridging of cortices" in 9 (15%) studies. Two studies included additional assessment of radiographic union using the Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (RUST) or modified Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fracture (mRUST) scores. One study included description of validity, and the other study included reliability testing. The reported mean union rate of distal femur fractures was 89% (range 58%-100%). The mean time to fracture union was documented in 49 studies and found to be 18 weeks (range 12-36 weeks) in 2,441 cases. No studies reported correlations between functional outcomes and radiographic parameters. CONCLUSION: The current literature evaluating surgically treated distal femur fractures lacks consistent definition of radiographic fracture union, and the appropriate time point to make this judgement is unclear. To advance surgical optimization, it is necessary that future research uses validated, reliable, and continuous measures of radiographic bone healing and correlation with functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Placas Óseas , Tornillos Óseos
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(5): e36904, 2024 Feb 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38306559

RESUMEN

Treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures is often complicated by a high rate of nonunion and varus collapse. For such fractures, lateral plating with lateral incision and double plating with anterior paramedial incision have shown promising results in the recent literature. The hypothesis of this study was that bilateral plating of comminuted distal femur fractures in osteoporotic patients would result in higher union rates and lower revision rates compared to an isolated lateral locking plate. The study included 56 patients (23 males, 33 females) with supracondylar femur fracture. According to the OA/OTA classification, 9 were type A3, 8 were A2, 13 were C1, 16 were C2, and 10 were C3. The mean follow-up period was 12 months, with 29 patients treated using lateral mini-incision, lateral locking plate, and 27 patients treated with anterior paramedial incision, dual plating. The clinical and radiological results were evaluated. The mean duration of radiological union in the studied population was 15 ±â€…2.1 months (range, 11-21 months) in the single plate group (Group A), and 13.5 ±â€…2.6 months (range, 9-19 months) in the double plate group (Group B). Mean ROM was 112.3° and flexion contracture 4° in Group A, and ROM 108.3° and flexion contracture 6.7° in Group B. (P = .15). The average Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score was 85.6 points in Group A and 83.5 points in Group B (P = .2278). The postoperative anteversion measurement in the operated extremity ranged from -15 to 19 in Group A, and from 5 to 18 in Group B. When the anteversion degrees were compared between the injured and uninjured extremities in the postoperative period, a significant difference was observed within Group A (P = .0018), but no significant difference was observed in Group B (P = .2492). Dual plate fixation using the anterior paramedial approach is an effective operative method for osteoporotic distal femur fractures. This has many advantages such as precise exposure, easy manipulation, anatomic reduction, and stable fixation. However, for surgical indications and medial bone defects > 1 cm, grafting should be performed.


Asunto(s)
Contractura , Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fracturas del Fémur , Herida Quirúrgica , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Pierna , Placas Óseas , Contractura/etiología
17.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 26, 2024 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167118

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Large bone defects require complex treatment, multidisciplinary resources, and expert input, with surgical procedures ranging from reconstruction and salvage to amputation. The aim of this study was to provide the results of a case series of open comminuted intra-articular distal femoral fractures with significant bone loss that were managed by early fixation using anatomical plates and a modified Masquelet technique with the addition of surgical propylene mesh. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients referred to our institution with OTA/AO C3 distal femur open fractures and meta-diaphyseal large bone loss between April 2019 and February 2021. We treated the fractures with irrigation and debridement, acute primary screw and plate fixation in the second look operation, and Masquelet method using shell-shaped antibiotic beads supplemented by propylene surgical mesh to keep the cements in place. The second step of the procedure was conducted six to eight weeks later with bone grafting and mesh augmentation to contain bone grafts. Surprisingly, hard callus formation was observed in all patients at the time of the second stage of Masquelet procedure. RESULTS: All five patients' articular and meta-diaphyseal fractures with bone loss healed without major complications. The average union time was 159 days. The mean knee range of motion was 5-95 degrees. The average Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS) was 49 out of 80. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of early plate fixation and the modified Masquelet technique with polypropylene mesh is an effective method for managing large bone defects in open intra-articular distal femoral fractures with bone loss, resulting in shorter union time possibly associated with the callus formation process. This technique may also be applicable to the management of other similar fractures specially in low-income and developing areas.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fracturas del Fémur , Fracturas Abiertas , Humanos , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Curación de Fractura , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Placas Óseas , Fracturas Abiertas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía
18.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 53(2): 136-143, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFF) are challenging injuries, as mostly geriatric patients with serious comorbidities are affected. Revision to a distal femoral replacement (DFR) is often the best option in very distal fractures, poor bone stock and/or loose total knee replacement. Data on outcome after these surgeries is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study was initiated to analyze the outcome after distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) were analyzed. From a total of 43,945 revision knee replacement surgeries in the registry, 629 patients could be identified with a PDFF in which a DFR was used for revision. The mean age was 79.1 years, and 84.1% were female. Revisions and mortality were analyzed and compared with patient groups with a similar procedure (revision total knee arthroplasty) or similar general condition (fracture hip replacement). To make the groups more comparable, matched-pair-analyses were performed that included age, gender, BMI and comorbidities as matching parameters. RESULTS: Within 1 year after surgery 17.1% of the patients died and 10.4% were revised. Within 4 years 35.5% died and 22.3% were revised. Revision rates were lower in elective knee revisions (1 year 6.0%, 4 years 16.8%). Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) accounted for 50% of all revisions, resulting a PJI rate of 7.3%. Mortality after DFR was similarly high as after fracture hip arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: After DFR for PDFF every third patient died, and every fifth patient needed revision within 4 years after surgery, which demonstrates the severity of this injury. Efforts should be undertaken to provide optimal treatment to these high-risk patients to reduce unfavorable outcomes. Surgeries should be well prepared and performed as early as possible in hospitals with adequate experience.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fracturas del Fémur , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fémur/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Muerte
19.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 144(3): 1211-1220, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265463

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study described a deformity induced by medial plating of supracondylar distal femur fractures using plates that are precontoured for other anatomic locations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: OTA/AO 33A fractures were created in 12 sawbone femurs and fixed with either a proximal humerus locking plate (PH), an ipsilateral lateral tibial plateau plate (LTP), or an ipsilateral medial distal tibial plate (MDT). A motion capture system measured changes in length and rotation of the distal femur as the plate was applied. Each plate underwent four trials and the mean and standard deviation (SD) for each measurement was reported. An analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test compared malreduction measures between plate types. RESULTS: All plates consistently created a varus deformity. There was lateral lengthening with a compensatory medial shortening and an increase in the lateral distal femoral angle. The distal fracture fragment was laterally translated, and internally rotated. The PH plate had significantly greater lateral length (27.39 mm SD 4.78, p = 0.007), shorter medial length (13.57 mm SD 4.99, p = 0.028), greater lateral translation (28.82 mm SD 5.70, p = 0.010) and greater widening of the lateral distal femoral angle (28.54° SD 4.98, p < 0.001) than the LTP and MDT plates. The MDT plate had significantly greater angulation anteriorly (8.40° SD 1.07, p < 0.001) and laterally (7.63° SD 3.10, p = 0.002) than the PH and LTP plates. There was no significant difference between plates in internal rotation (PH: 3.07° SD 2.79; LTP: 2.05° SD 1.05; MDT 3.81° SD 3.56; p = 0.659). CONCLUSION: When dual plating supracondylar distal femur fractures, poor plate positioning and a mismatch between plate contour and the slope of the medial distal femur can lead to varus angulation, internal rotation, and lateral translation or a "reverse golf club deformity". After comparing three types of precontoured plates, the authors recommend initial evaluation of the ipsilateral proximal tibial plate when placing a plate along the medial distal femur. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fracturas del Fémur , Golf , Humanos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fémur , Placas Óseas
20.
Int Orthop ; 48(3): 841-848, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38175206

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to estimate the mortality at various post-operative intervals and explore influential variables for these outcomes in elderly patients with distal femur fractures (DFF). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted across two tertiary care institutions, between 2014 and 2020. The primary outcomes were mortality rates at 30-day, six month, and one year post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included 1-year readmission and reintervention rates along with their correlated complications. RESULTS: A total of 37 DFF in 35 patients was analyzed; average age was 83.6 years (range, 65-98 years). The overall mortality rate at a maximum follow-up of 8.8 years was 74% (26/35 patients). The median survival time was 3.2 years and the survival probability at five years was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13 to 43%). Mortality rates at 30 days, six months, and one year after surgery were 8.6% (3 patients), 23% (8 patients), and 34% (12 patients), respectively. Overall mortality rate was 64% (15/24 patients) for native distal femur fractures, and 92% (13/14 patients) for periprosthetic fractures (p = 0.109). Patients older than 85 years and male gender were identified as risk factors for mortality within the first year post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Elderly fractures have a high mortality at eight years of follow-up. Mortality at one year was much higher than in other studies of the same nature. We did not find statistically significant differences when comparing native bone fractures with periprosthetic fractures. Factors that impact mortality were being a man, advanced age, elevated index comorbidity, and dementia. There is no relationship between the time to be taken to the surgical procedure and mortality results.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Femorales Distales , Fracturas del Fémur , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fémur/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA