Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[High revision rates and mortality after treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures with a distal femur replacement : An analysis from the EPRD]. / Hohe Revisionsraten und Mortalität nach Versorgung periprothetischer distaler Femurfrakturen mit einem distalen Femurersatz : Eine Analyse aus dem EPRD.
Lützner, Jörg; Melsheimer, Oliver; Steinbrück, Arnd; Postler, Anne.
Afiliación
  • Lützner J; UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. joerg.luetzner@ukdd.de.
  • Melsheimer O; Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD), Berlin, Deutschland. joerg.luetzner@ukdd.de.
  • Steinbrück A; Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD), Berlin, Deutschland.
  • Postler A; Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD), Berlin, Deutschland.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 53(2): 136-143, 2024 Feb.
Article en De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193921
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFF) are challenging injuries, as mostly geriatric patients with serious comorbidities are affected. Revision to a distal femoral replacement (DFR) is often the best option in very distal fractures, poor bone stock and/or loose total knee replacement. Data on outcome after these surgeries is limited.

OBJECTIVES:

This study was initiated to analyze the outcome after distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Data of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) were analyzed. From a total of 43,945 revision knee replacement surgeries in the registry, 629 patients could be identified with a PDFF in which a DFR was used for revision. The mean age was 79.1 years, and 84.1% were female. Revisions and mortality were analyzed and compared with patient groups with a similar procedure (revision total knee arthroplasty) or similar general condition (fracture hip replacement). To make the groups more comparable, matched-pair-analyses were performed that included age, gender, BMI and comorbidities as matching parameters.

RESULTS:

Within 1 year after surgery 17.1% of the patients died and 10.4% were revised. Within 4 years 35.5% died and 22.3% were revised. Revision rates were lower in elective knee revisions (1 year 6.0%, 4 years 16.8%). Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) accounted for 50% of all revisions, resulting a PJI rate of 7.3%. Mortality after DFR was similarly high as after fracture hip arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION:

After DFR for PDFF every third patient died, and every fifth patient needed revision within 4 years after surgery, which demonstrates the severity of this injury. Efforts should be undertaken to provide optimal treatment to these high-risk patients to reduce unfavorable outcomes. Surgeries should be well prepared and performed as early as possible in hospitals with adequate experience.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Fracturas Periprotésicas / Fracturas del Fémur / Fracturas Femorales Distales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: De Revista: Orthopadie (Heidelb) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Fracturas Periprotésicas / Fracturas del Fémur / Fracturas Femorales Distales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: De Revista: Orthopadie (Heidelb) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania