RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare HFNC therapy to noninvasive ventilation (NIV/BiPAP) in children with bronchiolitis who developed respiratory failure. We hypothesized that HFNC therapy would not be inferior to NIV. METHODS: This was a noninferiority open-label randomized single-center clinical trial conducted at a tertiary Brazilian hospital. Children under 2 years of age with no chronic conditions admitted for bronchiolitis that progressed to mild to moderate respiratory distress (Wood-Downes-Férres score < 8) were randomized to either the HFNC group or NIV (BiPAP) group through sealed envelopes. Vital signs, FiO2, Wood-Downes-Férres score and HFNC/NIV parameters were recorded up to 96 h after therapy initiation. Children who developed respiratory failure despite receiving initial therapy were intubated. Crossover was not allowed. The primary outcome analyzed was invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. The secondary outcomes were sedation usage, invasive mechanical ventilation duration, the PICU LOS, the hospital LOS, and mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were allocated to the NIV group (132 randomized and 6 excluded), and 126 were allocated to the HFNC group (136 randomized and 10 excluded). The median age was 2.5 (1-6) months in the NIV group and 3 (2-7) months in the HFNC group (p = 0,07). RSV was the most common virus isolated in both groups (72% vs. 71.4%, NIV and HFNC, respectively). Thirty-seven patients were intubated in the NIV group and 29 were intubated in the HFNC group (29% vs. 23%, p = 0.25). According to the Farrington-Manning test, with a noninferiority margin of 15%, the difference was 6.3% in favor of HFNC therapy (95% confidence interval: -4.5 to 17.1%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the PICU LOS or sedation duration. Sedation requirement, hospital LOS and invasive mechanical ventilation duration were lower in the HFNC group. CONCLUSION: HFNC therapy is noninferior to NIV in infants admitted with mild to moderate respiratory distress caused by bronchiolitis that progresses to respiratory failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: U1111-1262-1740; RBR-104z966s. Registered 03/01/2023 (retrospectively registered). ReBEC: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-104z966s .
Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis , Ventilación no Invasiva , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Enfermedad Aguda , Brasil , Bronquiolitis/terapia , Bronquiolitis/complicaciones , Cánula , Tiempo de Internación , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A high-flow nasal cannula is a practical and safe instrument that can be used for children with asthma exacerbation and promotes beneficial outcomes such as improved asthma severity scores and reduced hospitalization durations, salbutamol use, and oxygen use. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula treatment and that of bilevel positive airway pressure treatment as respiratory physiotherapy interventions for pediatric patients who are hospitalized because of asthma exacerbation. METHODS: During a randomized clinical trial, treatment was performed using a high-flow nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure for hospitalized children with asthma. After randomization, data regarding lung function, vital signs, and severity scores (pulmonary index, pediatric asthma severity, and pediatric asthma scores) were collected. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in this study (25 in the Bilevel Group and 25 in the high-flow nasal cannula group). After 45 minutes of therapy, an improvement in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second was observed. The high-flow nasal cannula group required fewer days of oxygen (O2) use, used fewer bronchodilators (number of salbutamol puffs), and required shorter hospitalization periods than the Bilevel Group (6.1±1.9 versus 4.3±1.3 days; 95% confidence interval, -5.0 to -0.6). CONCLUSION: A high-flow nasal cannula is a viable option for the treatment of asthma exacerbation because it can reduce the hospitalization period and the need for O2 and bronchodilators. Additionally, it is a safe and comfortable treatment modality that is as effective as bilevel positive airway pressure.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04033666.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Cánula , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Asma/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/instrumentación , Terapia Respiratoria/métodos , Terapia Respiratoria/instrumentación , Preescolar , Adolescente , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine predictors of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure in COVID-19 patients in a hospital in northern Peru. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective cohort study was conducted during the months of March and May 2021. Data collection was based on a follow-up of 156 hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who were users of HFNC. Epidemiological factors and clinical outcomes of treatment were analyzed from medical records. Epidemiological, analytical, and HFNC use-related characteristics were described using measures of absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency, and dispersion. A multivariate Poisson regression analysis with robust variance and a 95% confidence interval was performed. RESULTS: We found that age, SpO2/FiO2, work of breathing (WOB scale) at admission, degree of involvement, type of infiltrate on CT scan, lymphocytes, c-reactive protein, and D-dimer were significantly associated with failure of HFNC (p < 0.05). In addition, the WOB scale, PaO2/FiO2, SaO2/FiO2, and ROX index were variables that presented statistical significance (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis model, a risk of failure of HFNC was determined with age > = 60 years [RRa 1.39 (1.05-1.85)] and PaO2/FiO2 score less than 100 [Rra 1.65 (0.99-2.76)]. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors to failure of HFNC are age older than 60 years and minimally significantly lower PaO2/FiO2 than 100.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cánula , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Perú/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Factores de EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the respiratory oxygenation index (ROX index) measured after the start of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy can help identify the need for intubation in patients with acute respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease 2019. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted at the intensive care units of six Brazilian hospitals from March to December 2020. The primary outcome was the need for intubation up to 7 days after starting the high-flow nasal cannula. RESULTS: A total of 444 patients were included in the study, and 261 (58.7%) were subjected to intubation. An analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) showed that the ability to discriminate between successful and failed high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy within 7 days was greater for the ROX index measured at 24 hours (AUROC 0.80; 95%CI 0.76 - 0.84). The median interval between high-flow nasal cannula initiation and intubation was 24 hours (24 - 72), and the most accurate predictor of intubation obtained before 24 hours was the ROX index measured at 12 hours (AUROC 0.75; 95%CI 0.70 - 0.79). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed a greater probability of intubation within 7 days in patients with a ROX index ≤ 5.54 at 12 hours (hazard ratio 3.07; 95%CI 2.24 - 4.20) and ≤ 5.96 at 24 hours (hazard ratio 5.15; 95%CI 3.65 - 7.27). CONCLUSION: The ROX index can aid in the early identification of patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 who will progress to the failure of high-flow nasal cannula supportive therapy and the need for intubation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cánula , Intubación Intratraqueal , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/instrumentación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Brasil/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted the recognition of diaphragmatic dysfunction as a significant factor contributing to respiratory disturbances in severely ill COVID-19 patients. In the field of noninvasive respiratory support, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has shown effectiveness in relieving diaphragm dysfunction. This study aims to investigate the diaphragmatic response to HFNC in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia by utilizing ultrasound. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care center in Buenos Aires, Argentina (Sanatorio de Los Arcos) over a 16-month period (January 2021-June 2022). The study included patients admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia who were deemed suitable candidates for HFNC therapy by the attending physician. Diaphragm ultrasound was conducted, measuring diaphragmatic excursion (DE) both before and during the utilization of HFNC for these patients. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were included in the study. A statistically significant decrease in respiratory rate was observed with the use of HFNC (p = 0.02), accompanied by a significant increase in DE (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: HFNC leads to a reduction in respiratory rate and an increase in DE as observed by ultrasound in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, indicating promising enhancements in respiratory mechanics. However, further research is required to validate these findings.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cánula , Diafragma , Ultrasonografía , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagen , Diafragma/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Anciano , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , SARS-CoV-2 , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Adulto , Frecuencia RespiratoriaRESUMEN
Introducción: La cánula nasal de alto flujo es un sistema que utiliza una mezcla de aire-oxígeno humidificado y calentado con un caudal de hasta 70 litros por minuto. Es utilizada mayoritariamente en la insuficiencia respiratoria aguda de origen hipoxémico, donde ha demostrado brindar mayor comodidad y poder resolutivo de la hipoxemia, en comparación con la oxigenoterapia convencional. Aunque se conocen sus indicaciones y estrategia de seguimiento, en la práctica clínica no es claro su proceso de destete/desmonte. Objetivo: Identificar en la bibliografía la literatura existente acerca de estrategias de destete/desmonte de la cánula nasal de alto flujo en adultos. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica en las bases de datos del portal regional de la BVS, PubMed, Web Of Science, Scopus y Google scholar, sin límite de tiempo y es- tructurando una ecuación PIO con palabras clave y operadores booleanos. Se asumieron artículos publicados en inglés y español, texto completo. Resultados: En la bibliografía, aún se reporta discrepancia en el proceso de destete y desmonte de la cánula nasal de alto flujo, pero en la mayoría de los estudios encontrados en esta revisión se propone disminuir la FiO2 primero de forma gradual (5-10%) hasta valores de 30-50% y, posteriormente, el flujo. Para desmontarla, se podría considerar tener una FiO2 entre 30-50%, flujo entre 20-30 litros por minuto, SaO2 >92%, con adecuada mecánica respiratoria y estado de conciencia. Conclusión: Aún no existe unanimidad en el proceso de destete/desmonte en la cánula nasal de alto flujo en el paciente adulto.
Introduction: The high-flow nasal cannula is a system that uses a humidified and heated air-oxygen mixture with a flow rate of up to 70 liters per minute. It is mostly used in acute respiratory failure of hypoxemic origin, where it has been shown to provide greater comfort and resolving power of hypoxemia, compared to conventional oxygen therapy. Although its indications and follow-up strategy are known, in clinical practice the weaning/weaning process is not clear. Objective: To identify in the bibliography the existing literature on weaning/ weaning strategies of high-flow nasal cannula in adults. Methods: A bibliographic review was carried out in the databases of the regional portal of the BVS, PubMed, Web Of Science, Scopus and Google scholar, without time limit and structuring a PIO equation with keywords and boléan connectors. Articles published in English and Spanish, full text, were assumed. Results: The literature still reports discrepancy in the process of weaning and disassembling the high-flow nasal cannula, but most of the studies found in this review propose to decrease the FiO2 first gradually (5-10%) to values of 30-50% and then the flow. To dismantle it, one could consider having a FiO2 between 30-50%, flow between 20-30 liters per minute, SaO2 >92%, with adequate respiratory mechanics and state of consciousness. Conclusion: There is still no unanimity on the weaning/weaning process in the high- flow nasal cannula in the adult patient.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Cánula/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Planificación Estratégica/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , HipoxiaRESUMEN
La terapia de alto flujo se ha popularizado durante los últimos años, basada en sus efectos fisiológicos, la entrega de una fracción inspirada de oxígeno segura y estable, sumada al flujo calefaccionado y humidificado, lo que hizo posible su utilización en distintos escenarios. Sin embargo, los estudios que muestran estos beneficios y efectos se han realizado, principalmente, con el empleo de una cánula nasal; mientras que las características de esta terapia en los pacientes traqueostomizados no se ha desarrollado suficientemente. Proponemos aquí una revisión narrativa con las características más salientes de la terapia de alto flujo en este subgrupo de pacientes.
High-flow therapy has become popular in recent years, based on its physiological effects, the delivery of a safe and stable inspired fraction of oxygen, combined with heated and humidified flow, which made its use possible in different scenarios. However, studies demonstrating these benefits and effects have been mainly conducted using a nasal cannula, while the characteristics of this therapy in tracheostomized patients have not been sufficiently developed. We propose a narrative review highlighting the most relevant characteristics of high-flow therapy in this subgroup of patients.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Terapia Respiratoria/métodos , Traqueostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial , Revisión , Cuidados Críticos , CánulaRESUMEN
This study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of two distinct single-puncture techniques in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis for managing disk displacement without reduction (DDwoR). Sixty patients with DDwoR were randomly and blindly assigned to two treatment groups (n = 30 each): group 1 - TMJ arthrocentesis with the classic concentric needle; and group 2 - TMJ arthrocentesis with the concentric needle-cannula system. The following variables were recorded and compared across the groups: patient's pain perception (visual analog scale - VAS, 0-10); maximal interincisal distance (MID, mm); facial edema (FE, presence or absence); and operation duration (OP, minutes). Patients in group 2 presented significantly lower values of VAS score and presence of FE (p < 0.05) when examining the data at 24 and 48 h after the arthrocentesis. They also showed an increase in MID values (p = 0.024) after 6 months. With regard to OP, no significant difference was observed between the groups. Performing a single-puncture TMJ arthrocentesis using a concentric needle-cannula system significantly reduced the patients' pain perception, and mitigated the presence of facial edema during the immediate postoperative period (at 24 and 48 h). Furthermore, it resulted in a notable increase in the MID after 6 months.
Asunto(s)
Artrocentesis , Cánula , Agujas , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular , Humanos , Artrocentesis/instrumentación , Artrocentesis/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly concerning global public health issue due to its high burden of morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a comprehensive intervention to improve patients' physical and psychological conditions, commonly involving oxygen supplementation. The potential benefits of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) have recently sparked interest as oxygen therapy. In this context, this study aims to assess the effects of HFNC during the exercise training component of a PR program in people with COPD. METHODS: Systematic review (CRD42022330929). We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including crossover RCTs with adults with stable COPD. We included trials using oxygen therapy with HFNC during the exercise training component of a PR programme. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL), exercise capacity (EC) and adverse events. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: treatment adherence, breathlessness and future exacerbations. RESULTS: We included five studies with 300 participants with moderate to severe COPD. The certainty of the evidence was primarily low or very low for all outcomes of interest due to risk of bias, inconsistency or imprecision. HFNC has little to no difference in HRQoL (4 studies, 129 participants, MD 0.17, 95% CI -1.20 to 1.54; I2 50%). HFNC may result in little to no difference in EC (3 studies, 212 participants, mean difference 18.73, 95% CI -20.49 to 28.94; I2 56%), and we are uncertain about the effect of HFNC on breathlessness (4 studies; 244 participants, MD of -0.07, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.26; I2 63%). Only one study with 44 participants reported a participant's withdrawal because of progressive dyspnoea during lower limb exercise. CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain about the effect of HFNC during the exercise component of a PR programme in HRQoL, EC or dyspnoea compared to usual care or conventional supplementary oxygen. Non-domiciliary oxygen patients showed improvements in HRQoL, EC and dyspnoea.
Asunto(s)
Cánula , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/rehabilitación , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure patients often use high-flow nasal cannula (HFNO) oxygen therapy. COVID-19 HFNO intubation and mortality risk factors are understudied in the Mexican population, so the aim was to study them. METHODS: This retrospective study searched electronic medical records from March 2020 to June 2022 for patients with COVID-19 who required hospitalization and HFNO. Descriptive statistics, a survival curve analysis, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine predictor factors for intubation and mortality in patients with HFNO and COVID-19, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients received HFNO treatment. Ninety-one (67.9%) were men with a mean (SD) age of 54.5 (17.9) years. Common medical history included obesity (n = 89, 66.4%) with a Body Mass Index (BMI) mean (SD) of 31.8 (5.9), hypertension (n = 67, 50.0%), type 2 diabetes (n = 55, 41.0%), and dyslipidemias (n = 43, 32.1%). The variables associated with a greater risk of requiring intubation after high-flow therapy were age (HR = 1.018, 95% CI 1.003-1.034, p = 0.022) and BMI (HR = 1.071, 95% CI 1.024-1.120, p = 0.003). No variables were associated with lower risk. Increased mortality was associated with increasing age (HR = 1.151, 95% CI 1.102-1.201, p = <0.001), hypertension (HR = 4.092, 95% CI 1.369-12.236, p = 0.012), and dyslipidemia (HR = 3.954, 95% CI 1.395-11.209, p = 0.010). Patients with type 2 diabetes had a lower risk of mortality (HR = 0.235, 95% CI 0.080-0.688, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: A higher age and BMI were associated with an increased risk of intubation in patients with HFNO and COVID-19. Hypertension and dyslipidemias were associated with a higher risk of mortality.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Dislipidemias , Hipertensión , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , COVID-19/complicaciones , Cánula , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Dislipidemias/complicaciones , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/complicaciones , OxígenoRESUMEN
La tasa de reintubación orotraqueal luego de la extubación se registra entre un 10 a 20%. La aplicación de soportes respiratorios no-invasivos (SRNI) posterior a la extuba-ción como cánula nasal de alto-flujo, ventilación no invasiva (dos niveles de presión) y presión positiva continua en la vía aérea demostraron ser seguras y efectivas post ex-tubación. El período pre-destete representa un momento crucial en el manejo de los pa-cientes críticos ya que el fracaso de la extubación, definido como la necesidad de reintu-bación dentro de los 2 a 7 días, demostró peores resultados al aumentar la mortalidad entre un 25-50%. Esta situación conlleva al requerimiento de ventilación mecánica prolongada, neumonía asociada a la ventilación mecánica y estancias prolongadas de internación. Por lo tanto, es esencial identificar a los pacientes que se beneficiarán utilizando SRNI post extubación.
The rate of re-intubation after extubation is recorded at 10-20%. The use of non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) post-extubation such as high-flow nasal cannula, non-invasive ventilation (bilevel pressure) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) have been shown to be safe and effective post-extubation. The pre-weaning period represents a crucial time in the management of critically ill patients, as extubation failure, defined as the need for reintubation within 2-7 days, showed worse outcomes with mortality increasing by 25-50%. This situation leads to the requirement for prolonged mechanical ventilation, ventilator-associated pneumonia and long lengths of hospital stay. Therefore, it is essential to identify patients who will benefit from NIRS post extubation.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/estadística & datos numéricos , Extubación Traqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Ventilación no Invasiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Cánula/estadística & datos numéricos , Intubación Intratraqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Mortalidad , RevisiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Eyelid ptosis is characterized by an inferior displacement of the upper eyelid when the eye assumes its primary position. Besides its aesthetic implications, ptosis can also adversely affect visual acuity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the simultaneous administration of IncobotulinumtoxinA (IncoBonTA) and hyaluronic acid effect in eyelid ptosis and ocular rejuvenation. METHODS: A novel, non-surgical technique for eyelid ptosis management involving IncoBonTA and hyaluronic acid the co-administration within a single syringe, and applied using a cannula. RESULTS: The dual action of IncoBonTA and hyaluronic acid in conjunction with the exact injection sites approaches improves overall aesthetic outcomes but also optimizes the restoration of eyelid functionality in palpebral ptosis. CONCLUSIONS: The functional balance achieved among the contributory muscles-primarily the orbicularis oculi (OO) and its antagonists, the frontal muscle and levator palpebrae superioris (LPS), yields to both, cosmetic and functional.
Asunto(s)
Blefaroptosis , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Cánula , Párpados , Ácido Hialurónico , Rejuvenecimiento , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/administración & dosificación , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Técnicas Cosméticas/instrumentación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Músculos Oculomotores/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the ROX index's accuracy in predicting the success or failure of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy in children under 2 years with acute respiratory failure (ARF) from lower respiratory tract infections. METHODS: From January 2018 to 2021 we conducted this multicenter retrospective cohort study, which included patients aged 2-24 months. We aimed to assess HFNC therapy outcomes as either success or failure. The analysis covered patient demographics, diagnoses, vital signs, and ROX index values at intervals from 0 to 48 h after initiating HFNC. We used bivariate analysis, repeated measures ANOVA, multivariate logistic regression, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The study involved 529 patients from six centers, with 198 females (37%) and a median age of 9 months (IQR: 3-15 months). HFNC therapy failed in 38% of cases. We observed significant variability in failure rates across different centers and physicians (p < .001). The ROX index was significantly associated with HFNC outcomes at all time points, showing an increasing trend in success cases over time (p < .001), but not in HFNC failure cases. Its predictive ability is limited, with AUC-ROC values ranging from 0.56 at the start to 0.67 at 48 h. CONCLUSION: While the ROX index is associated with HFNC outcomes in children under 2 years, its predictive ability is modest, impacted by significant variability among patients, physicians, and centers. These findings emphasize the need for more reliable predictive tools for HFNC therapy in this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Cánula , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/terapia , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/instrumentación , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Saturación de Oxígeno , PreescolarRESUMEN
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a relatively recent therapy that has been used to treat respiratory failure. Until now, the criterion for failure requiring escalation to other forms of ventilatory support has remained unclear. This study evaluated how the ROX index predicts the success or failure of HFNC in infants with bronchiolitis. A prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted in 2 pediatric ICUs. The data were collected at 7 moments. Patients were categorized into failure and success groups according to HFNC. A total of 102 infants were included, 18(17.6%) of whom failed HFNC therapy. For the ROX index, significant differences were observed between the failure 5.8(95%CI 4.7-7.1) and success 7.7(95%CI 7.2-8.2) groups (p = 0.005) at the 12 h evaluation. According to the analysis of the performance of the ROX index, the AUC at 12 h was 0.716(95%CI 0.591-0.842; p = 0.016). The best cutoff range for the ROX index at 12 h was 6.50-7.18, with a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 66% at the cutoff of 6.50, and a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 54% at the cutoff of 7.18. We concluded that the ROX index could be effective at predicting the failure of HFNC therapy in infants with bronchiolitis beginning at 12 h after installation.
Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Lactante , Niño , Humanos , Cánula , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Bronquiolitis/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success rate of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy using an adapted obsolete mechanical ventilator (MV), Optiflow™ and Vapotherm™ in newborns (NBs). METHOD: This was a retrospective observational study conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The sample comprised NBs who underwent HFNC therapy due to ventilatory dysfunction, for weaning from non-invasive ventilation (NIV), or post-extubation. The three groups, stratified according to gestational age (GA) and birth weight, and corrected GA and weight at the beginning of HFNC use, were as follows: Optiflow ™, Vapotherm ™, and obsolete Mechanical Ventilator (MV) adapted for high flow therapy. Subsequently, the NBs were divided into a success group (SG) and a failure group (FG). HFNC success was defined as a therapy duration exceeding 72 h. RESULTS: A total of 209 NBs were evaluated, with 31.1 % using HFNC due to ventilatory dysfunction, 2.4 % after extubation, and 66.5 % after NIV weaning. HFNC success rate was observed in 90.9 % of the NBs, with no difference between equipment types (Vapotherm ™, Optiflow ™, and adapted VM). CONCLUSION: Different types of HFNC equipment are equally effective when used in neonatology for respiratory dysfunction, as a method of weaning from NIV and post-extubation. Adapted obsolete MV can be an alternative for HFCN therapy in resource-constrained settings.
Asunto(s)
Ventilación no Invasiva , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Peso al Nacer , Cánula , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Respiración Artificial , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common cause of admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We described and analyzed the therapies applied to children admitted to a tertiary PICU because of asthma. Later, we evaluated high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use in these patients and compared their evolution and complications with those who received non-invasive ventilation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study (October 2017-October 2019). Collected data: epidemiological, clinical, respiratory support therapy needed, complementary tests, and PICU and hospital stay. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) only HFNC; (2) HFNC and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV); and (3) only NIMV. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included (39 female). The median age was 2 years and 1 month. The median pulmonary score was 5. The median PICU stay was 3 days, and the hospital stay was 6 days. Children with HNFC only (56/76) had fewer PICU days (p = 0.025) and did not require NIMV (6/76). Children with HFNC had a higher oxygen saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio ratio (p = 0.025) and lower PCO2 (p = 0.032). In the group receiving both therapies (14/76), NIMV was used first in all cases. No epidemiologic or clinical differences were found among groups. CONCLUSION: HFNC was a safe approach that did not increase the number of PICU or hospital days. On admission, normal initial blood gases and the absence of high oxygen requirements were useful in selecting responders to HFNC. Further randomized and multicenter clinical trials are needed to verify these data.
INTRODUCCIÓN: El asma es una causa frecuente de ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos (UCIP). En este, cuadro el uso de cánula nasal de alto flujo (CNAF) se ha visto extendido. En este trabajo se describe el tratamiento global en la UCIP ante el ingreso por asma en un hospital monográfico pediátrico y se evalúa la respuesta al uso de la CNAF, comparando la evolución de los pacientes con aquellos que recibieron ventilación no invasiva (VNI). MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional prospectivo (de octubre del 2017 a octubre del 2019). Se describieron epidemiología, clínica, tratamiento y soporte respiratorio. Para la comparación se crearon tres grupos de pacientes: 1) solo CNAF; 2) CNAF y VNI; y 3) solo VNI. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 76 pacientes. La mediana de edad fue de dos años y un mes; la mediana de índice pulmonar fue 5. La mediana de ingreso en UCIP fue de tres días y de ingreso hospitalario, seis días. Los niños con solo CNAF (56/76) mostraron menos días de UCIP (p = 0.025) y no requirieron VNI (6/76). También mostraron mayor SatO2/FiO2 (saturación de oxígeno/fracción de oxígeno inspirado) (p = 0.025) y menor nivel de PCO2 (presión parcial de CO2) (p = 0.032). La VNI se utilizó primero siempre en el grupo que recibió ambas modalidades (14/76). No se encontraron diferencias epidemiológicas o clínicas entre grupos. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestra serie, el uso de CNAF no aumentó los días de ingreso en la UCIP ni de hospital. Tampoco requirió cambio a VNI. Al ingreso, una gasometría normal y bajo requerimiento de oxígeno permitieron seleccionar a los pacientes respondedores. Se necesitan más ensayos multicéntricos clínicos aleatorizados para verificar estos datos.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Respiración Artificial , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Preescolar , Cánula , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/efectos adversos , Asma/terapia , Oxígeno , Cuidados CríticosRESUMEN
Exercise increases the cost of breathing (COB) due to increased lung ventilation (VËE), inducing respiratory muscles deoxygenation (∇SmO2), while the increase in workload implies ∇SmO2 in locomotor muscles. This phenomenon has been proposed as a leading cause of exercise intolerance, especially in clinical contexts. The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) during exercise routines in rehabilitation programs has gained significant interest because it is proposed as a therapeutic intervention for reducing symptoms associated with exercise intolerance, such as fatigue and dyspnea, assuming that HFNC could reduce exercise-induced ∇SmO2. SmO2 can be detected using optical wearable devices provided by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technology, which measures the changes in the amount of oxygen bound to chromophores (e.g., hemoglobin, myoglobin, cytochrome oxidase) at the target tissue level. We tested in a study with a cross-over design whether the muscular desaturation of m.vastus lateralis and m.intercostales during a high-intensity constant-load exercise can be reduced when it was supported with HFNC in non-physically active adults. Eighteen participants (nine women; age: 22 ± 2 years, weight: 65.1 ± 11.2 kg, height: 173.0 ± 5.8 cm, BMI: 21.6 ± 2.8 kg·m-2) were evaluated in a cycle ergometer (15 min, 70% maximum watts achieved in ergospirometry (VËO2-peak)) breathing spontaneously (control, CTRL) or with HFNC support (HFNC; 50 L·min-1, fiO2: 21%, 30 °C), separated by seven days in randomized order. Two-way ANOVA tests analyzed the ∇SmO2 (m.intercostales and m.vastus lateralis), and changes in VËE and ∇SmO2·VËE-1. Dyspnea, leg fatigue, and effort level (RPE) were compared between trials by the Wilcoxon matched-paired signed rank test. We found that the interaction of factors (trial × exercise-time) was significant in ∇SmO2-m.intercostales, VËE, and (∇SmO2-m.intercostales)/VËE (p < 0.05, all) but not in ∇SmO2-m.vastus lateralis. ∇SmO2-m.intercostales was more pronounced in CTRL during exercise since 5' (p < 0.05). Hyperventilation was higher in CTRL since 10' (p < 0.05). The ∇SmO2·VËE-1 decreased during exercise, being lowest in CTRL since 5'. Lower dyspnea was reported in HFNC, with no differences in leg fatigue and RPE. We concluded that wearable optical biosensors documented the beneficial effect of HFNC in COB due to lower respiratory ∇SmO2 induced by exercise. We suggest incorporating NIRS devices in rehabilitation programs to monitor physiological changes that can support the clinical impact of the therapeutic intervention implemented.
Asunto(s)
Oxígeno , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Cánula , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Disnea/tratamiento farmacológico , MúsculosRESUMEN
Background: The ROX index (iROX) obtained from pulse oximetry saturation/inspired fraction of oxygen and respiratory rate, predicts success with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), however its performance for low-flow oxygenation devices (DOBF) is unknown. Objective: To determine suitability of iROX at 12 hours as a predictor of mechanical ventilation (VMI) in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 and DOBF. Material and methods: An historical cohort was performed. Adults with COVID-19, hospitalized, with supplemental oxygen supply are included, excluding patients with pathologies in chronic stages that could alter the results, calculating the iROX at 12 hours, obtaining the cut-off point using a ROC curve and Youden index, the risk of VMI is prolonged using relative risk (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Confounding variables were evaluated to determine the performance of the iROX. The dependent variable mechanical ventilation recorded as reported in the file and the independent iROX obtained in the same way as the previous one. Results: 63 patients with a median age of 62 years were included. The best iROX cut-off point at 12 hours was 5.35. With this cut-off point, VMI was associated with a RR of 8.75 (95% CI 2.36-32.35). In the multivariate model with an OR of 9.26; (95% CI, 2.39 - 35.78), after initiation of DOBF was consistently associated with an increased risk of intubation. Conclusion: In hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, an iROX < 5.35 at 12 hours appears to be a predictor for the onset of VMI.
Introducción: el índice ROX (iROX) obtenido a partir de la saturación por oximetría de pulso/fracción inspirada de oxígeno y frecuencia respiratoria, pronostica el éxito con cánulas nasales de alto flujo (CNAF), pero se desconoce su desempeño para dispositivos de oxigenación de bajo flujo (DOBF). Objetivo: determinar el punto de corte y el desempeño del iROX a las 12 horas como predictor para el inicio de la ventilación mecánica (VMI) en los pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 grave y DOBF. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio tipo cohorte histórica, en el que se incluyeron pacientes adultos con COVID-19, hospitalizados, con aporte de oxígeno suplementario. Se excluyeron los pacientes con patologías en etapas crónicas que pudieran alterar los resultados, calculando el iROX a las 12 horas y obteniendo el punto de corte mediante una curva ROC e índice de Youden, determinando el riesgo de VMI usando riesgo relativo (RR), con intervalos de confianza de 95% (IC95%). Evaluando otras variables confusoras para conocer el desempeño del iROX. La variable dependiente fue ventilación mecánica, obtenida por lo reportado en el expediente y la independiente el iROX, obtenida igual que la anterior. Resultados: se incluyeron 63 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 62 años. El mejor punto de corte del iROX a las 12 horas fue de 5.35. Con este punto de corte se asoció a VMI con un RR de 8.75 (IC95%: 2.36-32.35). En el modelo multivariado con un OR de 9.26; (IC95%: 2.39-35.78), después del inicio del DOBF se asoció consistentemente con un mayor riesgo de intubación. Conclusión: en pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 grave, un iROX < 5.35 a las 12 horas es un predictor para el inicio de la VMI.