RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has made remarkable achievements, but newly identified armored and cold tumors cannot respond to ICB therapy. The high prevalence of concomitant medications has huge impact on immunotherapeutic responses, but the clinical effects on the therapeutic outcome of armored and cold tumors are still unclear. METHODS: In this research, using large-scale transcriptomics datasets, the expression and potential biological functions of angiotensin II receptor 1 (AGTR1), the target of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), were investigated. Next, the roles of ARB in tumor cells and tumor microenvironment cells were defined by a series of in vitro and in vivo assays. In addition, the clinical impacts of ARB on ICB therapy were assessed by multicenter cohorts and meta-analysis. RESULTS: AGTR1 was overexpressed in armored and cold tumors and associated with poor response to ICB therapy. ARB, the inhibitor for AGTR1, only suppressed the aggressiveness of tumor cells with high AGTR1 expression, which accounted for a very small proportion. Further analysis revealed that AGTR1 was always highly expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and ARB inhibited type I collagen expression in CAFs by suppressing the RhoA-YAP axis. Moreover, ARB could also drastically reverse the phenotype of armored and cold to soft and hot in vivo, leading to a higher response to ICB therapy. In addition, both our in-house cohorts and meta-analysis further supported the idea that ARB can significantly enhance ICB efficacy. CONCLUSION: Overall, we identify AGTR1 as a novel target in armored and cold tumors and demonstrate the improved therapeutic efficacy of ICB in combination with ARB. These findings could provide novel clinical insight into how to treat patients with refractory armored and cold tumors.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/farmacología , Animales , Ratones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Receptor de Angiotensina Tipo 1/metabolismo , Receptor de Angiotensina Tipo 1/genética , Microambiente Tumoral , Línea Celular Tumoral , FemeninoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is an emerging pandemic associated with increased mortality, recurrent hospitalizations, and reduced quality of life. Guideline-directed medical therapy has been shown to improve outcomes, particularly in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The main goal of HF clinics is optimizing medical therapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of our HF clinic on medical therapy and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We obtained demographic, echocardiographic, and clinical data of patients listed in our HF clinic during a 4-year period. Medical therapy was evaluated based on patient reports and documented data. Recurrent admissions for HF were documented. RESULTS: A total of 317 patients (74.1% male, median age 66 years, IQR 55-74) were listed in the clinic with a total of 1140 visits. Of these patients, 62.5% had HFrEF, 20.5% presented with mildly reduced ejection fraction, and 17% showed preserved ejection fraction at the time of the first visit. The use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was optimized in 92% and 91% of the patients, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with HFrEF, the use of angiotensin-receptor antagonist/neprilysin inhibitor increased from 22.6% to 87.9% (P < 0.001) and SGLT2 inhibitor use increased from 49.2% to 92% (P < 0.001). During the follow-up period (2.2 years, IQR 1.1-3.1), 203 patients (64%) were readmitted to the hospital for HF at least once. The rate of readmissions decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: An HF clinic plays an important role in optimizing medical therapy and reducing readmissions.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Israel/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Background: Sodiumâglucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors offer glycaemic and cardiorenal benefits in the early stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors may increase the risk of genitourinary tract infection (GUTI). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may also cause deterioration of kidney function. The long-term follow-up of cardiorenal outcomes and GUTI incidence in patients with advanced CKD receiving SGLT2 inhibitors combined with ACEIs/ARBs should be further investigated. Methods: We analysed data from 5,503 patients in Taiwan's Taipei Medical University Research Database (2016-2020) who were part of a pre-end-stage renal disease (ESRD) program (CKD stages 3-5) and received ACEIs/ARBs. SGLT2 inhibitor users were matched 1:4 with nonusers on the basis of sex, CKD, and program entry duration. Results: The final cohort included 205 SGLT2 inhibitor users and 820 nonusers. SGLT2 inhibitor users experienced a significant reduction in ESRD/dialysis risk (aHR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.190.67), and SGLT2 inhibitor use was not significantly associated with acute kidney injury or acute kidney disease risk. Among SGLT2 inhibitor users, those with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) had greater CVD rates. Conversely, those without a CVD history had lower rates of congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, acute pulmonary oedema, and acute myocardial infarction, although the differences were not statistically significant. Notably, SGLT2 inhibitor usage was associated with a greater GUTI incidence (aHR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.122.84) shortly after initiation, irrespective of prior GUTI history status. Conclusion: Among patients with CKD stages 3-5, SGLT2 inhibitor use was linked to increased GUTI incidence, but it also significantly reduced the ESRD/dialysis risk without an episodic AKI or AKD risk. Clinical physicians should consider a personalized medicine approach by balancing GUTI episodes and cardiorenal outcomes for advanced CKD patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Humanos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Taiwán/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Anciano , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensinreceptor blockers (ARB) can improve cardiac and renal function, but whether ACEI/ARB therapy improves long-term prognosis remains unclear among these high-risk patients. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate the relationship between ACEI/ARB therapy and long-term prognosis among CAD patients with advanced CKD. METHODS: CAD patients with advanced CKD were included in five hospitals. Advanced CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Cox regression models and competing risk Fine and Gray models were used to examine the relationship between ACEI/ARB therapy and all-cause and cardiovascular death, respectively. RESULTS: Of 2527 patients, 47.6% population of our cohort was discharged on ACEI/ARB. The overall all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were 38.6% and 24.7%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that ACEI/ARB therapy was found to be associated with lower rates of both all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR)=0.836, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.738-0.948, p = 0.005) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.817, 95%CI: 0.699-0.956, p = 0.011). In the propensity-matched cohort, the survival benefit was consistent, and significantly better survival was observed for all-cause mortality (HR = 0.856, 95%CI: 0.752-0.974, p = 0.019) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.830, 95%CI: 0.707-0.974, p = 0.023) among patients treated with ACEI/ARB. CONCLUSION: ACEI/ARB therapy showed a better survival benefit among high-risk CAD patients with advanced CKD at long-term follow-up, which manifested that strategies to maintain ACEI/ARB treatment may improve clinical outcomes among these high-risk populations.
What is the current knowledge on the topic? Advanced CKD is highly prevalent and strongly associated with higher mortality risk and worse outcomes among CAD patients, and patients with advanced CKD have often been excluded from randomized controlled trials, creating an evidence gap for these high-risk CAD patients. ACEI/ARB are beneficial for greater survival among CAD patients, but the effect of ACEI/ARB therapy on long-term prognosis is unclear among CAD patients with advanced CKD.What does this study add to our knowledge? ACEI/ARB treatment showed a better survival benefit among high-risk CAD patients with advanced CKD at long-term follow-up.How might this change clinical pharmacology or translational science? CAD patients with advanced CKD are not only have worse outcomes but also limited in their choice of therapy strategies. Our study may prompt an important reference for the subsequent improvement of long-term prognosis among these high-risk populations.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Masculino , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Estudios Longitudinales , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Causas de MuerteRESUMEN
Importance: Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) on kidney biopsy is a pattern of endothelial injury commonly seen in malignant hypertension (mHTN), but treatment strategies are not well established. Objective: To evaluate the kidney outcomes of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), specifically sacubitril/valsartan, vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy for patients with mHTN-associated TMA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center cohort study enrolled consecutive patients in China diagnosed with mHTN-associated TMA through kidney biopsy from January 2008 to June 2023. Follow-up was conducted until the conclusion of the study period. Data were analyzed in September 2023. Exposures: Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan or ACEI/ARBs during hospitalization and after discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of kidney recovery: a 50% decrease in serum creatinine level, decrease in serum creatinine levels to the reference range, or kidney survival free from dialysis for more than 1 month. The secondary and tertiary outcomes were a 15% increase in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) relative to baseline and kidney survival free from dialysis, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to evaluate the association between sacubitril/valsartan and ACEI/ARB therapy with kidney recovery outcomes. Results: Among the 217 patients (mean [SD] age, 35.9 [8.8] years; 188 men [86.6%]) included in the study, 66 (30.4%) received sacubitril/valsartan and 151 (69.6%) received ACEI/ARBs at baseline. Sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with shorter time to the primary outcome compared with ACEI/ARB treatment (20 of 63 [31.7%] vs 38 of 117 [32.5%]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.05-3.23). Sacubitril/valsartan treatment was independently associated with shorter time to a 15% increase in eGFR (15 of 46 [32.6%] vs 46 of 83 [55.4%]; aHR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.09-4.17) and kidney survival free from dialysis (11 of 23 [47.8%] vs 16 of 57 [28.1%]; aHR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.15-5.88) compared with ACEI/ARB treatment. These differences remained significant in the PSM comparison. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, sacubitril/valsartan treatment was associated with a potential kidney function benefit in patients with mHTN-associated TMA compared with ACEI/ARB treatment. The findings suggested that sacubitril/valsartan could be a superior therapeutic approach for managing this serious condition in terms of kidney recovery.
Asunto(s)
Aminobutiratos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Compuestos de Bifenilo , Combinación de Medicamentos , Microangiopatías Trombóticas , Valsartán , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Microangiopatías Trombóticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valsartán/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bifenilo/uso terapéutico , Aminobutiratos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Hipertensión Maligna/tratamiento farmacológico , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Neprilisina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estudios de Cohortes , China , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome that affects millions of people worldwide and leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Sacubitril/valsartan, a combination drug consisting of a neprilysin inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), has shown a greater improvement in the prognosis of HF than ACE inhibitors (ACEI) or ARB. Recent studies have found that ACEI/ARB or sacubitril/valsartan can increase flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and reduce pulse wave velocity (PWV), which are independent predictors of cardiovascular events and HF prognosis. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the effect of sacubitril/valsartan and ACEI/ARB on FMD and PWV using meta-analysis and further provide a reference for the role of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of HF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Clinical randomised controlled trials investigating the effect of sacubitril/valsartan and/or ACEI/ARB on FMD and PWV in patients with HF will be searched in the relevant database, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library and China's National Knowledge Infrastructure up to January 2024. The outcomes of interest are changes in endothelial function assessed by FMD and changes in arterial stiffness assessed by PWV. The risk of bias was evaluated using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB2.0). Review Manager V.5.3 software is used for meta-analysis data synthesis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression analysis, subgroup analysis and risk of bias assessment. The reporting bias of studies will be evaluated using the funnel plot, in which symmetry will be assessed by Begg's and Egger's tests. The evidence quality of the included studies will be evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study only analyses research data from the published literature and therefore does not require ethical approval. We will submit the systematic review to a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024538148.
Asunto(s)
Aminobutiratos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Compuestos de Bifenilo , Combinación de Medicamentos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Valsartán , Rigidez Vascular , Humanos , Valsartán/uso terapéutico , Aminobutiratos/uso terapéutico , Aminobutiratos/farmacología , Rigidez Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Endotelio Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Endotelio Vascular/fisiopatología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Proyectos de Investigación , Análisis de la Onda del PulsoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a chronic condition that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Effective management is crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing costs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used to manage heart failure by reducing cardiac strain and preventing disease progression. Despite their common use, ACE inhibitors and ARBs differ in mechanisms, cost, and potential side effects. ACE inhibitors have long been the standard treatment, while ARBs are often prescribed to patients intolerant to ACE inhibitors, particularly due to side effects like cough. Given these differences, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of these treatments is essential. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of ACE inhibitors and ARBs from a healthcare system perspective, considering both direct medical costs and health outcomes. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a decision-analytic Markov model to simulate heart failure progression in a hypothetical cohort. Data inputs included clinical trial outcomes, real-world effectiveness data, direct medical costs (medications, hospitalizations, monitoring), and utility values for quality of life. The primary outcome measures were the cost per quality-adjusted life year gained and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of results, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on age and disease severity. RESULTS: The base-case analysis showed that ACE inhibitors were associated with lower overall costs and slightly higher quality-adjusted life years than ARBs. Sensitivity analyses revealed that variations in key parameters, such as transition probabilities, mortality rates, and healthcare expenses, had limited impact on the overall cost-effectiveness conclusions. Subgroup analyses indicated that ACE inhibitors and ARBs exhibited similar cost-effectiveness profiles for patients aged <65 and ≥65 years. However, among patients with severe heart failure, ARBs demonstrated a higher incremental cost-effectiveness ratio compared with ACE inhibitors, suggesting reduced cost-effectiveness in this subgroup. CONCLUSION: ACE inhibitors are likely a more cost-effective option for managing heart failure than ARBs, particularly from a healthcare system perspective. The findings underscore the importance of tailoring treatment decisions to individual patient factors, preferences, and clinical conditions, providing valuable insights for healthcare policy and practice, particularly regarding cost-effectiveness across patient subgroups.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Cadenas de Markov , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/economía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/economía , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/economía , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure is a clinical syndrome with signs and symptoms from underlying cardiac abnormality and evidence of pulmonary or systemic congestion on laboratory testing or other objective findings (Bozkurt et al. in Eur J Heart Fail 23:352-380, 2021). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), when heart failure is due to underlying reduction in ejection fraction to ≤ 40. The goal of this review is to briefly describe the mechanisms and benefits of the various pharmacological interventions described in the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guidelines focusing on Stage C: Symptomatic Heart Failure HFrEF, while providing basic guidance on safe use of these medications. RECENT FINDINGS: Use of medications from each class as recommended in the 2022 Guidelines can provide significant morbidity and mortality benefits for our patients. Despite advances in therapeutics for patients with HFrEF, patients are frequently under treated and more research is needed to help optimize management of these complicated patients.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Poststroke epilepsy (PSE) is a common complication after ischemic stroke. This study investigates the association between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and the risk of PSE in patients with ischemic stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 2000 and 2015. Patients with hypertension with a history of ischemic stroke were classified into prevalent, new, and nonusers according to their use of ACEIs/ARBs. Prevalent ACEI/ARB users were further classified into continuing or discontinued users, based on their poststroke medication adherence. We used multivariate Cox regression models, adjusted for demographics and comorbidities, to assess the risk of PSE among different ACEI/ARB user groups. There were 182 983 ACEI/ARB users and 38 365 nonusers included. There were 7387 patients diagnosed with PSE, whereas 213 961 were not. Nonusers exhibited a higher risk of PSE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.72 [95% CI, 1.63-1.82]). Both prevalent and nonusers had higher risks compared with new ACEI/ARB users, with respective aHRs of 1.33 (95% CI, 1.25-1.41) and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.87-2.14). Discontinued ACEI/ARB users showed the highest risk of PSE (aHR, 2.34 [95% CI, 2.15-2.54]), suggesting the importance of continuing ACEI/ARB use after stroke. Treatment-by-age interaction was significant among patients with or without ACEI/ARB use before stroke (P value for interaction 0.004 and <0.001, respectively), suggesting a stronger beneficial association in younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ACEIs/ARBs after ischemic stroke in patients with hypertension is associated with a reduced risk of PSE, especially among younger patients.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Epilepsia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Taiwán/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Bases de Datos Factuales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores ProtectoresRESUMEN
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have a high mortality rate, and despite the several available therapeutic targets, non-response to antihypertensives remains a common problem. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are important classes of drugs recommended as first-line therapy for several CVDs. However, response to ACEIs and ARBs varies among treated patients. Pharmacogenomics assesses how an individual's genetic characteristics affect their likely response to drug therapy. Currently, numerous studies suggest that genetic polymorphisms may contribute to variability in drug response. Moreover, further studies evaluating gene-gene interactions within signaling pathways in response to antihypertensives might help to unravel potential genetic predictors for antihypertensive response. This review summarizes the pharmacogenetic data for ACEIs and ARBs in patients with CVD, and discusses the potential pharmacogenetics of these classes of antihypertensives in clinical practice. However, replication studies in different populations are needed. In addition, studies that evaluate gene-gene interactions that share signaling pathways in the response to antihypertensive drugs might facilitate the discovery of genetic predictors for antihypertensive response.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Farmacogenética , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , AnimalesRESUMEN
Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) has unique pathogenic and clinical features with worse prognosis than other causes of heart failure (HF), despite the fact that patients with CCC are often younger and have fewer comorbidities. Patients with CCC were not adequately represented in any of the landmark HF studies that support current treatment guidelines. PARACHUTE-HF (Prevention And Reduction of Adverse outcomes in Chagasic Heart failUre Trial Evaluation) is an active-controlled, randomized, phase IV trial designed to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily vs enalapril 10 mg twice daily added to standard of care treatment for HF. The study aims to enroll approximately 900 patients with CCC and reduced ejection fraction at around 100 sites in Latin America. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite of time from randomization to cardiovascular death, first HF hospitalization, or relative change from baseline to week 12 in NT-proBNP levels. PARACHUTE-HF will provide new data on the treatment of this high-risk population. (Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril on Morbidity, Mortality, and NT-proBNP Change in Patients With CCC [PARACHUTE-HF]; NCT04023227).
Asunto(s)
Aminobutiratos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Compuestos de Bifenilo , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica , Combinación de Medicamentos , Enalapril , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Tetrazoles , Valsartán , Humanos , Compuestos de Bifenilo/uso terapéutico , Aminobutiratos/uso terapéutico , Enalapril/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Cardiomiopatía Chagásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Fragmentos de Péptidos/sangre , Enfermedad Crónica , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Masculino , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a common cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Evidence suggests that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) decrease liver fibrosis, an intermediate step between liver injury and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our aim was to investigate the association between the use of ACEIs and ARBs on incident HCC and liver-related mortality among patients with HBV infection. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study on a new-user cohort of patients seen at 24 hospitals across China. We included adult patients with HBV infection who started ACEIs or ARBs (ACEIs/ARBs), or calcium channel blockers or thiazide diuretics (CCBs/THZs) from January 2012 to December 2022. The primary outcome was incident HCC; secondary outcomes were liver-related mortality and new-onset cirrhosis. We used propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of study outcomes. RESULTS: Among 32 692 eligible patients (median age 58 [interquartile range (IQR) 48-68] yr, and 18 804 male [57.5%]), we matched 9946 pairs of patients starting ACEIs/ARBs or CCBs/THZs. During a mean follow-up of 2.3 years, the incidence rate of HCC per 1000 person-years was 4.11 and 5.94 among patients who started ACEIs/ARBs and CCBs/THZs, respectively, in the matched cohort. Use of ACEIs/ARBs was associated with lower risks of incident HCC (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.86), liver-related mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.93), and new-onset cirrhosis (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94). INTERPRETATION: In this cohort of patients with HBV infection, new users of ACEIs/ARBs had a lower risk of incident HCC, liver-related mortality, and new-onset cirrhosis than new users of CCBs/THZs.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Masculino , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , China/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática , Incidencia , Hepatitis B Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis B Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study is aimed to compare the effectiveness of modern therapy including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with conventional heart failure treatment in the real world. BACKGROUND: Since ARNI and SGLT2i were introduced to treat heart failure (HF), its therapeutic regimen has modernized from previous treatment with beta-blocker (BB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) as added-on in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, a comparison between conventional and modern treatment strategies with drugs in combination has not been performed. METHODS: This observational study (2013-2020), using the Swedish HF Registry, involved 20,849 HF patients. Patients received either conventional (BB, ACEi/ARB, with/without MRA, n = 20,140) or modern (BB, ACEi/ARB, MRA, SGLT2i or BB, ARNI, MRA with/without SGLT2i, n = 709) treatment at the index visit. The endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. RESULTS: Modern HF therapy was associated with a significant 28% reduction in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.72 (0.54-0.96); p = 0.024) and a significant 62% reduction in CV mortality (aHR, 0.38 (0.21-0.68); p = 0.0013) compared to conventional HF treatment. Similar results emerged in a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching. The interaction analyses did not reveal any trends for EF (< 40% and ≥ 40%), sex, age (< 70 and ≥ 70 years), eGFR (< 60 and ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2), and etiology of HF subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, modern HF therapy was associated with significantly reduced all-cause and CV mortality, regardless of EF, sex, age, eGFR, and etiology of HF.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Sistema de Registros , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Suecia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neprilisina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guideline-directed heart failure therapy with angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) and sodium-glucose transporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been incrementally beneficial in improving outcomes in heart failure patients. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in adults congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, ACHD patients with either New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II symptoms or systemic ejection fraction (EF) <45%, optimized on a combination of beta-blocker (BB), ARNi, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and SGLT2i were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a mean age 42.6 ± 12.1 years prescribed GDMT were identified. Twenty-eight (61%) were male, 20 (43%) had a systemic right ventricle (RV) and 9 (20%) had single-ventricle physiology. Over the optimization period, 20 (43%) were sustained on ARNi and 42 (91%) on SGLT2i in addition to treatment with BB and MRA. Over a period of 45 weeks, echocardiography parameters for left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (+7.5%, p = 0.006), systemic ventricle (SV) velocity time integral (VTI) (+1.9 cm, p = 0.012) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-2.5%, p = 0.005) improved when 3-4 medications were used versus 1-2 medications alone. The use of either ARNi or SGLT2i (+8.1%, p = 0.017) or in combination (+7.0%, p = 0.043) increased LVEF compared to the use of neither medication. CONCLUSION: Combination GDMT is beneficial in improving myocardial characteristics in ACHD patients with systemic RV and LV.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Cardiopatías Congénitas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiopatías Congénitas/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Neprilisina/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
Background: Depression ranks as a leading contributor to the global disease burden. The potential causal relationship between the use of antihypertensive medications and depression has garnered significant interest. Despite extensive investigation, the nature of this relationship remains a subject of ongoing debate. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the influence of antihypertensive medications on depression by conducting a Mendelian randomization study focused on drug targets. Method: We focused on the targets of five antihypertensive drug categories: ACE Inhibitors (ACEIs), Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists (ARBs), Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs), Beta-Blockers (BBs), and Thiazide Diuretics (TDs). We collected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with these drug targets from genome-wide association study (GWAS) statistics, using them as proxies for the drugs. Subsequently, we conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis targeting these drugs to explore their potential impact on depression. Results: Our findings revealed that genetic proxies for Beta-Blockers (BBs) were associated with an elevated risk of depression (OR [95%CI] = 1.027 [1.013, 1.040], p < 0.001). Similarly, genetic proxies for Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) were linked to an increased risk of depression (OR [95%CI] = 1.030 [1.009, 1.051], p = 0.006). No significant associations were identified between the genetic markers of other antihypertensive medications and depression risk. Conclusion: The study suggests that genetic proxies associated with Beta-Blockers (BBs) and Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) could potentially elevate the risk of depression among patients. These findings underscore the importance of considering genetic predispositions when prescribing these medications, offering a strategic approach to preventing depression in susceptible individuals.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Depresión , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Humanos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Depresión/genética , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/genética , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de los Simportadores del Cloruro de Sodio/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de los Simportadores del Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The conventional sequence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) initiation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) assumes that the effectiveness and tolerability of GDMT agents mirror their order of discovery, which is not true. In this review, the authors discuss flexible GDMT sequencing that should be permitted in special populations, such as patients with bradycardia, chronic kidney disease, or atrial fibrillation. Moreover, the initiation of certain GDMT medications may enable tolerance of other GDMT medications. Most importantly, the achievement of partial doses of all four pillars of GDMT is better than achievement of target dosing of only a couple.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Importance: Randomized clinical trials have shown that sacubitril-valsartan reduces the risks of mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis were excluded. Objective: To investigate the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs or ARBs) in patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, 1:1 propensity score-matched comparative effectiveness study included patients who were 18 years or older with HFrEF, enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, and survived at least 90 days receiving in-center hemodialysis from July 8, 2015, to December 31, 2020. Patients were excluded for less than 180 days of continuous Medicare Parts A, B, and D primary payer coverage or prior dispensing of sacubitril-valsartan. Data analysis was conducted from September 23, 2023, to June 25, 2024. Exposures: New use of sacubitril-valsartan vs new or continued use of ACEIs or ARBs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The associations between initiation of sacubitril-valsartan therapy and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and HF hospitalization were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models in a propensity score-matched sample. Results: Participants included 1:1 matched pairs of 1434 sacubitril-valsartan users and 1434 ACEI or ARB users (mean [SD] age, 64 [13] years). Of the 2868 matched participants, 996 (65%) were male; 987 (34%) were Black or African American and 1677 (58%) were White; and median dialysis vintage was 3.8 (IQR, 1.8-6.3) years. The median follow-up was 0.9 (IQR, 0.4-1.7) years. Sacubitril-valsartan (vs ACEI or ARB) therapy was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92]) and all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.93]) but not cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]) or HF hospitalization (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02]). There was a decrease in hyperkalemia (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62-0.81]) and no difference in hypotension (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.83-1.19]). Only 195 participants (14%) ever received the maximum combination dose of sacubitril (97 mg twice daily) and valsartan (103 mg twice daily). Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study of patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis, sacubitril-valsartan therapy was associated with beneficial effects in all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
Aminobutiratos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Compuestos de Bifenilo , Combinación de Medicamentos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Diálisis Renal , Valsartán , Humanos , Compuestos de Bifenilo/uso terapéutico , Valsartán/uso terapéutico , Aminobutiratos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Puntaje de Propensión , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estados Unidos , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Since 2014, sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto®) is widely prescribed for heart failure. Despite neprilysin inhibition's benefits in heart failure, concerns about potential amyloid-beta (Aß) accumulation and Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk have persisted. This narrative review, a decade post-approval, evaluates the risk of amyloid pathology and neurocognitive disorders in long-term sacubitril/valsartan use. Clinical trials, real-world studies, and pharmacovigilance data do not indicate an increased risk of cognitive decline. In patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan blood-based amyloid biomarkers show perturbations, while neuroimaging biomarkers reveal no significant increase in amyloid load. Despite a theoretical risk of amyloid accumulation and AD under treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, current clinical data appears reassuring, and there is no signal indicating an increased risk of cognitive decline, but a perturbation of amyloid blood-based biomarkers, which implies great caution when interpreting biomarkers in this context.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Aminobutiratos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Compuestos de Bifenilo , Combinación de Medicamentos , Tetrazoles , Valsartán , Humanos , Aminobutiratos/uso terapéutico , Aminobutiratos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Tetrazoles/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/inducido químicamente , Péptidos beta-Amiloides/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/sangreRESUMEN
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a commonly seen clinical entity in the family physician's practice. This clinical review focuses on the pharmacologic management of chronic HFrEF. Special attention is paid to the classification of heart failure and the newest recommendations from the American Heart Association concerning the use of guideline-directed medical therapy. ß blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are discussed in detail. The new emphasis on sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2i's as therapies for HFrEF are reviewed, followed by a brief discussion of more advanced therapies and comorbidity management.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Aminobutiratos/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Compuestos de Bifenilo/uso terapéutico , Valsartán , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Tetrazoles/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
RENOPROTECTIVE TREATMENTS: RENIN-ANGIOTENSINALDOSTERONE SYSTEM BLOCKADE AND BEYOND. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) require both etiological and symptomatic treatments to slow renal function decline. Reductions of protein and salt intakes are required. Pharmacological treatments combines blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in most diabetic patients. The albumin creatinine ration (ACR) in morning spot urine samples is now a therapeutic target both in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD patients.
NÉPHROPROTECTION MÉDICAMENTEUSE : AU-DELÀ DU BLOCAGE DU SYSTÈME RÉNINE-ANGIOTENSINE. Au-delà du traitement étiologique éventuel d'une maladie rénale chronique (MRC), et du contrôle de l'ensemble des facteurs de risque vasculaire, un traitement symptomatique est nécessaire pour ralentir le déclin de la fonction rénale. La prise en charge diététique permet de limiter les apports en protéines et en sel. Le traitement pharmacologique comporte nécessairement une association d'un bloqueur du système rénine-angiotensine-aldostérone, le plus souvent un inhibiteur du co-transport sodiumglucose de type 2 (SGLT2i) et chez certains diabétiques un antagoniste des récepteurs des minéralocorticoïdes (ARM). Le rapport albuminurie/créatininurie (RAC) sur un échantillon d'urine devient une cible thérapeutique aussi bien chez les non-diabétiques que chez les diabétiques.