RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To investigate a correlation between cervical ripening, the immunological features and the hemodynamic characteristics of the cervix during the preparation for vaginal labor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: We examined 75 pregnant women at different gestational age. General clinical and immunological studies were conducted in order to check serum concentration of cytokines IL-6, IL-1ß, and TNF-α. Ultrasound and Doppler study were used to determine resistance index and systolic-diastolic ratio of blood flow in the common uterine artery as well as the descending and ascending parts and cervical stromal arteries. RESULTS: Results: Pregnant women with high cervical ripening score had high concentrations of the major proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α). Analysis of the of the cervical blood flow indicators of the studied groups showed significant differences in the indices of vascular resistance in the vessels that feed the cervix. Our data showed a significant correlation between the cervix ripening and both the serum levels of the studied cytokines and the level of peripheral vascular resistance indices in the common uterine arteries of the cervix, and the blood flow indices in the cervical stromal vessels. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Our study shows that the process of preparing the woman's body for labor is associated with immunological adjustment and increased hemodynamics of the cervix. We report that cervical ripening is associated with the immunological components and hemodynamic parameters of the cervix at late-stage pregnancy. Measuring cervix ripening and the accompanied changes in cytokine levels and hemodynamic parameters will form a more accurate assessment of birth preparedness and labor complications.

Asunto(s)

Cuello del Útero , Mujeres Embarazadas , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuello del Útero/fisiología , Maduración Cervical , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Interleucina-6 , Citocinas , Hemodinámica

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Breech delivery has been reported to be associated with a high incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate pattern leading to neonatal asphyxia. In this study, we examined the effect of the presence of nuchal cords on perinatal outcomes of vaginal breech labor. METHODS: We reviewed the obstetric records of all singleton breech labor cases at the Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital between 1999 and 2011. Of the 266 breech labor cases in singleton pregnancies, the presence of nuchal cords was recognized in 50 cases (18.8%) on neonatal findings at birth. We compared the clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes between the breech labor cases with and without nuchal cords. A chi-square test was used for categorical data, and a p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: It was found that the incidence of fetal heart rate abnormality during breech labor or neonatal asphyxia in the deliveries with nuchal cords was not significantly different from that in those without nuchal cords. Also, there was no significant difference in the rate of emergent caesarean delivery between the two labors with and without nuchal cords. CONCLUSION: The current results suggest that the presence of nuchal cords may not be associated with perinatal outcomes. Our results may become one of several pieces of evidence leading to the alleviation of anxiety in pregnant women with breech presentation and fetal nuchal cords.

RESUMEN

Studying quasi-experimental data from French hospitals from 2010 to 2013, we test the effects of a substantial diagnosis-related group (DRG) tariff refinement that occurred in 2012, designed to reduce financial risks of French maternity wards. To estimate the resulting DRG incentives with regard to the choice between scheduled C-sections and other modes of child delivery, we predict, based on pre-admission patient characteristics, the probability of each possible child delivery outcome and calculate expected differences in associated tariffs. Using patient-level administrative data, we find that introducing additional severity levels and clinical factors into the reimbursement algorithm had no significant effect on the probability of a scheduled C-section being performed. The results are robust to multiple formulations of DRG financial incentives. Our paper is the first study that focuses on the consequences of a DRG refinement in obstetrics and develops a probabilistic approach suitable for measuring the expected effects of DRG fee incentives in the presence of multiple tariff groups.

Asunto(s)

Parto Obstétrico , Hospitales , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Francia

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In many countries, vaginal breech labor at term is an option in selected cases. However, the safety of vaginal breech labor in preterm is still unclear. Therefore our study aimed to evaluate the safety of vaginal breech labor in late preterm deliveries. DESIGN: A retrospective register-based study. SETTING: Maternity hospitals in Finland, 2004-2017. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included 762 preterm breech deliveries at 32 + 0-36 + 6 gestational weeks according to the mode of delivery, 535 (70.2%) of them were born vaginally in breech presentation, and 227 (29.8%) were delivered by non-urgent cesarean section. METHODS: The study compared short-term neonatal adverse outcomes of singleton vaginal breech deliveries with non-urgent cesarean deliveries at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks of gestation. An odd ratio with 95% confidence intervals was calculated to estimate the relative risk of adverse outcomes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Neonatal death, an arterial umbilical pH below seven, a five-minute Apgar score below four and seven, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal intubation, neonatal antibiotic therapy, neonatal birth trauma, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal convulsions, cerebral ischemia, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, congenital hypotonia, and a composite of severe adverse outcomes. RESULTS: A five-minute Apgar scores below seven were increased in vaginal breech labor at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks of gestation compared to non-urgent cesarean sections (aOR 2.48, 95% CI 1.08-5.59). Neonatal antibiotic therapy, the admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome were decreased after vaginal breech labor compared to the outcomes of non-urgent cesarean section (neonatal antibiotic therapy aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.89; neonatal NICU admission aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.68; respiratory distress syndrome aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.48). CONCLUSION: Vaginal breech labor at 32 + 0-36 + 6 gestational weeks does not increase severe neonatal short-term morbidity or mortality compared to cesarean section.

Asunto(s)

Presentación de Nalgas , Cesárea , Presentación de Nalgas/epidemiología , Presentación de Nalgas/terapia , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at the age of four after an attempted vaginal delivery according to the fetal presentation in birth. METHODS: This retrospective record linkage study evaluated the risks of cerebral palsy, epilepsy, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and speech, visual, and auditory disabilities among preterm children born after an attempted vaginal breech delivery. The control group comprised children born in a cephalic presentation at the same gestational age. This study included 23 803 singleton deliveries at gestational weeks 24 + 0-36 + 6 between 2004 and 2014. RESULTS: From 1629 women that underwent a trial of vaginal breech delivery, 1122 (66.3%) were converted to emergency cesarean sections. At extremely preterm and very preterm gestations (weeks 24 + 0-31 + 6), no association between a trial of vaginal breech delivery and neurodevelopmental delay occurred. At gestational weeks 32 + 0-36 + 6, the risks of visual disability (aOR 1.67, CI 1.07-2.60) and autism spectrum disorders (aOR 2.28, CI 1.14-4.56) were increased after an attempted vaginal breech delivery as compared to vaginal cephalic delivery. CONCLUSION: A trial of vaginal breech delivery at extremely preterm and very preterm gestations appears not to increase the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at the age of four. In moderate to late preterm births, a trial of vaginal breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of visual impairment and autism spectrum disorders compared to children born in cephalic presentation. A trial of vaginal preterm breech delivery requires distinctive consideration and careful patient selection.

Asunto(s)

Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Presentación de Nalgas , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/etiología , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Niño , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the risk factors for adverse outcomes in attempted vaginal preterm breech deliveries. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study, including 2312 preterm breech deliveries (24 + 0 to 36 + 6 gestational weeks) from 2004 to 2018 in Finland. The preterm breech fetuses with adverse outcomes born vaginally or by emergency cesarean section were compared with the fetuses without adverse outcomes with the same gestational age. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the risk factors for adverse outcomes (umbilical arterial pH below 7, 5-min Apgar score below 4, intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death < 28 days of age). RESULTS: Adverse outcome in vaginal preterm breech delivery was associated with maternal obesity (aOR 32.19, CI 2.97-348.65), smoking (aOR 2.29, CI 1.12-4.72), congenital anomalies (aOR 4.50, 1.56-12.96), preterm premature rupture of membranes (aOR 1.87, CI 1.00-3.49), oligohydramnios (28-32 weeks of gestation: aOR 6.50, CI 2.00-21.11, 33-36 weeks of gestation: aOR 19.06, CI 7.15-50.85), epidural anesthesia in vaginal birth (aOR 2.44, CI 1.19-5.01), and fetal growth below the second standard deviation (28-32 weeks of gestation: aOR 5.89, CI 1.00-34.74, 33-36 weeks of gestation: aOR 12.27, CI 2.81-53.66). CONCLUSION: The study shows that for each subcategory of preterm birth, there are different risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes in planned vaginal breech delivery. Due to the extraordinary increased risk of adverse outcomes, we would recommend a planned cesarean section in very preterm breech presentation (28 + 0 to 32 + 6 weeks) with severe maternal obesity, oligohydramnios, or fetal growth restriction and in moderate to late preterm breech presentation (33 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks) with oligohydramnios or fetal growth restriction.

Asunto(s)

Presentación de Nalgas/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Anestesia Epidural , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/etiología , Muerte Perinatal , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Mortinato/epidemiología , Adulto Joven

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The opinions of Brazilian women regarding vaginal delivery and cesarean sections was studied. METHODS: Six hundred and fifty-six women who had given birth in seven hospitals in São Paulo and Pernambuco, using the Public Health Service, were interviewed. The opinions of women who had delivered only by cesarean section was compared with those of women who had had at least one vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Significantly more women who had experienced at least one vaginal delivery considered this to be the best way of giving birth (90.4% vs. 75.9% among C-section-only women). Similar proportions in both groups (45.5% and 42.8%) stated that vaginal labor is better because it causes less pain and suffering for the woman. Significantly more women who had experienced a vaginal labor (47.1% vs. 30.3%) reported that it had no disadvantage. More women who had only had cesarean sections referred not having contractions/pain as an advantage of this method (56.7% vs. 41.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Apparently, pain and women's perception of pain were the characteristics which differentiated women with history of vaginal delivery from those with cesarean sections in the sample studied. However, the opinion that vaginal delivery is better than cesarean section was expressed independently of the recognition that pain could be its main disadvantage.