RESUMEN

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects around 35% of adult women and has a significant impact on quality of life. A single incision sling (SIS), such as Altis®, was introduced to improve original slings and avoid complications. The present study aimed to evaluate the SIS Altis® subjective and objective cure rates of women with SUI, mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), recurrent SUI, and SUI with concomitant prolapse and report its complications from one single medical center. Methodology: A retrospective cohort, unsponsored study was conducted at the Jordan University Hospital. All women patients were treated with the SIS Altis® procedure, and prolapse procedures were also completed as necessary. The chi square analysis for the cure rates was conducted between the subgroups. Results: From June 2016 to June 2019, 111 women patients with a mean age of 48.0 ± 11.3 years underwent a SIS Altis® procedure. The overall outcome resulted in 81% and 85% of patients being subjectively and objectively cured. The subjectively cured MUI patients were significantly fewer than SUI patients (70% versus 86%, p < 0.05), and patients with recurrent SUI had significantly lower rates (56% for subjective and objective cure rates; p < 0.01 and 0.001). Of the 44 patients who underwent SIS Altis® and concomitant vaginal repair surgery, no significant differences in subjective and objective cure rates were observed. Only 2.7% of women had mild pain, 2.7% had vaginal tape erosion, and 9% had to be re-operated on. Conclusions: The Altis® procedure is effective in women who suffer from SUI for a 19-month follow-up period. However, recurrent SUI patients had lower subjective and objective cure rates than primary SUI patients. Further research is needed with a larger sample size in a prospective study design to determine the effectiveness of single SIS in patients with recurrent SUI.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The evidence basis for therapy selection in women who have failed primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery is limited. The ICI-RS group discussed the available data at its meeting in June 2023, particularly the anatomical characteristics as assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) modalities, functional characteristics associated with storage and voiding urodynamic assessment, as well as the patient characteristics that might influence outcomes. This paper summarizes the evidence base that supported these discussions and offers the basis for research proposals for future groups. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed, and the data is presented. Research questions are based on the knowledge gaps highlighted. RESULTS: Possible MRI parameters that may influence outcomes were striated urethral sphincter volume, bladder and proximal urethral funneling, pubo-urethral ligament integrity, distance of the bladder neck below the pubococcygeal line, posterior urethra-vesical angle, and bladder neck to levator ani distance. US parameters included sling distance to the urethral lumen and pubis, sling position, bladder neck mobility, and lateral arm asymmetry, twisting, or curling. Urodynamic parameters included detrusor overactivity, Valsalva leak point pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure, and bladder outlet obstruction. Important patient parameters included body mass index, age, and previous interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying and quantifying causative factors in patients with recurrent SUI, that allow clinicians to modify subsequent treatment choices and techniques may help reduce treatment failure and complications. Formulating algorithms is the next step in optimizing patient counseling, surgical selection, and healthcare allocation.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling placement is not uncommon. Treatment options include placement of a second midurethral sling, autologous fascial sling, retropubic urethropexy, or urethral bulking. Shortening of the sling by plication has also been suggested as an alternative option which may reduce operative time, cost, risk of trocar injury, and mesh burden. In this video, we aimed to demonstrate our technique and experience on sling plication. METHODS: The key steps of the procedure are as follows: (1) suburethral incision and sharp dissection to identify the sling; (2) mobilization of the suburethral portion of the sling; (3) plication with two interrupted, horizontal sutures placed 1 cm laterally on each side; (4) application of upward pressure while tying the sutures and tensioning the sling. In our experience, we have found this technique to be most successful for retropubic slings, especially when performed within 2-12 weeks of the initial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Sling plication is an effective and minimally invasive option to treat persistent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling procedures. It avoids additional mesh burden or more invasive retropubic surgery and should be offered as a treatment option for appropriately counseled patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with mid-urethral sling (MUS) is considered to have a high success rate. However, between 5% and 20% of MUS fail, with inadequate surgical implantation being a possible cause of SUI persistence or recurrence. Misplacement of a MUS can be determined by pelvic floor ultrasound (PF-US). The aim of this study was to investigate the role of PF-US in patients with persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms after MUS surgery for SUI with a midterm follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A historical cohort study including women undergoing MUS surgery for SUI between 2013 and 2015 was designed. The primary outcome was to correlate the sonographic parameters of MUS with SUI cure (negative International Continence Society-Uniform Cough Stress Test, Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form < 5 points and no symptoms of SUI), at 5 years postsurgery. Secondary outcomes were changes of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and symptoms of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) at 1 and 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients (80 transobturator-MUS, 7 retropubic-MUS) were included. At 5 years all patients referred improvement of UI and objective cure of SUI was demonstrated in 81.2%. The MUS was sonographically correct in 67 (98.5%) of the 68 patients with cure of SUI. The MUS was considered incorrectly placed in only 4 (28.6%) of the 14 patients with noncured SUI. MUCP decreased from 61.9 to 48.8 cmH2 O at 5 years of follow-up (p < 0.01) and up to 53% of women had UUI symptoms after surgery, with a nonsignificant decrease compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: Patients cured of SUI had sonographically correct MUS by PF-US. Less than one-third of cases of SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS surgery could be explained by a sonographically incorrect sling. Low urethral resistance and/or UUI symptoms could help to explain the remaining failures. Complete functional and anatomic studies, including urodynamics and PF-US, should be performed before deciding on the next management strategy in patients with SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) experience urine leakage with physical activity. Currently, the interventional treatments for SUI are surgical, or endoscopic bulking injection(s). However, these procedures are not always successful, and symptoms can persist or come back after treatment, categorised as recurrent SUI. There are longstanding symptoms and distress associated with a failed primary treatment, and currently, there is no consensus on how best to treat women with recurrent, or persistent, SUI. METHODS: A two-arm trial, set in at least 20 National Health Service (NHS) urology and urogynaecology referral units in the UK, randomising 250 adult women with recurrent or persistent SUI 1:1 to receive either an endoscopic intervention (endoscopic bulking injections) or a standard NHS surgical intervention, currently colposuspension, autologous fascial sling or artificial urinary sphincter. The aim of the trial is to determine whether surgical treatment is superior to endoscopic bulking injections in terms of symptom severity at 1 year after randomisation. This primary outcome will be measured using the patient-reported International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence - Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF). Secondary outcomes include assessment of longer-term clinical impact, improvement of symptoms, safety, operative assessments, sexual function, cost-effectiveness and an evaluation of patients' and clinicians' views and experiences of the interventions. DISCUSSION: There is a lack of high-quality, randomised, scientific evidence for which treatment is best for women presenting with recurrent SUI. The PURSUIT study will benefit healthcare professionals and patients and provide robust evidence to guide further treatment and improve symptoms and quality of life for women with this condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) registry ISRCTN12201059. Registered on 09 January 2020.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Recurrent stress urinary incontinence (rSUI) represents a major challenge for most clinicians as there is little evidence in the literature on the best option after sling failure. The objective of this study is to summarise the findings on the use of urethral bulking agents (UBAs) in the management of rSUI after the failure of a mid-urethral sling (MUSs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and selected eleven publications for inclusion in the analysis. We found that the overall cure and improvement rate ranged from 64% to 85% in the included studies, with a pooled value of 75%, compared with pooled failure and re-operation rates of 32% (95% CI: 22%-43%) and 25% (95% CI: 17%-34%), respectively. The I2 test indicated significant statistical heterogeneity among the studies in relation to all the outcome measures; however, no risk of publication bias was found. To explore this heterogeneity in more depth, we performed a sub-group analysis of the two most commonly used bulking agents (Bulkamid and Macroplastique). The pooled values of the cure and improvement rate were 84% (95% CI: 77.0%-90.0%) and 80% (95% CI: 74.0%-85.0%) for Macroplastique and Bulkamid, respectively. We did not find significant heterogeneity or significant differences in the outcome measures in either group. For the first time in literature, our study provides an insight into the use of UBAs after failed MUSs. Although the results seem very promising, future studies with shared protocols are needed in order to recommend the use of UBAs in the treatment of recurrent cases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy and safety of salvage autologous pubovaginal sling (PVS) placement after a two or more failed synthetic midurethral sling. METHODS: Women undergoing autologous PVS placement for two or more failed synthetic MUS between 2008 and 2019 were identified. Those patients were conducted a follow-up examination. Outcomes of surgery were assessed using the cough stress test with a full bladder and symptom questionnaire, including Incontinence Visual Analogue Scale (I-VAS) and Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire. Surgical results were categorized into three classes: cured, improved, and failed. Secondary measures included patients' recommendation of autologous fascial sling (AFS). RESULTS: A total of 18 eligible patients met the criteria, of whom median age at surgery was 67 (52-74) years with a median follow-up of 80 (12-144) months. Preoperatively, all patients were identified by urodynamic test with Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) < 60 cmH2O. All patients had concomitant part sling excision combined with urethrolysis at the salvage operation. At the follow-up examination, sixteen in eighteen (88.89%) patients were cured and improved. The postoperative total score and each individual domain in I-QOL improved significantly compared with the baseline (p < 0.001). Postoperative I-VAS was significantly lower than preoperative (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 7.8 ± 2.2, p < 0.001). A total of 16 patients (88.89%) recommended the AFS to others. Neither perioperative blood transfusions nor other complications above Clavien level 3 were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that autologous PVS is effective and safe in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after two or more failed synthetic MUS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to evaluate the results of a readjustable sling (Remeex® system) among a selected group of women with complex stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with sonographic hypomobile urethra and assessing failure-related risk factors. METHODS: Observational, longitudinal, prospective cohort study, including patients who underwent surgery with the Remeex® system. The primary outcome was a binary outcome in change of one level or more of the severity of urinary incontinence symptoms according to the intervals of the Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) score (mild, moderate, severe and very severe). Secondary outcomes were postsurgical complications, absolute ICIQ-UI-SF, 24-h pad weight test (24-h PT), urodynamic SUI and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score to evaluate subjective success. RESULTS: Among 120 women included, after surgery we found a 70% subjective success rate, a 76.7% decrease of urinary incontinence severity and a mean reduction of the 24-h PT of 109.6 ± 291.4 g. Women with post-surgical decreased severity of incontinence had lower mean body mass index (BMI) and 24-h PT than those without incontinence severity changes with statistically significant differences (p = 0.028 and p = 0.027, respectively). A logistic regression model demonstrated that a 1-point increase of BMI increased the risk of persistence of incontinence severity after surgery by 19% (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.01-1.41; p = 0.040), and an increase of 10 g in the pre-surgical 24-h PT represented a 3% rise of the aforementioned risk (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with complex SUI and sonographic hypomobile urethra, use of a readjustable sling (Remeex® system) led to improvement of SUI. Patients with a greater BMI and pre-surgical 24-h PT showed worse results after surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of management and follow-up practices in repeat retropubic mid-urethral synthetic sling (MUS) procedure after transobturator tape/tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TOT/TVT-O) failure, and to clarify the possible etiology of recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Methods: The charts of all women patients who underwent tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) slings after previous failed transobturator MUS procedures between February 2012 and November 2018 at a single center were reviewed retrospectively. The transperineal ultrasound was performed to assess the pre-operative or post-operative urethral mobility and location of the slings. Furthermore, some essential evaluations were also made, mainly including medical history, physical examination, 1 h pad test, and urodynamic study. Finally, primary outcomes were evaluated according to the above items at 3, 6, and 12 months after the second operation, respectively. Results: Thirty-five patients were included in the primary transobturator MUS sling procedure. At the 6 months follow-up, 32 (91.42%) patients were socially continent and negative in 1 h pad test. The transperineal ultrasound measurement results revealed that the bladder neck descent (BND) values were significantly decreased after the repeat sling operation, and better urinary continence function was observed according to the post-operative urodynamic study. Multifactorial etiologies resulted in recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI), including poor surgical technique, inadequate sling tension when treating ISD, and inappropriate sling position. Then the detail of the surgical procedure varied with the results of pre-operative evaluations, affecting the validity of the second sling. Conclusion: Recurrent SUI has resulted from multi factors, pre-operative urodynamic study and transperineal ultrasound might be valuable tools to guide repeat sling operation and predict post-operative outcomes. A repeat TVT procedure may be regarded as a remedial measure for a failed transobturator MUS operation.

RESUMEN

This case presents the work-up and management of a patient requesting surgical intervention for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after previous excision of a portion of her midurethral sling because of mesh exposure. Four international experts provide their approach to this complex case. There is little consensus regarding further surgery in a patient who has required mesh excision. Treatment by fascial sling was commonly considered and the literature review outlines the pros and cons of autologous fascia versus donor fascia for this specific case.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Limited evidence guides operative technique in primary midurethral sling (MUS) lysis or excision at the time of repeat sling placement for persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Our objective is to compare subjective improvement in patients undergoing repeat MUS placement with and without concurrent primary sling lysis or removal. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study with a prospective survey of patients who underwent two MUS placements for SUI at a single institution from January 1996 to December 2015. After patient identification, the electronic record was queried for demographic and perioperative data. Subjects then completed the Urogenital Distress Index, (UDI-6), Incontinence Severity Index (ISI), and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). Subjects were also asked if they would choose to undergo repeat MUS surgery again. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included. 17 out of 61 (28%) underwent concomitant primary sling lysis or excision, and 44 out of 61 (72%) did not. Fifty-seven percent (n = 35) completed the survey. Of the respondents, the median ISI score was 4 (1-8), with no difference between groups; 14 out of 35 (40%) reported the presence of bothersome urge incontinence, 11 out of 35 (31%) reported bothersome stress urinary incontinence, and 8 out of 35 (23%) reported symptoms of voiding dysfunction, with no difference between groups. 57% of patients (20 out of 35) would undergo repeat MUS placement again. CONCLUSIONS: In a small cohort, concurrent excision of the primary sling at the time of repeat MUS did not improve subjective outcomes. Many patients reported urinary urgency and voiding symptoms, and only about half of patients would choose to undergo the surgery again if given the choice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine long-term surgical outcomes of salvage autologous fascial sling placement after a failed synthetic midurethral sling. METHODS: Women who had undergone autologous fascial sling placement without concomitant pelvic surgery for a failed synthetic midurethral sling utilizing mesh with a minimum follow up of 36 months were identified. Charts were reviewed, and patients were contacted by telephone. Success was determined by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. Secondary measures included the Incontinence Severity Index questionnaire, patient recommendation of the autologous fascial sling and need for further incontinence surgery. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients met the criteria, and 21 were successfully contacted. Of those contacted, the median age at surgery was 67 years (range 53-81 years) and at the time of the survey was 75 years (range 63-84 years) with median follow up of 74 months (range 36-127 years). Preoperatively, 12 patients (57.1%) had urethral hypermobility and 13 patients (61.9%) had mixed urinary incontinence. Eight patients (38.1%) had concomitant sling excision with five of those combined with urethrolysis at the time of the salvage operation. Patient Global Impression of Improvement success was noted in 16 patients (76.2%). A total of 11 patients (52.4%) were dry or had slight incontinence by the Incontinence Severity Index. One patient required additional anti-incontinence surgery (4.8%). A total of 18 patients (85.7%) recommended the autologous fascial sling. No statistical impact was noted with sling excision (P = 0.62), mixed urinary incontinence (P = 0.61), age at surgery (P = 0.23), age at follow up (P = 0.15), length of follow up (P = 0.71) or first surgery type (transobturator tape vs retropubic; P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Autologous fascial sling provides reasonable long-term success as a salvage operation for failed midurethral slings.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: To examine treatment options selected for recurrent stress urinary incontinence (rSUI) in follow-up after Burch, autologous fascial and synthetic midurethral sling (MUS) procedures. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the SISTER and ToMUS trials of participants who underwent primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment (without prior SUI surgery or concomitant procedures). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, retreatment-free survival rates by initial surgical procedure were compared. Mean MESA (Medical Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging) stress index was also compared between those retreated for rSUI compared to those not retreated. RESULTS: Half of the women in the SISTEr trial met inclusion criteria for this analysis (329/655, 174 Burch and 155 fascial sling), as did 444/597 (74%) of subjects in ToMUS (221 transobturator midurethral sling (TMUS), and 223 retropubic midurethral sling (RMUS). Types of surgical retreatment included autologous fascial sling (19), synthetic sling (1), and bulking agent (18). Five-year retreatment free survival rates (and standard errors) were 87% (3%), 96% (2%), 97% (1%), and 99% (0.7%) for Burch, autologous fascial sling, TMUS, and RMUS groups respectively (P < 0.0001). For all index surgery groups, the mean MESA stress index at last visit prior to retreatment for those retreated (n = 23) was significantly higher than mean MESA stress index at last visit for those not retreated (n = 645) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In these cohorts, 6% of women after standard anti-incontinence procedures were retreated within 5 years, mostly with injection therapy or autologous fascial sling. Not all women with rSUI chose surgical retreatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although the surgical treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has been well studied, the optimal treatment of persistent or recurrent SUI represents a significant challenge to the surgeon, and there are limited relevant published data. The aim of this study was to document outcome data for various surgical techniques used at our centre for the treatment of recurrent SUI, and to assess the immediate and long-term complications associated with these procedures. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed the outcome of the laparoscopic two-team sling procedure, tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) insertion, and transobturator tape (TOT) insertion in the treatment of recurrent SUI in women. Data collected included patient demographics, urodynamic data, postoperative subjective cure and objective cure (negative cough stress test), and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Forty-six women with recurrent SUI were included in the study: 24 had had laparoscopic two-team sling procedures, 15 had had TVT insertion, and 7 had had TOT insertion. For each procedure, objective cure rates were 91.7%, 73.3%, and 85.7%, respectively, and subjective cure rates were 79.2%, 60%, and 57.1% respectively. In the laparoscopic two-team sling group, one woman developed an infected hematoma and one required surgery for a small bowel obstruction. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic two-team sling procedure or TVT or TOT insertion may be used in experienced hands for surgical management of patients with recurrent stress urinary incontinence. We found no statistically significant differences in outcomes between the three groups, possibly because of the small sample size. Larger sample size and longer follow-up within prospective randomized trials are warranted to identify any possible differences.

Objectif : Bien que la prise en charge chirurgicale de l'incontinence urinaire à l'effort primaire (IUE) ait été bien étudiée, la prise en charge optimale de l'IUE persistante ou récurrente constitue un défi considérable pour le chirurgien et les données publiées pertinentes sont limitées. Cette étude avait pour but de documenter les données quant aux issues de diverses techniques chirurgicales utilisées dans notre centre pour la prise en charge de l'IUE récurrente, ainsi que d'évaluer les complications immédiates et à long terme étant associées à ces interventions. Méthodes : Cette étude rétrospective a évalué l'issue de l'intervention laparoscopique de fronde à deux équipes, de l'insertion d'une bandelette vaginale sans tension (TVT) et de l'insertion d'une bandelette transobturatrice (TOT) dans la prise en charge de l'IUE récurrente chez des femmes. Parmi les données recueillies, on trouvait les caractéristiques démographiques des patientes, les données urodynamiques, la guérison postopératoire subjective et la guérison objective (test à la toux négatif), ainsi que les complications peropératoires et postopératoires. Résultats : Quarante-six femmes présentant une IUE récurrente ont été admises à l'étude : 24 d'entre elles ont subi une intervention laparoscopique de fronde à deux équipes, 15 ont subi une insertion de TVT et 7 ont subi une insertion de TOT. Les taux de guérison objective ont été de 91,7 %, de 73,3 % et de 85,7 %, respectivement, tandis que les taux de guérison subjective ont été de 79,2 %, de 60 % et de 57,1 %, respectivement. Au sein du groupe « intervention laparoscopique de fronde à deux équipes ¼, une des participantes en est venue à présenter un hématome infecté, tandis qu'une autre a nécessité une chirurgie en raison d'une occlusion de l'intestin grêle. Conclusion : L'intervention laparoscopique de fronde à deux équipes ou l'insertion d'une TVT ou d'une TOT peuvent être utilisées par des praticiens expérimentés pour assurer la prise en charge chirurgicale des patientes qui présentent une incontinence urinaire à l'effort récurrente. Nous n'avons constaté aucune différence significative sur le plan statistique en matière d'issues entre ces trois groupes, et ce, peut-être en raison de la faible envergure de l'échantillon. La tenue d'essais randomisés prospectifs comptant des échantillons de plus grande envergure et des suivis prolongés s'avère justifiée aux fins de l'identification de toute différence possible.

Asunto(s)