RESUMEN

Background: Although hands-on simulation plays a valuable role in procedural training, there are limited tools available to teach pediatric flexible bronchoscopy (PFB). Fellowship programs rely on patient encounters, with inherent risk, or high-cost virtual reality simulators that may not be widely available and create education inequalities. Objective: Our objective was to study the educational value and transferability of a novel, low-cost, three-dimensional-printed pediatric airway model (3D-AM) for PFB training. Our central hypothesis was that the 3D-AM would have high educational value and would be easily transferrable to learners at different teaching hospitals. Methods: The 3D-AM was designed to teach technical bronchoscopy skills, airway anatomy, airway pathology, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). The curriculum was offered to incoming fellows in pediatric pulmonology, pediatric surgery, and pediatric critical care across three different teaching institutions. After course completion, each participant assessed the simulation model(s) with a 5-point Likert scale across six domains: physical attributes, realism of experience, ability to perform tasks, value, relevance, and global impression. The expert instructors assessed the learners' competency using a modified version of the Bronchoscopy Skills and Tasks Assessment Tool. Results: A total of 14 incoming fellows participated in the course. The mean scores for the 3D-AM across all six domains and across the three institutions was between 4 and 5, suggesting that learners generally had a favorable impression and a similar experience across different institutions. All learners "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the course was a valuable use of their time, helped teach technical skills and airway anatomy, and would be useful for extra training during fellowship. Most of the learners correctly identified anatomy, bronchomalacia, and performed a BAL. Wall trauma was observed in 36% of learners. Conclusion: The utility, low cost, and transferability of this model may create opportunities for PFB training across different institutions despite resource limitations in the United States and abroad.

RESUMEN

Objective:To explore the significance of laparoscopic virtual reality simulation training by analyzing the learning curve of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among young general surgeons who had participated in laparoscopic skills training at our hospital.Methods:Fifty young surgeons were divided into two groups, with the intervention group participating in virtual reality simulation training and the control group participating in traditional laparoscopic clinical training. After completion of the training, 30 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed under the supervision of highly qualified surgeons with extensive laparoscopic experience. CUSUM analysis was applied to plot the trainees' surgical learning curve based on the completion rate, surgical score and operative time. " x" is the number of surgical cases and " k" is the slope. The value of x when k=0 was calculated and the surgical learning curves and intraoperative scores of the 2 groups of trainees were compared. SPSS 23.00 was performed for t-test and Chi-square test. Results:The intervention and control groups crossed the surgical learning curve at x=19.24±0.39 and x=21.72±0.73 respectively, with significant differences ( P<0.01); the intervention and control groups scored (10.82±2.73) and (9.71±2.69) for gallbladder exposure ( t=4.61, P<0.01), (12.59±3.12) and (8.87±2.99) for gallbladder dissection triangle ( t=6.21, P<0.01), and (10.69±3.38) and (8.80±3.55) for gallbladder dissection ( t=3.10, P<0.01). Conclusions:Virtual reality simulation training can facilitate the translation of basic laparoscopic training skills into clinical skills and can promote the growth of young general surgeons.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is increased learner competition for a shrinking pool of procedural training opportunities and indications in pediatrics. This study aimed to describe pediatric residency program directors' (PDs) and chief residents' (CRs) perspectives about whether procedural requirements for pediatric residents should be reformed and individualized. METHODS: This was a survey-based, mixed methods study of PDs and CRs affiliated with the Association of Pediatric Program Directors (APPD). We used descriptive statistics to analyze demographics and perspectives, logistic regressions to examine individual and program factors, and thematic analysis for qualitative data. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent (95/203) of PDs and 16% (64/392) of CRs responded, representing APPD membership across program setting, size, and region (average standard mean deviation 0.28). Ninety-one percent of PD respondents considered one or more of the current Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) required procedures nonessential; 74% favored individualizing procedural training. CR responses mirrored PD responses. Program size, setting, and access to procedural teams did not significantly associate with likelihood to favor individualization. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of PD and CR respondents believe that current ACGME procedures should be reformed and individualized to future career goals. This change could allow maximization of limited time in residency in this era of decreased opportunity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives In 2014, the Council of Academic Family Medicine released recommendations for the education of family medicine residents in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) curricula for Family Medicine Residency programs. One barrier to resident education in POCUS is the lack of access to equipment. This pilot study evaluates whether introducing didactic education on POCUS within a Family Medicine Residency program, with limited access to equipment, correlated with increased utilization of ultrasound by residents. Methods Sixteen family medicine residents participated in the intervention, consisting of a four-hour didactic ultrasound session. Resident confidence in POCUS was evaluated utilizing a Likert scale. Resident utilization of POCUS in a clinical setting was also evaluated by review and analysis of resident procedure logs in the New Innovations database. Results The resident confidence in all skills increased immediately after the completion of the didactic teaching session. Residents demonstrated improved confidence in needle guidance immediately and six weeks after the session (p < 0.001). A review of resident activity two years after the intervention revealed a 9.6% increase in the proportion of resident ultrasounds performed compared to the academic year before the intervention. Conclusions Access to equipment is an ongoing barrier to Family Medicine Residency programs in providing education on POCUS. The results of this study indicate that introducing the basics of POCUS via a didactic teaching session not only increased resident confidence in basic ultrasound but also correlated with increased utilization of POCUS. This increased utilization occurred despite residents not having access to ultrasound in their home clinics.

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on medical education and gastroenterology fellowship training. As a result of the pandemic, a trainee's physical safety, mental health and wellness, clinical and procedural training, and educational opportunities were all potentially altered. Changes necessitated at the start of the pandemic were different than those needed further along in the pandemic course. Fellowship programs were required to modify policies and adapt to changes rapidly to advocate for their trainees and ensure quality education. Much of COVID-19's initial impact on education - decreased endoscopic procedures and the loss of educational conferences - has largely returned to pre-pandemic form. However, other changes made during the pandemic have persisted and likely will continue in the future. This includes a virtual interview format for fellowship matches, a virtual option for many national conferences, and an expansion of simulation training. This article reviews the impact that COVID-19 had on medical education with a specific focus on gastroenterology fellowship. The paper highlights the initial impact of COVID-19, the lingering effects, and discusses the areas needed for further research to best understand the total impact COVID-19 had on our trainees' education.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of simulation-based training for skill acquisition is widely recognized. However, the impact of simulation-based procedural training (SBPT) on pre-clerkship medical students and the retention of procedural skills learned through this modality are rarely investigated. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted among pre-clerkship medical students. Learners underwent SBPT in venipuncture in the skills laboratory. Assessments were conducted at two main points: 1) immediate assessment following the training and 2) delayed assessment one year after training. Learner self-assessments, independent assessor assessments for procedural competency, and communication skills assessments were conducted in both instances. The students were assessed for their competency in performing venipuncture by an independent assessor immediately following the training in the simulated setting and one-year post-training in the clinical setting, using the Integrated Procedural Protocol Instrument (IPPI). The student's communication skills were assessed by standardized patients (SP) and actual patients in the simulated and clinical settings, respectively, using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). RESULTS: Fifty-five pre-clerkship medical students were recruited for the study. A significant increase was observed in self-confidence [mean: 2.89 SD (Standard Deviation) (0.69)] and self-perceived competency [mean: 2.42 SD (0.57)] in performing venipuncture, which further improved at the delayed assessment conducted in the clinical setting (p < 0.001). Similarly, the IPPI ratings showed an improvement [immediate assessment: mean: 2.25 SD (1.62); delayed assessment: mean: 2.78 SD (0.53); p < 0.01] in venipuncture skills when assessed by an independent assessor blinded to the study design. A significant difference (p < 0.01) was also observed in doctor-patient communication when evaluated by SPs [mean: 2.49 SD (0.57)] and patients [mean: 3.76 SD (0.74)]. CONCLUSION: Simulation-based venipuncture training enabled students to perform the procedure with confidence and technical accuracy. Improved rating scores received at a one-year interval denote the impact of clinical training on skills acquisition. The durability of skills learned via SBPT needs to be further investigated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Simulation is accepted as an effective method of learning procedural skills. However, the translational outcomes of skills acquired through simulation still warrants investigation. We designed this study to assess if skills laboratory training in addition to bedside learning (intervention group [IG]) would provide better learning results than bedside learning alone (control group [CG]) in the context of venipuncture training. This prospective, cluster-randomized, single-blind study took place at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. Seventeen clusters of second-year medical students were randomly assigned to either IG or CG. The IG trained on venipuncture in the skills laboratory, receiving instruction after modified Payton's Four Step Method. Following the training, students of both IG and CG underwent bedside learning for one month. Afterward, students of both groups performed venipuncture on actual patients in a clinical setting. An independent, blinded assessor scored students' performance using the Integrated Procedural Protocol Instrument (IPPI) and a checklist. Patients assessed students' performance with the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Eight and nine clusters were randomized to the intervention and control groups, respectively. IG completed significantly more single steps of the procedure correctly (IG: 19.36 ± 3.87 for checklist items; CG: 15.57 ± 4.95; p < 0.001). IG also scored significantly better on IPPI ratings (median: IG: 27 (12) vs. CG: 21 (8); p < 0.001). Rated by patients, students' communication skills did not significantly differ between the two groups. Simulation-based venipuncture training enabled students to perform the procedure on actual patients with a higher technical accuracy than students who learned venipuncture at the bedside. Students were able to transfer the skills acquired through venipuncture training at the skill laboratory to the bedside.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Opportunities to practice procedural skills in the clinical learning environment are decreasing, and faculty time to coach skills is limited, even in simulation-based training. Self-directed learning with hands-on practice early in a procedural skill course might help maximize the benefit of later faculty coaching and clinical experience. However, it may also lead to well-learned errors if learners lack critical guidance. The present study sought to investigate the effects of a hands-on, self-directed "study hall" for central line insertion among first-year residents. METHODS: Learner cohorts before vs. after introduction of the study hall (n = 49) were compared on their pre- and post-test performance of key procedural behaviors that were comparable across cohorts, with all learners receiving traditional instructor-led training between tests. RESULTS: Study hall participants spent a median of 116 min in hands-on practice (range 57-175). They scored higher at pre-test (44% vs. 27%, p = .00; Cohen's d = 0.95) and at post-test (80% vs. 72%, p = .02; Cohen's d = 0.69). A dose-response relationship was found, such that 2 h of study hall were roughly equivalent to the performance improvement seen with four clinical observations or supervised insertions of central lines. CONCLUSIONS: Self-directed, hands-on "study hall" supported improved procedural skill learning in the context of limited faculty availability. Potential additional benefits make the approach worth further experimentation and evaluation.

RESUMEN

This chapter begins by exploring the current landscape of virtual and augmented reality technologies in a post-pandemic world and asserting the importance of virtual technologies that improve students' learning outcomes while also reducing costs. Next, the chapter describes clinical anatomy instruction concepts in medical education, including applied anatomy content knowledge, pedagogical anatomy content knowledge, and virtual stereoscopic visualization studies that exemplify these concept areas, respectively. The chapter then explores the concept of procedural training with a specific emphasis on virtual stereoscopic anatomy visualization studies that exemplify or have implications for procedural training in medical education. Subsequently, the chapter discusses the benefits and challenges as well as the potential future positive and negative implications of virtual stereoscopic visualizations in medical education before finally concluding with some pensive considerations for the present and future of anatomy education and training using virtual technologies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: An annual survey of chief residents in accredited North American radiology programs is conducted by the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (A3CR2). Special topics surveyed for the 2021-2022 academic year were procedural competency and virtual radiology education in the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to summarize the 2021-2022 A3CR2 chief resident survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was distributed to chief residents from 197 Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited radiology residency programs. Chief residents responded to questions regarding their individual procedural readiness and attitudes on virtual radiology education. A single chief resident from each residency answered programmatic questions including the use of virtual education, faculty coverage, and fellowship choices among their graduating classes. RESULTS: We received 110 individual responses from 61 programs, yielding a 31% program response rate. Although the majority (80%) of programs maintained purely in-person attending readout throughout the COVID 19 pandemic, only 13% of programs reported purely in-person didactics and 26% converted to all virtual didactics. The majority (53%-74%) of chief residents perceived virtual learning (in read-out, case conference, and didactic formats) to be less effective than in-person learning. One third of chief residents reported decreased procedural exposure during the pandemic, and 7%-9% of chief residents felt uncomfortable with basic procedures (basic fluoroscopy examinations, basic aspiration/drainage procedures, and superficial biopsy procedures). The number of programs with 24/7 attending coverage increased from 35% in 2019 to 49% in 2022. Body, neuroradiology, and interventional radiology were the most popular advanced training options among graduating radiology residents. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on radiology training, particularly in terms of virtual learning. These survey results suggest that although digital learning offers increased flexibility, most residents still prefer in-person readout and didactics. Despite this, virtual learning will likely remain a viable option as programs continue to evolve following the pandemic.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to ascertain how well award-winning and highly viewed upper-extremity surgical videos meet the needs of users and adhere to procedural learning theory. We hypothesized that upper-extremity videos hosted on academic society websites meet user needs better than upper-extremity videos hosted on a commercial website. METHODS: Twenty-five upper-extremity videos were evaluated by 3 reviewers. A standardized scoring sheet was used to assess each video's content, production quality, and adequacy. Video lengths were compared. The inclusion frequencies of specific content categories, the adequacy of content, and meeting certain production standards, all of which assess consistency with procedural learning theory, were reported, stratified by video host. Associations between the video host and video content, production quality, and adequacy were assessed. RESULTS: The median lengths of academically hosted and commercially hosted videos were similar. Regardless of the video host, no video contained information in all content categories. Sixty percent of the scored categories were present in less than 75% of evaluated videos. Academically hosted videos contained scored content more frequently than commercially hosted videos in 68.4% of categories. There were significant associations between academic hosts and inclusion of a case presentation, surgical indications, outcomes literature, a preoperative examination, follow-up visit intervals, and alternative surgical techniques. Overall, academically hosted videos had a higher percentage of adequate content categories compared with commercially hosted videos. CONCLUSIONS: Videos on academic websites more consistently meet users' content needs and production expectations, as informed by procedural learning theory, while having higher rates of adequate content compared with videos on commercial websites. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While academically hosted videos appear to more consistently adhere to the tenets of procedural learning theory, opportunity exists for video creators to more consistently apply procedural learning theory, allowing for the creation of even more educationally beneficial online surgical videos.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Significant gaps exist in the pediatric resident (PR) procedural experience. Graduating PRs are not achieving competency in the 13 ACGME recommended procedures. It is unclear why PR are not able to achieve competency, or how existing gaps may be addressed. METHODS: We performed in-depth one-on-one semistructured interviews with 12 pediatric residency program directors (PPDs). The interviews were audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Coding of the data using conventional content analysis led to generation of categories, which were validated through consensus development. RESULTS: We identified 4 main categories, including (1) programs struggle to ensure adequate training in procedural skills for PRs, with various barriers reported; (2) programs develop individualized strategies to address challenges in procedural skills training, and multiple options are necessary; (3) PPDs face challenges defining procedural competency and standardizing expectations; and (4) expectations for PR procedural training may require modification based upon current practice environments. Solutions include simulation, procedural boot camps, and procedural/subspecialty electives. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous methods to combat challenges in PR procedural training have been identified by participating PPDs, including simulation, tailoring electives, and developing institutional guidelines. However, accreditation bodies may need to update procedural expectations based on individual resident career goals and realities of current day practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: The fast-paced nature of physician assistant (PA) programs warrants an emphasis on high-fidelity, critical care skills training. Generally, manikins or task trainers are used for training and assessing. Soft-preserved cadavers provide a high-fidelity model to teach high-acuity, low-opportunity procedures; however, their effectiveness in PA pre-clinical training is not well understood. Objective: This study compared procedural competency of task trainer and soft-preserved cadaver trained pre-clinical PA (pcPA) students in completing tube thoracostomy, endotracheal intubation, intraosseous infusion, and needle thoracostomy. Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted with pcPA students (n = 48) at a midwestern program. Participants were randomly assigned to cadaver trained (CT), task trainer (TT), or control group (CG). We assessed procedural competency using skill-specific rubrics and performed qualitative analysis of student comments regarding skill-specific procedural preparedness. Results: Intervention groups surpassed the control group on all skills. The CT students exhibited significantly higher procedural competency compared to TT-trained students in endotracheal intubation (p = 0.0003) and intraosseous infusion (p = 0.0041). Thematic analysis of student comments revealed pre-training students consistently felt unprepared and lacked confidence to perform needle thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy, and endotracheal intubation. Post-training perceptions, CT/TT, focused on preparedness and confidence. The CT group also consistently described the impact of realistic simulation. Conclusion: High-fidelity training with soft-preserved cadavers may be the most effective way to prepare pcPA students to perform endotracheal intubation and intraosseous infusion. Student perspectives on procedural preparedness highlight the importance of multidimensional, realistic training methods. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01575-0.

RESUMEN

Objective In this study, we aimed to develop and pilot a mixed-methods curriculum among pediatric subspecialty fellows that combined didactics, role-play, and bedside coaching with a procedure card. We hypothesized that this curriculum would improve fellows' ability to navigate difficult conversations and would be feasible to implement across training programs. Methods This study was conducted from 2019 to 2020. Phase 1 focused on establishing baseline performance. Phase 2 involved the education of participants and faculty. During phase 3, participants communicated difficult news to patients and families using the procedure card as a prompt with the aid of faculty coaching. Six months later, participants' performance was re-evaluated and compared with baseline performance. Results A total of 10 out of 17 (60%) participants completed the pilot study. Likert self-efficacy results revealed an improvement in the skill of delivering difficult news (3.0 pre-intervention, 4.1 post-intervention, p=0.0001), conducting a family conference (2.5 pre-intervention, 3.6 post-intervention, p=0.0001), and responding to emotions (3.4 pre-intervention, 4.2 post-intervention, p=0.0003). Investigator assessments showed improvement in fellows' ability to communicate information clearly (2.5 pre-intervention, 3.9 post-intervention, p=0.0001) and demonstrate empathy (2.7 pre-intervention, 3.3 post-intervention, p=0.005). Conclusions In this pilot study, coaching at the bedside with a procedure-card prompt was effective at improving specific self-perceived and observed communication skills. Future research is needed to evaluate modifications to this curriculum to enhance its feasibility.

RESUMEN

Background: In teaching hospitals, the majority of central venous lines (CVL) are placed by trainees, resulting in little opportunity for attending critical care physicians to maintain this procedural skill. Additionally, not all attending critical care physicians have been trained in the most up-to-date method of dynamic ultrasound (US) guided CVL placement. Furthermore, there is no standardized method to assess procedural competency of attending critical care physicians or to train them in the evolving practice of CVL placement. Despite these limitations, attending critical care physicians are ultimately responsible for supervision of CVL placement by trainees. Objective: To assess the utility of an instructional video to impact attending critical care physicians' competency and confidence in dynamic US guided CVL placement. Methods: A pre-post intervention study was conducted at an academic medical center. Attending critical care physicians were first asked to obtain CVL access on a gelatin model using US guidance. They then participated in the intervention, which consisted of watching a short instructional video demonstrating a method of dynamic US guided CVL placement. They were then asked to obtain access again, this time using the described method. All CVL placements were video recorded to assess competency in dynamic US guided CVL placement as well as the time required to obtain CVL access. Two blinded and independent reviewers evaluated each video with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Participants were also surveyed pre and post intervention to assess their confidence in performing and supervising CVL placement. Results: A total of 21 attending critical care physicians were included. Pre-intervention, four used dynamic US guidance compared to 16 post-intervention (P < .001). Confidence in both CVL placement and supervision improved post-intervention (P = .03 each). Time required to obtain CVL access did not differ significantly pre and post intervention. The majority (20/21) believed there should be required competency testing for CVL placement. Conclusions: Pre-intervention dynamic US guided CVL competency was poor in this sample of attending critical care physicians but improved significantly with an instructional video intervention. This study suggests there is a role for procedural competency testing among attending critical care physicians, and that significant improvement is achievable with relatively minimal instruction.

RESUMEN

Dental training faces the growing shortage of extracted teeth and the ethical precepts of Bionot learning on patients and reducing the environmental damage that preclinical trainings generate. Haptic and 3D simulators reproduce pathologies and provide a greater magnification of the processes, reducing water expenditure and pollution, but their curricular integration is complex. Two resources of complementary use (informative written manual and video tutorial) were designed to facilitate the theoretical and technical domain (know how the simulator works and make it work), as well as the advanced management of the simulator (operate the simulator autonomously, without setbacks). After 5 years of using these resources, an evaluative study was conducted with 175 students and 32 teachers. The aim was to assess the student's perception of knowledge/learning, its statistical relationship with the didactic resources used and compare these results with the teachers' perception of their students' knowledge/learning. Spearman's Rho coefficient and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test were performed. Both students and teachers considered that the technical domain (make the simulator work) was the domain that prevailed the most. There was a tendency for students not to value much the necessity of a specific preparation prior to using the simulator. This tendency resulted in a low level of study of both the written manual and the video tutorial. In conclusion, both students and teachers considered that the best strategy of knowledge/learning was the direct exchange with the simulator.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate whether pretraining of basic skills in virtual vitreoretinal surgery affected the performance curve when proceeding to procedure-specific modules. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled, two-centre study. Medical students were randomized into two groups: Group 1 pretrained basic psycho-motor skills (Navigation Training level 2 and Bimanual Training level 3) until they reached their performance curve plateau. Hereafter, both groups trained on the procedure-specific modules (Posterior Hyaloid level 3 and ILM Peeling level 3) until they reached their performance curve plateau. Plateau was defined as three consecutive sessions with the same score with an acceptable variation. The primary outcome was time used to reach performance curve plateau in the procedure-specific modules. RESULTS: A total of 68 medical students were included, and equally randomized into two groups. The participants in Group 1 used a median time of 88 minutes to reach plateau in the basic skills modules but did not differ from Group 2 in time to reach plateau on the procedure-specific modules (183 min versus 210 min, p = 0.40) or in the amplitude of plateau. Group 1 and 2 differed significantly in the starting score of ILM peeling level 3 (0 (0-0) versus 3.5 (0-75), p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: We were not able to show positive skill transfer from basic skills training to the procedure-specific modules in time, starting score or amplitude of plateau. Thus, we recommend that aspiring vitreoretinal surgeons proceed directly to simulation-based training of procedures instead of spending valuable training time on basic skills training.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is limited data assessing simulation and virtual reality training as a standardized tool in medical education. This feasibility study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality training and a student-led simulation module in preparing medical students to perform a lumbar puncture. METHODS: Twenty-five medical students completed a pre-intervention survey, and a baseline video recorded lumbar puncture procedure on a task trainer. Students were randomly distributed into the virtual reality group, or the curriculum's standard student-led procedural instruction group. Participants were then given 45 min to practice the lumbar puncture procedure. After the intervention, all participants were video recorded again as they performed a post-intervention lumbar puncture and completed a post-intervention survey. Pre- and post-intervention videos were scored using a critical action checklist in conjunction with time needed to complete the procedure to evaluate proficiency. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no major statistically significant differences between groups. Assessing overall post-intervention performance, both groups showed improvement in aggregate score (p < 0.001) and time required to complete (p = 0.002) the lumbar puncture. Following interventions, the student-led group improved over the virtual reality group in a variety of metrics. The student-led group increased their aggregate score by 3.49 and decreased their time to completion by 34 s over the VR group when controlling for baseline measures. CONCLUSIONS: Both virtual reality and student-led simulation training were useful training modalities, with hands-on simulation showing better results versus virtual reality training in this setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-020-01141-6.

RESUMEN

Background Emergency physicians must be proficient at inserting central venous catheters and performing lumbar punctures to provide life-saving therapies to critically ill patients. An assessment of procedural skill is rarely performed after an emergency physician has completed residency. Current board certification exams for emergency medicine focus only on verbal descriptions of procedures to assess skill. We compared two methods of procedural skill assessment, simulated task trainer and verbal description, to assess the range of skill in central venous catheter insertion and lumbar punctures of emergency attending physicians at a large, urban, academic tertiary care institution. Methodology This is a prospective cohort study of simulated internal jugular central venous catheter insertion and lumbar puncture skill by emergency attending physicians on a task trainer versus verbal description. A total of 17 attending emergency medicine physicians consented to participate in the study during a yearly procedural skills session. For each subject, two expert raters used previously published checklists to assess procedural skill and give a global rating score. Results More checklist items were performed correctly on the task trainer than on verbal assessment for central line (task trainer = 78.4% ± 8.32% and verbal = 68.26% ± 8.9%) and lumbar puncture (task trainer = 85.57% ± 7.6% and verbal = 73.53%4 ± 10.34%) procedures, both with significant differences (p < 0.001). Of the participants, 82% strongly preferred the task trainer format to the verbal description assessment format. Conclusions The higher scores on the simulated format compared to the current verbal format imply that a shift towards simulated procedural assessment techniques may benefit examinees. More work is needed to determine if objective checklist scores for practicing attending emergency physicians correlate with subjective expert assessments of their procedural skills.