RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic factors and survival outcomes of patients with surgically treated high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC). METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study involved 98 cervical cancer patients with stage IA2-IIA2 and IIIC1/2p high-grade NECC. We divided the patients into two groups based on histology: the pure and mixed groups. All clinicopathologic variables were retrospectively evaluated. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods were used for analysis. RESULTS: In our study, 60 patients were in the pure group and 38 patients were in the mixed group. Cox multivariate analysis showed that mixed histology was a protective factor impacting overall survival (OS) (P = 0.026) and progression free survival (PFS) (P = 0.018) in surgically treated high-grade NECC. Conversely, survival outcomes were negatively impacted by ovarian preservation (OS: HR, 20.84; 95% CI: 5.02-86.57, P < 0.001), age >45 years (OS: HR, 4.50; 95% CI: 1.0-18.83, P = 0.039), tumor size >4 cm (OS: HR, 6.23; 95% CI: 2.34-16.61, P < 0.001), parity >3 (OS: HR, 4.50; 95% CI: 1.02-19.91, P = 0.048), and perineural invasion (OS: HR, 5.21; 95% CI: 1.20-22.53, P = 0.027). Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed notable differences in histologic type (OS: P = 0.045; PFS: P = 0.024), chemotherapy (OS: P = 0.0056; PFS: P = 0.0041), ovarian preservation (OS: P = 0.00031; PFS: P = 0.0023), uterine invasion (OS: P < 0.0001; PFS: P < 0.0001), and depth of stromal invasion (OS: P = 0.043; PFS: P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Patients with mixed histologic types who undergo surgery for high-grade NECC have a better prognosis. Meanwhile, ovarian preservation, tumor size >4 cm, parity >3, age >45 years and perineural invasion were poor prognostic predictors. Therefore, patients with high-risk factors should be considered in clinical practice.

RESUMEN

The objective of this review is to summarize the current scientific evidence to formulate clinical recommendations regarding the classification, diagnostic approach, and treatment of rare histological subtypes of cervical cancer; neuroendocrine carcinoma, gastric-type mucinous adenocarcinoma, and glassy cell adenocarcinoma. These histological subtypes are generally characterized by their low frequency, aggressive biological behavior, certain chemoradioresistance, and consequently, high recurrence rates with a deleterious impact on survival. Molecular studies have identified several associated mutations in neuroendocrine carcinoma (PIK3CA, MYC, TP53, PTEN, ARID1A, KRAS, BRCA2) and gastric-type adenocarcinoma (KRAS, ARID1A, PTEN) that may serve as molecular targets. While adenocarcinomas are typically treated and classified based on squamous histology across early, locally advanced, and advanced stages, the treatment strategies for neuroendocrine carcinomas in early stages or locally advanced cases differ, particularly in the sequencing of administering chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or surgery. The chemotherapy regimen is based on etoposide plus cisplatin (EP). Unlike squamous cell carcinomas, immune checkpoint inhibitors are yet to establish a standard role in the treatment of recurrent neuroendocrine carcinomas due to the absence of clinical trials. Regarding glassy cell adenocarcinomas and gastric-type adenocarcinoma, the potential use of immunotherapy in advanced stages/disease requires further evaluation through international collaborations, given the limited number of cases.

RESUMEN

Small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNECC) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis, with limited data to guide its treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in the management of SCNECC. A 23-question online survey on management of SCNECC was disseminated to Canadian gynecologic oncologists (GO), radiation oncologists (RO) and medical oncologists (MO). In total, 34 practitioners from eight provinces responded, including 17 GO, 13 RO and four MO. During staging and diagnosis, 74% of respondents used a trimodality imaging approach, and 85% tested for neuroendocrine markers. In early-stage (1A1-1B2) SCNECC, 87% of practitioners used a surgical-based approach with various adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments. In locally advanced (1B3-IVA) SCNECC, 53% favored primary chemoradiation, with cisplatin and etoposide, with the remainder using surgical or radiation-based approaches. In metastatic and recurrent SCNECC, the most common first-line regimen was etoposide and platinum, and 63% of practitioners considered clinical trials in the first line setting or beyond. This survey highlights diverse practice patterns in the treatment of SCNECC. Interdisciplinary input is crucial to individualizing multimodality treatment, and there is a need for prospective trials and intergroup collaboration to define the optimal approach towards managing this rare cancer type.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

There have been no reported cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the cervix with pagetoid spread (Pag-S). A 44-year-old woman came to our department because of abnormal cytology that persisted immediately after a radical hysterectomy for NEC of the cervix. A mapping biopsy in a large area from the vaginal wall to the vulva revealed that synaptophysin/Ki-67-positive tumor cells were scattered within the epithelium in multiple areas, suggesting a wide Pag-S of NEC. Because tumor cells were found beyond the vaginal wall, the anterior pelvic exenteration was performed. Since we could pathologically confirm the complete resection and no distant metastases were detected, no adjuvant therapy was performed. Four years have passed since the initial treatment without any tumor recurrence. It is known that the prognosis of NEC of the cervix that invades beyond the cervix is poor; however, if there is a Pag-S pattern, a radical surgical treatment can be considered.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare malignancy with poor clinical prognosis due to limited therapeutic options. This study aimed to establish a risk-stratification score and nomogram models to predict prognosis in NECC patients. METHODS: Data on individuals diagnosed with NECC between 2000 and 2019 were retrieved from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and then randomly classified into training and validation cohorts (7:3). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated independent indicators of prognosis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis further assisted in confirming candidate variables. Based on these factors, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) nomograms that predict survival over 1, 3, and 5 years were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the concordance index (C-index), and the calibration curve estimated the precision and discriminability of the competing risk nomogram for both cohorts. Finally, we assessed the clinical value of the nomograms using decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Data from 2348 patients were obtained from the SEER database. Age, tumor stage, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery predicted OS. Additionally, histological type was another standalone indicator of CSS prognosis. For predicting CSS, the C-index was 0.751 (95% CI 0.731 ~ 0.770) and 0.740 (95% CI 0.710 ~ 0.770) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the C-index in OS prediction was 0.757 (95% CI 0.738 ~ 0.776) and 0.747 (95% CI 0.718 ~ 0.776) for both cohorts. The proposed model had an excellent discriminative ability. Good accuracy and discriminability were also demonstrated using the AUC and calibration curves. Additionally, DCA demonstrated the high clinical potential of the nomograms for CSS and OS prediction. We constructed a corresponding risk classification system using nomogram scores. For the whole cohort, the median CSS times for the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups were 59.3, 19.5, and 7.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: New competing risk nomograms and a risk classification system were successfully developed to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS and OS of NECC patients. The models are internally accurate and reliable and may guide clinicians toward better clinical decisions and the development of personalized treatment plans.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

•Ideal treatment for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) remains unclear.•A patient with metastatic NECC experienced a durable complete response to multi-modal therapy that included atezolizumab.•Atezolizumab may improve response rates and overall survival when incorporated into therapy for NECC.

RESUMEN

Non-metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a rare and aggressive disease. Lacking prospective studies, the optimal multimodal treatment approach has not yet been clearly defined. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with non-metastatic NECC treated with surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, according to pathologic prognostic factors and multimodal treatments received. We retrospectively examined data from patients with non-metastatic NECC candidate to receive surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and discussed at the European Institute of Oncology's Multidisciplinary Neuroendocrine Tumor Board, between January 2003 and December 2021. Primary endpoints were event-free survival and overall survival. A total of 27 consecutive patients were evaluated, 15 with early stage NECC and 12 with a locally advanced NECC. Eight patients received neoadjuvant and 19 adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy; 14 received adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy, half with external-beam radiation therapy alone, and half combined with brachytherapy. No patients progressed or relapsed during (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The median event-free survival was 21.1 months and the median overall survival was 33.0 months. Pathological FIGO stage ≥ IIB, adjuvant external-beam radiation therapy with or without brachytherapy emerged as significant and independent prognostic factors for event-free survival. Brachytherapy was also prognostic for overall survival. Non-metastatic NECC requires a multimodal approach, mainly weighted on the FIGO stage. The addition of brachytherapy should be considered, especially in patients with locally advanced disease. Because of the scarcity of robust clinical data, treatment strategy should be discussed in multidisciplinary board, taking into account patient.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is a rare feature of metastasis that is characterized by thickening and increased contrast enhancement throughout the meninges of the central nervous system (CNS). Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) can occur as spread from primary CNS tumors or as a manifestation of metastasis to the CNS from primary tumor sites outside the CNS. Leptomeningeal disease is, however, rare in cervical cancer, in which metastasis occurs typically from local invasion. OBSERVATIONS: The authors discuss the case of CNS metastasis with LMD from the rare neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC). Cervical cancer infrequently metastasizes to the CNS, but NECC is an aggressive variant with greater metastatic potential. Many of these patients will have previously received pelvic radiation, limiting their candidacy for craniospinal radiation for LMD treatment due to field overlap. This illustrative case documents the first known case of NECC CNS metastasis accompanied by LMD treated with intrathecal chemotherapy. LESSONS: Reported is the first known case of NECC with CNS metastasis accompanied by LMD. The authors highlight the potentially critical role of intrathecal chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy, in treating leptomeningeal metastasis from cervical cancer.

RESUMEN

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is a highly aggressive and rare gynecological malignancy with a poor prognosis. Despite aggressive local and systemic treatments, there are high rates of locoregional recurrence and distant metastases. Therefore, more potent treatments are required to manage NECC. In recent years, emerging immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, have been used in treating various solid tumors and provide a new direction for immune-targeted therapy for NECC. In this review, we summarize the biomarkers useful for the evaluation of the therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with NECC and the clinical applications and prospects of monotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and combinations with other therapies in patients with NECC. In some individual case reports, therapeutic strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors showed good efficacy. Further studies are needed to confirm the possibility of using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as a standard treatment strategy in NECC.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigate the correlation between programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor-associated immune cell (TAIC) density in small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix (SCNEC) and their correlation with clinicopathologic features. METHODS: PD-L1 and mismatch repair protein (MMR) expression in cancer cells and the density of TAIC were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 89 SCNEC patients. The combined positive score (CPS), tumor proportion score (TPS), and immune cell score (ICS) of PD-L1 were measured, along with their correlation with clinicopathologic features in SCNEC patients using statistical analyses. RESULTS: CPS of PD-L1 ≥ 1 was seen in 68.5% of patients, positive TPS and ICS of PD-L1 were detected in 59.6% and 33.7% of patients, respectively. PD-L1CPS was higher in tumor-infiltrating immune cells (r = 0.387, p = 0.001) and positively correlated with programmed cell death-1 and forkhead box P3 + regulatory T cell (FOXP3 + Treg) infiltration (r = 0.443, p < 0.001; r = 0.532, p < 0.001). There was no statistical correlation between PD-L1 and MMR status. PD-L1CPS and PD-L1ICS positivity were independent prognostic factors, correlating with a favorable survival (HR (95%CI) = 0.363(0.139-0.950), p = 0.039 and HR (95% CI) = 0.199(0.050-0.802), p = 0.023, respectively). PD-L1ICS positivity was an independent indicator of recurrence in SCNEC patients and associated with better disease-free survival (HR (95% CI) = 0.124(0.036-0425), p = 0.001). TAIC and MMR levels had no statistical impact on survival results. CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 positivity was seen in over half of SCNEC tumors. It may work synergistically with FOXP3 + Treg and other infiltrating immune cells to support an adaptive immune response. PD-L1 positivity may be a favorable prognostic factor in SCNEC.

RESUMEN

Objectives: To describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNCC) and determine the staging system most predictive of outcome-the two-tier (limited-stage [LS] vs. extensive-stage [ES]) or International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. Methods: Patients with SCNCC evaluated at our institution from 1/1/1990-6/30/2021 were included. Medical records were reviewed for variables of interest. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to determine associations. Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method. Concordance probability estimates (CPEs) were calculated to evaluate the prediction probability of the staging systems. Results: Of 63 patients, 41 had LS and 22 ES SCNCC. Patients with ES disease were significantly older than those with LS disease (median, 54 and 37 years, respectively; p < 0.001). Smoking status, race, and history of HPV were not associated with stage or outcomes. Forty-eight patients had metastatic disease (24 [50%] at initial diagnosis). The most common first sites of metastasis were lung (n = 20/48, 42%), lymph nodes (n = 19/48, 40%), and liver (n = 13/48, 27%). Nine patients had brain metastasis (8 symptomatic at recurrence; 1 asymptomatic at initial diagnosis). Both staging systems were associated with progression-free and overall survival. Adjusted CPE found the FIGO staging system was more predictive of outcomes than the two-tier staging system. Conclusions: Providers should have a low threshold to obtain brain imaging for patients with SCNCC, especially in the presence of visceral metastases. FIGO staging should be used to classify SCNCC. Further research is necessary to understand prognostic factors of this rare disease.

RESUMEN

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix is a rare subtype of cervical cancer with a poor prognosis. Primary treatment of this disease involves a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. The majority of patients will experience disease recurrence, for which there exist no treatment guidelines. Because of histologic similarities, small cell lung cancer has often informed management of extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Immunotherapy regimens, including a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab, have been shown to have activity in small cell lung cancer. In this report, we present the cases of 3 patients with recurrent neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix who experienced durable response to a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To screen for specific differentially expressed genes in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNEC) and to further explore their roles and mechanisms in tumor progression. METHODS: Differentially expressed genes in SCNEC compared with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) were screened by microarray and immunohistochemical analyses. The biological functions of the identified genes were examined in a SCNEC cell line using RNA interference and over-expression plasmid-transfection technologies. Co-expression network analysis and immunoprecipitation technology were used to explore the potential mechanisms. RESULTS: Compared with SCC and AC, UCHL1 (encoding ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1) was identified as a specific differentially expressed gene in SCNEC, which was positively related to lymph node metastasis (LNM). Migration and invasion of SCNEC tumor cells were induced by UCHL1 over-expression and suppressed by UCHL1 down-regulation, as shown by scratch and transwell invasion assays. Co-expression network analysis suggested that Prospero homeobox protein 1 (PROX1) might interact with UCHL1, and in vivo immunoprecipitation and western blots verified that levels of ubiquitinated PROX1 were significantly decreased following UCHL1 overexpression. CONCLUSION: UCHL1 is a potential biomarker of LNM in SCNEC. UCHL1 might promote SCNEC cell migration and invasion by reducing PROX1 ubiquitination.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to explore the outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNEC) and to determine the effects of adjuvant treatment on survival in patients with FIGO stage I-II SCNEC after radical surgery. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed in 92 patients who underwent radical surgery for SCNEC. All clinicopathological variables and treatment strategies were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used for survival analyses. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 38months (23.6-52.4), 43 (46.7%) patients experienced disease recurrence, and distant metastases were documented in 35 (81.4%) patients. The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for the entire group was 50.1%. The median RFS was 39months. The multivariate analysis confirmed that lymph node metastasis, positive parametrial extension and cycles of etoposide plus platinum (EP) were independent prognostic factors for disease recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy for at least 5cycles of EP (EP 5+, n=39) was associated with improved 5-year RFS compared with other treatments (n=46) (67.6% vs. 20.9%, p<0.001). Additional radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation failed to validate further improved RFS in patients with EP 5+, and this finding was consistent in the subset of patients with high-risk factors (positive lymph nodes or positive parametrium). CONCLUSIONS: Half of stage I-II SCNEC patients experienced disease failure within 3years, and distant metastasis was an outstanding issue. EP regimen for at least 5cycles improved long-term RFS after radical surgery. Additional radiation might be unnecessary, even in patients with high-risk factors.

Asunto(s)