RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate associations between Body Image concerns (BICs) measured by the ICD Body Image Concerns Questionnaire (ICD-BICQ) and other Patient-Reported-Outcomes (PROs), in a cohort of patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a cross-sectional survey, we included patients >18 years implanted with a first-time ICD (VVI, DDD and CRT-D) who had lived with their ICD from 3-24 months. They completed the 39-item ICD-BICQ together with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-scale, Patient Health-Questionnaire, Type D-Scale, Health Status-Questionnaire and the Florida Patient Acceptance-Survey. Data were analyzed using linear regression to compare personality constructs between patients with and without BICs. Logistic repression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to predict patients with BICs based on other PROs.A total of 330 patients completed the survey. Five patients were excluded due to re-operations leaving 325 patients in the analyses. A total of 20% reported BICs at the recommended cut-off at 36-points. Patients with BICs reported higher anxiety and depression levels, lower device acceptance and health status, had a Type D personality as compared to patients without BICs. FPAS was moderately able to predict BICs, while other PROs only had limited ability to predict BICs. CONCLUSION: Patients with BICs reported poorer PROs. The PRO instruments were not able to predict patients with BICs, indicating that the ICD-BICQ provides independent relevant clinical information. In clinical practice, healthcare professionals can use the ICD-BICQ to identify and obtain information on possible BICs. The ICD-BICQ can also be used to evaluate new operation techniques.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, contemporary data on secondary-prevention ICDs in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remain limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using 2013 to 2019 CARES (Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival) linked to Medicare, we identified 3226 patients aged ≥65 years with an initial shockable rhythm who survived to discharge without severe neurological disability. Multivariable hierarchical regression models were used to examine the association between patient variables and ICD placement and quantify hospital variation in ICD implantation. The mean age was 72.2 years, 23.5% were women, 10% were Black individuals, and 4% were Hispanic individuals. Overall, 997 (30.9%) patients received an ICD before discharge, 1266 (39.2%) at 90 days, and 1287 (39.9%) within 6 months. Older age (≥85 years), female sex, history of diabetes, calendar year, and presentation with acute myocardial infarction were associated with lower odds of ICD implantation, but race or ethnicity was not associated with ICD implantation. Among 297 hospitals, the median proportion of survivors receiving ICD at discharge was 28.6% (interquartile range, 20%-50%). The relative odds of ICD implantation varied by 62% across hospitals (median odds ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.38-1.82]) after adjusting for case mix. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 1 in 3 survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to a shockable rhythm received a secondary-prevention ICD before discharge. Although patient variables were associated with ICD implantation, there was no difference by race or ethnicity. Even after adjusting for patient case mix, ICD implantation varied markedly across hospitals.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) is challenging, especially in those at intermediate risk. The Predicting Arrhythmic evenT (PAT) score has recently been demonstrated to be excellent for predicting future arrhythmic events in patients without prior ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, validation studies are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the performance of a novel risk stratification model in predicting future VF events in patients with BrS in a Japanese multicenter cohort. METHODS: The PAT score was calculated for 413 patients with BrS (mean age, 50.9±13.6 years; 395 men) from 59 hospitals in Japan, including 314 patients without prior VF. The incidence of developing VF during the follow-up period was investigated. RESULTS: During the 106.8-month follow-up period, 54 patients (13.1%) experienced VF events. Of the 314 patients without prior VF at enrollment, 14 (4.5%) experienced VF events. The incidence of VF events during the follow-up period was significantly higher in patients with PAT scores ≥10 than in those with scores <10 (41/173 [23.7%] vs. 13/240 [5.4%], p<0.0001) in the total cohort. No difference was observed in the incidence of VF events between patients with PAT scores ≥10 and <10 among the 314 patients without prior VF (6/86 [7.0%] vs. 8/228 [3.5%], p=0.22). PAT scores ≥10 predicted future VF events with a sensitivity and specificity of 42.9% and 73.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This Japanese multicenter registry demonstrated that the novel risk stratification model could not accurately predict future VF events in patients with BrS, but without prior VF.

RESUMEN

Infections associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasing and are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality. This article summarizes the latest updates with respect to the epidemiology, microbiology, and risk factors for CIED-related infections. It also covers important considerations regarding the diagnosis, management, and prevention of these infections. Newer technologies such as leadless pacemakers and subcutaneous implantable cardioverters and defibrillators are discussed.

RESUMEN

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a pressing health issue, affecting hundreds of thousands each year globally. The heterogeneity among SCD victims, ranging from individuals with severe heart failure to seemingly healthy individuals, poses a significant challenge for effective risk assessment. Conventional risk stratification, which primarily relies on left ventricular ejection fraction, has resulted in only modest efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) for SCD prevention. In response, artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise for personalised SCD risk prediction and tailoring preventive strategies to the unique profiles of individual patients. Machine and deep learning algorithms have the capability to learn intricate non-linear patterns between complex data and defined endpoints, and leverage these to identify subtle indicators and predictors of SCD that may not be apparent through traditional statistical analysis. However, despite the potential of AI to improve SCD risk stratification, there are important limitations that need to be addressed. We aim to provide an overview of the current state-of-the-art of AI prediction models for SCD, highlight the opportunities for these models in clinical practice, and identify the key challenges hindering widespread adoption.

RESUMEN

The authors report for the first time to their knowledge, implantation of a standard implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead for permanent delivery of left bundle branch area pacing. Implantation was successful and safe in 11 of 12 patients, with adequate defibrillation testing, good electrical and electrocardiographic parameters, and uneventful device-related short-term follow-up.

RESUMEN

For more than two decades the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been utilized with practically uncritical absolutism for the risk stratification of patients with ischemic and, historically, also nonischemic cardiomyopathy, in order to identify patients who could be threatened by sudden cardiac death. Based on historical data and in the absence of other better predictive parameters, the LVEF continues to appear in the guidelines unchanged, with cut-off values that lie in the region of the measurement accuracy of LVEF as determined by echocardiography. The basic identification of high-risk patients who then really benefit from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) must be re-evaluated under the aspect of a meaningfully altered interventional and pharmaceutical treatment of heart failure.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend defibrillation testing (DFT) during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Implant position, patient characteristics and device factors, such as shock impedance, influence defibrillation success. To evaluate the shock impedance, a manual synchronous 10J shock (low energy synchronous shock [LESS]) can be delivered, without the need to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF). OBJECTIVE: To compare LESS and DFT impedance values and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LESS impedance for predicting a successful DFT during S-ICD implantation. METHODS: Consecutive S-ICD implantations were included. Shock impedances were compared by paired t-tests. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with successful DFT. A prediction model of successful DFT based on LESS impedance was assessed by logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the accuracy of LESS impedance. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included (52 ± 14 years; 69% male). LESS and DFT impedance values were highly correlated (r2 = 0.97, p < .01). Patients with a failed first shock had higher body mass index (BMI) (30 ± 3 vs. 25.7 ± 4.3, p = .014), higher mean LESS (120 ± 35Ω vs. 86. ± 23Ω, p = .0013) and DFT impedance (122 ± 33Ω vs. 87 ± 24Ω, p = .0013). ROC analysis showed that LESS impedance had a good diagnostic performance in predicting a successful conversion test (AUC 84% [95% CI: 0.72-0.92]) with a cutoff value of <94Ω to identify a successful DFT (sensitivity 71%, specificity 73%). CONCLUSION: LESS impedance values without the need to induce VF can intraoperatively predict a successful DFT.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Electrical storms (E-storms), defined as multiple fatal ventricular arrhythmias over a short period, negatively affect the prognosis of patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D). However, the prognostic impact of recurrent E-storms has not been well elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the association between E-storm recurrences and mortality using data from 1,274 participants in the Nippon Storm Study, a prospective observational study conducted at 48 ICD/CRT-D centers in Japan. Differences in E-storm recurrences by patient characteristics were evaluated using the mean cumulative function (MCF), which is the cumulative number of E-storm episodes per patient as a function of time. Patients with multiple E-storms had a 3.39-fold higher mortality risk than those without E-storms (95% confidence interval 1.82-6.28; P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in mortality risk between patients with a single E-storm and those without E-storms. The MCF curve exhibited a slower ascent in patients who received primary prevention ICD/CRT-D than in those who received secondary prevention ICD/CRT-D. However, when analyzing only patients with E-storms, the MCF curves demonstrated comparable trajectories in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: E-storm recurrences may have a negative impact on prognosis. Once patients with primary prevention experience an E-storm episode, they face a similar risk of subsequent recurrent E-storms as patients with secondary prevention.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advances in medical treatment and outcomes in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients incentivize a need for improved candidate selection and identification of risk factors for ICD therapy. We examined contemporary rates of and risk factors for ICD therapy. METHODS: Patients with ICD for primary (PP) or secondary prevention (SP), implanted between January 2010 and December 2020, were followed for appropriate and inappropriate incident and recurrent shock. RESULTS: Overall, 2998 patients (mean age 61.8 ± 12.7 years, 20% female, 73% ICD carriers, and 47.1% SP) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 4.3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.1-7.4) years. A total of 426/2998 (14.2%) patients had shock; 364/2998 (12.1%) had appropriate and 82/2998 (2.7%) inappropriate shock, with annualized event rates of 2.34 (2.11-2.59) and 0.49 (0.39-0.61) per 100 person-years, respectively. Of those with shock, 133/364 (36.5%) experienced recurrent appropriate shock and 8/364 (2.2%) received recurrent inappropriate shock, with event rates of 10.57 (8.85-12.53) and 0.46 (0.20-0.92), respectively. In multivariable analyses, female sex was associated with a reduced risk of incident appropriate shock (hazard ratio 0.69 [95% confidence interval 0.52; 0.91]). Of other variables, only revascularization status was associated with recurrent appropriate shock in PP, and CRT-D with recurrent appropriate shock in the overall cohort. CONCLUSION: One in eight ICD recipients received appropriate shock 2-7 years after guideline-directed implantation. More than one-third of patients with a first shock experienced recurrent shock. Few clinical variables showed potential in predicting shocks, illustrating a need for more advanced tools to select candidates for implantation.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Impedance is a crucial parameter in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Clinically, most CIEDs measure impedance using low voltage sub-threshold measurement (LVSM). Although the LVSM of shock impedance (LVSM-SI) is generally comparable with high voltage shock impedance (HVSI), LVSM-SI might be inaccurate if peri-lead tissue degeneration occurs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We present a case of elevated LVSM-SI occurring 8 years post-lead implantation, possibly attributed to encapsulation of the right ventricular lead coil. After 0.1 J shock was delivered, a full output synchronized shock was administered to measure HVSI, revealing a normal value. Furthermore, LVSM-SI was normalized and maintained within the normal range during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest conducting a full-output synchronized shock test to assess HVSI when abnormal LVSM-SI is detected in the remote phase post-ICD implantation, which may be considered to help normalize LVSM shock impedance.

RESUMEN

Background: Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) implantation in both primary and secondary prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) in at-risk population is well established. ICD implantation rates remain low particularly in Africa with a paucity of data regarding factors associated with non-uptake. Objectives: The primary study objective was to determine the factors associated with non-uptake of ICD among heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF<35%). Reasons for ICD refusal among eligible patients were reviewed as a secondary objective. Methods: This was a retrospective study among HF patients eligible for ICD implantation evaluated between 2018 to 2020. Comparison between ICD recipient and non-recipient categories was made to establish determinants of non-uptake. Results: Of 206 eligible patients, only 69 (33.5%) had an ICD. Factors independently associated with non-uptake were lack of private insurance (42.3% vs 63.8%; p = 0.005), non-cardiology physician (16.1% vs 5.8%; p = 0.045) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (54.7% vs 36.4% p = 0.014). The most common (75%) reason for ICD refusal was inability to pay for the device. Conclusion: ICDs are underutilized among eligible HF with reduced EF patients in Kenya. The majority of patients without ICD had no private insurance, had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and non-cardiology primary physician. Early referral of HF with reduced EF patients to HF specialists to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy and make ICD recommendation is needed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE) poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and is associated with notable morbidity and mortality. When presented concurrently with other comorbidities, these challenges and the chances of morbidity and mortality significantly increase. This case presents right-sided BCNE accompanied by pulmonary cavitary lesions in a patient with a history of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT), a biventricular pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (BiV-ICD), alcohol use, and anticoagulant noncompliance. The patient missed follow-up appointments for six months after the death of his wife, leading to increased alcohol use and noncompliance with medications. During this period, his home monitoring device was offline. Once reconnected, it detected several episodes of SVT and ventricular tachycardia (VT), prompting a wellness check. He presented to the cardiology clinic with shortness of breath and a cough producing brown-tinged sputum. Evaluation revealed cavitary lesions in the lingula and left lower lobe, a vegetation on his tricuspid valve, and vegetations on his endocardial leads, despite negative blood cultures. Tuberculosis testing was negative, while sputum cultures were positive for Haemophilus influenzae. After ruling out other possible infectious causes of the cavitary lesions, septic emboli were suspected as the cause. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were begun and surgical intervention was done to replace the tricuspid valve and remove the endocardial leads. This procedure was complicated by fibrosis of the leads at the coronary sinus, necessitating their cutting at the superior vena cava and leaving them inside the patient until laser therapy could be performed for their removal. The patient's history of bradycardia and SVTs required the ongoing use of a pacemaker. Inventory discrepancy during the placement of the new pacemaker epicardial leads lead to complications warranting an alternative approach to lead implantation. A traditionally used epicardial lead was placed on the right ventricle for pacing, and an innovative technique was employed to place an endocardial lead on the right atrium epicardium for sensing. This case underscores the importance of thorough evaluation and collaborative management strategies to optimize outcomes for patients with concomitant cardiac and pulmonary pathologies, particularly in the context of underlying psychosocial stressors. Additionally, it demonstrates solutions to challenges that can arise during surgery and presents an alternative lead placement technique for physicians who have only one epicardial lead available after removing infected endocardial leads. This is illustrated by the innovative use of an endocardial lead as an epicardial sensing lead.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) are considered at risk for VT recurrence and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Recent guidelines indicate that in selected patients catheter ablation should be considered instead of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze outcomes of patients referred for VT ablation according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), tolerance of VT, and acute ablation outcome. METHODS: Post-MI patients without prior ICD undergoing VT ablation at a single center between 2009 and 2022 were included. Patients who presented with tolerated VT and who had an LVEF >35% were offered catheter ablation as first-line therapy. ICD implantation was offered to all patients but was subject to shared decision according to clinical presentation, LVEF, and ablation outcome. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients (mean age 69 ± 9 years, 84% male, mean LVEF 41 ± 9%) underwent VT ablation. In 66 patients, LVEF was >35%, of whom 51 had tolerated VT. Of these 51 patients, 37 (73%) were rendered noninducible. In 5 of 37 noninducible and in 11 of 14 inducible patients, an ICD was implanted. During a median follow-up of 40 months (Q1-Q3: 24-70 months), 10 of 86 patients had VT recurrence. The overall mortality was 27%, and 1 patient with ICD died suddenly. Among the 37 patients (none on antiarrhythmic drugs) with LVEF >35%, tolerated VT, and noninducibility, no SCD or VT recurrence occurred. Among the 14 patients with LVEF >35%, tolerated VT, and inducibility after ablation, no SCD occurred, but VT recurred in 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Post-MI patients with LVEF >35%, tolerated VT, and noninducibility after ablation have an excellent prognosis. Deferring ICD implantation seems to be safe in these patients.

RESUMEN

Background: There is an increase in the sale of legal drugs in our country. One of these substances is kratom. Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is a partial agonist of the opioid kappa, mu, and delta receptors. It acts as a stimulant at low concentrations, making users feel more energetic and euphoric. It has sedative and antinociceptive effects at higher doses. Case summary: An 18-year-old man collapsed during football training and required cardiopulmonary resuscitation; the initial rhythm was ventricular fibrillation managed by defibrillation. Laboratory parameters were unremarkable. Blood samples sent for toxicological evaluation were positive for kratom and caffeine. Echocardiographic examination, coronary computed tomography angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging did not prove the cause. Genetic testing did not find a pathogenic gene variant associated with familial ventricular fibrillation, but a variant of unknown significance was found in MYOM1. Given this situation, we implanted an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) from the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) according to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). No recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia has been reported by ambulatory ICD memory checks on our patient. Discussion: In some country, kratom is freely available and sold as a plant, not a drug. Only incident cases of ventricular fibrillation after kratom use are described in the literature. There is insufficient scientific evidence linking kratom to ventricular fibrillation. This is an absolutely crucial case report of this type, which has not yet been published in similar circumstances in the world. Therefore, the development of ventricular fibrillation was assumed to be due to a combination of kratom, caffeine, and exercise. The safety profile and effects of kratom should be the subject of future research. We would like to stress the importance of reporting further case series for more scientific evidence and thus increasing the pressure for stricter availability and regulation of kratom in some countries, especially where it is over-the-counter.

RESUMEN

Background: The current status of wearable cardiovascular defibrillators (WCD) use in Japan is unclear. Methods: Using a nationwide claims database of Japan, we assessed characteristics of patients using WCD and factors influencing subsequent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Results: In 1049 cases, those with prior cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) or ventricular arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, or device-related issues were more likely to require permanent ICDs, whereas females were less likely. Conclusions: Prior CPA or fatal arrhythmia, underlying cardiomyopathy, or device-related issues were associated with future permanent ICD implantation. These findings offer insights into the current status of WCD use in Japan.

RESUMEN

The brachiocephalic vein (BCV), also known as the innominate vein, is a central vein in the upper chest formed by merging the internal jugular and subclavian veins. It plays a crucial role in venous return from the head, neck, and upper extremities and is significant in procedures such as pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement, chemotherapy ports, and central venous catheter insertions. The presence of foreign bodies and local malignancy are major risk factors for thrombosis in the BCV. As part of the deep venous system, BCV thrombosis (BCVT) is a rare condition but can lead to serious complications like superior vena cava syndrome and, rarely, pulmonary embolism. This case report presents an 82-year-old woman with a history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, HIV, pulmonary embolism, systemic lupus erythematosus, and breast cancer who required an ICD placement due to persistent systolic dysfunction. During the procedure, chronic BCVT leading to the stenosis was incidentally discovered, necessitating urgent vascular intervention to establish venous patency. The patient's complex medical history, including previous chemotherapy through a central venous catheter, contributed to the risk factors for BCVT. The multidisciplinary approach led to successful ICD placement and the reinstatement of anticoagulation therapy. This case underscores the rarity and severity of BCVT and highlights the importance of pre-procedural imaging, such as CT venography, in patients with multiple risk factors. Additionally, the report suggests considering leadless ICD technology for patients with limited venous access to avoid complications. The findings emphasize the critical need for thorough evaluation and planning in complex cases to ensure successful outcomes.