RESUMEN
Gelatin capsules deliver their contents to the stomach, while delayed-release (DR) capsules are designed to allow delivery to the small intestine. This study evaluated the gastrointestinal release site of DR capsules in six healthy adult dogs compared to gelatin capsules. Both gelatin and DR capsules were filled with barium-impregnated polyethylene spheres (BIPS™), and following enteral administration, release site was assessed using abdominal radiographs at baseline, immediately after ingestion, 15 min post-ingestion, 30 min post-ingestion, and then every 30 min thereafter. The evaluated phases included fasted conditions (phase 1, n = 6), increased meal size (phase 2, n = 2), double encapsulation (phase 3, n = 2), and altered capsule size (phase 4, n = 1). The released site was the stomach in all phases for both capsule types. In phase 1, DR capsules had a significantly prolonged time (median 60 min, range 60-90) to release BIPS™ compared to gelatin capsules (15 min, range 15-30; p = .03). In phase 2 (full meal size), 3 (double encapsulation), and 4 (smaller capsule size) pilot studies, release time was prolonged but still occurred in the stomach. This is similar to the release site for gelatin capsules but differs from the release site for DR capsules in people. This has implications for pharmacologic outcomes for products that are affected by gastric physiology (e.g. fecal microbiota transplantation). Based on this pilot data, clinicians and researchers should not assume DR capsules will allow for intestinal delivery of contents in dogs. Future studies should be conducted on larger and varied populations of dogs.
Asunto(s)
Cápsulas , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Gelatina , Animales , Perros , Gelatina/administración & dosificación , Gelatina/química , Masculino , FemeninoRESUMEN
'Dose form' is a construct that has evolved over the last number of years and is central to treating childhood language disorders. In this commentary, we present a framework of dose form that includes techniques, procedures, manner of instruction, and intervention context. We present key findings from a systematic review exploring the impact of intervention dose form on oral language outcomes (specifically morphosyntax and vocabulary learning) in children with DLD. We then discuss the hypothesized theoretical mechanisms of action underpinning these findings.
RESUMEN
Objective To investigate and analyze the inpatient use of narcotic drugs, provide reference for clinical norms and rational use of narcotic drugs. Methods The narcotic prescription number, usage and cost were analyzed statistically. The inpatient narcotic use was analyzed by screening the dose form, indication, and dosage. Results The injections topped the list of narcotic prescriptions from year 2016 to 2019 with 15 820 (61.4%), 15 813 (61.5%), 16 682 (64.7%) and 17 293 (71.5%) prescriptions respectively. The oral and topical narcotic drugs were less prescribed. Although pethidine hydrochloride injection prescriptions decreased year by year, it still topped in the narcotic use with 8 009 (31.1%), 7 707 (30.0%), 7 151 (27.7%) and 6 844 (28.3%) prescriptions each year. Pethidine hydrochloride injection was mostly used for patients with cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Conclusion Doctors preferred to use injectable narcotics for patients with moderate to severe pain. Improper use of narcotic drugs was noticed, such as unsuitable choice of dose form, inappropriate use of pethidine hydrochloride injection, etc. Pharmacists should keep vigilant in prescription review and medication intervention for narcotic drugs to improve the standardization and rational use of narcotics.