RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Compare the tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching efficacy (BE) of in-office dental bleaching performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) or 37% carbamide peroxide (CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six participants were randomly divided into two groups according to the bleaching gel applied to the right hemiarch: 35% HP, or 37% CP. TS was recorded immediately after, up to 1, 24, and 48 h after bleaching, using the VAS and NRS scales. BE was assessed before bleaching and 1 month after using color guide units (ΔSGUs) and a spectrophotometer (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID). TS was assessed using McNemar's and paired t-test (VAS) or Wilcoxon signed rank (NRS). The paired t-test was used to analyze BE (α = 0.05). RESULTS: TS risk and intensity were lower for the 37% CP (p = 0.003 and p < 0.005). Despite significant differences between the groups after 1 month (ΔSGU and ΔE00; p < 0.05), the color measurements of both groups exceeded the 50%:50% perceptibility/acceptability threshold. CONCLUSION: In-office dental bleaching using 37% CP resulted in reduced risk and TS intensity, without prejudice to the BE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of 37% CP for in-office dental bleaching could decrease TS risk and intensity without affecting BE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: RBR-683qhf.

RESUMEN

O clareamento dental pode ser realizado através da técnica caseira ou de consultório, utilizando agentes como o peróxido de carbamida (PC) e peróxido de hidrogênio (PH). Apesar de seguro, existem alguns efeitos adversos relacionados ao clareamento dental, como a sensibilidade dentinária (SD), que pode estar presente em diferentes graus dependendo da técnica utilizada. A aplicação de agentes dessensibilizantes antes, durante ou depois do clareamento dental vem sido estudada para evitar ou reduzir a sensibilidade associada ao clareamento. O estudo visa revisar a literatura em relação a aspectos e conceitos importantes do clareamento dental, discutindo seus possíveis efeitos adversos com foco na sensibilidade dentinária. Foi realizada uma pesquisa digital da base de dados Medline, via PubMed, utilizando palavras-chave relacionadas ao tema, priorizando artigos publicados há menos de 20 anos e escritos em inglês ou português. Artigos também foram buscados manualmente e foram utilizados livros de odontologias relacionados ao tema. De um total de 48 artigos, 28 foram escolhidos para a composição do trabalho, além de 2 livros de dentística que abordam o clareamento dental. Constata-se que a sensibilidade dentinária é um efeito adverso comum relacionado ao clareamento dental, que possui causa exata desconhecida, porém sabe-se que está relacionada à difusão do peróxido de hidrogênio pelos tecidos dentários. A sensibilidade dentinária é mais frequente na técnica de clareamento de consultório do que na técnica caseira, e pode ser agravada por fatores relacionados ao indivíduo e/ou ao dente. Alguns agentes como o nitrato de potássio, fosfopeptídeos de caseína-fosfato de cálcio amorfo (CPP-ACP), vidros bioativos e partículas de hidroxiapatita, se mostraram efetivos no controle da sensibilidade dentinária.

Dental bleaching can be performed in at-home or in-office techniques, using agents such as carbamide peroxide or hydrogen peroxide. Although it's safe, there are some side effects related to dental bleaching, such as tooth sensitivity, which may be present in different degrees, depending on the chosen technique. The application of desensitizing agents before, during or after dental bleaching is being studied to avoid or reduce the bleaching related sensitivity. The study aims to review the literature over important aspects and concepts of dental bleaching, discussing its possible side effects, focusing on tooth sensitivity. Methods: an online search was done on Medline's database, through PubMed, using keywords related to the theme, prioritizing articles published less than 20 years ago, written in English or Portuguese. Articles were also researched manually, and dentistry books related to the theme were used as well. Out of 48 articles, 28 were chosen to this study's composition, in addition to 2 books that approach dental bleaching. Tooth sensitivity is a common side effect related to dental bleaching, with an unknown cause, however, it is known that it's related to hydrogen peroxide's diffusion through dental tissues. Tooth sensitivity is more frequent within in-office technique than within at-home technique, and may be worsen by individual and/or dental related factors. Agents such as potassium nitrate, CPP-ACP, bioactive glasses and hydroxyapatite particles, showed up to be effective in dental sensitivity control.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introdução:A sensibilidade dentária é o efeito adverso mais comum relacionado ao clareamento dentário. Na técnica de consultório, o peróxido de carbamida a 37%, surgiu como possibilidade de clarear e não causar sensibilidade.Objetivo:trata-se deum relato de caso, que avaliou a eficácia (mudança de cor) e a presença ou não de sensibilidade dentária quando se fezo uso de um produto àbase de peróxido de hidrogênio a35% e outro de peróxido de carbamida a 37%, na técnica de clareamento dentário de consultório.Relato de caso:Paciente de25 anos, sexo masculino, submetido a estudo de boca dividida, onde no hemiarco esquerdo foi aplicado peróxido de hidrogênio a 35% e no hemiarco direito, peróxido de carbamida a 37%. Foram feitas 3 sessões, sendo Peróxido de Carbamidacom aplicação única de 45 minutos, e Peróxido de Hidrogêniocom 3 aplicações de 15 minutos, em seu respectivo lado de aplicação e intervalo de sete dias entre cada sessão. Os valores de sensibilidade foram analisados antes e depois de cada sessão por meio da escala visual analógica de dor, e a alteração de cor foi avaliada através da Escala Vita, analisando incisivos e caninos superiores, antes de cada sessão.Conclusões:O clareamento dental com o Peróxido de Hidrogênio apresentou melhor eficácia clareadora e o Peróxido de Carbamida apresentou ausência de sensibilidade durante o procedimento clareador. Sugerem-se mais estudos do tipo ensaio clínico, com o Peróxido de Carbamida, para que se possa, com uma amostra maior de pacientes, verificar suas vantagens no quesito sensibilidade, bem como sua efetividade clareadora (AU).

Introduction:Tooth sensitivity is the most common adverse effect related to tooth bleaching. In the in-office technique, 37% carbamide peroxide has emerged as a way of tooth bleaching which does not cause sensitivity.Objective:This paper consists of a case report that evaluated the efficacy (color change) and the presence or absence of tooth sensitivity when using a product based on 35% hydrogen peroxide and another product based on 37% carbamide peroxide in the in-office tooth bleaching technique.Case report:A 25-year-old male patient underwent a split-mouth study in which 35% hydrogen peroxide was applied to the left hemi-arch and 37% carbamide peroxide to the right hemi-arch. Three sessions were carried out, carbamide peroxide with a single 45-minute application, and hydrogen peroxide with three 15-minute applications, on their respective application side and with a seven-day interval between each session. Sensitivity values were analyzed before and after each session using the visual analogue pain scale, and color change was assessed using the Vita Scale, analyzing upper incisors andcanines before each session. Conclusions:Teeth bleaching with hydrogen peroxide showed better bleaching efficacy and carbamide peroxide showed no sensitivity during the bleaching procedure. Further clinical trials with carbamide peroxide are suggested inorder to verify, with a larger sample of patients, its advantages in terms of sensitivity, as well asits bleaching effectiveness (AU).

Introducción: La sensibilidad de la dentina es el efecto adverso más común relacionado con el blanqueamiento dental. En la técnica en clínica, el peróxido de carbamida al 37% ha surgido como una posibilidad de blanqueamiento sin causar sensibilidad.Objetivo: Se tratade un informe de caso que evaluó la eficacia (cambio de color) y la presencia o ausencia de sensibilidad de la denina al utilizar un producto a base de peróxido de hidrógeno al 35% y otro a base de peróxido de carbamida al 37% en la técnica de blanqueamiento dental en clínica.Informe de caso:Un paciente del sexo maculino de 25 años fue sometido a un estudio de boca dividida en el que se aplicó peróxido de hidrógeno al 35% en la hemiarcada izquierda y peróxido de carbamida al 37% en la hemiarcada derecha.Se realizaron tres sesiones, la peróxido de carbamida con una única aplicación de 45 minutos, y la peróxido de hidrógeno con tres aplicaciones de 15 minutos, en sus respectivos lados de aplicación y con un intervalo de siete días entre cada sesión. Se analizaron los valores de sensibilidad antes y después de cada sesión mediante la escala analógica visual del dolor, y se evaluó el cambio de color mediante la Escala Vita, analizando los incisivos superiores y los caninos antes de cada sesión. Conclusiones: El blanqueamiento dental con peróxido de hidrógeno demostró una mayor eficacia blanqueadora y el peróxido de carbamida no manifestó sensibilidad durante el procedimiento de blanqueamiento. Se sugiere realizar más ensayos clínicos con peróxido de carbamidaparapoder utilizar una muestra mayor de pacientes y verificar sus ventajas en términos de sensibilidad, así como su eficacia blanqueadora (AU).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the knowledge of dental undergraduates and dentists on the prevention, diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity (DH); to compare their knowledge scores; and to understand the related variables using a regression model. METHODS: An original online questionnaire investigated the attitudes, self-reported knowledge ('how much they thought they knew') and real knowledge ('how much they really knew') of 132 students and 338 dentists. Data were analysed descriptively, both knowledge scores were compared using Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and data were subjected to two multiple linear regression analyses considering real knowledge scores as the dependent variable (α < 0.05). RESULTS: The self-reported knowledge on DH was higher than the real knowledge for both students and dentists, but dentists presented the highest scores. Gingival recession and acidic diet were reported as the main predisposing factors for DH by undergraduates and dentists. Students normally managed DH with dietary and hygiene instructions followed by a desensitizing agent application, while dentists managed with occlusal adjustments. The mechanism of glutaraldehyde/HEMA and bioactive fillers on DH is widely unknown by students and dentists. The majority of the questioned individuals cannot differentiate DH from sensitivity of caries or molar-incisor hypomineralization. CONCLUSION: Both students and dentists overestimate their knowledge of DH, revealing deficiencies in prevention, diagnosis and management. Students' knowledge improves towards the end of the Dentistry course, while younger dentists and PhD holders are more knowledgeable. Institutions should implement ongoing DH education for undergraduates and conduct interventions for experienced professionals, especially older ones.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate dentin wear and biological performance of desensitizing materials. METHODS: Seventy bovine root dentin blocks were sectioned. Half of the surface of each specimen was untreated (control) and the other half was immersed in EDTA and treated with the following desensitizing materials: placebo varnish (PLA), fluoride varnish (FLU), sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish + sodium trimetaphosphate (TMP), universal adhesive (SBU), S-PRG varnish (SPRG), biosilicate (BIOS), and amelotin solution (AMTN). After application, the specimens were submitted to an erosive-abrasive challenge and the wear analyzed by optical profilometer. Serial dilutions of extracts obtained from the culture medium containing discs impregnated with those desensitizers were applied on fibroblasts and odontoblasts-like cells cultures. Cytotoxicity and production of total protein (TP) by colorimetric assays were determined after 24 h. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn's, One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: No dentin wear was observed only for SBU. The lowest dentin wear was observed for AMTN and TMP. Cell viability was significantly reduced after treatment with undiluted extracts of PLA, FLU, TMP and SBU in fibroblasts and TMP and SBU in odontoblast-like cells. SPRG, BIOS and AMTN were cytocompatible at all dilutions tested. Considering TP results, no statistical difference was observed among the groups and high levels for TP were observed after TMP and FLU treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Universal adhesive system may protect dentin with opened tubules from wear after challenge. Extracts of adhesive and fluoride varnishes presented cytotoxic mainly on fibroblasts. The enamel protein may be a future alternative to treat dentin with opened tubules because it may cause low wear under erosive-abrasive challenge with low cytotoxic effects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess color change efficacy and the adverse effects of varied over-the-counter (OTC) bleaching protocols. METHODOLOGY: The study included randomized clinical trials evaluating color changes from OTC bleaching agents. Nine databases were searched, including the partial capture of the grey literature. The RoB2 tool analyzed the individual risk of bias in the studies. Frequentist network meta-analyses compared treatments through common comparators (∆Eab* and ∆SGU color changes, and tooth sensitivity), integrating direct and indirect estimates and using the mean and risk differences as effect measures with respective 95% confidence intervals. The GRADE approach assessed the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Overall, 37 remaining studies constituted the qualitative analysis, and ten composed the meta-analyses. The total sample included 1,932 individuals. ∆Eab* was significantly higher in groups 6% hydrogen peroxide (HP) strips (≥ 14 h). ∆SGU was significantly higher in groups at-home 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) (≥ 14 h), followed by 6% HP strips (≥ 14 h) and 3% HP strips (≥ 14 h). At-home 10% CP (7-13 h) and placebo showed lower risks of tooth sensitivity without significant differences between these treatments. CONCLUSION: Considering the low level of evidence, OTC products presented satisfactory short-term effects on tooth bleaching compared to the placebo, with little to no impact on dentin hypersensitivity and gingival irritation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: OTC products are proving to be practical alternatives for tooth whitening. However, patients should be advised about the possible risks of carrying out such procedures without professional supervision.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Determinar as evidências científicas sobre a influência do uso de lasers de baixa e alta intensidade no tratamento da hipersensibilidade da dentina. Revisão de literatura: Foram realizadas buscas na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), incluindo as bases de dados: Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS); Bibliografia Brasileira de Odontologia (BBO); e National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE). A maioria dos estudos destacam a eficácia dos lasers na redução da HD, com o laser Nd:YAG mostrando-se eficaz na obliteração dos túbulos dentinários e proporcionando alívio a longo prazo. Apesar dos benefícios, alguns estudos alertam para possíveis danos à polpa dentária, especialmente com lasers de alta potência. Considerações finais: Embora os lasers tenham se mostrado eficazes na redução da HD, a escolha do laser deve ser personalizada para cada paciente, destacando a necessidade de aprimorar os protocolos clínicos e adquirir experiência relevante por parte dos profissionais especialistas.

Objective: To determine the scientific evidence on the influence of the use of low and high intensity lasers in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. Literature review: Searches were carried out in the Virtual Health Library (VHL), including the databases: Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS); Brazilian Bibliography of Dentistry (BBO); and National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE). Most studies highlight the effectiveness of lasers in reducing HD, with the Nd:YAG laser proving effective in obliterating dentinal tubules and providing long-term relief. Despite the benefits, some studies warn of possible damage to the dental pulp, especially with high-power lasers. Final considerations: Although lasers have been shown to be effective in reducing HD, the choice of laser must be personalized for each patient, highlighting the need to improve clinical protocols and acquire relevant experience on the part of specialist professionals.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The inherently technique-sensitive nature of periodontal plastic procedures demands a significant level of skill and expertise. The incorporation of three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies emerges as a potential strategy to optimize and simplify surgical procedures. This case report describes the digital workflow and presents the clinical outcomes achieved using a guided coronally advanced flap for the treatment of a single gingival recession (GR). METHODS AND RESULTS: A female patient with a gingival recession type 1 (RT1 B-) defect on the mandibular second left premolar underwent successful treatment using a guided coronally advanced flap (g-CAF) and de-epithelized connective tissue graft (CTG). The digital planning included intraoral scanning of the mandible and hard palate using an intraoral scanner, with resulting polygon format (PLY) files exported for virtual model creation. The CAF guide was meticulously designed to orient horizontal and vertical incisions at the papillae base adjacent to the GR defect. For the donor site, a guide was specifically created, positioning the graft area 2 mm apically to the premolars' gingival margins. The delineation of this area involved two horizontal and vertical incisions, meticulously based on the dimensions of the GR. The digitally designed guides were then 3D-printed using a surgical guide-specific resin, contributing to the precise execution of the innovative surgical approach. Complete root coverage was achieved. CONCLUSION: This case report demonstrates that g-CAF can be a promising approach for the treatment of single GR. HIGHLIGHTS: Why is this case new information? To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first manuscript to report a guided procedure for the treatment of gingival recession. This report provides the digital workflow for the fabrication of a guide to perform the coronally advanced flap for single recession defects. What are the keys to successfully manage this case? It is necessary to adequately scan the recession defect area and palate. Properly not only design the guide using specific software but also print it. The guide has to be stable when in position for the surgical procedure. What are the primary limitations of this technique? This guide was designed to help surgeons during the incisions. However, it does not provide aid to split and release the flap and suture.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the bleaching efficacy (BE) and tooth sensitivity (TS) of in-office bleaching using different application tips. METHODS: Forty-eight participants were selected (split-mouth), one to receive bleaching with an attached brush tip and one with a conventional tip. The procedure was performed with Whiteness Automixx Plus 35%. The BE was evaluated at the beginning, weekly, one and 12 months post-bleaching with a Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer (ΔE*ab, ΔE00, and WID) and with Vita classical A1-D4 and Vita Bleachedguide shade guides units (ΔSGU). Absolute risk and intensity of TS were recorded using the Visual Analogue Scale. The equivalence of BE was analyzed using the two one-sided t-tests for paired samples. The absolute risk of TS was evaluated using the McNemar test, and the TS intensity was measured with the paired t test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The equivalence of BE was observed for both groups in all color evaluations (p > 0.05). A lower absolute risk and intensity of TS were observed for the attached brush tip when compared with the conventional tip (p < 0.003 and p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Using an attached brush tip showed the same BE as a conventional tip. However, for the attached brush tip, there was a reduction in TS. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The applicator-attached brush tip is recommended for in-office dental bleaching, because of the possible reduction in risk and intensity of TS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The application of anti-inflammatories as topical desensitizers before dental bleaching is an approach to reduce bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity (TS). This randomized controlled trial compared the risk and intensity of TS and the color change resulting from in-office dental bleaching after using an experimental desensitizing gel containing ibuprofen and arginine. METHODS: Sixty-two participants with upper canine shades A2 or darker were randomly assigned to either the ibuprofen-arginine desensitizing group or the placebo group. The desensitizing gel was applied for 15 min before in-office bleaching with 35 % hydrogen peroxide gel for 50 min (2 sessions). To assess the absolute risk and intensity of TS, visual (0-10) and numeric rating (0-5) scales were used, and group comparisons were made using the McNemar test, Wilcoxon test, and paired Student t-test (α = 0.05). Color change was evaluated using Vita Classical, Vita Bleachedguide (ΔSGU), and Vita EasyShade (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) before and one month after the bleaching procedure. Group comparisons for color change were done using a paired t-test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The odds ratio for TS was 0.14 [95 % CI 0.02 to 0.6], meaning lower odds of TS for the desensitizing gel. A lower intensity of TS was also observed for the experimental group (p < 0.005) up to 48 h after bleaching. All color evaluation tools demonstrated effective and similar whitening for both groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using the experimental desensitizing gel containing ibuprofen and arginine effectively reduced the risk and intensity of TS without compromising the bleaching efficacy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The topical application of ibuprofen/arginine on the in-office bleaching reduced risk and intensity of bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: To summarize data of clinical trials that used silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to prevent and treat caries lesions and dentinal hypersensitivity. Material and Methods: Six electronic databases were searched in May 2022. The concentration of SDF, type of usage (alone/combined), dentition, anterior/posterior teeth, tooth region, dental tissue, number of the treated surfaces, the intervention environment, participants' age, frequency and duration of SDF application, purpose, and outcome were the extracted variables. The type of study, year of publication, authors, journals, and country were also investigated. Results: From 8860 articles, S3 were selected. Most were randomized (n=38), that applied 38% SDF (n=43), alone (n=44), on multiple surfaces (n=44), only in dentin (n=36), of the crown (n=46) of anterior and posterior (n=36) primary teeth (n=39). The studies were preferably carried out outside the clinic (n=3l), only in children (n=33), with reapplication of SDF (n=30), but did not inform the duration of application (n= 19). SDF was most used to treat (n=46) only caries lesions (n=50). They were published between 2001 and 2022, mainly in the Journal of Dentistry (n=10). China (n=19) and Lo E.GM (n=19) were the countries and authors that published the most, respectively. Conclusion: The silver diamine fluoride 38% alone was most used to treat caries lesions in the dentin of the crown of all primary teeth, preferably applied on multiple surfaces, requiring re application, and outside the clinic.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Objective: To identify the prevalence, severity, hypersensitivity, and distribution of Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) among university students in Brazil. Material and Methods: 179 participants answered an anamnesis with twenty questions about the presence or absence of habits associated with NCCL. The participants' teeth were evaluated to identify the presence or absence of the lesion, its classification, involved surfaces, severity, hypersensitivity, and tooth wear index. A hypersensitivity test was performed with ice water. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and simple logistic regression (p<0.01). Results: 179 participants answered an anamnesis with twenty questions about the presence or absence of habits associated with NCCL. The participants' teeth were evaluated to identify the presence or absence of the lesion, its classification, involved surfaces, severity, hypersensitivity, and tooth wear index. A hypersensitivity test was performed with ice water. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and simple logistic regression (p<0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of NCCL was 15.1% and abfraction was the most frequent lesion. Premolars were the teeth most affected by non-carious cervical lesions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract The aim of this clinical, prospective, randomized, and parallel study was to evaluate different in-office treatments for dentin hypersensitivity (DH). One hundred ninety-two teeth with non-cavitated root exposures were treated using different desensitizers: fluoride varnish (Duraphat - FLU); bioactive ceramic solution (Biosilicate - BIOS); universal self-etching adhesive (Single Bond Universal - SBU); bioactive photoactivated varnish (PRG filler - SPRG). The degree of DH was analyzed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and computerized visual scale (CoVAS), before treatments and after 7, 15, and 30 days from the first session. Comparisons among desensitizers were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests. Friedman test was used to compare between times (p ≤ 0.05). Comparing desensitizers FLU presented a higher value of DH than BIOS using VAS at 7 days, however, no differences were found using CoVAS analysis. Comparing times, BIOS and SBU showed a reduction in DH after 7 days and SBU showed a reduction at 30 days compared to 7 days using VAS. FLU and SPRG groups reduced DH from 15 days to 30 days using VAS. There was a reduction in DH for FLU, BIOS, and SBU after 7 days and for BIOS this reduction also occurred at 30 days when compared to 15 days using CoVAS. SPRG group showed a reduction from 15 to 30 days. All desensitizers tested were able to reduce the initial sensitivity. The bioactive ceramic solution reduced the DH gradually after 30 days using computerized analysis.

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo clínico, prospectivo, randomizado e paralelo foi avaliar diferentes tratamentos em consultório para hipersensibilidade dentinária (HD). Cento e noventa e dois dentes com exposições radiculares não cavitadas foram tratados com diferentes dessensibilizantes: verniz fluoretado (Duraphat - FLU); solução cerâmica bioativa (Biosilicato - BIOS); adesivo autocondicionante universal (Single Bond Universal - SBU); verniz fotoativado bioativo (PRG filler - SPRG). O grau de HD foi analisado por meio da escala visual analógica (VAS) e da escala visual computadorizada (CoVAS), antes dos tratamentos e após 7, 15 e 30 dias da primeira sessão. As comparações entre dessensibilizantes foram feitas pelos testes de Kruskal-Wallis e Dunn. O teste de Friedman foi utilizado para comparação entre os tempos (p ≤ 0,05). Comparando os dessensibilizantes, o FLU apresentou um valor de HD maior do que o BIOS usando VAS aos 7 dias, no entanto, nenhuma diferença foi encontrada usando a análise CoVAS. Comparando os tempos, BIOS e SBU apresentaram redução de HD após 7 dias e SBU apresentou redução aos 30 dias em comparação com 7 dias usando VAS. Os grupos FLU e SPRG reduziram a HD em 15 dias a 30 dias usando VAS. Houve redução de HD para FLU, BIOS e SBU após 7 dias e para BIOS essa redução também ocorreu aos 30 dias quando comparada a 15 dias usando CoVAS. O grupo SPRG apresentou redução de 15 para 30 dias. Todos os dessensibilizantes testados foram capazes de reduzir a sensibilidade inicial. A solução de cerâmica bioativa reduziu o HD gradualmente após 30 dias usando análise computadorizada.

RESUMEN

RESUMEN Objetivos: Identificar la evidencia del manejo de la hipersensibilidad dentinaria (HD) primaria utilizando diferentes tratamientos, como agentes tópicos, cirugía o láser. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática con los términos MeSH relacionados con el tema de investigación mediante un único algoritmo de búsqueda exhaustiva de la literatura en las bases de datos computarizadas de MEDLINE, Registro Cochrane de Ensayos Clínicos Controlados, Ovid y Scopus. Sólo se incluyeron ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados que incluyeran pacientes con HD asociada a dentina sensible con túbulos abiertos en dentición permanente y que realizaran tratamientos para la HD con terapia láser, tratamientos quirúrgicos o terapia tópica, evaluando el nivel de dolor con la Escala Visual Análoga (EVA). Resultados: Se seleccionaron 34 artículos. Se encontró que entre alternativas de tratamiento para disminuir la HD primaria, los agentes tópicos y el empleo de laser son intervenciones que mejoran significativamente la respuesta dolorosa, sin embargo, se obtuvo mejores resultados al emplear ambas técnicas de manera combinada. Conclusiones: Los resultados de este estudio permiten concluir que existe evidencia de la eficacia para manejar la HD primaria mediante intervenciones con terapia láser y agentes tópicos. Este trabajo abre un nuevo camino hacia futuras investigaciones que evalúen los efectos a largo plazo de este tipo de intervenciones y de los efectos adversos derivados de los mismos.

ABSTRACT Objectives: To identify the evidence of primary dentin hypersensitivity (DH) management using different treatments such as topical agents, surgery, or laser. Materials and methods: A systematic search was performed with the MeSH terms related to the research topic using a single comprehensive literature search algorithm in the computerized databases of MEDLINE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, OVID, and Scopus. We only included randomized controlled clinical trials that included patients with HD associated with sensitive dentin with open tubules in the permanent dentition and who underwent HD treatments with laser therapy, surgical treatments, or topical therapy, evaluating the level of pain with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results: 34 articles were selected. It was found that among treatment alternatives to reduce primary HD, topical agents and the use of laser are interventions that significantly improve the pain response, however, better results were obtained when using both techniques in combination. Conclusions: The results of this study allow us to conclude that there is evidence of the efficacy of managing primary HD through interventions with laser therapy and topical agents. This work opens a new path towards future research that evaluates the long-term effects of this type of intervention and its adverse effects.

RESUMEN

About half of the cases of gingival recession are associated with the noncarious cervical lesion (NCCL), resulting in combined defects (CDs). NCCL negatively affects the root coverage outcomes. In addition, considering the morbidity associated with graft harvesting, soft-tissue substitutes (STSs) appeared as a suitable option for connective tissue grafts for surgical root coverage. Currently, the literature addressing the therapy of CDs employing STSs is scarce. Thus, the present review aimed to update the literature and outline the future perspectives about root coverage of CDs using STSs. A detailed literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, LILACS, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using keywords and Boolean operators. Randomized clinical trials (2) and case reports (6) were included. None of the selected studies reported any adverse effect using STSs. Based on the limited evidence available, we cannot state that STSs may benefit the periodontal clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the long-term outcomes, surgical approaches, and restorative protocols.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer (GL) on postoperative sensitivity (POS) in posterior bulk-fill resin composite restorations using an adhesive applied in the self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse (ER) strategies; and to assess the clinical performance of the restorations. METHODS: Posterior resin composite restorations (n = 228) at least 3 mm deep were inserted in 57 subjects using a split-mouth design. The adhesive was applied with/without prior application of a GL. A resin composite was used for all restorations. Spontaneous POS (risk and intensity), as well as POS caused by stimulation with an air blast and assess the response to horizontal and vertical percussion was assessed using two scales in the baseline and after 7, 14, and 30 days. In addition, some parameters were evaluated using FDI criteria up to 24 months of clinical service. RESULTS: No significant POS was observed (p > 0.05). A higher absolute risk and intensity of spontaneous POS was observed within 7 days (35.1%), without statistically significant differences among groups. At 24 months 5 restorations were considered clinically unsatisfactory, and 73 restorations showed minor discrepancies in adaptation, with no significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: A GL agent does not influence POS in posterior restorations with bulk-fill resin composite. It may be considered a dispensable clinical step in the restorative protocol.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare a connective tissue graft (CTG) to a (porcine) xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix (XDM), both associated with modified coronally advanced flap (MCAF) and partial resin composite restoration to treat multiple combined defects (CDs). METHODS: Seventy-eight defects in 38 patients presenting multiple combined defects, that is, gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions, were treated by partial resin composite restoration (apical margin up to 1 mm of the estimated cement-enamel junction) and MCAF along with CTG or XDM. After 6 months, the groups were compared with regard to clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic outcomes. RESULTS: CD coverage was 72.9% for CTG versus 50.7% for XDM (P < 0.001). Recession reduction was 2.3 mm for CTG versus 1.5 mm for XDM (P < 0.001). CTG resulted in a greater increase in keratinized tissue width (CTG: 0.96 mm vs. XDM: 0.3 mm, P = 0.04) and gingival thickness (CTG: 0.9 mm vs. XDM: 0.3 mm, P < 0.001). Both treatments successfully reduced dentin hypersensitivity and increased esthetics satisfaction, with no statistically significant intergroup differences. Moreover, XDM patients experienced a shorter surgery duration (CTG: 57.2 min vs. XDM: 37.4 min, P < 0.001) and less time to no pain (visual analog scale  =  0; CTG: 6.5 days vs. XDM: 3.5 days, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: CTG resulted in significantly greater root coverage and increased keratinized tissue width compared to XDM for treating multiple partially restored CDs. However, increased root coverage at the CTG sites was accounted for by increased probing depth compared to the XDM sites.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Perform a systematic review to evaluate the influence of smoking on the effectiveness of tooth whitening (TW) and to analyze whether tooth sensitivity is different between smokers and non-smokers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review modeled according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and OpenGrey databases were searched for related clinical trials. The population, exposure, comparison, outcomes (PECO) was individuals who had TW performed, smoking individuals, non-smoking individuals, and effectiveness of TW, respectively. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool, and data from included studies were extracted by two researchers independently. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach. RESULTS: Five studies were selected for qualitative analysis. The ROBINS-I tool classified 3 studies as having a moderate risk of bias, one study as having a serious risk of bias, and one with a critical risk. GRADE performed only for color change results and showed a low certainty of evidence. Limited evidence suggests that effectiveness of TW between smokers and non-smokers is similar. The tooth sensitivity also does not seem to be influenced by smoking. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, a meta-analysis could not be performed. CONCLUSIONS: Effectiveness of TW between smokers and non-smokers is comparable. The tooth sensitivity also does not seem to be influenced by smoking. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The effectiveness of bleaching among smokers and non-smokers appears to be similar. Tooth sensitivity during TW also appears not to be influenced by smoking.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS), and the efficacy of in-office bleaching after applying an experimental desensitizing gel composed of 10% calcium gluconate, 0.1% dexamethasone acetate, 10% potassium nitrate, and 5% glutaraldehyde. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a split-mouth, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 50 participants had their upper hemiarches randomized into experimental and placebo groups. Desensitizing and placebo gels were applied for 10 min before in-office bleaching (35% hydrogen peroxide, 1 × 50 min; two bleaching sessions; 1-week interval). TS was recorded immediately after bleaching, 1, 24, and 48 h after each session, with a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) and a five-point numerical rating scale (NRS). The color was recorded in all groups at baseline, 1 week after each session, and 1 month after the end of bleaching using shade guide units (ΔSGUs) and a spectrophotometer (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID). RESULTS: Most participants (96%) felt some discomfort during treatment regardless of the study group. The odds ratio for pain was 0.65 (95% CI 0.1 to 4.1; p = 1.0). The intensity of TS did not differ between groups (p > 0.31), and it was only 0.34 VAS units lower in the experimental group. A significant color change occurred in both groups regardless of the group. CONCLUSIONS: The desensitizing experimental gel applied before in-office bleaching did not reduce the risk and the intensity of TS and did not affect color change. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the experimental desensitizing agent with varying mechanisms of action did not jeopardize the color change, it did not reduce the risk or intensity of in-office bleaching. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RBR-7T7D4D.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Few studies evaluated low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide protocols. The aim of this paper was evaluated two application protocols using 4% hydrogen peroxide in at-home bleaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with upper canines' shade A2 or darker were randomly allocated under two experimental conditions: two daily applications of 1 h each or a 2-h single application. Color change was evaluated using Vita Classical, Vita Bleachedguide, and digital spectrophotometer weekly and 1 month after the bleaching procedure through one-way ANOVA. The risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) was assessed through visual and numeric rating scale and measured by Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney test and one-way ANOVA respectively. RESULTS: After 3 weeks, the mean difference for the ΔSGU Vita Classical (1.0; 95% CI -0.1 to 2.0), ΔEab (0.7; 95% CI -1.4 to 2.8), ΔE00 (0.1; 95% CI -1.4 to 1.6) and Wi (1.8; 95% CI -1.9 to 5.5) presented no difference (p > 0.08). The relative risk for TS was 0.91 (0.72 to 1.14) without significant difference neither in the risk (p = 0.6) nor in the TS intensity for both pain scales (p > 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The application protocols evaluated (two daily applications of 1 h each or a 2-h single application) for at-home bleaching with 4% hydrogen peroxide did not showed differences in color change and tooth sensitivity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Higher amount of active hydrogen peroxide in two daily applications for at-home bleaching neither accelerate bleaching nor increase the risk or intensity of tooth sensibility.

Asunto(s)