RESUMEN
Background Residents from diverse specialties perform clinical rotations in the emergency department (ED). There is little research about the value of the ED rotation for them. Objectives We sought to determine the learning objectives of non-EM residents (NEMRs) in the ED, the effectiveness of the rotation, and the highest-yield components of their experience. Methods From 2017-2019, we surveyed NEMR on their pre-rotation learning objectives and their comfort level with 15 common ED presentations/procedures before and after the rotation. We assessed how well their objectives were met, the highest-yield components of their rotation, and opportunities for improvement. Results We collected responses from 56 (47%) pre-rotation and 61 (51%) post-rotation residents over a two-year period. The five most commonly cited learning goals were: management of acutely ill patients, triage skills, procedural competence, and ultrasound. Seventy-eight percent (78%) of residents reported their learning goals were moderately to very well met during their rotation. NEMRs' level of comfort improved in all the commonly encountered clinical experiences in the ED in a statistically significant manner. They cited on-shift teaching by attending physicians and senior EM residents as the most valuable learning resource. Conclusion NEMR from diverse medical and surgical specialties could identify specific learning objectives for their EM rotation with common themes, and the majority felt their educational goals were met. They gained comfort with the management and triage of all the assessed common ED conditions. By collecting and defining their specific needs and goals, we are better equipped to improve the quality and value of the rotation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Improvement of the learning in undergraduate bedside teaching needs to be promoted through innovative interventions. Changes in the structured format (SF) for bedside case discussion may help students improve their learning experience and gain insights into collaborative self-directed learning. The aim of the present study was to encourage collaborative and self-directed learning strategies by MBBS undergraduate students through a new case presentation format structured for this purpose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an interventional study carried out in the year 2010-2011. A new SF for bedside cases presentation was developed. A comparison with the traditional format was done by holding one session in each format. Uniformity of topic and teaching style was ensured by having the sessions on pulmonary medicine cases with the same teacher. The student perspective of the educational process was analyzed using evaluation pro forma, Likert scale, and narratives. RESULTS: Ninety final year and prefinal year MBBS students participated in this study. There was significantly higher participation in history taking (50.7%) and clinical examination (60%) in the SF. A higher statistically significant number of clinical possibilities were considered in the SF (85.3% vs. 66.6%). Similarly, significantly higher number of students indulged in self-directed learning and referred to learning resources in the SF. The SF provided students an active role (96.9%), encouraged access to resources (93.9%), and control of learning (75.7%). The additional interactive session was productive (90.9%), discussions were streamlined (66.6%), and the role of a teacher was considered important (75.7%). CONCLUSION: The SF generated higher participation in the aspects of history taking, clinical examination, and consideration of differential diagnoses. It led to a perceived improvement in self-directed and collaborative learning among students.
RESUMEN
<p>Background: There is increasing demand for clinical clerkships in palliative medicine, though conventional medical education has focused only on providing students with sufficient medical knowledge and skills. In Japan, there is no standard program for palliative medicine in undergraduate medical education. Our hospice, in cooperation with a clinical clerkship for palliative medicine launched by Tokyo Medical and Dental University, has developed its own comprehensive bedside learning curriculum. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the program. Methods: The curriculum involves not only experience in hospice care, ward rounds, and interviews with terminally ill patients, it also provides each medical student with educational sessions moderated by certified hospice nurses and pharmacists. We conducted a self-administered five-point scale questionnaire (with a higher score indicating higher satisfaction) to assess students’ satisfaction and understanding of the program. We also conducted a questionnaire on basic palliative medicine knowledge before and after the program. Results: Twenty students took part in the program. Ratios of scores of 4 or 5 for satisfaction and understanding of the program were 100% and 95%, respectively. Mean rates of correct answers on the pre-program and post-program test were 51% and 85%, respectively; showing a marked increase and emphasizing the educational significance of our curriculum. Students evidently benefit from the experience of bedside learning, and 95% reported having recommended the program to their juniors. Conclusion: These outcomes suggest the program is effective toward developing a standard education program in palliative medicine.</p>
RESUMEN
<p>Aim: We investigated what medical students learned on the clinical clerkship in our hospice and how their images of hospice care were changed, with self-reported questionnaires. Methods: Descriptions given in the contents were analyzed using a content analysis method based on Berelson’s methodology. A total of 20 students who participated in the program responded. Results: From their responses, 212 descriptions were extracted and 59 codes elicited. The codes were inductively classified and categorized based on content similarities. Eleven categories were generated: “care for quality of life of patients and families,” “characteristics and effects of palliative care” “practical approaches to end-of-life medicine,” “hospices’ positions in the healthcare system” “development of trust-based relationships with patients and their families,” “cooperation among healthcare professionals,” “appropriate attitudes toward patients and their families,” “being with patients when they pass away,” “opinions of patients and their families,” “characteristics and threats of cancer,” and “mental health for healthcare workers.”The students were found to have acquired a more positive image of hospices. Conclusion: They reported gaining valuable experience from the direct encounters with patients and their family, and that they had acquired behavior appropriate for physicians, as well as knowledge and skills about the basic palliative care.</p>
RESUMEN
This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended.
RESUMEN
Cardiac patient simulators are commonly used in Japanese educational institutions; however, most institutions have not established concrete learning objectives or strategies for mastering physical examination of the circulatory system, including cardiac auscultation. In this study, we propose clear learning objectives and strategies for simulator practice for fifth-year medical students who have passed the objective structured clinical examination, and explored their educational effectiveness.<br>1)The subjects were fifth-year medical students (n=94) at the University of Miyazaki. Learning objectives were the mastery of the sequential physical examination and the ability to distinguish 6 cardiac findings, including normal status. The subjects were evaluated with a checklist before and after lectures and simulator practice.<br>2)The mean score (maximum score=14) significantly increased from before simulator practice (2.2±0.9) to after simulator practice (11.4±1.5; p<0.001). There was no difference in scores after practice among the cardiac diseases.<br>3)Before practice more than 50% of subjects could use a stethoscope on only right positions and could indicate only the maximum point of a cardiac murmur; in contrast, after practice more than 90% of the subjects could sequentially describe physical findings and accurately predict cardiac diseases.<br>4)In a questionnaire administered after practice, 83% of the subjects answered that all physicians should acquire proficiency in cardiac auscultation regardless of their specialty.<br>Simulator practice with clear learning objectives may help improve clinical examination skills when both time and human resources are limited. The reevaluation of the program's continuing educational effectiveness and the establishment of an iterative learning program will be needed.
RESUMEN
Student self-evaluations in pediatric bedside learning based on a problem-oriented system (POS) were compared with teacher evaluations of the same items. Self-evaluations were also compared with two different methods: unsigned and signed submissions. Students evaluated themselves poorly in the ability to recall pediatric knowledge and highly in the ability to investigate and summarize suggested topics. They evaluated themselves more highly on signed submissions than on unsigned submissions left in a box. Evaluations by teachers were higher than or equal to student self-evaluations. There were few critical evaluations or complaints about POS-bedside learning, but the ratio of criticism was four-fold higher on unsigned submissions. Bedside learning based on POS was accepted willingly by students.
RESUMEN
We analyzed and evaluated problem lists compiled by students during bedside learning. Ninety percent of the items on problem lists were medical problems, 4% were psychological problems, and 6% were social problems. Among medical problems, items related to laboratory data were most prominent, followed by data from physical examination, symptoms, and complications. Highly evaluated problem lists contained items related to psychological problems and social problems, while poorly evaluated lists did not include such items. Students with good scores on problem lists also achieved good scores in problem-oriented system fields other than compiling problem lists. It was extremely useful for students to write problem lists on problem-oriented system bedside learning.
RESUMEN
We evaluated bedside learning in the department of pediatric surgery by conducting a questionnaire survey of senior medical students at Chiba University School of Medicine. We obtained responses from 70 of 95 students (74%). Although 84% of students responded by making lists of patients' problems. Many students indicated insufficient knowledge about diseases and insufficient technical skills for medical treatment as the reasons they could not solve these problems. This finding indicates that students do not have sufficient basic knowledge and clinical skills for bedside learning. These skills must be acquired and evaluated before bedside learning can be started.
RESUMEN
Participation of students in the management of patients was evaluated by analyzing medical records written by the students. Sixty-four percent of the students wrote in the medical chart everyday, however the amount of data was on average only 5.6 lines per day. Descriptions of subjective data were scant. Physical complaints were described for 65% of patients, but were insufficient in detail. Psychic and social complaints were rarely described. Objective data on the physical examination comprised the main body of chart notes recorded by the students, although only 37% of these were judged to be sufficient. Laboratory and radiological data were described less thoroughly than data from the physical examination, and were completely absent from 64% of charts. Assessments were incomplete, and patient problems were not clearly elucidated for most patients. These undergraduate students failed in their assessment of patient problems during their one week of bedside learning.
RESUMEN
The learning of problem-solving skills at the bedside in our department was investigated by comparing the results of student self-evaluations with teacher evaluations before and after the bedside learning (BSL) course. Students evaluated their behavior highly in terms of 1) positiveness, 2) motivation, and 3) bedside manner. However, they evaluated their medical competence poorly in terms of the ability to 4) perform physical examinations, 5) analyze medical histories and clinical findings, 6) interpret ECG and X-ray films, and 7) gather data, and 8) recall medical knowledge.<BR>The results of the student self-evaluations on items 5) to 8) were compared to those of the teacher evaluations before the BSL course (term examination in the fourth year) and after the BSL course. The student self-evaluations were not correlated with the two teacher evaluations, but there was a very close correlation between the two teacher evaluations.