RESUMEN
Introduction: The sample matrix composition, which is greatly affected by the type of blood collection tube used during phlebotomy, is of major importance in laboratory testing as it can influence test results. We developed an LC-MRM-MS test to molecularly characterize antithrombin in citrate plasma. The test principle differs greatly from traditional laboratory tests and the influence of varying plasma sample matrices is largely unknown. Objectives: To identify whether variations in sample matrix affect the LC-MRM-MS test for antithrombin and assess whether sample pre-processing by immunocapture reduces matrix-specific effects. Methods: Samples (n = 45) originating from four different blood collection tubes (sodium citrate, lithium heparin, K2-EDTA and K2-EDTA with protease inhibitors) were processed directly or after immunocapture. Antithrombin was digested into proteotypic peptides, which were monitored by LC-MRM-MS. Results from lithium heparin and the K2-EDTA matrices were compared to the standard sample matrix, sodium citrate, using Deming regression analysis and repeated measures one-way ANOVA. Results: Deming regression analysis of directly processed samples revealed slopes deviating >5% from the line of identity for at least six out of 22 peptides in all matrices. Significant differences between all matrices were found upon analysis by ANOVA for at least 10 peptides. Pre-processing by immunocapture led to slopes within 5% of the line of identity for nearly all peptides of the matrices. Furthermore, significant differences between matrices after immunocapture were only observed for four peptides. Conclusion: Variations in the sample matrix affect the measurement of antithrombin by LC-MRM-MS, but observed effects are greatly reduced upon pre-processing by immunocapture.
RESUMEN
Objectives: Highly selective and sensitive multi-analyte methods for the analysis of steroids are attractive for the diagnosis of endocrine diseases. Commercially available kits are increasingly used for this purpose. These methods involve laborious solid phase extraction, and the respective panels of target analytes are incomplete. We wanted to investigate whether an improvement of kit solutions is possible by introducing automated on-line solid phase extraction (SPE) and combining originally separate analyte panels. Methods: Sample preparation was performed using automated on-line SPE on a high-pressure stable extraction column. Chromatographic separation, including isobaric compounds, was achieved using a 0.25 mM ammonium fluoride-methanol gradient on a small particle size biphenyl column. Standard compounds and internal standard mixtures of two panels of a commercially available kit were combined to achieve an optimized and straightforward detection of 15 endogenous steroids. Validation was performed according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines with slight modifications. Results: Validation was successfully performed for all steroids over a clinically relevant calibration range. Deviations of intra- and inter-assay accuracy and precision results passed the criteria and no relevant matrix effects were detected due to highly effective sample preparation. External quality assessment samples showed the applicability as a routine diagnostic method, which was affirmed by the analyses of anonymized clinical samples. Conclusions: It was found possible to complement a commercially available kit for quantitative serum steroid profiling based on isotope dilution LC-MS/MS by implementing automated on-line SPE, thereby improving the practicality and robustness of the measurement procedure.