RESUMEN

This study aimed to assess the incidence of post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) following sedation with nalbuphine and etomidate and to evaluate the prophylactic effects of scopolamine in reducing PDNV. A two-stage prospective clinical trial was conducted. The first part involved an observational study of 77 subjects to assess the PDNV incidence post-sedation with nalbuphine, etomidate, and propofol. The second part compared the effectiveness of palonosetron 0.075 mg (P group), scopolamine 0.1 mg (S group), and their combination (PS group) in reducing PDNV. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PDNV within 8 h post-sedation. Secondary outcomes included PDNV frequency and severity at 8-24, 0-24, and 24-48 h and side effects of medications. The incidence of PDNV within 8 h post-sedation was 37.66% (29/77). The PS group showed a significantly lower PDNV rate of 2.56% within 8 h, compared to the P group (35.71%, P < .001), S group (19.64%, P < .001), and control group (38.39%, P < .001), respectively. The S group (19.64%) also had a lower rate than the P group (35.71%, P = .007) and the control group (38.39%, P = .002). Subgroup analysis suggested a potential differential effect of palonosetron in reducing vomiting among male patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures. The combination therapy was also associated with fewer cases of mild or no nausea and vomiting. In summary, the incidence of PDNV following sedation with nalbuphine and etomidate was notably high. The combination of scopolamine and palonosetron was more effective in preventing PDNV, with implications for improved post-sedation care.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fasting headaches frequently occur during the first few days of Ramadan, and treatment is challenging because of fasting. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of extended-release paracetamol on preventing fasting headaches. METHODS: A randomized, open-label clinical trial investigated the efficacy of extended-release paracetamol at a daily dose of 1330 mg in preventing fasting headache. Adults aged 18 years and older were recruited through the Clinical Trial Unit at the King Saud University Medical City. The eligible participants in the study fasted 13.5 h daily during the first week of Ramadan. Participants in the treatment and control arms were followed up to investigate the occurrence, severity, and timing of headache symptoms via self-reporting using a standardized headache diary scale with a daily online link or phone call. The primary outcome was the frequency of headache episodes while fasting during the first week of Ramadan. RESULTS: A total of 238 participants were enrolled and randomized. Of these, 173 followed the protocol (80 treated, 93 control) for at least the first day and were included in the analysis. Most participants were young and healthy, with a mean age of 32.2 ± 10.2 years. More men were included in the study (102/173; 59.0%), a small proportion of participants were smokers (31/173; 17.9%), and almost all participants reported being coffee drinkers (165/173; 95.4%); nonetheless, these characteristics were evenly distributed between the two groups in the study. The overall incidence of headache episodes was 33.0% (57/173) on day 1 and decreased to 11.3% (18/159) on day 7. On average over the 7 days, no significant effect was observed for the treatment on the incidence of headache, as the findings from the generalized estimating equation model indicated (ß = -0.398, p = 0.084; odds ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-1.06). Moreover, there was initially no significant difference in the incidence of headache episodes between the treatment and control groups. However, the treatment group had significantly fewer headache episodes during fasting than the control group on day 3 (4/72 [5.6%] vs. 15/91 [16.5%], p = 0.031; relative risk [RR] = 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.97) and day 6 (5/69 [7.2%] vs. 20/90 [22.2%], p = 0.010; RR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.82). No adverse effects were observed during the study period. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of fasting headaches between the two groups on most days during the study period. Additional studies are required to address fasting headaches during the first week of Ramadan.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delayed sternal closure (DSC) can be a lifesaving approach for certain patients who have undergone cardiac surgery. The value of the type of prophylactic antibiotics in DSC is still debatable. AIM: To investigate clinical outcomes of different prophylactic antibiotic regimens in patients who had DSC after cardiac surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational single-center study. Fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery and had an indication for DSC were included. Patients were subjected to two regimens of antibiotics: Narrow-spectrum and broad-spectrum regimens. RESULTS: The main outcome measures were length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality. Of the 53 patients, 12 (22.6%) received narrow-spectrum antibiotics, and 41 (77.4%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics. The mean age was 59.0 ± 12.1 years, without significant differences between the groups. The mean duration of antibiotic use was significantly longer in the broad-spectrum than the narrow-spectrum group (11.9 ± 8.7 vs 3.4 ± 2.0 d , P < 0.001). The median duration of open chest was 3.0 (2.0-5.0) d for all patients, with no difference between groups (P = 0.146). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly longer in the broad-spectrum group [60.0 (Δ interquartile range (IQR) 170.0) h vs 50.0 (ΔIQR 113.0) h, P = 0.047]. Similarly, the median length of stay for both ICU and hospital were significantly longer in the broad-spectrum group [7.5 (ΔIQR 10.0) d vs 5.0 (ΔIQR 5.0) d, P = 0.008] and [27.0 (ΔIQR 30.0) d vs 19.0 (ΔIQR 21.0) d, P = 0.031]. Five (9.8%) patients were readmitted to the ICU and 18 (34.6%) patients died without a difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with DSC post-cardiac surgery but was associated with longer ventilation duration, length of ICU and hospital stays vs narrow-spectrum antibiotics.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic vasopressor administration reduces spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, however the effects of vasopressor administration on neonatal acidemia remain uncertain. We examined the occurrence of neonatal acidemia in the setting of non-urgent cesarean delivery and compared outcomes between cases receiving prophylactic phenylephrine infusion versus cases treated with boluses of phenylephrine. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with ethical approval, comparing non-urgent cesarean delivery cases performed under spinal anesthesia (2016 to 2021), receiving either prophylactic phenylephrine infusion or boluses as needed. Data were collected from anesthesia and labor ward electronic medical records. Records with missing pH or missing blood pressure data were excluded. The independent variable was prophylactic phenylephrine administration, a strategy implemented following international recommendations in 2018. The main outcome was neonatal acidemia, defined as umbilical artery pH < 7.1. The secondary outcome was maternal hypotension, defined as at least one systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement below 100 mmHg or below 80% baseline. RESULTS: A total of 4392 patients were included in the final analysis; 1318 (30.0%) received prophylactic phenylephrine infusion. Neonatal acidemia (umbilical artery pH < 7.1) occurred in 28 (2.1%) cases receiving prophylactic phenylephrine versus 50 (1.6%) treated with boluses as needed (p = 0.188). Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was not associated with occurrence of neonatal acidemia (aOR 0.83; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.33, p = 0.435). Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was associated with a reduced spinal hypotension rate when defined as SBP < 100 mmHg (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.57; p < 0.001), with similar results when hypotension was defined as a drop below 80% or 90% of baseline SBP. CONCLUSION: In this pragmatic study, prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was associated with a reduction in maternal spinal hypotension, but not reduced neonatal acidemia.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a general consensus among dental professionals regarding the extraction of impacted third molars in the presence of clinical symptoms. However, there is less agreement on the management of asymptomatic third molars. The objective of this study is to compare the perspectives of oral surgeons and orthodontists regarding the indications for the extraction of asymptomatic third molars. It is possible that healthcare professionals from different specialties may approach the extraction of these teeth in different ways. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a web-based questionnaire has been employed to collect data by inquiring about the reasons why participants prefer the extraction of asymptomatic third molars. Descriptive statistics were employed to evaluate the data obtained. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Prophylactic extraction of partially impacted molars was more favored among the participants (P < 0.05). The orthodontists preferred prophylactic extraction due to the risk of late anterior dental crowding (LADC); however, the oral surgeons preferred pre-pregnancy extractions (P < 0.05). The extraction decision for partial impaction was higher in females when the risk of distal caries was considered. For fully impacted ones, it was higher in males when the risk of caries and pericoronitis were considered (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontists preferred extraction because of the risk of LADC and caries, while oral surgeons focused on preventing pericoronitis, pathology, focal infection, and symptoms during pregnancy. This divergence between the participants may inform the guidelines for prophylactic management of third molars. These findings may be pertinent in gender medicine. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study has been enlightening for departments to consult each other before the extraction of a patient's asymptomatic third molar.

Asunto(s)

Tercer Molar , Ortodoncistas , Extracción Dental , Diente Impactado , Humanos , Tercer Molar/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Diente Impactado/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cirujanos Oromaxilofaciales , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Maloclusión/prevención & control

RESUMEN

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) constitute one of the main complications in kidney recipients, increasing both morbidity and mortality. Due to the resurgence of antimicrobial resistance, new prophylactic approaches are being investigated. Nitrofurantoin is an antibiotic from the nitrofuran group that is effective against several Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms; hence, there has been a resurgence in its prescription for treating MDR pathogens. Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of nitrofurantoin as an add-on to conventional therapy (amikacin + ceftriaxone or cefotaxime) for the treatment of urinary tract infections in kidney recipients. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, we included patients who received a kidney in a tertiary-care hospital. According to the intensive care specialist, group 1 patients were treated with the conventional prophylactic treatment plus nitrofurantoin as an add-on. Group 2 patients were treated only with the conventional prophylactic treatment. They were followed-up for 3 months, and the incidence of urinary tract infections was reported. Results: The UTI incidence for group 1 at 3 months was 20.6%, and for group 2, it was 20.0%; no statistical difference between treatments was observed (p = 0.9). The most commonly isolated pathogens were E. coli (28.5) and K. pneumonie (28.5%). The factor most associated with developing a UTI was female gender (aHR: 7.0; 95% IC 2.3-20.9, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our cohort study, nitrofurantoin as an add-on in conventional therapy did not prove to be effective in preventing UTI development; therefore, other treatment options should be considered as a part of prophylactic treatment.

RESUMEN

Objective: To synthesize contemporary evidence of the impact of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) on survival outcomes in patients with unilateral breast cancer (UBC). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases were searched for observational studies published up to November 15, 2023. Random-effects model was used to obtain pooled effect estimates that were reported as hazards ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), recurrence free survival (RFS) and risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Results: Twenty-one studies were included. Most studies had a retrospective design. CPM was associated with significant improvement of OS (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.85), BCCS (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.90), and RFS (HR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.86) and significantly reduced risk of CBC (HR 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.09) in patients with UBC. No evidence of publication bias was detected. Conclusion: Our results provide strong evidence supporting the positive impact of CPM on survival outcomes in patients with UBC. Further research and long-term follow-up studies are warranted to validate these findings.

RESUMEN

Background: Hypocalcaemia as a common complication after total thyroidectomy [23-40% in University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC)] and could result in prolonged hospital stay. We compared the early hypocalcaemia rate between prophylactic infusion of calcium and placebo among post total thyroidectomy patients and to establish whether prophylactic intravenous infusion of calcium reduces the rate of hypocalcaemia in the first 48 hours after surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing elective total thyroidectomy in UMMC between June 2020-May 2022, were recruited and randomized to receive placebo or prophylactic calcium infusion. Both groups of patients received same dosages of post-operative prophylactic vitamin D and oral calcium. Early hypocalcaemia (within 48 hours) rate after surgery was the primary outcome and duration of hospital stay was the secondary outcome. The data collected was analysed using per-protocol analysis. Results: Thirty-four patients were randomized equally (1:1) into both arms. No differences in the early hypocalcaemia rate between the intervention and placebo arms (0% vs. 5.8%, P>0.05). The median serum calcium levels were comparable between the intervention and placebo arms at 6 hours (2.33 vs. 2.37 mmol/L, P=0.59) and 48 hours (2.26 vs. 2.23 mmol/L, P=0.19) post-surgery. However, the median serum calcium level at 24 hours was statistically significantly higher in the intervention arm than the placebo arm (2.31 vs. 2.22 mmol/L, P=0.02). Similar duration of hospital stay between the both groups (2 vs. 2 days, P=0.81). Conclusions: Routine prophylactic calcium infusion with oral calcium and vitamin D does not diminish the rate of early symptomatic hypocalcaemia post total thyroidectomy in a low-risk group. However, its usefulness needs to be further assessed in a large scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) incorporating more bigger population. Trial Registration: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04491357).

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In the United States, 5%-10% of breast cancer cases are due to genetic predisposition. Among this population, prophylactic mastectomy is viable risk-reducing option. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to understand the timing to prophylactic mastectomy in patients with genetic predisposition to breast cancer and uncover factors influencing this decision. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with genetic predisposition for breast cancer from 2010 to 2020. RESULTS: In a cohort of 506 patients with genetic predisposition for breast cancer, 154 (30.4%) underwent prophylactic mastectomy, the remainder opted for surveillance alone. The median time from diagnosis to mastectomy was 1.1 years (IQR, 0.5-3.1 years). During the surveillance period, 118 patients (33.5%) underwent breast biopsy. Of the patients with benign or atypical findings, 35 (36.8%) pursued prophylactic mastectomy, a median of 0.5 years (IQR, 0.2-1.6 years) after their gene diagnosis. The most common factor impacting the decision to undergo prophylactic mastectomy was having a family member with cancer (54.7%) followed by a personal diagnosis of other cancer(s) (27.5%). CONCLUSION: Understanding the factors influencing the decision to undergo prophylactic surgery will allow for more effective shared decision-making for primary care providers, breast surgeons, and reconstructive surgeons.

RESUMEN

Dens invaginatus (DI) is a rare developmental defect in dentistry that results from invagination of the enamel organ into the dental papilla during tooth formation. However, such morphology presents cases that challenge treatment and diagnosis because of the morphology of the canal. The present study reports a case of DI in a 12-year-old boy showing a very unusual clinical and radiographic appearance of maxillary lateral incisors. The flowable composite was used to seal the invagination, and an etchant and a bonding agent were used as part of the preventative or prophylactic clinical therapy that was implemented in this instance. This offers a secure and efficient substitute therapy. This method has the potential to yield the greatest results for patients by combining expertise from endodontics and restorative dentistry.

RESUMEN

Cervical cancer is a significant health concern for women worldwide, with human papillomavirus (HPV) being the primary cause. This study aimed to assess Saudi women's awareness and knowledge of HPV, determine their information sources, and evaluate their intention to receive the HPV vaccine. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 654 Saudi females aged 18 to 60 years from January to May 2023. The results revealed that 60.85% of the participants had heard about HPV, but only 8.25% had received the HPV vaccination. Despite the low vaccination rate, 71.11% of the respondents expressed willingness to receive the vaccine. Educational level was the significant predictor of the vaccine awareness and acceptance. The internet and social media were the most prevalent sources of information about HPV. The study highlights the need for additional education about HPV-related diseases and vaccination among Saudi women. Although there is a high level of HPV vaccine acceptance, the lack of knowledge suggests that targeted educational interventions are necessary to increase awareness and promote vaccination uptake. These findings can inform public health strategies to reduce the burden of cervical cancer in Saudi Arabia through improved HPV vaccination coverage and education.

Asunto(s)

Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Arabia Saudita , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Papillomaviridae/inmunología , Virus del Papiloma Humano

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal anaesthesia is a common anaesthetic method for caesarean sections but often results in hypotension, posing potential risks to maternal and neonatal health. Norepinephrine, as a vasopressor, may be effective in preventing and treating this hypotension. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion for the treatment of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia in caesarean sections. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases for relevant studies on prophylactic administration of norepinephrine for the treatment of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery. Reference lists of included articles were also searched. The latest search update was on March 20, 2024. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software. The methods recommended by the Cochrane Handbook, Begge's and Egger's tests were used for risk of bias evaluation of the included literature. RESULTS: Nine studies were finally included in this study. The results showed that prophylactic administration of norepinephrine was superior to the control group in four aspects of treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery: the incidence of hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.34, 95%CI (0.27-0.43), P < 0.01]; the incidence of severe hypotension was reduced [RR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.21-0.51), P < 0.01]; and maternal blood pressure was more stable with MDPE [MD = -5.00, 95%CI (-7.80--2.21), P = 0.06] and MDAPE [MD = 4.11, 95%CI (1.38-6.85), P < 0.05], the incidence of nausea and vomiting was reduced [RR = 0.52, 95%CI (0.35-0.77), P < 0.01]. On the other hand, the incidence of reactive hypertension was higher than the control group [RR = 3.58, 95%CI (1.94-6.58), P < 0.01]. There was no difference between the two groups in one aspects: newborn Apgar scores [MD = -0.01, 95%CI (-0.10-0.09, P = 0.85)]. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic administration of norepinephrine is effective in treating hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in caesarean delivery patients; however, it does not provide improved safety and carries a risk of inducing reactive hypertension.

---

Hypotension, or low blood pressure, after spinal anaesthesia can threaten the health of both mothers and their babies during caesarean sections. Norepinephrine is a drug that affects heart rate less and does not easily cross the placental barrier, which may reduce its potential negative effects on the baby. However, there are not many studies on using norepinephrine as a preventive measure. Our study systematically evaluated the use of prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to prevent hypotension in caesarean section patients. We found that it is effective in preventing low blood pressure but does not show improved safety and carries some risk of causing high pressure as a reaction.

Asunto(s)

Anestesia Obstétrica , Anestesia Raquidea , Cesárea , Hipotensión , Norepinefrina , Vasoconstrictores , Humanos , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Femenino , Hipotensión/prevención & control , Hipotensión/etiología , Hipotensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación , Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Norepinefrina/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Anestesia Obstétrica/efectos adversos , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Adulto

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In the era of rising antimicrobial resistance and successful protocols for empiric and prophylactic antimicrobial therapy in elective surgical procedures, it is important to consider the specific needs of the trauma population based on injury location, severity, and environmental exposures. In this study, we aim to compare outcomes of high-activation trauma patients who received antibiotics during initial evaluation with those who did not. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients focusing on antimicrobial administration who presented as the highest trauma activation criteria during the year 2021 was conducted at a single urban institution. Patient demographic, injury, and outcome data ere collected through manual data abstraction from our institutional trauma registry. RESULTS: Nearly half of all trauma patients in our study received antibiotics after initial evaluation and age was found to be significantly associated with antibiotic administration within the first 1.5 h. Young men with penetrating injuries were more likely to receive antibiotic treatment. Seventy-eight percent of patients who received early antibiotics underwent a procedure, while 61% of those who did not receive early antibiotics did not (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the importance of individualizing antibiotic treatment based on the patient's age and specific injury pattern. They also underscore the need for trauma providers to prioritize antibiotic stewardship.

RESUMEN

Dental caries, the most prevalent chronic disease across all age groups, has a high prevalence, particularly among children. However, there is no specific and effective treatment for the prevention of caries in primary teeth (Pr.T.), which stems from a lack of knowledge regarding the basic nature of the tooth surface. Herein, we observed that the adhesion energies of the caries-related bacteria Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis to Pr.T were approximately 10 and 5.5 times higher than those to permanent teeth (Pe.T). A lower degree of mineralization and more hydrophilic characteristics of the Pr.T enamel account for this discrepancy. Accordingly, we proposed that the on-target modification of both hydroxyapatite and organic components on Pr.T by dual modification would render a sufficient hydration layer. This resulted in an approximately 11-time decrease in bacterial adhesion energy after treatment. In contrast, a single hydroxyapatite modification on Pe.T and young permanent teeth (Y.Pe.T) was sufficient to achieve a similar effect. Theoretical simulation further verified the rationality of the approach. Our findings may help understand the reason for Pr.T being caries-prone and provide references for treatment using resin restorations. This strategy offers valuable insights into daily oral hygiene and dental prophylactic treatment in children.

Asunto(s)

Adhesión Bacteriana , Caries Dental , Durapatita , Streptococcus mutans , Streptococcus sanguis , Diente Primario , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Caries Dental/microbiología , Streptococcus mutans/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Adhesión Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus sanguis/efectos de los fármacos , Durapatita/química , Esmalte Dental/química , Esmalte Dental/efectos de los fármacos

RESUMEN

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most malignant pathological type of lung cancer with the highest mortality, and the incidence of brain metastasis (BM) is in high frequency. So far, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been suggested as an effective treatment for preventing brain metastasis of SCLC. PCI has long been applied to limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) patients who have achieved complete remission after radiotherapy and chemotherapy as a standard treatment. However, the neurocognitive decline is a major concern surrounding PCI. New therapeutic approaches targeting PCI-induced neurotoxicity, including hippocampal protection or memantine, have been increasingly incorporated into the therapeutic interventions of PCI. Helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a head-tilting baseplate are recommended for hippocampal protection. Besides, in the MRI and immunotherapy era, the significance of PCI in SCLC patients is controversial. SCLC patients with PCI should be recruited in clinical trials since this is the only way to improve the existing standard of care. This review summarizes the current therapeutic strategy and dilemma over PCI for SCLC, providing a theoretical basis for clinical decision-making and suggestions for PCI practice in clinical.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the context of the widespread availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and aggressive salvage irradiation techniques, there has been controversy surrounding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. This study aimed to explore whether regular brain MRI plus salvage brain irradiation (SBI) is not inferior to PCI in patients with limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). METHODS: This real-world multicenter study, which was conducted between January 2014 and September 2020 at three general hospitals, involved patients with LS-SCLC who had a good response to initial chemoradiotherapy and no brain metastasis confirmed by MRI. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who did not receive PCI for various reasons but chose regular MRI surveillance and followed salvage brain irradiation (SBI) when brain metastasis was detected and patients who received PCI. RESULTS: 120 patients met the inclusion criteria. 55 patients received regular brain MRI plus SBI (SBI group) and 65 patients received PCI (PCI group). There was no statistically significant difference in median OS between the two groups (27.14 versus 33.00 months; P = 0.18). In the SBI group, 32 patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy and 23 patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy + simultaneous integrated boost. On multivariate analysis, only extracranial metastasis was independently associated with poor OS in the SBI group. CONCLUSION: The results of this real-world study showed that MRI surveillance plus SBI is not inferior to PCI in OS for LS-SCLC patients who had a good response to initial chemoradiotherapy.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias Encefálicas , Irradiación Craneana , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Terapia Recuperativa , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/radioterapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Irradiación Craneana/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Adulto , Quimioradioterapia/métodos

RESUMEN

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common but life-threatening condition, and diagnosis can be challenging. Diagnosis is even more difficult in those patients with atypical presentations such as the absence of pleuritic chest pain, dyspnoea, tachycardia, or symptoms of deep vein thrombosis. We have delineated shoulder and back pain as an atypical sign of PE. However, the significant amount of misdiagnosis highlights the importance of other rare symptoms of this potentially fatal disease. Therefore, eliciting these rare presenting symptoms can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. Here, we report the case of a patient who, 13 days after a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, presented to the emergency department (ED) with left shoulder and left-sided pleuritic back pain. She was managed in the resuscitation area in the ED and was subsequently diagnosed with a left-sided PE. Her care was taken over by the medical team, and she continued her recovery in the acute medical unit.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of twin pregnancies is on the rise worldwide due to assisted reproductive technologies. Cervical dilatation is a frequent complication and can be considered a cause of premature births in twin pregnancies. In vitro fertilization (IVF) twins are more prone to preterm delivery. Routine cervical cerclage with normal cervical length is not recommended in twins, but studies were not done on IVF twins. So, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of routine transvaginal cerclage in twin IVF pregnancies with normal cervical length on maternofetal outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted at a maternity hospital in eastern India from January 2016 to December 2019 with over 21800 deliveries. Two groups were taken, cases were those IVF twins with normal cervical length in whom cervical cerclage was done as they have referred to our hospital from the IVF centers for cerclage and in control no-cervical cerclage as they are referred from other IVF centers where cerclage was not a routine protocol. We have excluded cerclage done for history, ultrasound indicated, uterine anomalies, and monochorionic twins. Fifteen participants were recruited in both cases and controls. RESULTS: In our study 2 (6.66%), 4 (13%), and 26 (86%) were IVF twins delivered at a gestational age of <28 weeks, 28-32 weeks, and 32-37 weeks, respectively. The mean age of participants, mean gestation age at delivery, and birth weight in cases and control were 35.27 ± 5.98 years (min: 23; max: 45), 32.40 ± 5.54 years (min: 25; max: 44); 34 weeks 2 days ± 3.28 (min: 31; max: 37), 33 weeks 5 days ± 1.66 (min: 25; max: 37); 1961.33 ± 340 gram, 1899.33 ± 437.48 gram, respectively with no statistical significant difference (p = 0.186, p = 1, p = 0.668, respectively) Conclusion: Routine transvaginal cerclage is not effective in twin IVF pregnancies with normal cervical length for preventing preterm births. IVF twin women usually present at a late age and their birth weight are also low.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer in female population worldwide. However, germline mutations are responsible for a small proportion of these cases. The aim of our study is to assess how germline mutations influence the management and outcome of these patients taken into consideration both their cancer diagnosis and genetic assessment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in a women's single-center during a period of six years to assess the contribution of germline mutation in the treatment, prognosis and survival of breast cancer patients. Statistics were collected from both the patients' medical records and genetics department. RESULTS: From the total number of patients treated for breast cancer in our department between 2017 and 2022, 243 were eligible for genetic testing, comprising either BRCA1/2 or extended panel, taking into consideration their personal and family history. Of all subjects included in our study cohort, 5% were carriers of a pathogenic(P) or likely pathogenic(LP) variant of cancer susceptibility gene, of which 78% were diagnosed before the age of 50; triple negative disease was diagnosed in the majority of cases, and therefore, 62% of patients started treatment with systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 32% of subjects underwent upfront surgery. Prophylactic surgery for contralateral breast and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was considered and performed for 20% of patients. Less than 2% of cases had metastatic disease and received PARP inhibitors, with excellent treatment response and a very low rate of mortality in the study group. CONCLUSION: Carriers of pathogenic variants with breast cancer diagnosis may have a greater benefit from a tailored approach, including both surgical and oncological treatment, with better long-term outcomes.