RESUMEN

People accused of sexual assault are often described as the "real" victim by their defenders, but the impact of "victim framing" on public opinion is unknown. We investigated this issue across four experiments (N = 2,614). Online U.S. adult participants read a report about an alleged sexual assault that framed the female accuser as the victim (of assault), framed the male alleged perpetrator as the victim (of false accusations), or was neutral about victimhood (baseline). Relative to those in the baseline condition, participants in the assault- and allegation-victim conditions generally expressed more support for the victim-framed protagonist and less support for the other protagonist. The consistency of these effects varied with how often the victim frame was instantiated and whether the report described a fictionalized or real-world case. Across all contexts, however, participants who identified the victim-related language as influencing their evaluations exhibited strong framing effects. This suggests that social-pragmatic reasoning is a key mechanism by which victim framing shapes moral judgments.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Young children can in principle make generic inferences (e.g., "doffels are magnetic") on the basis of their own individual experience. Recent evidence, however, shows that by 4 years of age children make strong generic inferences on the basis of a single pedagogical demonstration with an individual (e.g., an adult demonstrates for the child that a single "doffel" is magnetic). In the current experiments, we extended this to look at younger children, investigating how the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are integrated with other aspects of inductive inference during early development. We found that both 2- and 3-year-olds used pedagogical cues to guide such generic inferences, but only so long as the "doffel" was linguistically labeled. In a follow-up study, 3-year-olds, but not 2-year-olds, continued to make this generic inference even if the word "doffel" was uttered incidentally and non-referentially in a context preceding the pedagogical demonstration, thereby simply marking the opportunity to learn about a culturally important category. By 3 years of age, then, young children show a remarkable ability to flexibly combine different sources of culturally relevant information (e.g., linguistic labeling, pedagogy) to make the kinds of generic inferences so central in human cultural learning.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

En esta investigación experimental se analiza la importancia de factores de tipo temático y pragmático en tareas de inferencia condicional, incluidas en textos narrativos, que describen situaciones plausibles de la vida cotidiana. Se manipula el tipo de contenido (causal versus promesa/amenaza), la congruencia de los textos (congruente versus no congruente), la probabilidad de ocurrencia empírica de los enunciados condicionales (deterministas, probabilísticos y ninguna relación), y el tipo de regla condicional (Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Afirmación del Consecuente y Negación del Antecedente). A partir de un paradigma de selección de respuesta, además de elegir la conclusión, los sujetos debían indicar la seguridad con la que hacían dicha selección. Los resultados pusieron de manifiesto que: (a) Los sujetos que razonaban con textos congruentes, obtenían mejores resultados y manifestaban sentirse más seguros de sus respuestas que los que razonaban con textos no congruentes; (b) se obtuvieron las tasas más elevadas de aciertos y la mayor seguridad en las respuesta cuando se razonaba con enunciados deterministas, que siempre suceden en el mundo real (c) el tipo de contenido no registró efectos principales, pero sí se obtuvieron efectos interactivos significativos entre el contenido y la congruencia de los textos. Los resultados obtenidos se discuten en el marco de los principales enfoques teóricos actuales de razonamiento condicional.

The purpose of this investigation is to explore the importance of thematic and pragmatic factors in conditional inference tasks, included in narrative texts, which described plausible everyday situations. Content type (causal versus promise/threat), text coherence (coherent versus non-coherent), the probability of empiric occurrence in conditional statements (deterministic, probabilistic and without specific relation), and the type of conditional rule (Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Affirmation of the Consequent and Denial of the Antecedent) were manipulated. Using an answer-selection paradigm, as well as choosing the conclusion, the subjects indicated the level of certainty with which they made their selection. The results showed that: (a) The subjects who reasoned with coherent texts obtained better results and declared feeling more certain of their answers than those who reasoned with incoherent texts; (b) when reasoning is carried out with deterministic statements, which always occur in the real world, the highest number of correct answers, as well as the highest level of certainty in the choice of answer, is achieved. (c) The content type did not register any principal effects, but significant interactive effects of this variable were obtained with text coherence. The results obtained were discussed within the framework of the principal current theoretical approaches to conditional reasoning.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

En este trabajo se estudia la influencia de variables de tipo pragmático en razonamiento condicional. Se manipuló: (a) la probabilidad de ocurrencia empírica de la relación entre el antecedente y el consecuente de los enunciados condicionales (determinista, probabilístico y ninguna relación); (b) la función pragmática de las premisas (causal, temporal, promesa/ amenaza), y (c) el tipo de regla condicional (Modus ponens, Modus tollens, Afirmación del consecuente y Negación del antecedente). Los resultados apoyan la influencia del conocimiento pragmático sobre las cuatro reglas de inferencia condicional, y son discutidos en términos de la teoría de modelos mentales y la teoría del doble proceso.

This paper sought to study the influence of pragmatic factors in conditional reasoning. We manipulated: (a) the probability of empirical occurrence of the relation between antecedent and consequent of conditionals (deterministic conditionals, probabilistic conditionals and those without any relation); (b) the pragmatic function of the premises (causal, temporal, promise vs. threat), and (c) the type of conditional rule (Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Affirmation of the Consequent and Denial of the Antecedent).The results obtained support the influence of pragmatic knowledge on the four conditional inference rules, and were discussed in terms of the mental models theory and the dual process theory.