RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Pipeline embolization device (PED) placement for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms is safe and effective under general anesthesia (GA). However, GA is associated with certain risks, longer procedural time, and higher hospital cost. The authors aimed to compare clinical outcomes and hospital cost between GA and local anesthesia (LA) procedures in patients who underwent PED placement for intracranial aneurysm treatment. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the charts of 216 patients with 223 intracranial aneurysms treated using the PED from June 2022 to March 2023. Cases were grouped according to type of anesthesia administered (LA or GA). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the groups to minimize confounding bias. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with 88 aneurysms were treated under LA, and 132 patients with 135 aneurysms were treated under GA. The complication rate and modified Rankin Scale score at 6 months were similar in both groups. Procedural time was significantly shorter with LA both before (87.47 ± 22.68 minutes vs 118.90 ± 46.80 minutes, p < 0.001) and after (84.75 ± 16.77 minutes vs 110.02 ± 38.56 minutes, p < 0.001) PSM. LA eliminates the need for postanesthesia recovery. Hospital cost was significantly lower in the LA group both before ($30,820.74 ± $3216.93 vs $32,846.62 ± $4731.50, p = 0.001) and after ($30,127.83 ± $2763.12 vs $33,874.41 ± $3163.56, p = 0.002) PSM. CONCLUSIONS: PED placement under LA can achieve satisfactory outcomes similar to those of PED placement under GA; however, the use of LA reduces procedural time and hospital cost.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Clopidogrel hyperresponsiveness is a timely topic, with wide ranging reports of hemorrhagic complications, using various clopidogrel dosing strategies following neuroendovascular procedures. This study serves to investigate hemorrhagic complications using standard clopidogrel doses and timing of these complications in relation to the procedure. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort of consecutive adult patients undergoing flow diversion with Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) at an academic medical center, receiving on-label clopidogrel doses. Patients with clopidogrel hyperresponsiveness (VerifyNowTM P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) ≤ 70) were compared to those who were normoresponsive. The primary outcome is the rate of hemorrhagic complications between groups. Results: Of 148 included patients, 54 (36.5%) were identified as clopidogrel hyperresponsive (PRU ≤ 70) and 94 (63.5%) as clopidogrel normoresponsive (PRU 71 - 194). There were no hemorrhagic complications observed in patients who were clopidogrel hyperresponsive, with 5 occurring in patients who were normoresponsive (P = 0.09). Three (60%) of the hemorrhages were intracranial with most occurring intra-procedure or within the first week of the procedure. Age > 60 years was the only candidate predictor for hemorrhagic complications (P = 0.004). Conclusion: Our findings are contradictory, with lower hemorrhagic complications in clopidogrel hyperresponders than prior literature, and most occurring intra-op or in the immediate acute post-op phase.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advancements in flow diversion technology have revolutionized the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The pipeline embolization device (PED) and the flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) have emerged as prominent tools in this field. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of PED and FRED in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Studies comparing PED and FRED were included and data extraction focused on study characteristics, patient demographics, and clinical and radiological outcomes. Primary outcomes were favorable outcomes, described as modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-2 score, and complete/near-complete occlusion, while secondary outcomes included retreatment rate and thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: Five studies, comprising 1238 patients, were included. No significant differences were found between PED and FRED in terms of complete occlusion at 6 months and 1 year, complete/near-complete occlusion at the last follow up, retreatment rates, and thromboembolic, in-stent thrombosis and hemorrhagic complications. However, FRED was significantly associated with higher favorable outcomes compared to PED (odds ratio: 0.37; confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.81; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study showed that both PED and FRED had comparable rates of complete occlusion, retreatment and complications, and FRED also demonstrated a higher likelihood of achieving favorable outcomes. The study underscores the need for further research with larger cohorts and longer follow up to consolidate these findings.

RESUMEN

Despite advancements in treatment modalities such as flow diverters, the optimal management of posterior communicating artery (PComA) aneurysms remains uncertain. While PComA aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been reported, the characteristics and progression of incomplete occluded aneurysms remain unclear. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the occlusion status and recurrence rates of PComA aneurysms treated with PED. A retrospective review of consecutive PComA aneurysm patients treated with PED was conducted between January 2015 and December 2020. Only patients with radiological follow-up were included. PComA aneurysms were categorized into incomplete occlusion and complete occlusion group. The primary outcomes included the characteristics of incomplete occlusion at the follow-up angiography. Among 121 PComA aneurysms treated with PED at our institution, 80 aneurysms were eligible in our study. During the follow-up period, 19 (23.8%) aneurysms demonstrated incomplete occlusion. Notably, there were no instances of recurrence among the 80 followed-up cases. Baseline characteristics of patients and aneurysms were comparable between the groups with complete and incomplete occlusion. However, the incomplete occlusion group showed a lower rate of assisted coils embolization (21.2% vs. 55.7%, P = 0.017) and shorter median operative time (91.0 vs. 145.5 min, P = 0.039). Differences in functional outcomes, complications, and PComA occlusion status between the groups were not significant. Multivariate analysis revealed the use of coils was associated with lower odds of incomplete PComA aneurysm occlusion (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.001-0.12; P = 0.001), while aneurysm size was associated with higher odds of incomplete occlusion (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10-1.46; P = 0.002). The treatment of PED for PComA aneurysm demonstrated favorable outcomes, with an acceptable rate of incomplete occlusion and no instances of recurrence observed. However, further research is needed to explore the optimal procedural strategy for large-sized PComA aneurysms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When it comes to intracranial aneurysms, the quest for more effective treatments is ongoing. Flow diversion represents a growing advancement in this field. This review seeks to compare 2 variants of the endovascular flow diversion method: the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) and the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, using appropriate terms to compare PED and FRED in double-arm studies from conception until October 8th, 2023. RESULTS: The meta-analysis encompassed 1769 patients, with a predominance of females (75.5%), among whom 973 patients underwent FRED procedures, while 651 received PED interventions. At 6 months, complete occlusion rates were 0.62 for FRED and 0.68 for PED (P = 0.68). At 1 year and the last follow-up, no significant differences were observed between FRED and PED, respectively. Adequate occlusion rates were similar between FRED and PED (0.82 vs. 0.79, P = 0.68). FRED showed a statistically significant higher rate of good mRS scores at follow-up (1.00 vs. 0.97, P = 0.03). Hemorrhage and re-treatment rates were higher in PED (P < 0.01) without considering the rupture status of the aneurysms due to the lack of data. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests comparable efficacy but different safety profiles between FRED and PED in treating intracranial aneurysms. FRED demonstrated a higher rate of good modified Rankin scores, while PED showed increased hemorrhage and re-treatment rates. Understanding these differences is crucial for informed decision-making in clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Flow diversion (FD) has revolutionized the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Since the introduction of the Pipeline Embolization Device, there has been a significant shift in the management of cerebral aneurysms, with increasing emphasis being placed on use of endoluminal reconstruction as a means of long-term, durable treatment of aneurysms. Increasingly, FD stents are being used as primary treatment for aneurysms, including those that present with subarachnoid hemorrhage.1 Improper use of FD stents, however, may create havoc, as access to the aneurysm sac is blocked with the placement of these devices. Aneurysms that are incompletely treated with FD may continue to grow and rupture. The inability to use coils or endosaccular devices for treatment of these aneurysms means the only options for treatment are placement of additional FD devices, deconstructive strategies with or without bypass, or microsurgical clipping,2 thereby making an aneurysm that may have been straightforward to treat with another strategy a complex lesion to treat with the presence of the FD stent. Although deconstructive techniques can be used for treatment of failed aneurysm occlusion with flow diversion, where possible, surgical clipping can result in the simplest, most durable solution. Herein we present (Video 1) a case of a patient with a posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm treated previously with FD using a single pipeline embolization device without aneurysm occlusion over 1 year of follow-up who was treated with retrosigmoid craniotomy and clipping of aneurysm. Nuances of the approach selection, clipping of the aneurysm, and preservation of the stent are discussed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Extensive research has confirmed the safety and effectiveness of flow diverters in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. However, their use in cases of acute rupture remains a subject of debate. METHODS: This study was conducted as a single-center retrospective investigation from January 2018 to January 2022 and included patients with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms (within three days of rupture) who were treated using the Pipeline Embolization Device with adjunctive coil embolization. Patient demographics, operative procedures, and outcomes were analyzed. Antiplatelet therapy included intra-arterial tirofiban and postoperative dual therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (5 males, 16 females) diagnosed with acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms were included in this study. The aneurysm types included 7 blood blister-like aneurysms (30.0%), 3 dissecting (14.3%), and 1 fusiform aneurysm (4.8%). Perioperative complications occurred in 2 patients (9.5%), and both cases involved thrombogenesis. Nineteen patients completed digital subtraction angiography during follow-up, with an average follow-up time of 8.7 months (5 - 18 months). Results showed a complete embolization rate of 94.7% (18/19), with a partial aneurysm still present in 1 patient. A total of 90.4% (19/21) of patients had a favorable prognosis (modified Rankin Scale score = 0 - 2). CONCLUSIONS: The Pipeline Embolization Device with adjunctive coil embolization proved to be a viable option for managing acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms, notwithstanding the potential for ischemic complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms pose unique challenges in treatment, often requiring alternative approaches compared to saccular aneurysms. Microsurgical options like clipping or a bypass can be difficult, leading to the advancement of endovascular techniques. Flow-diverting stents and vessel sacrifice with detachable coils have shown efficacy in reconstruction. The MVP® Micro Vascular Plug System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) offers a resheathable plug for vessel occlusion through electrolytic detachment. This case report illustrates the supplementary application of MVP® subsequent to flow diverter (FD) stenting, resulting in the effective endovascular management of a fusiform aneurysm affecting both vertebral arteries (VA), following unsuccessful coil vessel sacrifice treatment. A 61-year-old female presented with an unruptured fusiform aneurysm in the bilateral vertebral arteries (VAs). Treatment included a flow diverter in the right VA and vessel sacrifice in the left VA using Onyx-18 and coils. Despite initial success, left V4 segment recanalization occurred. Endovascular treatment, deploying two devices and additional coils using the MVP®, halted the flow. Follow-up showed left VA occlusion and reconstruction of the treated right VA, with the patient being discharged without deficits. This case demonstrates a unique approach using MVP® alongside a flow diverter (a PipelineTM Embolization Device (PED), Medtronic) for the treatment of a V4 segment fusiform aneurysm. This innovative technique is an alternative when conventional coil embolization for vessel sacrifice fails. The MVP®'s ease of use and precise delivery render it a feasible and efficacious alternative for treating complex aneurysms.

RESUMEN

Nickel and cobalt are frequently found in metallic alloys used in the manufacture of aneurysm clips and endovascular prostheses, such as the pipeline embolization device (PED). Nickel hypersensitivity can affect up to 15% of the population, however, it is very rarely overt in patients who undergo endovascular stent placement. Here, we present the case of a 35-year-old woman who developed allergic symptoms after PED placement and was later confirmed to be allergic to both nickel and cobalt by patch testing. Fortunately, she responded well to pharmacologic treatment, rendering surgical intervention unnecessary. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of symptomatic nickel hypersensitivity, and the second report of symptomatic cobalt allergy caused by the PED. Despite its low prevalence, we believe that surgeons should actively inquire patients in the postoperative period about allergic symptoms, to facilitate early diagnosis and treatment.

RESUMEN

The Flow Diverter is a self-expandable braided stent that has helped improve the effectiveness of cerebral aneurysm treatment during the last decade. The Flow Diverter's efficiency heavily relies on proper decision-making during the pre-operative phase, which is currently based on static measurements that fail to account for vessel or tissue deformation. In the context of providing realistic measurements, a biomechanical computational method is designed to aid physicians in predicting patient-specific treatment outcomes. The method integrates virtual and analytical treatment models, validated against experimental mechanical tests, and two patient treatment outcomes. In the case of both patients, deployed stent length was one of the validated result parameters, which displayed an error inferior to 1.5% for the virtual and analytical models. These results indicated both models' accuracy. However, the analytical model provided more accurate results with a 0.3% error while requiring a lower computational cost for length prediction. This computational method can offer designing and testing platforms for predicting possible intervention-related complications, patient-specific medical device designs, and pre-operative planning to automate interventional procedures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Rationale and objectives: The off-label use of flow diverters (FDs) has broadened to include treating aneurysms in posterior circulation (PC). A novel flow diverter, the Tubridge flow diverter (TFD), has been created in China specifically for treating PC aneurysms. However, studies comparing between pipeline embolization device (PED) and TFD are rare. Thus, our study aimed to explore the effectiveness of PED and TFD in the treatment of PC aneurysms using a propensity score matched cohort design. Methods: Retrospective data collection was conducted on patients who underwent treatment with either PED or TFD over the period from 2015 through 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to calibrate for patient age; history of ischemic stroke; aneurysm size; morphology; location and neck; number of FDs; parent vessel diameter; and the employment of assisted coiling and balloon techniques. Data on previously ruptured aneurysms was not included in the analysis. A comparison was conducted between the two devices to assess perioperative complications, aneurysm occlusion rates, and functional outcomes. Results: A total of 252 PC aneurysms were treated in 248 patients. Clinical and imaging follow-ups were lost in 26 and 47 patients, respectively. Major perioperative complications occurred in 7.5% of the cases, with favorable clinical outcomes in 91.0% and complete occlusion in 79.1%. Eighty-two (32.5%) aneurysms were treated with TFD, while 170 (67.5%) aneurysms were treated with PED. PSM was used to account for these significant variations, producing 82 matched pairs of unruptured aneurysms treated with PED or TFD. In terms of functional and angiographic outcomes, no significant differences were found between PED and TFD (functional outcome, p = 0.594 and angiographic outcome, p = 0.415). However, more perioperative major complications were found in patients treated with TFD (p = 0.005) compared with those receiving PED. Conclusion: The comparative study of PED and TFD in the treatment of PC aneurysms resulted in positive clinical results and sustained occlusion rates, with acceptable perioperative complications. However, higher quality studies are needed to enhance our understanding of the use of FDs for treating of PC aneurysms.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by flow diversion is safe and effective and is increasingly popular. However, the correct treatment paradigm for aneurysms incompletely treated by initial placement of a flow diverter has not been established, nor have the subsequent natural history and occlusion rates of such aneurysms. The authors sought to outline the natural history of such aneurysms, which to date have been considered partially treated. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases from 6 high-volume neurointerventional services, including all cases in which the first follow-up imaging after placement of a flow diverter showed incomplete occlusion of the aneurysm, and for which subsequent clinical and/or radiological follow-up was available. All included patients were treated with the Pipeline Flex embolization device or the Pipeline Flex embolization device with Shield Technology. Subsequent radiographic and clinical outcome data were collected and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival function. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients with persistently patent aneurysms on first follow-up imaging after flow diversion were identified. Of these, 204 had clinical follow-up and 152 had additional imaging follow-up. Of this final cohort, 148 aneurysms were unruptured, and 4 were ruptured. The average aneurysm size by maximum dimension was 10.8 mm. The average recorded follow-up was 27.8 months in the cohort, with some patients followed for as long as 9 years from treatment. Over the course of 403 person-years of follow-up, no delayed aneurysm ruptures were recorded. Both with and without retreatment, aneurysms showed a trend toward progressive occlusion over time. Complications related to device placement were low. CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysms that have been incompletely treated by flow diversion have a benign natural history with progression toward occlusion over time, with or without retreatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Off-label use of pipeline embolization devices (PEDs) has been increasingly used for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Numerous articles have highlighted the safety and effectiveness of PED placement from independent centers for both on- and off-label indications. There remains a paucity of information that considers overall safety and efficacy of off-label PED placement across the existing literature. Our objective is to systematically review the safety and occlusion outcomes of PED off-label use in intracranial aneurysm embolization. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed to identify studies on off-label use of PED. The selected studies provided relevant information, including study characteristics, patient demographics, clinical outcomes, peri-procedural complications, and long-term outcomes, which were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were 747 patients and 791 aneurysms included for analysis. Among the patient, 69.2% were female, with an age range of 16 to 80 years. The overall incidence rates for ischemic and hemorrhagic complications were 7% (95% CI: 4%-10%) and 2% (95% CI: 0%-4%), respectively. The mortality rate was 1% (95% CI: 0%-4%). The occlusion rates of aneurysm at initial follow up and 1 year follow-up were 82% (95% CI: 72%-91%) and 81% (95%CI: 75%-86%), respectively. Meta-regression analysis indicated no correlation between occlusion rate and factors such as age, sex, aneurysm size, location, morphology, rupture, or history of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variations in results observed in single-center studies, this meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of PED off-label use.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Flow diversion using the pipeline embolization device (PED) has been a paradigm shift for anterior circulation (AC) aneurysms. However, only a few studies report the long-term (≥1 year) angiographic and clinical outcomes for posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms. This study aims to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of treatment of AC and PC aneurysms with PED. METHODS: The databases included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane, and Scopus. Studies with at least 10 patients and 1-year follow-up were included. Twenty-four studies met our inclusion criteria. A random effect meta-analysis was performed to estimate the ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to estimate the pooled rates of long-term complete aneurysmal occlusion, symptomatic stroke, aneurysmal rupture, and intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: There were 1952 aneurysms, of which 1547 (79.25%) were in the AC and 405 (20.75%) in the PC. The 1-year occlusion rate was 78% in AC compared to 73% in PC aneurysms (P < 0.01). The symptomatic infarct rate was 5% in AC compared to 13% in PC (P < 0.01). While the rupture rate was 1% in AC compared to 4% in PC (P = 0.01), the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 2% for both (P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term occlusion rate after PED was higher in AC aneurysms, and the cumulative incidence of stroke and aneurysm rupture was higher in PC aneurysms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: By providing a more physiological approach to the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, the Pipeline embolization device (PED) has revolutionized the endovascular treatment of aneurysms. Although there are many flow diverters on the market, the authors report their experience with the PED, the first flow diverter to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration. They aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PED flow diversion for the treatment of a wide range of aneurysms, as well as to look at factors affecting occlusion. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database of patients treated with the PED between January 2011 and December 2019. Charts were reviewed for patient, aneurysm, and procedure characteristics. The primary outcomes of interest were complication rates, occlusion outcomes (O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale), and functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]). Secondary outcomes included predictors of incomplete occlusion at 6 and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The study cohort included 581 patients with 674 aneurysms. Most aneurysms (90.5%) were in the anterior circulation and had a saccular morphology (85.6%). Additionally, 638 aneurysms (94.7%) were unruptured, whereas 36 (5.3%) were acutely ruptured. The largest mean aneurysm diameter was 8.3 ± 6.1 mm. Complications occurred at a rate of 5.5% (n = 32). The complete occlusion rate was 89.3% at 24 months' follow-up, and 94.8% of patients had a favorable neurological outcome (mRS score 0-2) at the last follow-up. On multivariate analysis, predictors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion at 6 months were hypertension (OR 1.7, p = 0.03), previous aneurysm treatment (OR 2.4, p = 0.001), and increasing aneurysm neck diameter (OR 1.2, p = 0.02), whereas a saccular morphology was protective (OR 0.5, p = 0.05). Predictors of incomplete occlusion at 24 months were increasing aneurysm neck diameter (OR 1.2, p = 0.01) and previous aneurysm treatment (OR 2.3, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study findings are corroborated by those of previous studies and trials. The complete occlusion rate was 89.3% at 24 months' follow-up, with 94.8% of patients having favorable functional outcomes (mRS score 0-2). Aneurysm treatment before PED deployment and an increasing aneurysm neck diameter increase the risk of incomplete occlusion at 6 and 24 months.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pipeline embolization device (PED) is widely used in intracranial aneurysms, and the scope of applications for the PED, which is frequently used to treat cerebral aneurysms, is also growing. It has some effect on branching vessels as a result of its inherent properties. The effects of PED on the complications rate and branching vessels blockage have not yet been thoroughly investigated. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review searching reports from multiple databases on PED use for intracranial aneurysms, and analyzed the influence of PED on the occlusion rate of different branching vessels, and the influence of the amount of PED on the occlusion rate of branching vessels by meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the literature using PUBMED, Web of Science, and OVID databases until August 2023. Inclusion criteria were that the study used only PED, included at least 10 patients, and recorded branching vessels occlusion rates, mortality, and neurological complications. RESULTS: Nine studies were analyzed consisting of 706 patients with 986 side branches. The results of the meta-analysis showed that application of more than one PED did not significantly elevate the rate of branching vessels occlusion compared to application of one PED (OR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.43; P = 0.33). In the comparison of branching vessels occlusion rates in the anterior circulation, the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) had a significantly higher occlusion rate compared to the ophthalmic artery (OphA) (OR = 6.54; 95% CI: 3.05 to 14.01; P < 0.01), ACA also had a higher occlusion rate compared to the anterior choroidal artery (AchA) (OR = 15.44; 95% CI: 4.11 to 57.94 P < 0.01), ACA versus posterior communicating artery (PcomA) occlusion rate difference was not statistically significant (OR = 2.58; 95% CI: 0.63 to 12.82; P = 0.17), OphA versus AchA occlusion rate difference was not statistically significant (OR = 2.56; 95% CI: 0.89 to 7.38; P = 0.08), and the occlusion rate was significantly higher for PcomA compared to AchA (OR = 7.22; 95% CI: 2.49 to 20.95; P < 0.01) and lower for OphA compared to PcomA (OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.55; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis shows that use of multiple PEDs did not significantly increase the occlusion rate of branching vessels, and the larger the diameter of branching vessels covered by PED, the higher the occlusion rate of branching vessels. However, the incidence of complications is low after branching vessels occlusion in anterior circulation, which is related to the collateral circulation compensation of the branching vessels.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: According to benchtop studies, the oversizing of a Pipeline embolization device (PED) relative to the parent artery leads to a significant increase in porosity and potentially compromises aneurysm occlusion as well as transitional zone (TZ) formation around the neck of aneurysms. However, no clinical assessment has been reported. Here this potential was studied by measuring the dynamic changes of PEDs in the clinical time course. METHODS: The authors retrospectively examined 124 anterior circulation unruptured aneurysms in 114 consecutive patients treated with a PED between July 2015 and December 2020 at their institution. The authors excluded 77 cases of 68 patients with adjunctive coil embolization or multiple stents that could affect the PED dynamics and measurements, and 47 aneurysms in 46 patients were included. Measurements were performed before, immediately after, and 6 months after treatment, and then at intervals of 6 months to 1 year after that for nonocclusion cases. RESULTS: Complete occlusion was achieved in 79.0% and incomplete occlusion in 21.0% at last follow-up. The PED length immediately after deployment was 136% nominal length. A multivariable regression analysis revealed that age (OR 1.11/year; p = 0.02) and PED elongation from nominal length (OR 1.31/mm; p = 0.012) were independently associated with a higher rate of incomplete occlusion at the last follow-up. TZ formation did not affect the occlusion rate. CONCLUSIONS: PED elongation from the nominal length is a new predictor of incomplete aneurysm occlusion. The PED showed vascular remodeling by changing its diameter and length in the clinical course. TZ formation was remodeled and did not affect the occlusion rate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is a flow-diverting intraluminal device that is approved for use in adults 18 years or older with internal carotid artery aneurysms. However, it can also be used off-label in pediatric patients with aneurysms that cannot be resolved with traditional endovascular treatments. Herein, we present two cases of flow diversion in the pediatric population with complete obliteration of the aneurysm and excellent outcomes. Flow diversion has been shown to be a safe endovascular option in treating complex aneurysms in children. Larger-sized, multicenter trials are encouraged to compare outcomes between flow diversion and other aneurysm treatment options given the rarity of pediatric aneurysms.

RESUMEN

Sizing of flow diverters (FDs) is a challenging task in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms due to their foreshortening behavior. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference between the sizing results from the AneuGuide™ software and from conventional 2D measurement. Ninety-eight consecutive patients undergoing pipeline embolization device (PED) treatment between October 2018 and April 2023 in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital (Beijing, China) were retrospectively analyzed. For all cases, the optimal PED dimensions were both manually determined through 2D measurements on pre-treatment 3D-DSA and computed by AneuGuide™ software. The inter-rater reliability between the two sets of sizing results for each methodology was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The degree of agreement between manual sizing and software sizing were analyzed with the Bland-Altman plot and Pearson's test. Differences between two methodologies were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. There was better inter-rater reliability between AneuGuide™ measurements both for diameter (ICC 0.92, 95%CI 0.88-0.95) and length (ICC 0.93, 95%CI 0.89-0.96). Bland-Altman plots showed a good agreement for diameter selection between two methodologies. However, the median length proposed by software group was significantly shorter (16 mm versus 20 mm, p < 0.001). No difference was found for median diameter (4.25 mm versus 4.25 mm). We demonstrated that the AneuGuide™ software provides highly reliable results of PED sizing compared with manual measurement, with a shorter stent length. AneuGuide™ may aid neurointerventionalists in selecting optimal dimensions for FD treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The collar sign has been previously described as an angiographic indicator of incomplete occlusion after deployment of a pipeline embolization device (PED) for intracranial aneurysms. In the present study, we explore the predictors for a collar sign in aneurysms treated with the PED. METHODS: Aneurysms with a collar sign at the initial follow-up angiogram were identified in a retrospective review of single-center data. The predictors of a collar sign were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 492 cases of cerebral aneurysm treated with the PED were identified. Among them, 53 were found to have a collar sign on the initial follow-up angiogram. Univariate analysis showed that previous treatment of the same aneurysm (odds ratio [OR], 2.46; P = 0.01), a branch vessel from the aneurysm neck or dome (OR, 6.2; P < 0.001), and a smaller aneurysm neck size (OR, 0.75; P = 0.01) were all predictors for the presence of a collar sign. A larger diameter (OR, 0.92; P = 0.06), increased dome/neck ratio (OR, 1.38; P = 0.1), increased aspect ratio (OR, 1.14; 0 P =.17), and previous treatment showed a trend toward an association with a collar sign. However, after multivariate analysis, a branch from the aneurysm neck or dome (OR, 6.23; P < 0.001), aneurysm diameter (OR, 0.75; P = 0.032), an increased dome/neck ratio (OR, 4.62; P = 0.006), and previous treatment were the strongest predictors for a collar sign. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a branch vessel arising from the aneurysm neck or dome, an increased dome/neck ratio, aneurysm diameter, and previous treatment are the strongest predictive factors for a collar sign in the angiographic follow-up of PED-treated aneurysms.

Asunto(s)