RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intranasal trigeminal function is important in detecting environmental stimuli. The impact of age-associated chemosensory dysfunction upon taste and olfaction is well described, but an understanding of trigeminal loss (chemesthesis) is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to characterize trigeminal function in a cohort of older adults and explore potential impacts. METHODS: Twenty-eight participants over 50 years of age were recruited from the community as part of an aging cohort study. This nested cohort completed chemosensory questionnaires, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and psychophysical testing for taste (taste strips), olfaction (Sniffin' Sticks), and trigeminal function (eucalyptol lateralization). Data were analyzed for associations between trigeminal function, olfactory, and taste psychophysical performance, patient-reported metrics, and demographic risk factors. RESULTS: Patient-reported trigeminal impairment is less severe than other chemosensory loss, with mean visual analog scores (VAS, rated 0-100 from least to most severe) for smell (32.9 ± 34.2), taste (20.6 ± 28.4), and trigeminal sensation (9.5 ± 12.8). Despite low VAS scores, psychophysical trigeminal dysfunction was present in 10 (35.7%) subjects. Psychophysical olfactory and taste dysfunction were present in 16 (57.1%) and eight (28.6%) participants respectively. Hypercholesterolemia was associated with psychophysical trigeminal dysfunction (mean lateralization performance in hypercholesterolemia 57.7% ± 17.1 vs. 74.1% ± 10.4, p = .008). CONCLUSION: Intranasal trigeminal impairment is present in nearly one-third of aging adults when assessed by psychophysical methods but is under-recognized. Hyperlipidemia may be associated with trigeminal impairment. Future inquiries should better characterize these findings in larger and prospective cohorts.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of olfactory disorders has increased in recent years, mainly related to COVID-19 infection. In Brazil, over 37 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported, and approximately 10 % of those cases continue to experience olfactory disorders for more than one month. Despite the significant negative impact on well-being, there is currently no validated instrument to assess how olfactory disorders impact the quality of life in Brazil. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to validate the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) for Brazilian Portuguese. METHODS: The authors first performed translation, back-translation, expert review, pre-testing, psychometric evaluation and cultural adaptation of the English version of the questionnaire. To assure linguistic and conceptual equivalence of the translated questionnaire, 126 participants from two Brazilian states and varying degrees of olfactory loss answered the QOD and the World Health Organization Quality of Life bref (WHOQOL-bref) questionnaires. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT®) was used to quantify the olfactory loss. Furthermore, to evaluate the reliability of the Portuguese version a test-retest was performed on a subgroup of patients. The authors observed a high Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.86) for internal consistency of the quality of Life (QOD-QOL) statements. FINDINGS: As expected, there was a negative correlation between QOD-QOL and UPSIT® (Spearman's ρ = -0.275, p = 0.002), since QOL score increases and UPSIT® score decreases with worsening of olfactory function. Correlations were moderate between QOD-QOL and WHOQOL-bref mean (Spearman's ρ = -0.374, p < 0.001) and weak to moderate between the QOD-QOL and Visual Analog Scale of the QOD regarding professional life, leisure, and private life (Spearman's ρ = -0.316, p = 0.000; Spearman's ρ = -0.293, p = 0.001; Spearman's ρ = -0.261, p = 0.004; respectively). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the authors have demonstrated a high internal consistency and validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the QOD for evaluating the quality of life in individuals with olfactory disorders.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Zinc deficiency may worsen the severity of olfactory dysfunction; however, the relationship between serum zinc levels and therapeutic effects on olfactory dysfunction remains uncertain. This study investigated the relationship between normalising serum zinc levels and the therapeutic effects on olfactory dysfunction. METHODS: Forty-two patients diagnosed with post-infectious, post-traumatic, and idiopathic olfactory dysfunction, with serum zinc levels <70 µg/dL, were included in the study. All patients were treated with mecobalamin, tokishakuyakusan, and polaprezinc. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the zinc-normalised (≥70 µg/dL) and zinc-deficient (<70 µg/dL) groups, based on their post-treatment serum zinc levels. Olfactory test results were compared in each of the 2 groups. RESULTS: The patients were treated for a median of 133 days. The zinc-normalised group had significantly better results in all olfactory tests (detection/recognition thresholds of the T&T olfactometer, odour identification test (Open Essence), Visual Analogue Scale for olfactory dysfunction, and self-administered odour questionnaire). In contrast, only the self-administered odour questionnaire showed a significant improvement in the zinc-deficient group, with no significant differences observed in the other olfactory tests. When comparing the changes in the olfactory test scores between the 2 groups, significant differences were observed in the detection/recognition thresholds of the T&T olfactometer test and Open Essence results. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that patients with olfactory dysfunction may have difficulty improving their olfactory function if they also have zinc deficiency. Furthermore, normalisation of zinc deficiency may contribute to the improvement of olfactory dysfunction with general treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) has been recognized as an early biomarker for neurodegenerative diseases. Identifying behaviors that increase the risk of OD is crucial for early recognition of neurogenerative diseases. Alcohol consumption can potentially impact olfaction through its neurotoxic effects. This study aims to examine the relationship between alcohol consumption and OD, using data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on data for 2757 adults from Round 1 of NSHAP. OD was defined as correctly identifying 0-3 odors in the 5-item Sniffin' Sticks test while normal olfactory function was defined as correctly identifying 4-5 odors. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to examine the association between alcohol consumption and OD, controlling for age, race, and comorbidities. Analyses were weighted to account for the sampling design. RESULTS: OD was present in 23.1 % of adults. The average age among those with OD was 71.2 ± 7.8 years, compared to 66.9 ± 7.2 years in those with normal olfaction. In terms of alcohol consumption, 31.1 % of adults with OD were light-to-moderate drinkers and 7.7 % were heavy drinkers, compared to 35.6 % light-to-moderate and 7.7 % heavy drinkers in the normal olfaction group. After adjusting for age, gender, race, and education, neither light-to-moderate drinking (aOR: 0.99; 95 % CI: 0.76-1.29) nor heavy drinking (aOR: 1.24; 95 % CI: 0.83-1.85) were significantly associated with OD. CONCLUSION: Alcohol consumption was not associated with OD after controlling for covariates. While this study provides insight into the relationship between alcohol consumption and OD, further research is needed due to conflicting results in previous studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Acute respiratory viruses (ARVs) are the leading cause of diseases in humans worldwide. High-risk individuals, including children and the elderly, could potentially develop severe illnesses that could result in hospitalization or death in the worst case. The most common ARVs are the Human respiratory syncytial virus, Human Metapneumovirus, Human Parainfluenza Virus, rhinovirus, coronaviruses (including SARS and MERS CoV), adenoviruses, Human Bocavirus, enterovirus (-D68 and 71), and influenza viruses. The olfactory deficits due to ARV infection are a common symptom among patients. This review provides an overview of the role of SARS-CoV-2 and other common ARVs in the development of human olfactory pathophysiology. We highlight the critical need to understand the signaling underlying the olfactory dysfunction and the development of therapeutics for this wide-ranging category of AVRs to restore the altered or loss of smell in affected patients.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Different olfactory tests have been performed by otorhinolaryngologists in different parts of the world. For example, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) has been used in the U.S., whereas the Sniffin' Sticks Test has been used in Europe, and similarly, T&T olfactometry is used in Japan. Although audiometers with electronic oscillators have long been used in hearing tests, electronic odor generators are not typically used in olfaction tests. We attempted an olfactory test using the AROMASTIC® (SONY, Tokyo, Japan), an electronically controlled device that can diffuse five different odors. METHODS: Forty participants who had visited an outpatient olfactory clinic were included in this study. The participants were instructed to answer whether they could smell the five different odors during the AROMASTIC® screening test (AS-test), and the number of odors smelled was summed and scored (AS-score). The patients also underwent T&T olfactometry concurrently. RESULTS: The AS-scores and T&T olfactometry detection and recognition thresholds showed significant correlations, confirming that the AS-test is a valid olfactory test. CONCLUSION: Electronic odor diffusers may be useful for olfaction tests.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop a reliable version of the Saudi Arabian-University of Pennsylvania smell identification test (SA-UPSIT) and to establish normative values for both genders. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was carried out on voluntarily recruited normal participants in King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from April 2018 to May 2023. Culture-familiar odors were chosen and the kit was translated into Arabic for the study. The test was modified 3 times in 4 versions. Following this, a random sample was collected to carry out a re-test after 6 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 288 subjects participated in the development of the SA-UPSIT across all versions, including 146 females and 142 males. The average age of the participants was 28.4±9.9 years. In the final version, 111 participants scored an average of 34.5±2.5 for the total score, 35±2.3 for females, and 34.1±2.6 for males. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.73, indicating acceptable reliability. CONCLUSION: The new changes carried out to the SA-UPSIT increased the average scores and demonstrated good reliability, making it clinically applicable for diagnosing and monitoring olfactory dysfunction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The focus on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in medical research is becoming more and more intensive, with attention being paid to the patient's subjective feelings and assessment of one's health status. Smell disorders can significantly impact human life. The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) is a self-monitoring questionnaire that provides subjective information about olfactory disorders. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to check the reliability and validation of the Polish version of QOD (QOD-PL) for use in patients with olfactory impairment in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 158 patients (76 females, mean age (Mage) 45.97 ±16.37 years), suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), whose olfactory function was measured using the Sniffin' Sticks test (SST), were studied. All patients completed 3 validated questionnaires: Importance of Olfaction (IO), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and QOD-PL. RESULTS: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the entire QOD-PL scale were good (Cronbach's α = 0.88). The convergent validity of the QOD-PL and its subscales correlated with IO and SNOT-22. The life quality statements in the QOD-PL (QOD-PL-LQ) score, its negative statements, and the mean score for VAS scales were significantly and positively correlated with all symptoms measured with SNOT-22 and none of the IO scales. CONCLUSIONS: The QOD-PL is a reliable, valid and important tool for assessing HRQOL in patients with olfactory disorders. However, it is important to note that not all of its subscales can be considered and interpreted separately.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Quantitative (hyposmia and anosmia) and qualitative (phantosmia and parosmia) olfactory disorders are common consequences of COVID-19 infection found in more than 38% of patients even months after resolution of acute disease. SARS-CoV-2 has tropism for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in the respiratory system, suggesting that it is the mechanism of damage to the olfactory neuroepithelium and of involvement at the central nervous system. The olfactory bulb is the organ with the highest insulin uptake in the central nervous system. Insulin increases the production of Growth Factors (GF); therefore, in this study, the administration of intranasal insulin is proposed as a viable treatment for olfactory disturbances. The aim of this study was to obtain improvement in olfaction after 4 weeks of intranasal insulin administration in a group of patients presenting chronic olfactory disturbances secondary to COVID-19 infection, quantified using the Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI) score based on the Sniffin Sticks®. METHODS: Experimental, longitudinal, prolective and prospective study of patients with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 in the last 3-18 months and who persisted with anosmia or hyposmia. The sample size was calculated with "satulator". The intervention was performed from January to May 2022. Throughout four appointments, a baseline olfactory measurement was obtained using the TDI score based on the Sniffin Sticks® test. In the first three appointments, Gelfoam® cottonoids soaked in 40 IU of NPH insulin were placed on the nasal roof of each nostril for 15 min. Descriptive statistics, student's paired t test and a multiple linear regression were utilized to ascertain statistical significance of the outcome on the TDI score obtained on the fourth and final appointment. RESULTS: 27 patients were included in the study. Table 1 summarizes the sample characteristics. The results exhibit that 93% of the sample had an improvement. The initial mean TDI score was 67% (63-71) compared to the final mean of 83% (80-86, p < 0.01). TDI subsection analysis is shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in pre-intervention and post-intervention glucose measurements after the intranasal insulin administration. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of intranasal insulin has promising results, pointing towards an alternative of treatment for chronic olfactory disturbances secondary to neuroepithelial damage caused by upper respiratory tract infections. Furthermore, this is the first study to use a three-point assessment of olfaction in post-COVID-19 patients, while using the Sniffin Sticks® TDI score adapted to Latin Spanish.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Olfaction has recently found clinical value in prediction, discrimination and prognosis of some neurodegenerative disorders. However, data originating from standard tests on olfactory dysfunction in Huntington's disease are limited to odour identification, which is only one domain of olfactory perceptual space. METHOD: Twenty-five patients and 25 age- and gender-matched controls were evaluated by the Sniffin' Sticks test in three domains of odour threshold, odour discrimination, odour identification and the sum score of them. Patients' motor function was assessed based on the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale. RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients' scores of all olfactory domains and their sum were significantly lower. Besides, our patients' odour threshold and odour discrimination impairments were more frequently impaired than odour identification impairment (86 per cent and 81 per cent vs 34 per cent, respectively). CONCLUSION: Olfactory impairment is a common finding in patients with Huntington's disease; it is not limited to odour identification but is more pronounced in odour discrimination and odour threshold.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE To determine the incidence and prognosis of olfactory,gustatory and auditory dysfunctions related to the COVID-19 Omicron strain infection.METHODS A cross-sectional investigation was performed through online questionnaires.Data of patients with Omicron strain infection from December 24th,2022 to January 2nd,2023 were collected.The visual analogue scale(VAS)was used to evaluate the self-reported olfactory,gustatory and auditory functions of patients.RESULTS A total of 869 valid questionnaires were obtained.The incidence of otolaryngology-related symptoms associated with omicron strain infection was 96.8%.The incidence of olfactory,gustatory and auditory dysfunction was 44.4%,44.2%and 10.7%,respectively.There were statistically significant differences(P<0.001)in VAS scores for olfactory,gustatory,and auditory impairments between all surveyed individuals before and after infection,as well as in the corresponding VAS scores for those who experienced these impairments.The median duration of olfactory,gustatory and auditory dysfunction were 5,4 and 3 days,respectively.CONCLUSION The incidence of olfactory,gustatory,and auditory impairments is high after Omicron infection,with most cases experiencing rapid spontaneous improvement.For the long-term symptoms,the otolaryngology doctors are responsible for exploring and developing effective intervention measures.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE To explore the expression changes of TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathways in olfactory disorders.METHODS There were 40 healthy BALB/c mice who were divided into an observation group and a control group,with 20 mice in each group.Detection of Toll-like receptors(TLR4),myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88(MyD88)and nuclear factor kappa B(NF-κB)in mice using quantitative reverse transcription PCR level;Detection of TLR4,MyD88 and NF-κB by Western blot(WB)test protein content;Immunohistochemical detection of the expression of mouse olfactory marker protein(OMP).RESULTS There was no significant difference in foraging time between the two groups of mice before modeling(P>0.05),after modeling,the foraging time of the observation group mice was significantly longer than that of the control group(P<0.05);The relative mRNA expression level of TLR4,MyD88 and NF-κB in the nasal epithelium of mice in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);The protein expression of TLR4,MyD88 and NF-κB in the nasal epithelium of mice in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);The level of OMP protein in the nasal epithelium of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Expression reinforcement of TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway in a mouse model of olfactory dysfunction.

RESUMEN

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the occurrence of self-reported olfactory and taste disorders in non-hospitalized Brazilian adults who presented severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 infection symptoms and attended primary health care. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was based on a routine standardized diagnostic screening questionnaire applied in a Brazilian primary care facility. The olfactory and taste disorder occurrence was compared between severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2-positive and severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2-negative cases and described by age and sex. RESULTS: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2-positive patients had a higher proportion of self-reported olfactory and taste disorders, as compared with severe acute respiratory syndrome-negative (50.7%, vs. 20.6%, p<0.0001). Of all individuals with self-reported olfactory and taste disorder cases, 69% presented both olfactory and taste impairments, 13% olfactory only, and 17% taste only. In severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2-positive cases, the frequency of olfactory and taste disorders was significantly higher among females as compared with males (71% vs. 34%). Additionally, people with olfactory and taste disorders were significantly younger in the severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2-positive group. CONCLUSION: Self-reported olfactory and taste disorders are highly common among non-hospitalized severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2-positive Brazilian people who attended the Family Health Care Unit. The co-occurrence of both self-reported olfactory and taste disorders was more frequent than self-reported olfactory or taste disorders alone.

RESUMEN

Abstract Background Parkinson's disease (PD) causes motor and non-motor symptoms such as hyposmia, which is evaluated through olfactory tests in the clinical practice. Objective To assess the feasibility of using the modified Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (mCCCRC) olfactory test and to compare its performance with the Sniffin' Sticks-12 (SS-12, Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Wedel, Germany) test. Methods A transversal case-control study in which the patients were divided into the PD group (PDG) and the control group (CG). The cost and difficulty in handling substances to produce the mCCCRC test kits were evaluated. Sociodemographic characteristics, smoking habits, past coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections, self-perception of odor sense, and cognition through the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were also evaluated. The PDG was scored by part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) and the Hoehn and Yahr Scale (H&Y) scale. Correlations were assessed through the Spearman rank correlation coefficient test (ρ, or rho). Results The mCCCRC test was easily manufactured and handled at a cost ten times lower compared with the SS-12. The groups (PDG: n= 34; CG: n= 38) were similar in terms of age, sex, level of schooling, smoking habits, and history of COVID-19. The tests results showed moderate correlation (rho = 0.65; p< 0.0001). The CG presented better cognitive performance and scored better in both tests (p< 0.0001). There was a tendency for a negative correlation with age, but good correlation with the MoCA (p= 0.0029). The results of the PDG group showed no correlation with olfactory results and motor performance or disease duration. The self-perception of hyposmia was low in both groups. Conclusion The mCCCRC is an easy-to-apply and inexpensive method that demonstrated a similar performance to that of the SS-12 in evaluating olfaction in PD patients and healthy controls.

Resumo Antecedentes A doença de Parkinson (DP) cursa com sintomas motores e não motores como a hiposmia, que é avaliada por diferentes testes olfativos na prática clínica. Objetivo Avaliar a viabilidade do teste olfatório Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center modificado (mCCCRC) e compará-la à do teste Sniffin' Sticks-12 (SS-12, Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Wedel, Alemanha). Métodos Estudo transversal de caso-controle em que os pacientes foram divididos no grupo DP (GDP) e no grupo controle (GC). O custo e as dificuldades no manuseio das substâncias necessárias para a produção dos kits do teste mCCCRC foram avaliados. Características sociodemográficas, tabagismo, histórico de infecção por doença do coronavírus 2019 (coronavírus disease 2019, COVID-19, em inglês), autopercepção do olfato e cognição pelo Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) também foram avaliados. O GDP foi avaliado pela parte III da Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) e pela escala de Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y). As correlações utilizaram o teste do coeficiente de correlação de postos de Spearman (ρ, ou rho). Resultados O mCCCRC foi facilmente poroduzido e manipulado com custo dez vezes inferior ao do SS-12. Os grupos (GDP: n= 34; GC: n= 38) eram similares em termos de idade, sexo, escolaridade, tabagismo e histórico de COVID-19. Os resultados obtidos em ambos os testes mostraram excelente correlação (rho = 0.65; p< 0.0001). O GC teve um desempenho cognitivo melhor e pontuou melhor nos dois testes (p< 0.0001). Houve uma tendência a uma correlação negativa com a idade, mas boa correlação com a pontuação no MoCA (p= 0.0029). Os resultados olfativos do GDP não mostraram correlação com desempenho motor ou duração da doença. A autopercepção de hiposmia foi baixa em ambos os grupos. Conclusão O mCCCRC é um teste de fácil aplicação, baixo custo, e apresentou um desempenho semelhante ao do SS-12 na avaliação olfativa de pacientes com DP e controles saudáveis.

RESUMEN

Abstract Background Olfactory dysfunction (OD) represents a frequent manifestation of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is a protein that interacts with the angiotensin-converting enzyme receptor, essential for viral entry into the cell. Previous publications have suggested a possible role of APOE in COVID-19 severity. As far as we know, no publications found significant associations between this disease's severity, OD, and APOE polymorphisms (E2, E3, and E4). Objective To analyze the epidemiology of OD and its relationship with APOE polymorphisms in a cohort of Long-COVID patients. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study with patients followed in a post-COVID neurological outpatient clinic, with OD being defined as a subjective reduction of olfactory function after infection, and persistent OD being defined when the complaint lasted more than 3 months after the COVID-19 infection resolution. This cross-sectional study is part of a large research with previously reported data focusing on the cognitive performance of our sample. Results The final sample comprised 221 patients, among whom 186 collected blood samples for APOE genotyping. The persistent OD group was younger and had a lower hospitalization rate during the acute phase of the disease (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the APOE variant E4 allele frequency was lower in this group (p = 0.035). This study evaluated OD in an outpatient population with COVID-19. In the current literature on this disease, anosmia is associated with better clinical outcomes and the E4 allele is associated with worse outcomes. Conclusion Our study provides new information to these correlations, suggesting APOE E4 as a protective factor for OD.

Resumo Antecedentes A disfunção olfatória (DO) é uma manifestação frequente da doença do coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19). A apolipoproteína E (APOE) é uma proteína que interage com o receptor da enzima conversora de angiotensina, essencial para a entrada viral na célula. Publicações anteriores sugeriram um possível papel da APOE na gravidade da COVID-19. Até onde sabemos, nenhuma publicação encontrou associações significativas entre a gravidade dessa doença, DO e polimorfismos da APOE (E2, E3 e E4). Objetivo Analisar a epidemiologia da DO e sua relação com os polimorfismos do gene APOE em uma coorte de pacientes com COVID longa. Métodos Um estudo de coorte prospectiva com pacientes acompanhados em ambulatório neurológico pós-COVID, com DO sendo definida como uma redução subjetiva da função olfativa após a infecção e a DO persistente sendo definida quando a queixa durou mais de 3 meses após a resolução da infecção por COVID-19. Este estudo transversal é parte de uma pesquisa maior com dados anteriormente relatados, focando na performance cognitiva dos pacientes. Resultados Foram selecionados 221 pacientes para esse estudo, dos quais 186 haviam coletado amostras de sangue para genotipagem APOE. O grupo DO persistente foi mais jovem e apresentou menor taxa de internação na fase aguda da doença (p < 0,001). Além disso, a frequência do alelo E4 da APOE foi menor nesse grupo (p = 0,035). Este estudo avaliou a DO em uma população com COVID longa. Na literatura atual sobre essa doença, a anosmia está associada a melhores desfechos clínicos e o alelo E4 está associado a piores desfechos. Conclusão Nosso estudo acrescenta novas informações a essas correlações, sugerindo a APOE E4 como um fator de proteção para DO.

RESUMEN

Abstract Background The incidence of olfactory disorders has increased in recent years, mainly related to COVID-19 infection. In Brazil, over 37 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported, and approximately 10 % of those cases continue to experience olfactory disorders for more than one month. Despite the significant negative impact on well-being, there is currently no validated instrument to assess how olfactory disorders impact the quality of life in Brazil. Objectives: This study aimed to validate the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) for Brazilian Portuguese. Methods: The authors first performed translation, back-translation, expert review, pre-testing, psychometric evaluation and cultural adaptation of the English version of the questionnaire. To assure linguistic and conceptual equivalence of the translated questionnaire, 126 participants from two Brazilian states and varying degrees of olfactory loss answered the QOD and the World Health Organization Quality of Life bref (WHOQOL-bref) questionnaires. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT®) was used to quantify the olfactory loss. Furthermore, to evaluate the reliability of the Portuguese version a test-retest was performed on a subgroup of patients. The authors observed a high Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.86) for internal consistency of the quality of Life (QOD-QOL) statements. Findings: As expected, there was a negative correlation between QOD-QOL and UPSIT® (Spearman's ρ = -0.275, p = 0.002), since QOL score increases and UPSIT® score decreases with worsening of olfactory function. Correlations were moderate between QOD-QOL and WHOQOL-bref mean (Spearman's ρ = -0.374, p < 0.001) and weak to moderate between the QOD-QOL and Visual Analog Scale of the QOD regarding professional life, leisure, and private life (Spearman's ρ = -0.316, p = 0.000; Spearman's ρ = -0.293, p = 0.001; Spearman's ρ = -0.261, p = 0.004; respectively). Conclusion: In conclusion, the authors have demonstrated a high internal consistency and validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the QOD for evaluating the quality of life in individuals with olfactory disorders.

RESUMEN

Introduction: Considering the inconsistent results regarding the association between the severity and duration of olfactory dysfunction (OD), and the viral load in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, we aimed to conduct this study. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective cohort study in which COVID-19 patients were evaluated for the initial cycle threshold value (Ct values) measured by the nasopharyngeal samples along with olfactory function measured by the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) within 2 months of COVID-19 onset. Results: Among 309 COVID-19 patients who were included in this study, 108 (34.9%), 112 (36.2%) and 89 (28.8%) were normosmic, hyposmic, and anosmic, respectively based on the UPSIT. The severity of COVID-19 and the rate of hospitalization were higher in anosmic patients (p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively). Moreover, significant associations between the initial Ct value and the severity of OD at admission and follow-ups were detected (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively). Anosmic patients had higher Ct values in comparison with hyposmic (approx. 3-fold) and normosmic (approx. 12-fold) patients. The recovery rate after one- and two-month follow-ups was 47% and 84%, respectively. At the follow-ups, OD-recovered patients significantly had lower Ct values (mean Ct value: 27.79 ± 2 and 28.21 ± 2.08) in comparison with those who have not recovered yet (mean Ct value: 30.19 ± 3.36, and 33.6 ± 3.37) (p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively). Conclusions: Ct value seems to be a significant factor not only in predicting OD severity in COVID-19 patients but also in the OD recovery duration. This finding may be helpful to investigate the underlying mechanisms of OD in COVID-19 patients.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyse variations in the n-butanol threshold and odour identification scores of the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Centre test in various grades of olfactory dysfunction and in different nasal conditions leading to olfactory loss. METHOD: Retrospective observational study. RESULTS: All grades of olfactory dysfunction were predominantly noted among males. In chronic rhinosinusitis, anosmia or severe hyposmia was seen in 87.5 per cent of patients without polyps in comparison with 68 per cent of patients with polyps. In addition, 90 per cent of patients with atrophic rhinitis and post-traumatic loss had anosmia, but only 30.7 per cent of patients with allergic rhinitis had anosmia. Pepper was the most affected smell for all the nasal diseases except atrophic rhinitis, in which asafoetida and baby powder smells were affected more. CONCLUSION: In most inflammatory sinonasal conditions, odour identification is relatively preserved even when the threshold is maximally affected. In patients with comparable olfactory dysfunction based on the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Centre test score, a relatively preserved suprathreshold odour identification score may predict better prognosis.

RESUMEN

Platinum-based chemotherapy is known to cause taste and smell changes (TSCs) via a host of mechanisms, including altered receptor activity, saliva/mucus production, and induction of receptor destruction via mitotic inhibition. In the literature to date, these changes have primarily resulted in worsening of taste and smell. In this case report, we document the first instance of an individual regaining their sense of olfactory detection following treatment with oxaliplatin for colorectal adenocarcinoma. We theorize that the improvement in his sense of smell may have resulted from oxaliplatin-induced destruction of his nasal polyps through the caspase-9/procaspase-9 apoptotic pathway, a pathway shared with other mechanisms of nasal polyp destruction. These findings were supported by nasal endoscopy and sphenoid sinusoscopy, which demonstrated no clinical persistence of nasal polyps, in contrast to nasal endoscopy prior to chemotherapy which demonstrated persistent nasal polyposis. Objective smell testing post-treatment revealed a diminished ability to discriminate odors. Chemotherapy-induced TSCs play a key role in poor weight gain, food aversion, emotional distress, and an overall decrease in quality of life, and patients should be informed of these potential consequences prior to starting treatment. However, in patients with anosmia secondary to nasal polyposis, treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy may provide an additional therapeutic benefit. Further studies may help elucidate the potential therapeutic benefits of these agents in managing steroid-resistant polyposis for patients suffering from olfactory dysfunction.

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Hypo/anosmia is a characteristic symptom of COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study is to investigate the time of smell recovery and to identify a possible order of perception recovery of different odors in COVID-19 patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on not hospitalized COVID-19 patients, selected according to eligible criteria. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee. A questionnaire formulated by our team was submitted to patients in order to know the duration of the hypo/anosmia and hypo/ageusia and the order of odor recovery: vanillin (mixed olfactory/gustatory substances), phenyl ethyl alcohol (rosewater) (pure olfactory substances), eucalyptol (mixed olfactory/trigeminal substances), and eugenol (mixed olfactory/trigeminal/gustatory substances). Results: 181 patients were included. Hypo/ageusia and hypo/anosmia lasted on average 10.25 (±8.26) and 12.8 (±8.80) days, respectively. The most frequent odor recovery sequence was: (1) phenyl ethyl alcohol; (2) eucalyptol; (3) vanillin; and (4) eugenol. In COVID-19 patients, hypo/anosmia occurs more often in women and at a young age. Conclusions: This preliminary investigation highlighted novel data: there is a chronological order in perception recovery of different olfactory substances and, therefore, in the restoration of the various sensitive nerve pathways involved in the sense of smell.

Asunto(s)