RESUMEN
The development and progression of ascites represent a crucial event in the natural history of patients with cirrhosis, predisposing them to other complications and carrying a heavy impact on prognosis. The current standard of care for the management of ascites relies on various combinations of diuretics and large-volume paracenteses. Periodic long-term albumin infusions on top of diuretics have been recently shown to greatly facilitate the management of ascites. The insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), an artificial connection between the portal and caval systems, is indicated to treat patients with refractory ascites. TIPS acts to decrease portal hypertension, thus targeting an upstream event in the pathophysiological cascade of cirrhosis decompensation. Available evidence shows a significant benefit on ascites control/resolution, with less clear results on patient survival. Patient selection plays a crucial role in obtaining better clinical responses and avoiding TIPS-related adverse events, the most important of which are hepatic encephalopathy, cardiac overload and failure, and liver failure. At the same time, some recent technical evolutions of available stents appear promising but deserve further investigations. Future challenges and perspectives include (i) identifying the features for selecting the ideal candidate to TIPS; (ii) recognizing the better timing for TIPS placement; and (iii) understanding the most appropriate role of TIPS within the framework of all other available treatments for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
RESUMEN
Background and aims Large-volume paracentesis (LVP) is a common practice for diuretic-refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is reportedly low in asymptomatic patients presenting for elective outpatient LVP. The benefits and cost-effectiveness of routine testing for SBP in these patients are yet to be established. We aimed to investigate the incidence of SBP in outpatients who underwent elective LVP and the diagnostic yield of routine ascitic fluid testing, specifically fluid culture, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of these tests. Methods This is a retrospective study of adult patients undergoing outpatient LVP at Wollongong Hospital over three years. Symptomatic patients and patients with non-cirrhosis-related ascites were excluded. The ascitic fluid results were reviewed to determine if the polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count was above 250 x 106/L and whether this was associated with positive fluid culture and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the incidence of SBP. The secondary outcome was the incidence of bacterascites. Results There were 26 patients with 122 elective ascitic taps. Two of 122 taps (1.6%) had ascitic PMN count above 250 x 106/L, indicating SBP. Four out of 122 taps (3.2%) had positive ascitic fluid cultures with a normal PMN count. All patients did not have significant clinical outcomes, did not receive antibiotic treatment, and remained asymptomatic over three years of follow-up. Conclusions Routine testing of ascitic fluid cell count and culture in asymptomatic patients with cirrhosis presenting for outpatient LVP yielded a low incidence of SBP and bacterascites, which were not clinically significant. Routine testing is costly and potentially exposes patients to antibiotics unnecessarily.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The primary aim is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) in two indications from a Spanish perspective. Firstly, as pre-emptive treatment for patients with acute variceal bleeding (indication 1) compared with endoscopic band ligation plus drug therapy. Secondly, to treat refractory ascites (indication 2) compared with large volume paracentesis. METHODS: A two-state (alive and dead) Markov model was developed to capture the costs and health impact for the two indications over a 2-year time horizon with monthly cycles. In the alive state, patients could experience adverse event(s), associated with costs and disutility, such as recurrent variceal bleeding, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy. Discount rates of 3% for utilities and costs and a cost-effectiveness threshold of 25,000 per QALY were applied. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, TIPSS was estimated to be cost-effective as a pre-emptive treatment for indication 1 (incremental cost and QALYs of - 230 and 0.211, respectively). TIPSS also remained cost-effective (16,819/QALY) in a conservative scenario analysis, conducted with an alternate source for clinical parameters. The key drivers of the outcomes were survival for the comparator arm, mean band ligation outpatient procedures, and TIPSS treatment costs. TIPSS was estimated to dominate the comparator for indication 2 (incremental cost and QALYs of - 25,687 and 0.531, respectively). The key drivers of the outcomes were monthly paracentesis sessions and cost per inpatient stay for those undergoing paracentesis. CONCLUSIONS: TIPSS is likely to be a cost-effective and a cost-saving treatment in patients with cirrhosis in indications 1 and 2, compared with standard treatments. The analyses estimate clinical benefits along with reduced healthcare costs from avoided downstream resource consumption.
Asunto(s)
Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Várices , Humanos , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/cirugía , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Ascitis/etiología , Ascitis/cirugía , Stents , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Ascites is the most common complication of cirrhosis, with 5-year mortality reaching 30%. Complications of ascites (ie, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, recurrent/refractory ascites, and hepatic hydrothorax) further worsen survival. The development of ascites is driven by portal hypertension, systemic inflammation, and splanchnic arterial vasodilation. Etiologic treatment and nonselective beta-blockers can prevent ascites in compensated cirrhosis. The treatment of ascites is currently based on the management of fluid overload (eg, diuretics, sodium restriction, and/or paracenteses). In selected patients, long-term albumin use, norfloxacin prophylaxis, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt reduce the risk of further decompensation and improve survival.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Portal , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Ascitis/etiología , Ascitis/terapia , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/terapia , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Hipertensión Portal/complicaciones , Hipertensión Portal/terapiaRESUMEN
Background: Ascites is the most common complication of decompensated cirrhosis of liver requiring paracentesis for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The ascitic fluid leak can develop after paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis leading to significant morbidity if persistent. We aimed to study the incidence and predictors of post-paracentesis leak in patients with ascites. Methods: In this prospective study, patients with cirrhosis undergoing therapeutic paracentesis were followed up, and those patients who developed persistent leak were included as cases. Controls were randomly selected in a 2:1 ratio from the group of patients who did not develop leak. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 256 patients underwent 1126 sessions of therapeutic abdominal paracentesis over a period of 14 months. Post-paracentesis leak was seen in 55 (4.8%) patients while only 20 (1.7%) patients had persistent leak. The management of leak was in a stepwise manner initially with tincture benzoin with tight dressing followed by topical cyanoacrylate adhesive and followed by autologous blood patch in those not responding. The persistent leak group had higher proportion of patients with parietal edema, higher PT-INR and Child-Pugh score, lower mid-upper arm circumference, short physical performance battery score, and handgrip strength. On multivariate analysis, only the presence of parietal edema was an independent predictor of post-paracentesis persistent leak (odds ratio 10.35, 95% confidence interval 1.61-66.54, P = 0.014). Conclusion: Persistent leak after paracentesis develops in a minority of patients with cirrhosis. The presence of parietal edema is a risk factor for persistent leak. The majority of these patients can be managed in a stepwise approach.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Refractory ascites has a 1-year survival rate of 50%. In selected patients, treatment options include liver transplantation (LT) or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS). AIM: To assess the outcomes of patients who underwent a TIPSS compared to large volume paracentesis (LVP). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients who underwent a covered TIPSS or LVP for refractory or recurrent ascites over 7 years. Primary outcome was transplant-free survival (TFS). Further analysis was done with propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: There were 150 patients [TIPSS group (n = 75), LVP group (n = 75)]. Seven patients in the TIPSS group underwent LT vs 22 patients in the LVP group. Overall median follow up, 20 (0.47-179.53) mo. In the whole cohort, there was no difference in TFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-1.21]; but lower de novo hepatic encephalopathy with LVP (HR: 95%CI: 0.20-0.96). These findings were confirmed following PSM analysis. On multivariate analysis albumin and hepatocellular carcinoma at baseline were associated with TFS. CONCLUSION: Covered TIPSS results in similar TFS compared to LVP in cirrhotic patients with advanced liver failure. Liver transplant assessment should be considered in all potential candidates for TIPSS. Further controlled studies are recommended to select appropriate patients for TIPSS.
RESUMEN
The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recognizes large volume paracentesis as draining greater than 5 liters of ascites and states there is no limit in the amount of ascites drained with appropriate replacement of albumin. For many practitioners performing safe large volume paracentesis between 5 and 10 liters or even 20 liters is not an uncommon practice. However, drainage of higher volumes outside common practice may raise concerns of patient intolerance and complication. The largest volume paracentesis reported in the literature to date is 41 liters. However, few other reports approach this volume. This case report demonstrates patient tolerance of a 39.5-liter paracentesis performed with close monitoring and hypertonic albumin replacement in a patient with chylous ascites due to high-grade follicular lymphoma.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with cirrhotic refractory ascites ineligible for transjugular intrahepatic shunt (TIPSS) have limited treatment options apart from repeated large volume paracentesis. The alfapump® is an implantable device mobilizing ascites from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder, from where it can be excreted. The aim of this observational cohort study was to prospectively investigate safety and efficacy of the device in a real-world cohort with cirrhotic refractory ascites and contraindications for TIPSS. METHODS: A total of 106 patients received an implant at 12 European centres and were followed up for up to 24 months. Complications, device deficiencies, frequency of paracentesis, clinical status and survival were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Approximately half of the patients died on-study, about a quarter was withdrawn because of serious adverse events leading to explant, a sixth were withdrawn because of liver transplant or recovery, and nine completed follow-up. The most frequent causes of on-study death and complication-related explant were progression of liver disease and infection. The device reduced the requirement for large-volume paracentesis significantly, with more than half of patients not having required any post-implant. Survival benefits were not observed. Device-related reinterventions were predominantly caused by device deficiencies. A post-hoc comparison of the first 50 versus the last 50 patients enrolled revealed a decreased reintervention rate in the latter, mainly related to peritoneal catheter modifications. CONCLUSIONS: The device reduced paracentesis frequency in a real-world setting. Technical complications were successfully decreased by optimization of management and device modification (NCT01532427).
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Ascitis/etiología , Ascitis/terapia , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Paracentesis/efectos adversos , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/efectos adversos , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/métodos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis on Liver Transplantation (LT) waiting list. Most of these patients have dilutional or hypervolemic hyponatremia secondary to splanchnic vasodilatation. Excessive secretion of the antidiuretic hormone also plays an important role. Hypervolemic hyponatremia is commonly associated with refractory ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatic encephalopathy. Although uncommon, the use of diuretics and laxatives can cause hypovolemic hyponatremia that is characterized by the striking absence of ascites or pedal edema. Clinical features are often nonspecific and depend on the acuity of onset rather than the absolute value of serum sodium. Symptoms may be subtle, including nausea, lethargy, weakness, or anorexia. However, rarely patients may present with confusion, seizures, psychosis, or coma. Treatment includes discontinuation of diuretics, beta-blockers, and albumin infusion. Hypertonic saline (3%) infusion may be used in patients with very low serum sodium (<110 mmol/L) or when patients present with seizures or coma. Short-term use of Vasopressin (V2) receptor antagonists may also be used to normalize sodium levels prior to LT. However, all these measures may be futile, and LT remains the definite treatment in these patients to improve survival. In this review, we describe the classification, pathogenesis of hyponatremia, and its clinical implications in patients with cirrhosis. Approach to these patients along with management will also be discussed briefly.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of tunneled peritoneal catheter (TPC) versus repeated large-volume paracentesis (LVP) for patients with recurrent ascites secondary to gynecological malignancy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single institution from 2016 through 2019 of patients with recurrent ascites from gynecologic malignancies that underwent either TPC or LVP. Data on procedural complications and hospital admissions were extracted. A cost-effectiveness analysis with Markov modeling was performed comparing TPC and LVP. Statistical analyses include base case calculation, Monte Carlo simulations and deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the cohorts in the average number of hospital days (p = 0.21) or emergency department visits (p = 0.69) related to ascites. Palliative care was more often involved in the care of patients who had a TPC. The base case calculation showed TPC to be the more cost-effective strategy with a slightly lower health benefit (0.22980 versus 0.22982 QALY) and lower cost ($3043 versus $3868) relative to LVP (ICER of LVP compared to TPC: $44,863,103/QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed TPC was the more cost-effective strategy in 8028/10,000 simulations. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed TPC to be more cost-effective if its complication risk was >0.81% per 22 days or its procedural cost of TPC insertion was >$1997. When varying the cost of complications, TPC was more cost-effective if the cost of its complication was less than $49,202. CONCLUSIONS: TPC is the more cost-effective strategy when compared to LVP in patients with recurrent ascites from gynecological malignancy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Paracentesis , Ascitis/etiología , Ascitis/terapia , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/complicaciones , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Humanos , Paracentesis/efectos adversos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper was to discuss the limitations of the studies serving as the evidence for recommendations in clinical practice guidelines concerning albumin use for cirrhosis-related complications, review relevant studies published since the guidelines and suggest directions for future investigations. COMMENT: There are no recent comprehensive clinical practice guidelines concerning albumin. Instead, more recent albumin guidelines reflect areas of specialty practice such as those by American and European associations for the study of the liver and liver disease. Studies published since the guidelines are useful for helping to define the most appropriate indications for albumin with respect to cirrhosis-related complications, as well as directions for future research. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Albumin has a long history of attempts to define appropriate uses by meta-analysis, but given the high cost and episodic shortages of albumin, there is a need for adequately powered randomized controlled trials using current state-of-the-art care evaluating the use of albumin to prevent or treat cirrhosis-related complications.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Albúminas/economía , Biomarcadores , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Hepatopatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Paracentesis/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Smaller 8-mm diameter transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) appear to be more beneficial than larger 10-mm TIPS stent-grafts, but lack the ability for secondary dilation in cases of clinical ineffectiveness. Underdilated VIATORR® TIPS stent grafts (VTS) expand passively, whereas novel VIATORR Controlled Expansion (VCX) stent grafts do not. This study evaluated the impact on survival of underdilated VCX compared with VTS in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: This was a prospective case-control study including patients with cirrhosis receiving TIPS using 10-mm VCX underdilated to 8 mm. Patients with cirrhosis receiving 10-mm VTS underdilated to 8 mm were matched for age, sex, indication for TIPS, and liver function. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients (47 VCX, 47 VTS, and 20 fully dilated VCX/VTS) were included. After TIPS implantation, underdilated VCX diameter was 8.0 (7.8-9.2) mm at a median time of 359 (87-450) days, compared with VTS at 9.9 (9.7-10.0) mm (p <0.001). The portosystemic pressure gradient immediately after TIPS procedure and after 7 days did not change significantly in VCX [mean 9.4 (± 0.8) vs. 10.4 (± 0.7) mmHg, p = 0.115). Hospital readmission rates for hepatic encephalopathy were 23% (n = 11) vs 51% (n = 24) for VCX and VTS (p <0.001), respectively. Patients with VCX had significantly lower rates of large-volume paracentesis (n = 5 [11%] vs. n = 10 [21%], p = 0.017) and heart failure (n = 1 [2%] vs. n = 7 [15%], p = 0.015). One-year mortality for underdilated VCX and VTS was 15% (n = 7) and 30% (n = 14) and, for fully dilated VCX/VTS, was 45% (n = 9) (log-rank p = 0.008), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that VCX stent grafts underdilated to 8 mm do not passively expand to nominal diameter and suggests reduced hospital readmissions because of hepatic encephalopathy, uncontrolled ascites, and heart failure, and improved 1-year survival compared with underdilated VTS. LAY SUMMARY: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) improves survival in selected patients with liver cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding or refractory ascites. Smaller 8-mm diameter TIPS stent grafts appear to improve patient outcome compared with larger 10-mm diameter stent grafts. Novel VIATORR® Controlled Expansion (VCX) stent grafts facilitate safe and stable underdilation to 8 mm of large 10-mm diameter stent grafts with improved patient outcome (survival, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites and heart failure) compared with legacy VIATORR TIPS stent graft (VTS). Thus, the use of underdilated VCX could preserve heart function. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: The study is registered at Clinicaltrials.govNCT03628807.
RESUMEN
Decompensated cirrhosis is characterized by chronic inflammation and severe portal hypertension leading to systemic circulatory dysfunction. Albumin infusion has been widely used in decompensated cirrhosis in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, large-volume paracentesis and hepatorenal syndrome. Emerging data suggest long-term albumin infusion has both oncotic and non-oncotic properties which may improve the clinical outcomes in decompensated cirrhosis patients. We review the current literature on both the established and potential role of albumin, and specifically address the controversies of long-term albumin infusion in decompensated cirrhosis patients.
RESUMEN
Considering the poor prognosis, severe and refractory ascites is a milestone in cirrhotic patients. Liver transplantation must be considered first. In the case of contraindication to liver transplantation or when the waiting period is estimated to be more than 6 months, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt should be discussed in eligible patients. Regardless of the type of treatment, a careful selection of patients is crucial to avoid further decompensation and specific complications of each treatment.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Ascitis/etiología , Ascitis/terapia , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ascites has been classified according to quantity and response to medical therapy. Despite its precise definitions, little is known about the effects of grade 1 ascites or recurrent ascites (i.e. ascites that recurs at least on 3 occasions within a 12-month period despite dietary sodium restriction and adequate diuretic dosage) on patient outcome. We studied progression of grade 1 ascites and recurrent ascites in a large cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of data from 547 outpatients with cirrhosis (259 without ascites, 54 patients with grade 1 ascites, 234 with grade 2 or 3 ascites) who participated a care management program study in Italy from March 2003 through September 2017. We collected demographic, clinical, and laboratory data and patients were evaluated at least every 6 months. Patients received abdominal ultrasound analysis at study inclusion and at least twice a year. Number and volume of paracentesis were collected, when available. Patients were followed until death, liver transplantation, or March 2018. The median follow-up time was 29 months. Primary outcomes were mortality and development of complications of cirrhosis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in 60-month transplant-free survival between patients with grade 1 vs grade 2 or 3 ascites (36% vs 43%) but survival was significantly lower when both groups were compared with patients without ascites (68%; P < .001 for both comparisons). However, the grade of systemic inflammation and the rate of complications were significantly greater in patients with grade 1 ascites than in patients without ascites, but significantly lower than in patients with grade 2 or 3 ascites. Development of grade 2 or 3 ascites did not differ significantly between patients with no ascites vs grade 1 ascites (10% vs 14%). There was no significant difference in 36-month transplant-free survival between patients with ascites responsive to medical treatment vs recurrent ascites (78% vs 62%), whereas patients with refractory ascites had significantly lower survival than patients with responsive or recurrent ascites (23%; responsive vs refractory ascites P<.001; recurrent vs refractory ascites P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from a large cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis, we found that grade 1 ascites is associated with systemic inflammation, more complications, and increased mortality compared with no ascites. Mortality does not differ significantly between patients with recurrent ascites vs ascites responsive to medical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Ascitis , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Paracentesis , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Annually, 10% of cirrhotic patients with ascites develop refractory ascites for which large-volume paracentesis (LVP) is a frequently used therapeutic procedure. LVP, although a safe method, is associated with circulatory dysfunction in a significant percentage of patients, which is termed paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD). PICD results in faster reaccumulation of ascites, hyponatremia, renal impairment, and shorter survival. PICD is diagnosed through laboratory results, with increases of >50% of baseline plasma renin activity to a value ≥4 ng/mL/h on the fifth to sixth day after paracentesis. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology and prevention of PICD.
RESUMEN
This review describes current approaches to the management of patients with cirrhotic ascites in relation to the severity of its clinical manifestations. The PubMed database, the Google Scholar retrieval system, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the reference lists from related articles were used to search for relevant publications. Articles corresponding to the aim of the review were selected for 1991-2018 using the keywords: "liver cirrhosis," "portal hypertension," "ascites," "pathogenesis," "diagnostics," and "treatment." Uncomplicated and refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis were the inclusion criteria. The literature analysis has shown that despite the achievements of modern hepatology, the presence of ascites is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality. The key to successful management of patients with ascites may be the stratification of the risk of an adverse outcome and personalized therapy. Pathogenetically based approach to the choice of pharmacotherapy and optimization of minimally invasive methods of treatment may improve the quality of life and increase the survival rate of this category of patients.
Asunto(s)
Ascitis/terapia , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/terapia , Hipertensión Portal/terapia , Cirrosis Hepática/terapia , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Ascitis/diagnóstico , Ascitis/etiología , Ascitis/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/etiología , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/mortalidad , Humanos , Hipertensión Portal/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Portal/etiología , Hipertensión Portal/mortalidad , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/mortalidad , Trasplante de Hígado , Paracentesis/instrumentación , Paracentesis/métodos , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM OF THE STUDY: A subgroup of cirrhotic patients undergoing therapeutic paracentesis develop acute kidney injury (AKI) despite adequate colloidal replacement.The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of paracentesis-induced AKI in cirrhotic patients with normal baseline renal parameters and adequate colloidal replacement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective, observational analytical study was undertaken between April 2015 and April 2017. All patients undergoing therapeutic paracentesis were enrolled as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria for AKI, comparative analysis was performed between those developing and not developing AKI for demography, renal parameters, frequency and quantity of paracentesis per session. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the predictors of AKI. RESULTS: Altogether, 177 patients underwent 859 therapeutic paracenteses. Ninety-four paracentesis sessions resulted in an AKI (10.9%). The median number of paracenteses was 10 (range 1-25) and the median volume of fluid drained per paracentesis was 6 l (1-20 l). In univariate analysis, younger age (p < 0.02), higher MELD (Model For End-Stage Liver Disease) score (p < 0.0001), CTP (Child-Turcotte-Pugh) class C (p < 0.017) and prior history of renal dysfunction (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with AKI. For each liter of fluid drained, the risk of AKI increased by 1.24 times. Frequency of paracentesis did not influence the AKI. In multivariate logistic regression, the significant predictors of AKI were past renal dysfunction, a higher MELD and volume of fluid tapped at paracentesis. CONCLUSIONS: Post-paracentesis AKI occurs in 10.9% of cases, despite adequate colloid replacement. For each 1 l of fluid drained during paracentesis, the risk of AKI increased by 1.24 times.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ascites is a major complication of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Intraabdominal hypertension and structural alterations of parenchyma involve decisive changes in hepatosplanchnic blood flow. Clearance of indo-cyanine green (ICG) is mainly dependent on hepatic perfusion and hepatocellular function. As a consequence, plasma disappearance rate of ICG (ICG-PDR) is rated as a useful dynamic parameter of liver function. This study primarily evaluates the impact of large-volume paracentesis (LVP) on ICG-PDR in critically ill patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Additionally, it describes influences on intraabdominal pressure (IAP), abdominal perfusion pressure (APP), hepatic blood flow, hemodynamic and respiratory function. METHODS: We analyzed LVP in 22 patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. ICG-PDR was assessed by using noninvasive LiMON technology (Pulsion® Medical Systems; Maquet Getinge Group), and hepatic blood flow was analyzed by color-coded duplex sonography. RESULTS: Paracentesis of a median volume of 3450 mL ascites evoked significant increases of ICG-PDR from 3.6 (2.8-4.6) to 5.1 (3.9-6.2)%/min (p < 0.001). Concomitantly, we observed a raise in "ICG-Clearance" from 99 (73.5-124.5) to 104 (91-143.5) mL/min/m2 (p = 0.005), while circulating blood volume index was unchanged [2412 (1983-3025) before paracentesis vs. 2409 (1997-2805) mL/m2, p = 0.734]. Sonography revealed a significant impact of paracentesis on hepatic blood flow: Hepatic artery resistance index dropped from 0.74 (0.68-0.75) to 0.68 (0.65-0.71) (p < 0.001) and maximum flow velocity in hepatic vein increased from 24 (17-30) to 30 (22-36) cm/s (p < 0.001). Consistent with previous studies, paracentesis caused significant decreases in IAP from 19.0 (15.0-20.3) to 11.0 (8.8-12.3) mmHg (p < 0.001) and central venous pressure from 22.5 (17.8-29.0) to 17.5 (12.8-24.0) mmHg (p < 0.001) with inverse increases in APP from 63.0 (56.8-69.5) to 71.0 (65.5-78.5) mmHg (p < 0.001). Changes in ICG-PDR were concomitant with changes in IAP (r = - 0.602) and APP (r = 0.576). Moreover, we found a substantial improvement in respiratory function. By contrast, hemodynamic parameters assessed by transpulmonary thermodilution, serum bilirubin and international normalized ratio did not change after paracentesis. CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients with decompensated cirrhosis and elevated IAP showed dramatically impaired ICG-PDR. Paracentesis evoked an improvement in ICG-PDR in parallel with a decreased IAP and an increased APP, while conventional parameters of liver function did not change. This effect on ICG-PDR is mainly referable to a relief of intraabdominal hypertension and changes in hepatosplanchnic blood flow.
RESUMEN
Among the various risky complications of liver cirrhosis, refractory ascites is associated with poor survival of cirrhotics and persistently worsens their quality of life (QOL). Major clinical guidelines worldwide define refractory ascites as ascites that cannot be managed by medical therapy either because of a lack of response to maximum doses of diuretics or because patients develop complications related to diuretic therapy that preclude the use of an effective dose of diuretics. Due to the difficulty in receiving a liver transplantation (LT), the ultimate solution for refractory ascites, most cirrhotic patients have selected the palliative therapy such as repeated serial paracentesis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, or peritoneovenous shunt to improve their QOL. During the past several decades, new interventions and methodologies, such as indwelling peritoneal catheter, peritoneal-urinary drainage, and cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy, have been introduced. In addition, new medical treatments with vasoconstrictors or vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists have been proposed. Both the benefits and risks of these old and new modalities have been extensively studied in relation to the pathophysiological changes in ascites formation. Although the best solution for refractory ascites is to eliminate hepatic failure either by LT or by causal treatment, the selection of the best palliative therapy for individual patients is of utmost importance, aiming at achieving the longest possible, comfortable life. This review briefly summarizes the changing landscape of variable treatment modalities for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites, aiming at clarifying their possibilities and limitations. Evolving issues with regard to the impact of gut-derived systemic and local infection on the clinical course of cirrhotic patients have paved the way for the development of a new gut microbiome-based therapeutics. Thus, it should be further investigated whether the early therapeutic approach to gut dysbiosis provides a better solution for the management of cirrhotic ascites.