RESUMEN
Digital and virtual support in the hermeneutic case-based learning in health professional education: A systematic review Abstract. Background: Nowadays, the digitization dominates almost all aspects of our lives, especially in the nursing field. The medial-supported teaching design program helps learners to be prepared for the digital challenges of their professional field. In addition, the concept of hermeneutic casework provides nurses with an expertise that can be applied individually and case-related. Virtual simulations can represent a realistic case scenario and extend the conventional concept of casework with modern technology. Aim: The aim of the review is, to identify national and international used types of virtual and digital medias in connection with the method of hermeneutic casework and describe its usefulness in health education. Methods: A literature review according to the design of a systematic review in the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane and Springer Link has been conducted and complemented by the snowball principle. Results: Eleven publications were analysed. The results show predominantly positive effects, which can be divide into eleven areas. Conclusion: The use of virtual patients is considered in both empirical and media-didactic research as an effective and an efficient learning arrangement. In a positive and a negative sense, the results depend from the didactic and methodological preparation, the design of the learning modules and the quality of the medium as well as the teaching.
Asunto(s)
Educación Profesional , Aprendizaje , Competencia Clínica , Hermenéutica , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Health literacy denoted as the ability to search for, understand and use health related information in health care decision-making is becoming increasingly important for complex chronic diseases such as cancer. There is growing evidence that limited health literacy has a negative impact on individual cancer prevention and disease coping behavior suggesting that interventions for quality assurance in cancer care should consider the health literacy of the target population. This poses the question of how cancer literacy should be operationalized and measured. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review on available instruments to measure cancer literacy. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guideline. Relevant instruments were categorized and evaluated in regard to construct definition, operationalization approach and psychometric properties. RESULTS: Overall, N=12 publications reporting on the development and validation of a cancer literacy instrument could be identified. Cancer literacy is defined as the ability to search for, understand and use health related information in health care decision-making (health literacy) or as the knowledge a layperson needs to understand the information and advice the health system offers with regard to preventing, diagnosing and treating cancerous conditions. In most cases, cancer literacy is operationalized by using cancer knowledge tests across distinct knowledge areas. The analysis of the psychometric properties yields the finding that only every second paper (N=6) is reporting reliability and validity data. Altogether, reliability data is quite satisfactory whereas construct and criterion validity data demonstrates low to moderate correlations between the instruments developed and external criteria as well as comparative instruments. CONCLUSION: The aspect of cancer literacy is gaining relevance in terms of its contribution to quality assurance and patient safety. Currently, there are a limited number of cancer literacy instruments available. Definitions of constructs and instrument conceptions mostly rely on the aspect of cancer knowledge making it difficult to differentiate cancer literacy from cancer knowledge. Prospective studies should take greater account of more sophisticated measurement approaches used to assess health literacy.