Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 207
Filtrar
2.
Am J Med Sci ; 2024 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39214248

RESUMEN

Medication-induced osteoporosis leads to substantial fracture morbidity. With polypharmacy and the aging population in the United States, significant increases in medication-associated fractures are predicted. The most common medication to cause osteoporosis and increase fractures is glucocorticoids. Many other therapies, including loop diuretics, SGLT2 inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, proton pump inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, heparin, warfarin, antiepileptics, aromatase inhibitors, anti-androgen therapies, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists, and calcineurin inhibitors are associated with increased fracture risks. Here, we review the latest evidence for fracture risk for these medications and discuss fracture risk screening and management strategies.

4.
Psychiatry Res ; 339: 116075, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39002502

RESUMEN

Lithium is considered to be the most effective mood stabilizer for bipolar disorder. Evolving evidence suggested lithium can also regulate bone metabolism which may reduce the risk of fractures. While there are concerns about fractures for antipsychotics and mood stabilizing antiepileptics, very little is known about the overall risk of fractures associated with specific treatments. This study aimed to compare the risk of fractures in patients with bipolar disorder prescribed lithium, antipsychotics or mood stabilizing antiepileptics (valproate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine). Among 40,697 patients with bipolar disorder from 1993 to 2019 identified from a primary care electronic health record database in the UK, 13,385 were new users of mood stabilizing agents (lithium:2339; non-lithium: 11,046). Lithium was associated with a lower risk of fractures compared with non-lithium treatments (HR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.44-0.98). The results were similar when comparing lithium with prolactin raising and sparing antipsychotics, and individual antiepileptics. Lithium use may lower fracture risk, a benefit that is particularly relevant for patients with serious mental illness who are more prone to falls due to their behaviors. Our findings could help inform better treatment decisions for bipolar disorder, and lithium's potential to prevent fractures should be considered for patients at high risk of fractures.


Asunto(s)
Antimaníacos , Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Bipolar , Fracturas Óseas , Humanos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/inducido químicamente , Antimaníacos/efectos adversos , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Compuestos de Litio/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Litio/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Litio/uso terapéutico , Litio/efectos adversos
5.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 17(6)2024 May 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38931343

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are extremely severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions which are relatively rare in routine clinical practice. An analysis of a national pharmacovigilance database may be the most effective method of obtaining information on SJS and TEN. (2) Methods: Design-a retrospective descriptive pharmacoepidemiologic study of spontaneous reports (SRs) with data on SJS and TEN retrieved from the Russian National Pharmacovigilance database for the period from 1 April 2019 to 31 December 2023. Descriptive statistics was used to assess the demographic data of patients and the structure of suspected drugs. (3) Results: A total of 170 SRs on SJS and TEN were identified, of which 32.9% were SJS and 67.1%-TEN. In total, 30% were pediatric SRs, 21.2%-SRs of the elderly. There were 12 lethal cases, and all cases were TEN. The leading culprit drugs were anti-infectives for systemic use and nervous system agents. The top 10 involved drugs are as follows: lamotrigine (23.5%), ibuprofen (12.9%), ceftriaxone (8.8%), amoxicillin and amoxicillin with beta-lactam inhibitors (8.8%), paracetamol (7.6%), carbamazepine (5.9%), azithromycin (4.1%), valproic acid (4.1%), omeprazole (3.5%), and levetiracetam (3.5%). (4) Conclusions: Our study was the first study in Russia aimed at the assessment of the structure of the drugs involved in SJS and TEN on the national level.

6.
Presse Med ; 53(2): 104233, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636787

RESUMEN

Neuropathic pain poses a significant challenge due to its complex mechanisms, necessitating specific treatments. In recent decades, significant progress has been made in the clinical research of neuropathic pain, marking a shift from empirical strategies to evidence-based medicine in its management. This review outlines both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Antidepressants (tricyclic and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors), antiepileptics (gabapentin, pregabalin), and topical agents constitute the main pharmacological treatments. These approaches target peripheral or central mechanisms associated with neuropathic pain. Noninvasive neurostimulation, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), provides non-pharmacological alternatives. However, challenges persist in effectively targeting existing medications and developing drugs that act on novel targets, necessitating innovative therapeutic strategies.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio , Humanos , Neuralgia/terapia , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico
8.
Pharmaceutics ; 15(9)2023 Aug 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37765152

RESUMEN

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the clinical practice of measuring drug concentrations. TDM can be used to determine treatment efficacy and to prevent the occurrence or reduce the risk of drug-induced side effects, being, thus, a tool of personalized medicine. Drugs for which TDM is applied should have a narrow therapeutic range and exhibit both significant pharmacokinetic variability and a predefined target concentration range. The aim of our study was to assess the current status of TDM in Greek public hospitals and estimate its progress over the last 20 years. All Greek public hospitals were contacted to provide data and details on the clinical uptake of TDM in Greece for the years 2003 and 2021 through a structured questionnaire. Data from 113 out of 132 Greek hospitals were collected in 2003, whereas for 2021, we have collected data from 98 out of 122 hospitals. Among these, in 2003 and 2021, 64 and 51 hospitals, respectively, performed TDM. Antiepileptics and antibiotics were the most common drug categories monitored in both years. The total number of drug measurement assays decreased from 2003 to 2021 (153,313 ± 7794 vs. 90,065 ± 5698; p = 0.043). In direct comparisons between hospitals where TDM was performed both in 2003 and 2021 (n = 35), the mean number of measurements was found to decrease for most drugs, including carbamazepine (198.8 ± 46.6 vs. 46.6 ± 10.1, p < 0.001), phenytoin (253.6 ± 59 vs. 120 ± 34.3; p = 0.001), amikacin (147.3 ± 65.2 vs. 91.1 ± 71.4; p = 0.033), digoxin (783.2 ± 226.70 vs. 165.9 ± 28.9; p < 0.001), and theophylline (71.5 ± 28.7 vs. 11.9 ± 6.4; p = 0.004). Only for vancomycin, a significant increase in measurements was recorded (206.1 ± 96.1 vs. 789.1 ± 282.8; p = 0.012). In conclusion, our findings show that TDM clinical implementation is losing ground in Greek hospitals. Efforts and initiatives to reverse this trend are urgently needed.

9.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 27(10): 497-502, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37584847

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although the association between CGRP and migraine disease is well-known and studied, therapies can target other pathways to minimize migraine symptoms. It is important to understand the role of these medications as options for migraine treatment and the varied mechanisms by which symptoms can be addressed. In the present investigation, the role of non-CGRP antagonist/non-triptan options for migraine disease therapy is reviewed, including NSAIDs, ß-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antidepressants, and antiepileptics. Pharmacologic therapies for both acute symptoms and prophylaxis are evaluated, and their adverse effects are compared. RECENT FINDINGS: At present, the Food and Drug Association has approved the beta-blockers propranolol and timolol and the anti-epileptic drugs topiramate and divalproex sodium for migraine prevention. Clinicians have other options for evidence-based treatment of episodic migraine attacks. Treatment decisions should consider contraindications, the effectiveness of alternatives, and potential side effects. NSAIDs are effective for the acute treatment of migraine exacerbations with caution for adverse effects such as gastrointestinal upset and renal symptoms. Beta-blockers are effective for migraine attack prophylaxis but are associated with dizziness and fatigue and are contraindicated in patients with certain co-morbidities, including asthma, congestive heart failure, and abnormal cardiac rhythms. Calcium channel blockers do not show enough evidence to be recommended as migraine attack prophylactic therapy. The anti-epileptic drugs topiramate and divalproex sodium and antidepressants venlafaxine and amitriptyline are effective for migraine exacerbation prophylaxis but have associated side effects. The decision for pharmacologic management should ultimately be made following consideration of risk vs. benefit and discussion between patient and physician.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Topiramato/uso terapéutico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Triptaminas , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Propranolol/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT1
10.
Ann Neurosci ; 30(1): 26-32, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37313334

RESUMEN

Background: Post traumatic seizures (PTS) and post traumatic epilepsy (PTE) are potential consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI). There is no consensus regarding its management among treating doctors. Purpose: We have undertaken a global survey to assess the variability of management practices of PTS and PTE and highlight the pressing need to formulate uniform practice guidelines. Methods: A questionnaire consisting of sixteen questions were developed with the help of Google survey and sent through e-mail, or social media platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook messenger or Telegram, to practicing Neurologists and Neurosurgeons round the world. Results: There were a total of 220 responses. Majority of our responders (n = 202; 91.8%) would start an anti-epileptic (AED) prophylaxis to prevent PTS; 18 people (8.18%) told that they would not start AED prophylaxis for TBI. Phenytoin (n = 98; 48.5%) followed by Levetiracetam (n = 78; 38.6%) was the preferred drug, although the latter was significantly preferred by high and upper middle-income countries (p<.001). Majority (n = 99; 49%) would not use it beyond two weeks. Most clinicians would manage PTE with a single drug (n = 160; 72.7%) either Phenytoin (n = 69; 31.3%) or levetiracetam (n = 67; 30.4%). Most of them (n = 174; 86%) would treat for less than one year. Conclusions: Practices in the management of PTS and PTE vary widely among clinicians. Our study point towards the need for the development of a more robust and comprehensive practice guidelines for the management of the same.

12.
Cureus ; 15(5): e39173, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37332450

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Currently, we have a shortage of comprehensive information about newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the pediatric population. This might explain the discrepancies among pediatricians' preferences in this regard. Therefore, it is crucial to study the multifaceted impacts of these drugs on children. The endpoints of our study were non-AED predictors of the requirement of combination therapy for seizure management, seizure-free period >6 months and >12 months, change in Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire - 55 (QOLCE-55), and incidence of adverse events. METHODS: This prospective, observational study was conducted in KIMS, Bhubaneswar, India, from January 2021 to November 2022. Children of 2-12 years of age were treated with monotherapy of either newer antiepileptics, e.g., levetiracetam, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine or older antiepileptics, e.g., valproic acid, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the assessment of predictors. We used R software (version 4.1.1) for data analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-eight (91.7%) of 216 enrolled participants completed this study. The mean age of the study population was 5.2 years and 117 (59%) of them were males. The univariate analysis showed that male gender, low birth weight, preterm birth, assisted vaginal delivery and site-specific epilepsy, and maternal history of epilepsy were significant predictors of combination therapy and reduced seizure-free period. There was a non-significant difference regarding the improvement of QOLCE-55 scores. None of the adverse events were serious. CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal complications and maternal history of epilepsy contribute significantly toward the efficacy of antiepileptics. However, multivariate analysis did not yield statistically significant results.

13.
15.
Psychiatry Res ; 325: 115236, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37172400

RESUMEN

Bipolar disorder (BPD) is associated with high rates of suicide attempts but the anti-suicidal effect of mood stabilizing agents remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between mood stabilizing agents (lithium, valproate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine or antipsychotics) and risk of suicide attempts in patients with BPD using self-controlled case series study design. Among 14,087 patients with BPD who received mood stabilizing agents from 2001 to 2020 in Hong Kong, 1316 patients had at least one suicide attempts during the observation period. An increased risk of suicide attempts was observed 14 days before treatment initiation compared to non-exposed period. Following treatment initiation, an increased risk with smaller magnitude was found with the use of mood stabilizing agents. A lower risk was observed with lithium and antiepileptics while the risk remained attenuated with decreasing magnitude with antipsychotics. During 30-day post-treatment period, the risk was elevated. Therefore, this study suggests that use of mood stabilizing agents is not causally associated with an increased risk of suicide attempts. Indeed, there are potential protective effects of lithium and antiepileptics against suicide attempts. Assiduous monitoring of symptoms relapse and warning signs of suicide should be part of the management plan and discussed between clinicians, caregivers and patients.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastorno Bipolar , Excipientes , Intento de Suicidio , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Excipientes/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes , Litio/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Cureus ; 15(3): e36982, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37139273

RESUMEN

Hiccups may appear to be a common normal phenomenon that does not warrant treatment in the general population. However, severe and persistent hiccups can become annoying and distressing and may decrease the quality of life, especially in cancer patients. The management of hiccups remains challenging. Despite trying many pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods, there is no clear evidence to support the management guidelines. In our case, we successfully treated persistent hiccups of more than four days duration in a patient with acute myeloblastic leukemia with gabapentin.

17.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 24(11): 1295-1305, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37224182

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain condition that is notoriously difficult to treat. Therapies for CRPS include cognitive behavioral, physical, and occupational therapy, single or multidrug pharmacotherapy, and a variety of interventional techniques. Unfortunately, randomized clinical trials of these therapies are limited. The large number of potential pharmacologic options can be overwhelming for providers in their attempts to develop a treatment plan. AREAS COVERED: This article will review the literature on the pharmacologic management of CRPS. It is based on a systematic search of PubMed using keywords, followed by evaluation of the bibliographies for relevant articles. EXPERT OPINION: No single drug has amassed enough evidence to suggest clear efficacy, but a handful of agents with at least modest evidence are commonly used, including gabapentinoids, bisphosphonates, ketamine, and pulsed dose steroids. Meanwhile, other agents that lack significant evidence specifically in CRPS but have evidence in other neuropathic conditions are commonly prescribed, including tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). In our opinion, careful selection and prompt initiation of appropriate pharmacotherapy may optimize pain relief and improve functionality in patients burdened with this debilitating condition.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Dolor Regional Complejo , Ketamina , Humanos , Síndromes de Dolor Regional Complejo/tratamiento farmacológico , Ketamina/uso terapéutico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico
18.
Molecules ; 28(8)2023 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37110645

RESUMEN

H3R is becoming an attractive and promising target for epilepsy treatment as well as the discovery of antiepileptics. In this work, a series of 6-aminoalkoxy-3,4-dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-ones was prepared to screen their H3R antagonistic activities and antiseizure effects. The majority of the target compounds displayed a potent H3R antagonistic activity. Among them, compounds 2a, 2c, 2h, and 4a showed submicromolar H3R antagonistic activity with an IC50 of 0.52, 0.47, 0.12, and 0.37 µM, respectively. The maximal electroshock seizure (MES) model screened out three compounds (2h, 4a, and 4b) with antiseizure activity. Meanwhile, the pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizure test gave a result that no compound can resist the seizures induced by PTZ. Additionally, the anti-MES action of compound 4a fully vanished when it was administrated combined with an H3R agonist (RAMH). These results showed that the antiseizure role of compound 4a might be achieved by antagonizing the H3R receptor. The molecular docking of 2h, 4a, and PIT with the H3R protein predicted their possible binding patterns and gave a presentation that 2h, 4a, and PIT had a similar binding model with H3R.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H3 , Receptores Histamínicos H3 , Ratas , Animales , Humanos , Histamina , Ratas Wistar , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H3/química , Receptores Histamínicos H3/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Anticonvulsivantes/química , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Pentilenotetrazol/efectos adversos
20.
Cureus ; 15(2): e35181, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36960256

RESUMEN

Background and objective Epilepsy is the commonest serious neurological condition and around 50 million people live with epilepsy (PWE). Primary and secondary generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) together constitute up to 50% of adult and adolescent epilepsy. GTCS respond well to broad-spectrum AEDs like valproate, phenytoin, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, and topiramate. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are considered alternatives. Metabolic derangements with the conventional AEDs (phenytoin causes loss of bone mass in women, phenytoin and carbamazepine produce increases in serum lipid and C-reactive protein, weight gain with valproate) are well documented. But, there is limited data regarding the effect of the newer AEDs on metabolic parameters. Thus, this study was undertaken to assess the effects of the newer AEDs on the metabolic profile of patients with epilepsy. Material and methods A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology, in collaboration with the Department of Neurology at S.C.B. Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack. 100 diagnosed patients with GTCS receiving monotherapy of either conventional or newer anti-epileptics were included in the study. Their metabolic parameters like total cholesterol, serum sodium, serum TSH and fasting blood glucose were collected at baseline, three months, and six months. ADRs were collected during the entire study period and causality assessment was done using WHO-UMC Causality Assessment Scale. All the data were analysed using SPSS 20.0 after applying appropriate statistical tests. Results There was a significant increase in total cholesterol in all four groups (p=0.002) but a pathological increase in the phenytoin and oxcarbazepine groups. There was a significant rise in the serum TSH levels in all groups except levetiracetam, but a pathological increase was seen with phenytoin and valproate, i.e., the conventional ones. Statistically significant hyponatremia was seen with valproate and oxcarbazepine. A rise in the FBS was seen with both phenytoin and valproate (p=0.002) but a pathological rise was seen with phenytoin. Out of the total reported ADRs, 53.5% were seen with conventional AEDs, and the rest 46.5% were seen with newer ones. Conclusion The advent of newer anti-epileptic drugs has unfolded wider horizons to the treatment of epilepsy. Each of these drugs has a unique mechanism of action, making it less prone to resistance. Metabolic derangements are a key determinant in the compliance of these drugs as they can predispose to other co-morbidities. Periodic monitoring of the various metabolic parameters is useful and together with patient counselling can improve the effectiveness of the anti-epileptic drugs.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA