RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: the surgical approach persists as the main treatment for esophageal cancer. This study compares the patients of the same institution over time at three different times. METHODS: this is a retrospective, observational, descriptive study comparing the surgical outcomes obtained by the Division of Surgical Oncology of Erasto Gaertner Hospital. The sample was divided into Period 1 (1987-1997), Period 2 (1998-2003) and Period 3 (2007-2015). Survival rates and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Maier method. Survival predictors were identified with Cox regression. ANOVA test was used for comparison between groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS 25.0 and STATA 16, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: a total of 335 patients underwent esophagectomy or esophagogastrectomy. When the clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference. Neoadjuvance was significantly higher in Period 3 (55.4% of patients). We found a histological change in the diagnosis over time, with a significant increase in adenocarcinoma. Morbidity and mortality rates were higher in Period 3. The main complications were pulmonary and anastomotic fistulas. Overall survival in 5 years increased over time, reaching 59.7% in Period 3. CONCLUSIONS: better neoadjuvant treatment contributed to increase the global survival of patients, despite greater rate of immediate complications to surgery.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Brasil , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objectives: the surgical approach persists as the main treatment for esophageal cancer. This study compares the patients of the same institution over time at three different times. Methods: this is a retrospective, observational, descriptive study comparing the surgical outcomes obtained by the Division of Surgical Oncology of Erasto Gaertner Hospital. The sample was divided into Period 1 (1987-1997), Period 2 (1998-2003) and Period 3 (2007-2015). Survival rates and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Maier method. Survival predictors were identified with Cox regression. ANOVA test was used for comparison between groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS 25.0 and STATA 16, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: a total of 335 patients underwent esophagectomy or esophagogastrectomy. When the clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference. Neoadjuvance was significantly higher in Period 3 (55.4% of patients). We found a histological change in the diagnosis over time, with a significant increase in adenocarcinoma. Morbidity and mortality rates were higher in Period 3. The main complications were pulmonary and anastomotic fistulas. Overall survival in 5 years increased over time, reaching 59.7% in Period 3. Conclusions: better neoadjuvant treatment contributed to increase the global survival of patients, despite greater rate of immediate complications to surgery.
RESUMO Objetivo: A abordagem cirúrgica persiste como tratamento principal para o câncer de esôfago. O presente estudo compara as casuísticas da mesma instituição ao longo do tempo, em três momentos diferentes. Métodos: Estudo descritivo retrospectivo comparativo observacional dos resultados cirúrgicos obtidos pelo Serviço de Cirurgia Oncológica do Hospital Erasto Gaertner. A amostra foi dividida em: Período 1 (1987-1997), Período 2 (1998-2003) e Período 3 (2007-2015). Taxas de sobrevida e sobrevida livre de doença foram estimadas pelo método de Kaplan-Maier. Preditores de sobrevida foram identificados com regressão de Cox. Para a comparação entre os grupos foi utilizado teste ANOVA. Os dados foram analisados com os programas SPSS 25.0 e STATA 16, sendo p<0,05 considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados: Ao todo, 335 doentes foram submetidos a esofagectomia ou esofagogastrectomia. Quando comparadas as características clínicas dos 3 grupos não houve diferença estatística significativa. A realização de neoadjuvância foi significativamente maior no Período 3 (55,4% dos pacientes). Verificamos uma mudança histológica do diagnóstico no decorrer do tempo, com um aumento significativo do adenocarcinoma. As taxas de morbimortalidade foram superiores no Período 3. As principais complicações foram pulmonares e de fistulas anastomóticas. A sobrevida global em 5 anos foi aumentando no decorrer do tempo, atingindo 59,7% no Período 3. Conclusões: Melhor tratamento neoadjuvante contribuiu para aumentar a sobrevida global dos pacientes, apesar de maior incidência de complicações imediatas à cirurgia.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Brasil , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esofagectomía , Terapia NeoadyuvanteRESUMEN
Background : Hyperinsulinemic hypoglicemia with severe neuroglycopenic symptoms has been identified as a late and rare complication in patients submitted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. However, the potential gravity of its manifestations requires effective treatment of this condition. The absence of treatment makes it necessary to develop more effective clinical or surgical methods. Aim : To present one surgical option to revisional surgery in the treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglicemia Methods : The procedure consists in reconstituting alimentary transit through the duodenum and proximal jejunum, while keeping the restrictive part of the gastric bypass. As an additional strategy to maintain weight loss, is realized gastric fundus resection, aiming to suppress ghrelin production more effectively. Results : It was used in three patients with successful results in one year of follow-up. Conclusion : The procedure to reconstruct the food transit through the duodenum and proximal jejunum, keeping the restrictive component of gastric bypass in the treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia showed good initial results and validated its application in other cases with this indication.
Racional : Hipoglicemia hiperinsulinêmica com sintomas neuroglicopênicos severos tem sido identificada como complicação tardia e rara em pacientes submetidos à gastroplastia com bypass em Y-de-Roux. Porém, a gravidade potencial de suas manifestações exige tratamento definitivo desta condição. A falta de tratamento efetivo gera a necessidade de desenvolver métodos clínicos ou cirúrgicos mais eficazes. Objetivo: Apresentar proposta de operação revisional para o tratamento da síndrome de hipoglicemia hiperinsulinêmica. Métodos : O procedimento consiste em reconstituir o trânsito alimentar pelo duodeno e jejuno proximal, mantendo o componente restritivo do by-pass gástrico. Como estratégia adicional de manutenção ponderal, é realizada ressecção do fundo gástrico, visando intensificar a supressão da grelina. Resultado: O procedimento foi realizado em três pacientes com bom resultado em seguimento de um ano. Conclusão : O procedimento de reconstituir o trânsito alimentar pelo duodeno e jejuno proximal, mantendo o componente restritivo do by-pass gástrico no tratamento da hipoglicemia hiperinsulinêmica apresentou bons resultados iniciais podendo validar sua indicação para outros casos.
Asunto(s)
Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Hiperinsulinismo/etiología , Hiperinsulinismo/cirugía , Hipoglucemia/etiología , Hipoglucemia/cirugía , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hyperinsulinemic hypoglicemia with severe neuroglycopenic symptoms has been identified as a late and rare complication in patients submitted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. However, the potential gravity of its manifestations requires effective treatment of this condition. The absence of treatment makes it necessary to develop more effective clinical or surgical methods. AIM: To present one surgical option to revisional surgery in the treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglicemia Methods : The procedure consists in reconstituting alimentary transit through the duodenum and proximal jejunum, while keeping the restrictive part of the gastric bypass. As an additional strategy to maintain weight loss, is realized gastric fundus resection, aiming to suppress ghrelin production more effectively. RESULTS: It was used in three patients with successful results in one year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The procedure to reconstruct the food transit through the duodenum and proximal jejunum, keeping the restrictive component of gastric bypass in the treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia showed good initial results and validated its application in other cases with this indication.