Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment of esophageal cancer: surgical outcomes of 335 cases operated in a single center.
Ferreira, Raphaella Paula; Bussyguin, Danilo Saavedra; Trombetta, Hygor; Melo, Victor Jose Dornelas; Ximenez, Daniele Rezende; Preti, Vinicius Basso; Valladares, Gerardo Cristino Gavarrete; Tomasich, Flavio Daniel Saavedra; Abreu, Phillipe.
Afiliación
  • Ferreira RP; - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.
  • Bussyguin DS; - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Centro de Projetos de Ensino e Pesquisa - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.
  • Trombetta H; - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Centro de Projetos de Ensino e Pesquisa - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.
  • Melo VJD; - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Centro de Projetos de Ensino e Pesquisa - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.
  • Ximenez DR; - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Centro de Projetos de Ensino e Pesquisa - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.
  • Preti VB; - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Departamento de Cirurgia, Serviço de Cirurgia Abdominal - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.
  • Valladares GCG; - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Departamento de Cirurgia, Serviço de Cirurgia Abdominal - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.
  • Tomasich FDS; - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Departamento de Cirurgia, Serviço de Cirurgia Abdominal - Curitiba - PR - Brasil.
  • Abreu P; - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 48: e20202723, 2021.
Article en En, Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33605392
OBJECTIVES: the surgical approach persists as the main treatment for esophageal cancer. This study compares the patients of the same institution over time at three different times. METHODS: this is a retrospective, observational, descriptive study comparing the surgical outcomes obtained by the Division of Surgical Oncology of Erasto Gaertner Hospital. The sample was divided into Period 1 (1987-1997), Period 2 (1998-2003) and Period 3 (2007-2015). Survival rates and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Maier method. Survival predictors were identified with Cox regression. ANOVA test was used for comparison between groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS 25.0 and STATA 16, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: a total of 335 patients underwent esophagectomy or esophagogastrectomy. When the clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference. Neoadjuvance was significantly higher in Period 3 (55.4% of patients). We found a histological change in the diagnosis over time, with a significant increase in adenocarcinoma. Morbidity and mortality rates were higher in Period 3. The main complications were pulmonary and anastomotic fistulas. Overall survival in 5 years increased over time, reaching 59.7% in Period 3. CONCLUSIONS: better neoadjuvant treatment contributed to increase the global survival of patients, despite greater rate of immediate complications to surgery.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En / Pt Revista: Rev Col Bras Cir Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En / Pt Revista: Rev Col Bras Cir Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Brasil