RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the arteriolar-to-venular ratio (AVR) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, and controlled clinical trial with parallel groups was performed. From a base of 138 patients, 83 were randomized to either CPAP or control. Nonstereoscopic 35º photographs were processed with Sirius software. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis showed no differences in AVR, although the arteriolar diameter increased from baseline in the CPAP group. Per-protocol analysis showed a 12-month increase in AVR (P = 0.035) and arteriolar diameter (P = 0.033) in CPAP versus control group. The venular diameter showed a nonstatistically significant reduction. CONCLUSIONS: CPAP is a potentially novel treatment for individuals with DR and concomitant OSA, improving the retinopathy status, reversing the arteriolar narrowing, and therefore increasing the AVR, tending to reduce the venular diameter. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].

RESUMEN

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with impaired glycemic control and a higher risk of vascular complications, such as diabetic retinopathy. However, the effect of apnea-hypopnea suppression on retinal disease progression is unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the reduction of retinal lesions in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and OSA. Methods: This open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted between October 2016 and February 2020 at a university hospital in Spain. The date of final follow-up was March 2, 2021. Eighty-three patients with OSA and mild to moderate NPDR receiving stable treatment were randomized to receive CPAP and usual care (43 patients with 79 available eyes) or usual care alone (40 patients with 67 available eyes) for 52 weeks. The primary outcomes were the change in the percentage of eyes with retinal exudates and the number of retinal microhemorrhages from baseline to week 52. We also assessed the effects of both interventions on retinal thickness by means of optical coherence tomography, serum concentrations of glycated hemoglobin, blood pressure, lipid concentrations, sleepiness, and quality of life. Results: Fifty-two weeks of CPAP treatment was associated with reductions from baseline in the percentage of eyes with hard exudates (overall difference, -21.7%; P = 0.035) and in optical coherence tomography indices of retinal edema, including central subfield thickness and cube volume. However, in patients who met prespecified criteria for CPAP adherence, treatment was also associated with a higher number of retinal microhemorrhages at 52 weeks (intergroup adjusted difference, 6.0 [95% confidence interval, 0.6-11.5]; P = 0.029), which was directly related to prescribed pressure levels. CPAP treatment also improved glycemic control, sleepiness, and general health-related quality of life. Conclusions: In patients with OSA and NPDR, long-term CPAP treatment in addition to usual care may result in slower progression of retinal disease, although it could also induce an increase in retinal microhemorrhages. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02874313).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To study antibiotic susceptibility in bacterial keratitis (BK), its profile over 10 years and its influence on ophthalmological practice. METHODS: Retrospective review of BK with positive corneal scraping over a 10-year period. Risk factors for keratitis, visual acuity (VA), empirical topical treatment, corneal infection characteristics and outcomes were analyzed for BK due to Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Propionibacterium acnes. RESULTS: 389 positive corneal scrapings were collected. All Gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycin. P. aeruginosa demonstrated >90% sensitivity to the most-commonly-used topical antibiotics. Susceptibility to methicillin was 90.2% for S. aureus and 66.3% for S. epidermidis. The results of 215 patients were available. 1.9% required enucleation and 2.8% required surgical treatments. Final VA improved after treatment in keratitis due to S. aureus (p = 0.026) and S. epidermidis (p = 0.005). There was a correlation between S. aureus resistance to methicillin (p = 0.002) and levofloxacin (p = 0.043) and enucleation (20% and 10%, respectively) compared with a 0% rate of enucleation in S. aureus-susceptible keratitis. CONCLUSIONS: BK due to S. pneumoniae is very aggressive irrespective of antibiotic sensitivity. S. aureus was frequently isolated in patients with systemic diseases. It causes severe keratitis and remains moderately resistant to methicillin and levofloxacin. For this reason, keeping vancomycin in empirical regimens is believed to be necessary

INTRODUCCIÓN: Estudiar la susceptibilidad antibiótica en queratitis bacteriana (QB), el perfil temporal a lo largo de 10 años y su influencia en la clínica ocular. MÉTODOS: Revisión retrospectiva durante un periodo de 10 años de QB con raspado corneal positivo. Se analizaron los factores de riesgo de queratitis, la agudeza visual (AV), el tratamiento empírico tópico, las características de la infección corneal y el resultado clínico para QB por Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa y Propionibacterium acnes. RESULTADOS: Se recogieron 389 raspados corneales positivos. Todas las bacterias grampositivas fueron susceptibles a la vancomicina. P. aeruginosa presentó sensibilidad mayor del 90% a los antibióticos tópicos más comúnmente utilizados. La susceptibilidad a la meticilina fue del 90,2% para S. aureus y del 66,3% para S. epidermidis. Los resultados clínicos estaban disponibles para 215 pacientes. El 1,9% requirieron enucleación y el 2,8% tratamientos quirúrgicos. La AV final mejoró después del tratamiento en queratitis por S. aureus (p = 0,026) y por S. epidermidis (p = 0,005). Hubo correlación entre la resistencia de S. aureus a la meticilina (p = 0,002) y levofloxacino (p = 0,043) y enucleación (20 y 10%, respectivamente) en comparación con una tasa de enucleación del 0% en S. aureus susceptible. CONCLUSIONES: Las QB por S. pneumoniae son muy agresivas independientemente de la sensibilidad antibiótica. S. aureus se aisló con frecuencia en pacientes con enfermedades sistémicas, causa queratitis severa y permanece moderadamente resistente a la meticilina y a levofloxacino; debido a esto, consideramos necesario mantener la vancomicina en la pauta empírica

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To study antibiotic susceptibility in bacterial keratitis (BK), its profile over 10 years and its influence on ophthalmological practice. METHODS: Retrospective review of BK with positive corneal scraping over a 10-year period. Risk factors for keratitis, visual acuity (VA), empirical topical treatment, corneal infection characteristics and outcomes were analyzed for BK due to Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Propionibacterium acnes. RESULTS: 389 positive corneal scrapings were collected. All Gram-positive bacteria were susceptible to vancomycin. P. aeruginosa demonstrated >90% sensitivity to the most-commonly-used topical antibiotics. Susceptibility to methicillin was 90.2% for S. aureus and 66.3% for S. epidermidis. The results of 215 patients were available. 1.9% required enucleation and 2.8% required surgical treatments. Final VA improved after treatment in keratitis due to S. aureus (p=0.026) and S. epidermidis (p=0.005). There was a correlation between S. aureus resistance to methicillin (p=0.002) and levofloxacin (p=0.043) and enucleation (20% and 10%, respectively) compared with a 0% rate of enucleation in S. aureus-susceptible keratitis. CONCLUSIONS: BK due to S. pneumoniae is very aggressive irrespective of antibiotic sensitivity. S. aureus was frequently isolated in patients with systemic diseases. It causes severe keratitis and remains moderately resistant to methicillin and levofloxacin. For this reason, keeping vancomycin in empirical regimens is believed to be necessary.

Asunto(s)