RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to report our results of toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with asymmetric astigmatism, its efficacy and safety in reducing the refractive cylinder. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with asymmetric astigmatism and non-progressive corneal ectasia, unable to fit hard contact lenses, with poor-corrected visual acuity or unsatisfactory spectacles-corrected visual acuity, underwent cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation. The choice of lens was individually after optical biometry examination. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon, with a 2.75-mm clear cornea self-sealing incision at 130° axis, from December 2008 to December 2015. RESULTS: We evaluated 88 eyes of 69 patients with asymmetric astigmatism: primary, secondary to leucoma, post-radial keratectomy, post-lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty, post-LASIK, post-PRK and due to pterygium. Snellen best-corrected spectacles visual acuity increased from 0.39 ± 0.23 preoperative to 0.80 ± 0.23 postoperative. The average refractive cylinder reduced from 2.32 ± 1.78 D preoperatively to 0.87 ± 1.09 D after surgery (P < .001). Sixty-three eyes out of 88 (71%) had residual refractive cylinder ≤ 1.0 D. CONCLUSION: The favorable efficacy on visual acuity outcomes we have found suggests that toric IOL can be used in cases of asymmetric astigmatism, in order to provide better-corrected vision, less spectacles dependence and an improved quality of vision overall, which is especially important in contact lenses intolerant patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Uma breve revisão de resultados e complicações da ceratoprótese (KPro) de Dohlman-Doane tipo 1. A KProDohlman-Doane é atualmente uma boa opção em casos graves de cegueira corneana, para os quais o transplante penetrante de córnea não apresenta bom prognóstico. As evoluções no design da KPro e as melhorias no procedimento cirúrgico, aliados a obtenção de condições favoráveis da superfície ocular pré-operatórias, garantem bons resultados da KPro em doenças não autoimunes. As principais complicações da KPro são membrana inflamatória retroprotética de fibrina, glaucoma, necrose corneana, vitreíte e infecção (ceratite e endoftalmite). Acompanhamento constante com exames pós-operatórios periódicos é necessário para monitorar e prevenir complicações sérias.

A short review of type 1 Dohlman-DoaneKeratoprosthesis (KPro) addresses results and complications. Dohlman-DoaneKPro is today a good option for cases of corneal blindness with poor prognosis for traditional penetrating keratoplasty. KPro design and surgical improvements along with proper preoperative ocular surface condition allows good results in non-immune diseases. Main complications of this KPro areinflammatory retroprosthetic membrane, glaucoma, corneal melting,vitreitis, and infection (keratitis and endophthalmitis). Comprehensive long-term postoperative follow-up examinationsare needed to monitor for and prevent serious complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe 9 eyes in 8 patients who received Dohlman-Doane type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) with a mean follow-up of 11.2 months (2 to 25 months). METHODS: A retrospective, non-comparative interventional case series. Previous corneal disease was alcaline burn in 4 eyes, multiple graft failure in 3 eyes, Stevens-Johnson syndrome in 1 eye and thermal injury in 1 eye. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was hand motions or worse in all patients. Glaucoma was present preoperatively in 3 eyes and received Ahmed valve implantation. RESULTS: 88,9% eyes achieved BCVA of better than or equal to 20/100, and 44,4% better than or equal to 20/40. In the postoperative period, 3 eyes developed posterior capsule opacity treated with YAG laser capsulotomy; 3 retroprosthetic membrane treated with tPA injection or steroids; 2 glaucoma in clinical treatment; 1 corneal melting, treated with donor cornea bottom exchange; and 1 fungic endophthalmitis, treated with corneal transplant, anterior vitrectomy, KPro and intraocular lens explantation, and specific intravitreal and endovenous treatment. CONCLUSION: Dohlman-Doane K-Pro seems to be a good option for cases of corneal blindness with poor prognosis for traditional penetrating keratoplasty. Its main advantage is not requesting systemic immunossuppression. Best results were achieved in non-immune diseases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO: Relatar a evolução de 9 olhos (8 pacientes) submetidos ao implante da ceratoprótese de Dohlman-Doane tipo 1, com tempo médio de seguimento de 11,2 meses (2 a 25 meses). MÉTODOS: Trabalho retrospectivo, não comparativo, intervencionista de uma série de casos. Quanto à doença de base, em 4 olhos foram queimadura alcalina, 3 falência de múltiplos transplantes de córnea, 1 síndrome de Stevens-Johnson e 1 queimadura térmica. A acuidade visual pré-operatória era de movimento de mãos ou pior em todos os olhos. Três olhos apresentavam glaucoma pré-operatório, sendo submetidos a implante valvulado de Ahmed. RESULTADOS: A acuidade visual com correção pós-operatória foi melhor ou igual a 20/100 em 88,9 por cento dos olhos e melhor ou igual a 20/40 em 44,4 por cento dos olhos. Como intercorrências pós-operatórias, 3 olhos apresentaram opacidade de cápsula posterior tratada com capsulotomia com YAG laser; 3 olhos membrana retroprotética de fibrina tratada com injeção tPA ou corticoterapia; 2 olhos glaucoma tratado com medicação; 1 olho "melting" corneano tratado com a troca do botão e 1 olho endoftalmite fúngica tratada com transplante a quente, vitrectomia anterior, explante da ceratoprótese e da LIO e tratamento antifúngico. CONCLUSÃO: A ceratoprótese de Dohlman-Doane é uma boa opção para casos graves de cegueira corneana, em que o transplante penetrante de córnea não apresenta bom prognóstico. Sua principal vantagem é não necessitar imunossupressão sistêmica. Casos de queimadura alcalina e de alta chance de rejeição apresentaram os melhores resultados.

PURPOSE: To describe 9 eyes in 8 patients who received Dohlman-Doane type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) with a mean follow-up of 11.2 months (2 to 25 months). METHODS: A retrospective, non-comparative interventional case series. Previous corneal disease was alcaline burn in 4 eyes, multiple graft failure in 3 eyes, Stevens-Johnson syndrome in 1 eye and thermal injury in 1 eye. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was hand motions or worse in all patients. Glaucoma was present preoperatively in 3 eyes and received Ahmed valve implantation. RESULTS: 88,9 percent eyes achieved BCVA of better than or equal to 20/100, and 44,4 percent better than or equal to 20/40. In the postoperative period, 3 eyes developed posterior capsule opacity treated with YAG laser capsulotomy; 3 retroprosthetic membrane treated with tPA injection or steroids; 2 glaucoma in clinical treatment; 1 corneal melting, treated with donor cornea bottom exchange; and 1 fungic endophthalmitis, treated with corneal transplant, anterior vitrectomy, KPro and intraocular lens explantation, and specific intravitreal and endovenous treatment. CONCLUSION: Dohlman-Doane K-Pro seems to be a good option for cases of corneal blindness with poor prognosis for traditional penetrating keratoplasty. Its main advantage is not requesting systemic immunossuppression. Best results were achieved in non-immune diseases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clonidine has been used in anesthesia for its sedative and analgesic properties, and to achieve greater hemodynamic stability with reduction in intra-ocular pressure. This study evaluated the clinical effects of intravenous clonidine (2.5 microg.kg(-1)) on the intra-ocular pressure (IOP), hemodynamic parameters, and post-anesthetic recovery in the surgical treatment of cataract. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that included patients undergoing cataract surgery under peribulbar block. After placement of monitoring devices, baseline (M0) values of IOP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), SpO2, and the degree of sedation (Ramsay) were determined. Afterwards, placebo (Group P) or clonidine (Group C) was administered intravenously. After 30 minutes, at Moment 1 (M1), measurements were repeated, and once again at the end of the surgery, at Moment 2 (M2). RESULTS: The change in IOP between M0 and M1 was different for both groups, 14.5% in Group C and 5.25% in Group P (p = 0.01), and the means remained reduced until M2. Mean arterial pressure in Group C showed a 17% reduction from M0 to M1 and increased 3.5% in Group P (p < 0.001) and in Group C it showed a recovery at M2 (p = 0.17). The heart rate decreased 6.4% in Group C and 1% in Group P (p = 0.1) from M0 to M1. There was a greater sedation in Group C when compared with Group P (p < 0.001) but there was no cases of respiratory depression. The relative risk of intraoperative hypertension was 0.657 (CI 95% 0.517 to 0.835) in Group C, p < 0.01. Differences in the incidence of tachycardia, hypoxemia, hypotension, and increased hospital staying were not observed between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Clonidine, under the conditions of the present study, showed to be a safe drug and decreased IOP and the intraoperative risk of hypertension without delaying hospital discharge.

Asunto(s)