RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is expressed as orbital inflammation, and serum levels of several proinflammatory cytokines have been studied among Graves' disease (GD) patients with and without TED; however, a more sensitive and specific marker for the different phases of GD and TED is still lacking. METHODS: 17 active TED, 16 inactive TED, 16 GD without TED, and 16 healthy controls were recruited. Serum IL-17A, MMP-2, MMP-3, and MMP-9 were measured by multiplex bead assay. TED hormone and eye parameters were evaluated, and their relationship with cytokine levels was analysed. RESULTS: Serum MMP-9 was higher in active TED than healthy controls, while IL-17A was lower among these patients than in GD without TED and healthy controls. No differences were found in MMP-3 and MMP-2 concentrations. MMP-9 levels were lower in inactive TED patients who underwent radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy and those on levothyroxine replacement, while MMP-9 levels were elevated in patients on methimazole. A negative correlation was found between age at assessment and time of follow-up with MMP-9 levels in inactive TED. Free T3 and ophthalmometry values were positively correlated with MMP-9 in the GD without TED and inactive TED groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serum MMP-9 was increased in patients with active TED and was related to the RAI treatment, longer follow-up time, and higher ophthalmometry in patients with inactive TED, as well as thyroid function in GD without TED. MMP-9 may be involved in both the active phase of TED and the active phase of inflammation related to GD.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) is the most common extra-thyroid manifestation of Graves' disease (GD). The Clinical Activity Score (CAS) has been widely used to evaluate GO inflammation severity and response to treatment; however, it is quite subjective. Infrared thermography (IRT) is a portable and low-cost device to evaluate local temperature and assess inflammation. The aim was to evaluate ocular temperature by IRT as an instrument for measuring inflammatory activity in GO and its correlation with CAS. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study involving 136 consecutive GD patients (12 with CAS ≥ 3/7, 62 with CAS < 3 and 62 without apparent GO) with 62 healthy controls. Patients with active ophthalmopathy were prospectively evaluated. Exophthalmometry, CAS, and thermal images from caruncles and upper eyelids were acquired from all subjects. RESULTS: All eye areas of thermal evaluation had higher temperatures in GD patients with active ophthalmopathy (caruncles, p<0.0001; upper eyelids, p<0.0001), and it was positively correlated with CAS (r=0.60 and p<0.0001 at caruncles; r=0.58 and p<0.0001 at upper eyelids). No difference in temperature was found between other groups. Patients with active ophthalmopathy were prospectively evaluated after 6 or 12 months of the treatment and a significant difference was found in ophthalmometry (p=0.0188), CAS (p=0.0205), temperature of caruncles (p=0.0120), and upper eyelids (p=0.0066). CONCLUSIONS: IRT was an objective and simple tool for evaluation and follow-up of inflammation in GO, allowed evidencing patients with significant inflammatory activity, and had a good correlation with the CAS score.