RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Motivation is critically important for rehabilitation, exercise, and motor performance, but its neural basis is poorly understood. Recent correlational research suggests that the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) may be involved in motivation for walking activity and/or descending motor output. This study experimentally evaluated brain activity changes in periods of additional motivation during walking exercise and tested how these brain activity changes relate to self-reported exercise motivation and walking speed. METHODS: Adults without disability (N = 26; 65% women; 25 [standard deviation = 5] years old) performed a vigorous exercise experiment involving 20 trials of maximal speed overground walking. Half of the trials were randomized to include "extra-motivation" stimuli (lap timer, tracked best lap time, and verbal encouragement). Wearable near-infrared spectroscopy measured oxygenated hemoglobin responses from frontal lobe regions, including the dmPFC, primary sensorimotor, dorsolateral prefrontal, anterior prefrontal, supplementary motor, and dorsal premotor cortices. RESULTS: Compared with standard trials, participants walked faster during extra-motivation trials (2.43 vs 2.67 m/s; P < .0001) and had higher oxygenated hemoglobin responses in all tested brain regions, including dmPFC (+842 vs +1694 µM; P < .0001). Greater dmPFC activity was correlated with more self-determined motivation for exercise between individuals (r = 0.55; P = .004) and faster walking speed between trials (r = 0.18; P = .0002). dmPFC was the only tested brain region that showed both of these associations. CONCLUSION: Simple motivational stimuli during walking exercise seem to upregulate widespread brain regions. Results suggest that dmPFC may be a key brain region linking affective signaling to motor output. IMPACT: These findings provide a potential biologic basis for the benefits of motivational stimuli, elicited with clinically feasible methods during walking exercise. Future clinical studies could build on this information to develop prognostic biomarkers and test novel brain stimulation targets for enhancing exercise motivation (eg, dmPFC).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cortical activity is typically indexed by analyzing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals in terms of the mean (e.g., mean oxygenated hemoglobin; HbO). Entropy approaches have been proposed as useful complementary methods for analyzing fNIRS signals. Entropy methods consider the regularity of a time series, and in doing so, may provide additional insights into the underlying dynamics of brain activity. Recent research using fNIRS found that non-disabled adults exhibit widespread increases in cortical activity and walk faster when under "extra motivation" conditions (e.g., verbal encouragement, lap timer) compared to trials without such motivators ("standard motivation"). This ancillary analysis of that study aimed to assess the extent to which fNIRS permutation entropy (PE) was affected by motivational conditions and explained variance in self-reported motivation. No regional PE differences were found between different motivational conditions. However, a greater difference in PE between motivational conditions (higher in standard, lower in extra motivation) in the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC) was associated with greater self-determined motivation. PE was also higher (less regular) in the primary sensorimotor cortex lower limb area compared to all other cortical areas analyzed, except the dorsal premotor cortex, regardless of motivational condition. This study provides early evidence to suggest that while different motivational environments during walking activity influence the magnitude of fNIRS signals, they may not influence the regularity of cortical signals. However, the magnitude of PE difference between motivational conditions was related to self-determined motivation in the aPFC, and this is an area warranting further investigation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Importance: For walking rehabilitation after stroke, training intensity and duration are critical dosing parameters that lack optimization. Objective: To assess the optimal training intensity (vigorous vs moderate) and minimum training duration (4, 8, or 12 weeks) needed to maximize immediate improvement in walking capacity in patients with chronic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter randomized clinical trial using an intent-to-treat analysis was conducted from January 2019 to April 2022 at rehabilitation and exercise research laboratories. Survivors of a single stroke who were aged 40 to 80 years and had persistent walking limitations 6 months or more after the stroke were enrolled. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity aerobic training (MAT), each involving 45 minutes of walking practice 3 times per week for 12 weeks. The HIIT protocol used repeated 30-second bursts of walking at maximum safe speed, alternated with 30- to 60-second rest periods, targeting a mean aerobic intensity above 60% of the heart rate reserve (HRR). The MAT protocol used continuous walking with speed adjusted to maintain an initial target of 40% of the HRR, progressing up to 60% of the HRR as tolerated. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was 6-minute walk test distance. Outcomes were assessed by blinded raters after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of training. Results: Of 55 participants (mean [SD] age, 63 [10] years; 36 male [65.5%]), 27 were randomized to HIIT and 28 to MAT. The mean (SD) time since stroke was 2.5 (1.3) years, and mean (SD) 6-minute walk test distance at baseline was 239 (132) m. Participants attended 1675 of 1980 planned treatment visits (84.6%) and 197 of 220 planned testing visits (89.5%). No serious adverse events related to study procedures occurred. Groups had similar 6-minute walk test distance changes after 4 weeks (HIIT, 27 m [95% CI, 6-48 m]; MAT, 12 m [95% CI, -9 to 33 m]; mean difference, 15 m [95% CI, -13 to 42 m]; P = .28), but HIIT elicited greater gains after 8 weeks (58 m [95% CI, 39-76 m] vs 29 m [95% CI, 9-48 m]; mean difference, 29 m [95% CI, 5-54 m]; P = .02) and 12 weeks (71 m [95% CI, 49-94 m] vs 27 m [95% CI, 3-50 m]; mean difference, 44 m [95% CI, 14-74 m]; P = .005) of training; HIIT also showed greater improvements than MAT on some secondary measures of gait speed and fatigue. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings show proof of concept that vigorous training intensity is a critical dosing parameter for walking rehabilitation. In patients with chronic stroke, vigorous walking exercise produced significant and meaningful gains in walking capacity with only 4 weeks of training, but at least 12 weeks were needed to maximize immediate gains. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03760016.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The roles and responsibilities of the director of clinical education (DCE) are of interest in the academic physical therapist (PT) community. This study explored the impact of professional and positional task characteristics of the DCE position on task-fit misalignment within PT education programs. Task-fit explores how the tasks of a particular job align with the appropriately trained person who holds the position. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: A recently published DCE Matrix highlights 2 extremes of misalignment and nonoptimal task-fit between the position and the person. Misalignment was investigated rather than alignment because negative connotations often have greater impact on behavior, decision making, and relationships. The impact of misalignment is unknown. SUBJECTS: Program directors and DCEs among ACAPT member PT programs were surveyed. METHODS: A qualitative grounded theory design was used. Two rounds of surveys with focused questions about the impact of task-fit misalignment. Qualitative content data analysis through a constant comparative process was followed. Respondent descriptive statistics were collected. RESULTS: Three realms of impact were identified when misalignment of positional and professional characteristics exists. The realms include the 1) individual person holding the position; 2) academic program; or 3) physical therapy profession. There is a high level of agreement that task-fit misalignment affects each realm; variability exists about its prevalence. DISCUSSION: There seems to be an interconnectedness of impact among the person, the program, and the profession when misalignment exists between the fit of the DCE to the job or the work environment to the DCE. Findings indicate job crafting may be necessary to evolve the nature of the DCE work toward higher director-level tasks. This is the first study of its kind to explore the impact intersection of person-job fit and task-fit and the impact on a DCE's responsibilities. Nonrespondent or attrition bias may have limited sample size.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Locomotor high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a promising intervention for stroke rehabilitation. However, overground translation of treadmill speed gains has been somewhat limited, some important outcomes have not been tested and baseline response predictors are poorly understood. This pilot study aimed to guide future research by assessing preliminary outcomes of combined overground and treadmill HIIT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten participants >6 months post-stroke were assessed before and after a 4-week no-intervention control phase and a 4-week treatment phase involving 12 sessions of overground and treadmill HIIT. RESULTS: Overground and treadmill gait function both improved during the treatment phase relative to the control phase, with overground speed changes averaging 61% of treadmill speed changes (95% CI: 33-89%). Moderate or larger effect sizes were observed for measures of gait performance, balance, fitness, cognition, fatigue, perceived change and brain volume. Participants with baseline comfortable gait speed <0.4 m/s had less absolute improvement in walking capacity but similar proportional and perceived changes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reinforce the potential of locomotor HIIT research for stroke rehabilitation and provide guidance for more definitive studies. Based on the current results, future locomotor HIIT studies should consider including: (1) both overground and treadmill training; (2) measures of cognition, fatigue and brain volume, to complement typical motor and fitness assessment; and (3) baseline gait speed as a covariate.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stroke results in neurologic impairments and aerobic deconditioning that contribute to limited walking capacity which is a major barrier post-stroke. Current exercise recommendations and stroke rehabilitation guidelines recommend moderate-intensity aerobic training post-stroke. Locomotor high-intensity interval training is a promising new strategy that has shown significantly greater improvements in aerobic fitness and motor performance than moderate-intensity aerobic training in other populations. However, the relative benefits and risks of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity aerobic training remain poorly understood following stroke. In this study, we hypothesize that locomotor high-intensity interval training will result in greater improvements in walking capacity than moderate-intensity aerobic training. METHODS: Using a single-blind, 3-site randomized controlled trial, 50 chronic (> 6 months) stroke survivors are randomly assigned to complete 36 locomotor training sessions of either high-intensity interval training or moderate-intensity aerobic training. Main eligibility criteria are age 40-80 years, single stroke for which the participant received treatment (experienced 6 months to 5 years prior to consent), walking speed ≤ 1.0 m/s, able to walk at least 3 min on the treadmill at ≥ 0.13 m/s (0.3 mph), stable cardiovascular condition (American Heart Association class B), and the ability to walk 10 m overground without continuous physical assistance. The primary outcome (walking capacity) and secondary outcomes (self-selected and fast gait speed, aerobic fitness, and fatigue) are assessed prior to initiating training and after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks of training. DISCUSSION: This study will provide fundamental new knowledge to inform the selection of intensity and duration dosing parameters for gait recovery and optimization of aerobic training interventions in chronic stroke. Data needed to justify and design a subsequent definitive trial will also be obtained. Thus, the results of this study will inform future stroke rehabilitation guidelines on how to optimally improve walking capacity following stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03760016 . Registered on November 30, 2018.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Imagined walking has yielded insights into normal locomotor control and could improve understanding of neurologic gait dysfunction. This study evaluated brain activation during imagined walking in chronic stroke. METHODS: Ten persons with stroke and 10 matched controls completed a walking test battery and a magnetic resonance imaging session including imagined walking and knee extension tasks. Brain activations were compared between tasks and groups. Associations between activations and composite gait score were also calculated, while controlling for lesion load. RESULTS: Stroke and worse gait score were each associated with lesser overall brain activation during knee extension but greater overall activation during imagined walking. During imagined walking, the stroke group significantly activated the primary motor cortex lower limb region and cerebellar locomotor region. Better walking function was associated with less activation of these regions and greater activation of medial superior frontal gyrus area 9. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with knee extension, imagined walking was less sensitive to stroke-related deficits in brain activation but better at revealing compensatory changes, some of which could be maladaptive. SIGNIFICANCE: The identified associations for imagined walking suggest potential neural mechanisms of locomotor adaptation after stroke, which could be useful for future intervention development and prognostication.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a promising strategy for improving gait and fitness after stroke, but optimal parameters remain unknown. We tested the effects of short vs long interval type and over-ground vs treadmill mode on training intensity. Methods: Using a repeated measures design, 10 participants with chronic hemiparesis performed 12 HIIT sessions over 4 weeks, alternating between short and long-interval HIIT sessions. Both protocols included 10 minutes of over-ground HIIT, 20 minutes of treadmill HIIT and another 10 minutes over-ground. Short-interval HIIT involved 30 second bursts at maximum safe speed and 30-60 second rest periods. Long-interval HIIT involved 4-minute bursts at ~90% of peak heart rate (HRpeak) and 3-minute recovery periods at ~70% HRpeak. Results: Compared with long-interval HIIT, short-interval HIIT had significantly faster mean overground speeds (0.75 vs 0.67 m/s) and treadmill speeds (0.90 vs 0.51 m/s), with similar mean treadmill HR (82.9 vs 81.8%HRpeak) and session perceived exertion (16.3 vs 16.3), but lower overground HR (78.4 vs 81.1%HRpeak) and session step counts (1481 vs 1672). For short-interval HIIT, training speeds and HR were significantly higher on the treadmill vs. overground. For long-interval HIIT, the treadmill elicited HR similar to overground training at significantly slower speeds. Conclusions: Both short and long-interval HIIT elicit high intensities but emphasize different dosing parameters. From these preliminary findings and previous studies, we hypothesize that overground and treadmill short-interval HIIT could be optimal for improving gait speed and overground long-interval HIIT could be optimal for improving gait endurance.

Asunto(s)