RESUMEN

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Many ophthalmologists preform clinical refactions, although little is known of the perceptions and practise of refraction by ophthalmologists and key barriers preventing this aspect of ophthalmic practice. BACKGROUND: Although there are numerous studies on visual acuity in ophthalmology, there is no study to date on the practice of refraction by ophthalmologists. This study evaluates the practice patterns of ophthalmologists in current practice. It specifically addresses perceptions of ophthalmologists about (a) the importance of refraction in clinical practice, and (b) barriers to performing refraction. The methodology and frequency of performing refraction by ophthalmologists is also assessed. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Annual Scientific Congress of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of ophthalmologists in 2017, held in Perth, Australia. All attending ophthalmologists and ophthalmology trainees were invited to participate. Participants completed a 17-variable questionnaire on the perceptions of practitioners about refraction and their practice of it. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Version 24. RESULTS: At this Congress, 213 attendees completed the survey, with most being consultant general ophthalmologists (85%). Twenty-six percent of participants either 'really loved' or 'liked' refracting patients. Those who reported feeling competent with refraction were more likely to perform it themselves (p = 0.001). Individuals most commonly reported taking 3-5 minutes to refract a patient (38%). Participants under the age of 65, and participants practising paediatric ophthalmology, were more likely to perform a refraction. CONCLUSIONS: The literature indicates that this is the first study to describe the practice patterns of refraction by ophthalmologists. Although ophthalmologists found refraction important, the majority preferred patients to be refracted by others. Key barriers to ophthalmologists performing refraction included the time required to perform the refraction, a busy clinic, and the availability of alternative providers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Drusen are retinal deposits comprising cell debris, immune material and complement that are characteristic of macular degeneration but also found in glomerulonephritis. This was a pilot cross-sectional study to determine how often drusen occurred in IgA glomerulonephritis and their clinical significance. Study participants underwent non-mydriatic retinal photography, and their deidentified retinal images were examined for drusen by two trained graders, who compared central drusen counts, counts ≥ 10 and drusen size with those of matched controls. The cohort comprised 122 individuals with IgA glomerulonephritis including 89 males (73%), 49 individuals (40%) of East Asian or Southern European ancestry, with an overall median age of 54 years (34-64), and median disease duration of 9 years (4-17). Thirty-nine (33%) had an eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 72 had previously reached kidney failure (61%). Overall mean drusen counts were higher in IgA glomerulonephritis (9 ± 27) than controls (2 ± 7, p < 0.001). Central counts ≥ 10 were also more common (OR = 3.31 (1.42-7.73, p = 0.006), and were associated with longer disease duration (p = 0.03) but not kidney failure (p = 0.31). Larger drusen were associated with more mesangial IgA staining (p = 0.004). Increased drusen counts were also present in IgA glomerulonephritis secondary to Crohn's disease but not with Henoch-Schonlein purpura. The finding of retinal drusen in IgA glomerulonephritis is consistent with complement activation and represents a model for better understanding glomerular immune deposition and a supporting argument for treatment with anti-complement therapies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction: Complement has been implicated in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis on the basis of the associations with inherited complement defects and genome-wide association study risk alleles, glomerular deposits, reduced serum levels, and occasional reports of retinal drusen. This study examined drusen in SLE and their clinical significance. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study compared individuals with SLE recruited from renal and rheumatology clinics with hospital controls. Participants were reviewed for clinical features and underwent imaging with a nonmydriatic retinal camera. Deidentified images were examined by 2 trained graders for drusen number and size using a grid overlay. Results: The cohort with SLE (n = 65) comprised 55 women (85%) and 10 men (15%) with a median age of 47 years (interquartile range 35-59), where 23 (35%) were of southern European or Asian ancestry, and 32 (49%) had biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. Individuals with SLE had higher mean drusen numbers than controls (27 ± 60, 3 ± 9, respectively, P = 0.001), more drusen counts ≥10 (31, 48% and 3, 5%, respectively, P < 0.001), and more medium-large drusen (14, 22% and 3, 5%, respectively, P < 0.001). In SLE, mean drusen counts were higher, and drusen were larger, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <90 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (P = 0.02, P = 0.02, respectively) or class IV nephritis (P = 0.03, P = 0.02). Conclusion: Drusen composition resembles that of glomerular immune deposits. CFH controls complement activation in the extracellular matrix and CFH risk variants are shared by drusen in macular degeneration and by SLE. CFH represents a possible treatment target for SLE especially with renal impairment.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)