RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of suicidal behavior among individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) in Southeast Asia (SEA) underscores the need for optimized management to address depressive symptoms, reduce suicide risk and prevent suicide in these individuals. Given the lack of clear guideline recommendations for assessing and managing these patients, regional consensus-based recommendations which take into account diverse local contexts across SEA may provide useful guidance for clinical practice. METHODS: A narrative literature review and pre-meeting survey were conducted prior to the consensus meeting of an SEA expert panel comprising 13 psychiatrists with clinical experience in managing patients with MDD with suicidal behavior. Utilizing the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, the expert panel developed consensus-based recommendations on the assessment and treatment of adult patients with MDD with suicidal behavior under 65 years. RESULTS: Screening of adult patients under 65 years with MDD for suicide risk using both a validated assessment tool and clinical interview is recommended. An improved suicide risk stratification - incorporating both severity and temporality, or using a prevention-focused risk formulation - should be considered. For a patient with an MDD episode with low risk of suicide, use of antidepressant monotherapy, and psychotherapy in combination with pharmacological treatment are both recommended approaches. For a patient with an MDD episode with high risk of suicide, or imminent risk of suicide requiring rapid clinical response, or for a patient who had received adequate AD but still reported suicidal behavior, recommended treatment strategies include antidepressant augmentation, combination use of psychotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy with pharmacological treatment, and inpatient care. Suicide-specific psychosocial interventions are important for suicide prevention and should also be part of the management of patients with MDD with suicidal behavior. CONCLUSIONS: There are still unmet needs in the assessment of suicide risk and availability of treatment options that can deliver rapid response in patients with MDD with suicidal behavior. These consensus recommendations on the management of adult patients with MDD with suicidal behavior under 65 years may serve as a useful guidance in diverse clinical practices across the SEA region. Clinical judgment based on careful consideration of individual circumstances of each patient remains key to determining the most appropriate treatment option.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Suicidio , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Consenso , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Humanos , Ideación Suicida , Suicidio/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The REVIDA study aimed to assess the evolution of major depression symptoms in South East Asian (SEA) patients treated with vortioxetine for major depression in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This non-interventional study was conducted from August 2016 to April 2017. A total of 138 patients (aged 18-65 years) with an active episode of major depression were recruited from Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Vortioxetine was initiated on the first visit and patients were followed for 3 months. Depression severity was assessed using the PHQ-9 questionnaire (patient assessed) and CGI-S scale (physician assessed); cognitive function was assessed with the PDQ-D questionnaire; work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) was assessed with the WPAI questionnaire. RESULTS: At baseline, 89.9% of patients were moderately to severely depressed (PHQ-9 score ≥10). During the 3 month treatment period, mean ± SD PHQ-9 score decreased from 18.7 ± 5.7 to 5.0 ± 5.3, mean ± SD CGI-S score decreased from 4.4 ± 0.7 to 2.2 ± 1.1 and mean ± SD PDQ-D score decreased from 42.1 ± 18.8 to 13.4 ± 13.0. By Month 3, response and remission rates reached 80.8% and 59.0%, respectively. Work productivity loss decreased from 73.6% to 30.5%, while activity impairment decreased from 71.5% to 24.6%. Positive correlations were observed between PHQ-9, PDQ-D, and WPAI work productivity loss and activity impairment. By Month 3, 82.0% of patients were either not depressed or only mildly depressed (PHQ-9 score ≤9). CONCLUSION: In real-world clinical settings, vortioxetine was effective in reducing depression severity and improving cognitive function and work productivity in SEA patients with major depression.
Asunto(s)
Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Depresión , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Vortioxetina/uso terapéutico , Rendimiento Laboral , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Asia Sudoriental , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Circadian abnormalities may be related to mood disorders. Circadian gene expression was measured in postmortem brain tissue from individuals with affective disorders and controls. Relationships between circadian gene expression, clinical characteristics, and alcohol and psychotropic medication use were noted. Further study is warranted to characterize these relationships.
Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/genética , Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Ritmo Circadiano/genética , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/genética , Trastornos del Humor/genética , Trastornos del Humor/patología , Proteínas Circadianas Period/genética , Autopsia , Trastorno Bipolar/patología , Encéfalo/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Relojes Circadianos/genética , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/patología , Femenino , Expresión Génica , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Cambios Post Mortem , Valores de ReferenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders and symptoms, ranging from mood dysregulation to delirium, are commonly observed in many neurological disorders. These manifestations complicate the illness and worsen prognosis. Pharmacological treatment options may be limited by the primary neurological illness and side effects. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review the safety and efficacy of pharmacological agents used to treat psychiatric manifestations of several common neurological conditions, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), post-stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI) and epilepsy. METHODS: Systematic review of the Medline database for articles published between 2000 and 2007 was done to retrieve relevant articles. RESULTS: The paucity of controlled data on the pharmacological treatments of psychiatric manifestations of neurological conditions makes recommendations difficult. CONCLUSION: When secondary depression, mania, anxiety, and delirium remain after treatment of the underlying condition, clinical experience and the limited research indicates that judicious pharmacological interventions may effectively treat mood dysregulation, delirium and agitation.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/complicaciones , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/fisiopatología , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Lesiones Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/fisiopatología , Psicotrópicos/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
This paper propounds two main theses. First, it asserts that the boundaries of the doctor-patient relationship are not clearly delineated, but they are clarified by the clarified contexts in which they are formed. Second, there is a need to formulate a set of guidelines that are flexible enough to accommodate ambiguous situations and yet definitive enough to define the limits of the interaction between the doctor and the patient. In order to advance the aforementioned theses, this paper will clarify what boundary transgressions are, how they come about, and how they could avoided.