RESUMEN

To investigate the trends of hospital admissions concerning diseases of the eye and adnexa in Australia in the past 2 decades. This is a descriptive ecological study on the population level that examined hospitalization data for the duration between 1998 and 2021 in Australia. Hospitalization data were extracted from the National Hospital Morbidity Database. The chi-squared test was utilized to assess the difference in admission rates between the years 1998 and 2021. Hospital admission rate for diseases of the eye and adnexa increased by 1.20-fold (from 852.32 [95% confidence interval [CI] 848.16-856.47] in 1998 to 1873.72 [95% CI 1868.48-1878.96] in 2021 per 100,000 persons, P < .01). The most common cause of hospitalization for diseases of the eye and adnexa was disorders of the lens (65.7%), followed by disorders of the choroid and retina (15.6%), followed by disorders of the eyelid, lacrimal system, and orbit (7.7%). Hospital admission rate among males increased by 1.25-fold (from 737.67 [95% CI 732.18-743.16] in 1998 to 1657.19 [95% CI 1650.19-1664.20] in 2021 per 100,000 persons). Hospital admission rate among females increased less sharply by 1.03-fold (from 965.37 [95% CI 959.14-971.59] in 1998 to 1964.35 [95% CI 1956.80-1971.90] in 2021 per 100,000 persons). There are clear gender and age roles in the epidemiology of hospital admissions related to eye and adnexa disorders. Lens disorders were the most common cause of hospital admission. The admission rate increase during the past decades could be due to increases in life expectancy, lifestyle changes, and improvements in screening protocols.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To date few studies have investigated the correlation between inflammatory markers and lipoproteins in the serum of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients, often reporting conflicting findings. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between lipid analytes and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in individuals diagnosed with dry AMD. METHODS: A standard clinical lipid panel (total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein [HDL], and low-density lipoproteins) and CRP laboratory results were retrospectively collected from the medical records of patients with dry AMD and age- and sex-matched controls. RESULTS: The study included 90 patients with dry AMD and 270 patients without AMD. In univariate analysis, CRP showed a higher mean value in cases than in controls. After adjusting for age and sex, CRP and triglyceride levels showed significant differences between cases and controls. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between CRP and HDL levels in the dry AMD group (n=90). Other lipid analytes showed no significant correlations with CRP. CONCLUSION: Our findings add to the growing body of evidence linking inflammation to AMD. Although it is unclear whether changes in serum CRP and triglyceride levels are the causes or effects, monitoring both analytes may be beneficial as an early disease predictor, especially in individuals with a family history of AMD. The negative correlation between CRP and HDL (i.e., inflammation and good cholesterol) may be targeted for future therapies.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of developing eye lens opacities and cataracts among physicians and healthcare workers occupationally exposed to radiation. METHODS: Our literature search captured articles published in Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Google Scholar databases until September 2021. Then, we retrieved articles reporting cataracts and eye lens opacities induced by radiation exposure among healthcare professionals. The outcomes of interest were cataracts, nuclear opacity, cortical opacity, posterior subcapsular opacity, and any lens opacity. RESULTS: Of the 4123 articles identified, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Healthcare workers exposed to radiation had a significantly greater risk of posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSCs), cataracts, and any lens opacities than those of the non-exposed participants (p<0.05). The cortical opacity was not significantly different between the exposed and non-exposed participants (p>0.05). Radiation was not determined to be a risk factor for nuclear opacity as it was significantly greater in the control group than the exposed participants. Subgroup analysis revealed that nurses had the highest risk for PSCs (risk ratio = 4.00), followed by interventional cardiologists (risk ratio = 3.85). CONCLUSION: The risk of posterior subcapsular opacities and cataracts is significantly higher in healthcare workers with occupational radiation exposure than in non-exposed workers, highlighting the necessity to enhance and promote the wearing of protective measures with high safety levels.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the magnitude and determinants of computer vision syndrome (CVS) among radiologists in Saudi Arabia using a reliable and validated survey instrument. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide cross-sectional web-based survey took place in April 2021 and included all radiologists and radiology residents residing practicing in Saudi Arabia. We used the reliable and validated CVS questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using nonparametric methods. The CVS score was correlated with different demographic- and health-related variables. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between subgroups. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 416 participants. The prevalence of CVS was 65.4% (95% CI: 60.8-70.0). The median CVS score was 7.5 (interquartile range: 4.0; 12.0). Mild CVS was observed in 188 participants (69.1%), moderate CVS was observed in 69 (25.4%), and severe CVS was observed in 15 (5.5%). The most common symptoms perceived by participants were headache (72.1%), dryness (70.7%), burning (63.7%), blurred vision (56.3%), and increased sensitivity to light (55.5%). Multinomial regression analysis suggested that female sex (p < 0.001), work as a general radiologist (p = 0.05), and the use of eyeglasses (p = 0.001) were significant predictors of CVS. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of CVS among radiologists in our study was high. Local and international societies need to establish and implement legislative and preventive measures to ensure the safety and ocular and visual health of radiologists.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data are required on ophthalmic cases that present to the emergency eye clinics in Madinah, Saudi Arabia for proper allocation of healthcare resources. OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency and various diagnoses of patients presenting to the A&E at Ohud Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively for all patients who presented to the A&E ophthalmology clinic from June 2014 to September 2014. The data was analyzed and presented using frequency of incidence and percentages. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the diagnoses based on age, sex and nationality. P ≤ 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: The study sample included 868 patients. The male-to-female ratio was 1.1:1.0. The main age categories included patients ≥45 years of age (256 patients) and 251 patients between the ages of 15-30 years. Various types of Conjunctivitis was the most common diagnosis, reported in 282 patients (32.5%), and followed by dry eye syndrome in 156 (18%) patients. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction in 156 patients (18%). Eyelid infections were detected in 102 patients (12%), corneal abrasion in 102 patients (9.3%). Various eye traumas was diagnosed in 30 patients (3.5%), increased intraocular pressure (IOP) in 17 patients (2%), ruptured globe in 2 patients (0.2%) and various other non-emergency pathologies in the remaining eyes. There were no significant differences in patient's characteristics and categories of diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Non-emergent ophthalmic cases were the most common reason for the ophthalmology emergency room visits. It was observed that most cases could be referred to outpatient departments and potentially be managed by primary healthcare providers. This would be more cost effective and will also allow for better management of vision threatening ocular emergencies.