Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the cancer survivors' self-efficacy scale.
Chien, Ching-Hui; Chuang, Cheng-Keng; Wu, Chun-Te; Pang, See-Tong; Liu, Kuan-Lin; Yu, Kai-Jie.
Afiliação
  • Chien CH; College of Nursing, Peitou District, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, No.365, Ming-Te Road, Taipei City, 112, Taiwan. chinghui@ntunhs.edu.tw.
  • Chuang CK; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
  • Wu CT; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Pang ST; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
  • Liu KL; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Yu KJ; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Psicol Reflex Crit ; 37(1): 33, 2024 Aug 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39177718
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The reliability and validity of the traditional Chinese version of the Cancer Survivors' Self-Efficacy Scale (CS-SES-TC) has not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the psychometric properties of the Traditional Chinese version of the CS-SES-TC.

METHODS:

Participants were recruited from the outpatient departments of a hospital in Taiwan. A single questionnaire was administered to 300 genitourinary cancer survivors. The scales included in the initial questionnaire were the CS-SES-TC, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scale (FACT-G). Data obtained from 300 survivors were used to confirm the structure through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

RESULTS:

The CFA results indicate that the 11-item CS-SES-TC is consistent with the original scale. Furthermore, it was identified as a unidimensional scale, with the model showing acceptable goodness-of-fit (CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.97). The factor loading of each item in the CS-SES-TC was above 0.6 and had convergent validity. Based on multiple-group CFA testing, the change (ΔCFI) between the unconstrained and constrained models was ≤ 0.01, indicating that measurement invariance holds for gender. The participants' CS-SES-TC scores were positively correlated with their FACT-G scores and negatively correlated with their CES-D scores. The scales exhibited concurrent validity and discriminant validity. The CS-SES-TC had a Cronbach's α in the range of .97-.98.

CONCLUSION:

The CS-SES-TC had acceptable reliability and validity. Healthcare workers can use this scale for ongoing assessment of the cancer-related self-efficacy of cancer survivors.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Psicol Reflex Crit Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan País de publicação: Brasil
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Psicol Reflex Crit Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan País de publicação: Brasil