Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol.
Windom, Reed R; Seitz, Samantha; Ly, Jean B; Dunn, Neha; Fergeson, Jennifer; Windom, Hugh H.
Afiliação
  • Windom RR; Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.
  • Seitz S; Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Neb.
  • Ly JB; Food Allergy Center of Florida, Sarasota, Fla.
  • Dunn N; Food Allergy Center of Florida, Sarasota, Fla.
  • Fergeson J; Food Allergy Center of Florida, Sarasota, Fla.
  • Windom HH; Food Allergy Center of Florida, Sarasota, Fla. Electronic address: hugh@windomallergy.com.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(9): 2447-2453.e1, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759790
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES:

To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food.

METHODS:

Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 11000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period.

RESULTS:

The 11000 and 1100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative.

CONCLUSIONS:

Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alérgenos / Imunoterapia Sublingual / Hipersensibilidade Alimentar Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alérgenos / Imunoterapia Sublingual / Hipersensibilidade Alimentar Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos