Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of DNA quantity and quality from fecal samples of mammals transported in ethanol or lysis buffer.
Roncancio-Duque, Néstor; García-Ariza, Jeison Eduardo; Rivera-Franco, Nelson; Gonzalez-Ríos, Andrés Mauricio; López-Alvarez, Diana.
Afiliação
  • Roncancio-Duque N; Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Grupo de Investigación en Diversidad Biológica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Palmira, Colombia.
  • García-Ariza JE; Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Grupo de Investigación en Diversidad Biológica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Palmira, Colombia.
  • Rivera-Franco N; Universidad del Valle, Facultad de Salud, Escuela de Ciencias Básicas, Grupo VIREM-Virus Emergentes y Enfermedad, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia.
  • Gonzalez-Ríos AM; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Maryland, United States.
  • López-Alvarez D; Universidad del Valle, Facultad de Salud, Escuela de Ciencias Básicas, Grupo VIREM-Virus Emergentes y Enfermedad, Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia.
One Health ; 18: 100731, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38655016
ABSTRACT
Using fecal microbial community profiles through sequencing approaches helps to unravel the intimate interplay between health, wellness, and diet in wild animals with their environment. Ensuring the proper preservation of fecal samples before processing is crucial to ensure reliable results. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of two different preservation methods, considering the following criteria DNA yield, quality and integrity, and microbial community structure based on Oxford Nanopore amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA and protozoa 18S rRNA genes. Eighteen matched pairs of mammalian fecal samples were collected and transported in 99.8% ethanol and lysis buffer; processing occurred between 55 and 461 days post-collection. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyze quantitative measurements for paired samples. The A260/280 ratio, a measure of nucleic acid purity, was assessed descriptively for each media, and the Bartlett test evaluated dispersion of this ratio. A Fisher test was performed to compare the number of positive reactions for DNA extraction or PCR amplification of the 16S and 18S rRNA genes between both media. The concentration of total DNA and amplicons, as well as the number of reads obtained in sequencing, was significantly higher in the samples preserved with lysis buffer compared to ethanol, with magnitudes up to three times higher. Electrophoretic analysis of total DNA and amplicons further confirmed superior DNA integrity in lysis buffer preserved samples. The A260/280 values  obtained using the lysis buffer were of optimal purity (mean 1.92) and with little dispersion (SD 0.27); on the other hand, the ethanol samples also presented an excellent average quality (mean 1.94), but they were dispersed (SD 1.10). For molecular studies using mammalian feces, the lysis buffer reagent proved to be a reliable solution for their collection, conservation, and storage.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: One Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: One Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Holanda