Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of educational programs in hearing health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bramati, Luciana; Allenstein Gondim, Lys Maria; Schmidt, Lucas; Lüders, Débora; Veríssimo Meira Taveira, Karinna; Néron, Noémi; Miranda de Araujo, Cristiano; Bender Moreira de Lacerda, Adriana.
Afiliação
  • Bramati L; Postgraduate Program in Communication Disorders, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná - UTP- UTP, Curitiba-Paraná, Brazil.
  • Allenstein Gondim LM; Postgraduate Program in Communication Disorders, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná - UTP- UTP, Curitiba-Paraná, Brazil.
  • Schmidt L; Postgraduate Program in Communication Disorders, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná - UTP- UTP, Curitiba-Paraná, Brazil.
  • Lüders D; Postgraduate Program in Communication Disorders, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná - UTP- UTP, Curitiba-Paraná, Brazil.
  • Veríssimo Meira Taveira K; Department of Morphology- Center of Biosciences, Associated Postgraduate Program in Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
  • Néron N; Center for Advanced Studies in Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - NARSM; NARSM, Curitiba-Paraná, Brazil.
  • Miranda de Araujo C; Postgraduate Program in Science of Speech-Language and Hearing, École d'Orthophonie et Audiologie, Université de Montreal - UdeM, Montreal, Canada.
  • Bender Moreira de Lacerda A; Postgraduate Program in Communication Disorders, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná - UTP- UTP, Curitiba-Paraná, Brazil.
Int J Audiol ; : 1-12, 2024 Feb 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411141
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effectiveness of hearing health education programs aimed at preventing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), of recreational and occupational origin, by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

DESIGN:

The search strategy was carried out in on five electronic databases, as well as referrals from experts. The risk of bias was judged, and the random effects meta-analysis was performed. The certainty of the evidence was assessed. STUDY SAMPLE Effectiveness studies that used educational intervention in hearing health and prevention of NIHL were included.

RESULTS:

42 studies were included. The Dangerous Decibels program was the only one that could be quantitatively analysed and showed improvement in the post-intervention period of up to one week [SMD = 0.60; CI95% = 0.38-0.82; I2 = 92.5%) and after eight weeks [SMD = 0.45; CI95% = 0.26-0.63; I2 = 81.6%) compared to the baseline. The certainty of evidence was judged as very low.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Dangerous Decibels program is effective after eight weeks of intervention. The other programs cannot be quantified. They still present uncertainty about their effectiveness. The level of certainty is still low for this assessment.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Audiol Assunto da revista: AUDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Audiol Assunto da revista: AUDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido